Attitude and behaviour of Dutch Otorhinolaryngologists to Evidence Based Medicine


Autoři: Maaike M. Rademaker aff001;  Adriana L. Smit aff001;  Marlous F. Kortekaas aff003;  Peter Paul G. van Benthem aff004;  Inge Stegeman aff001
Působiště autorů: Division of Surgical Specialties, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands aff001;  UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands aff002;  Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands aff003;  Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands aff004
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(12)
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226743

Souhrn

Objective

The objective of this study was to assess the attitude and behaviour of Dutch ENT surgeons and ENT residents towards Evidence Based Medicine.

Introduction

Evidence Based Medicine is the cornerstone of modern clinical care. It is considered of crucial importance for optimal patient care and health care quality. Practicing it requires positive attitude and behaviour. Little is known about the attitude and behaviour towards Evidence Based Medicine in otorhinolaryngology.

Methods

We performed a web-based questionnaire among 607 Dutch Ear- Nose & Throat surgeons of whom 106 residents (cross-sectional study). The questionnaire consisted of 3 parts; (1) personal characteristics, (2) questions regarding Evidence Based Medicine attitude (McColl questionnaire, scale 0–100%) and (3) questions regarding Evidence Based Medicine behaviour (barriers and information seeking behaviour). Data were collected between March 26th 2018 and June 1st 2018.

Results

The median score on the overall McColl questionnaire was 50 (IQR 35). The main barriers respondents experienced were time related. Limited time in the outpatient clinic was considered a more important barrier for residents to practice EBM compared to ENT surgeons. Respondents’ gut feeling and their own preference were identified as the main contributing factors in clinical decision making.

Conclusion

In conclusion Dutch ENT surgeons have a moderate attitude on the McColl questionnaire. The main barriers to practice Evidence Based Medicine they experience are time related.

Klíčová slova:

Behavior – Decision making – Employment – Evidence based medicine – Otolaryngological procedures – Otorhinolaryngology – Questionnaires – Surgeons


Zdroje

1. Kortekaas MF. Improving evidence-based general practice [Internet]. 2016. http://www.narcis.nl/publication/RecordID/oai%3Adspace.library.uu.nl%3A1874%2F338766

2. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray J a M, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ [Internet]. 1996;312(7023):71–2. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2349778/pdf/bmj00524-0009.pdf 8555924

3. Chapman G, Talbot N, Mccartney D, Tippett V, Burch D. Evidence based medicine—older, but no better educated? in India faces new. Lancet [Internet]. 2013;382(9903):1484. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62286-2

4. Ayre S, Mclip MA, Mrcp GW. Are therapeutic decisions made on the medical admissions unit any more evidence-based than they used to be? 2009;15:1180–6.

5. Asplund K. Randomized controlled trials and consensus as a basis for interventions in internal medicine. J Intern Med. 2000;247:94–104. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2000.00583.x 10672136

6. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams JL, Keesey J, Hicks J, DeCristofaro AH, et al. Quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2003;348:2635–45. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14606462

7. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: Effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet. 2003;362(9391):1225–30. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1 14568747

8. Aarts M.C.J., van der Heiden G.J.M.G., Siegers C. RMM Grolman W.. Awareness of, Opinions About, and Adherence to Evidence-Based Guidelines in Otorhinolaryngology. Arch Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;138(2):148–52.

9. van Dijk Nynke, Hooft Lotty de W MW. What are the barriers to residents´practicing evidence-based medicine? A systematic review. Acad Med. 2010;85(7):1163–70. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d4152f 20186032

10. Fineout-Overholt E, Melnyk BM, Schultz A. Transforming health care from the inside out: Advancing evidence-based practice in the 21st century. J Prof Nurs. 2005;21(6):335–44. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.10.005 16311228

11. Straus S.E., Richardson W.S. G P. Evidence-based medicine, how to practice and teach EBM. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2005.

12. Covell D.G., Uman G.C. M PR. Information needs in office practice: are they being met? Ann Intern Med. 1985;103(4):596–9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-103-4-596 4037559

13. Del Fiol G, Workman TE, Gorman PN. Clinical questions raised by clinicians at the point of care a systematic review. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):710–8. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.368 24663331

14. Zwolsman S, Hooft L, Waard MW, Van Dijk N. Barriers to GPs’ use of evidence-based medicine: A systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2012;62(600):e511–21. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X652382 22781999

15. Knops AM, Vermeulen H, Legemate DA, Ubbink DT. Attitudes, awareness, and barriers regarding evidence-based surgery among surgeons and surgical nurses. World J Surg. 2009;33(7):1348–55. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0020-8 19412569

16. Funk SG, Champagne MT, Wiese RA, Tornquist EM. BARRIERS: The Barriers to Research Utilization Scale. Appl Nurs Res. 1991;4(1):39–45. doi: 10.1016/s0897-1897(05)80052-7 1741634

17. Dawes M, Summerskill W, Glasziou P, Cartabellotta A, Martin J, Hopayian K, et al. Sicily statement on evidence-based practice. BMC Med Educ. 2005;5:1–7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-5-1 15634359

18. Kortekaas MF, Bartelink MEL, Van der Heijden GJMG, Hoes AW DW N. Development and validation of a new instrument measuring EBM behaviour in clinical practice. Submitted. 2016;33(2):1–7.

19. Zwolsman SE, van Dijk N, Te Pas E, Wieringa-de Waard M. Barriers to the use of evidence-based medicine: knowledge and skills, attitude, and external factors. Perspect Med Educ [Internet]. 2013;2(1):4–13. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23670651%5Cnhttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC3576485

20. Elbers NA, Chase R, Craig A, Guy L, Harris IA, Middleton JW, et al. Health care professionals’ attitudes towards evidence-based medicine in the workers’ compensation setting: a cohort study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017;17(1):1–12.

21. Mccoll A, Smith H, White P, Field J. Information in practice based medicine: a questionnaire survey. EvidenceBased Med [Internet]. 1998;316(February 2009):361–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10674320

22. Te Pas E, Van Dijk N, Bartelink MEL, Wieringa-De Waard M. Factors influencing the EBM behaviour of GP trainers: A mixed method study. Med Teach. 2013;35(3):e990–7. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.733044 23102157

23. Te Pas E, De Waard MW, De Ruijter W, Van Dijk N. Learning results of GP trainers in a blended learning course on EBM: A cohort study. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15(1).

24. VvAA en het Roer Moet OM. Administratiedruk medisch specialisten. De Arugmentenfabriek [Internet]. online pub. https://www.demedischspecialist.nl/sites/default/files/20171117_DEF%20Rapport-administratiedruk-specialisten.pdf

25. Ellis J, Mulligan I, Rowe J, Sackett DL. Inpatient general medicine is evidence based. Lancet. 1995;346:407–10. 7623571

26. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research [Internet]. 1975 [cited 2018 May 15]. http://people.umass.edu/aizen/f&a1975.html

27. Ireland J., Johnson N., Adams D., Eboh w. M E. Blended learning in education: effects on knowledge and attitude. Br J Nurs. 2009;18(2):124–30. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2009.18.2.37868 19270612

28. Coomarasamy A, Khan KS. What is the evidence that postgraduate teaching in evidence based medicine changes anything? A systematic review. BMJ. 2004;329(7473):1017. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7473.1017 15514348


Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 12