Child protection, domestic violence, and ethnic minorities: Narrative results from a mixed methods study in Australia


Autoři: Pooja Sawrikar aff001
Působiště autorů: School of Human Services and Social Work (HSV), Griffith University (GU), Southport, Queensland, Australia aff001
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(12)
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226031

Souhrn

Objective

To help address a long-standing gap in research and knowledge, this paper explores the issue of what service providers need to be aware of to best meet the needs of ethnic minority children and families who have come to the attention of child protection authorities and have substantiated reports of domestic violence.

Method

The results are written in narrative form, combining informed insider perspectives with a small subset of data drawn from a larger rigorous mixed methods study in Australia, that involved an exhaustive literature review, review of 120 randomly selected case files, and in-depth qualitative interviews with 29 ethnic minority families involved in the child protection system and 17 child protection caseworkers.

Results and significance

Three issues for ethnic minorities relating to the nexus of child protection and domestic violence are identified: (i) being in the child protection system tarnishes family name, which is greatly valued, leading to a preference for child maltreatment and family violence to remain private, and for compliance with Apprehended Violence Orders (AVOs) and service uptake/engagement to be low, (ii) family cohesion is also highly valued, so family violence victims may sacrifice their own personal safety to protect the family unity and cultural safety of their children, and (iii) family violence interacts with cultural factors for ethnic minorities but does occur in all families; attributing it to race or culture would be racism. Several implications for practice are identified, falling under a broad umbrella approach that asks for child protection authorities and family violence agencies to work collaboratively. A call for empirically rigorous future research is also made to ensure practice is evidence-based.

Klíčová slova:

Cross-cultural studies – Culture – Domestic violence – Human families – Children – Mothers – Racial discrimination – Sexual and gender issues


Zdroje

1. Bromfield L, Arney F. Developing a road map for research: Identifying priorities for a national child protection research agenda: Issues paper. Australian Institute of Family Studies. 2008; No 28.

2. Cashmore J, Higgins DJ, Bromfield L, Scott DA. Recent Australian child protection and out of home care research: what’s been done and what needs to be done? Children Australia. 2006; 31(2): 4–11.

3. Chuan C, Flynn C. Children and young people of culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds in out of home care in NSW: Support strategies, challenges, and issues: A qualitative research report. Report prepared for Association of Children’s Welfare Agencies (ACWA). 2006.

4. Korbin JE. Culture and child maltreatment: cultural competence and beyond. Child Abuse and Neglect. 2002; 26: 637–644. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2134(02)00338-1 12201159

5. Sawrikar P. Working with ethnic minorities and across cultures in Western child protection systems. UK: Routledge. 2017.

6. Thoburn J, Chand A, Procter J. Child Welfare Services for Minority Ethnic Families: The Research Reviewed. Jessica Kingsley: London. 2005.

7. Welbourne P. Culture, children’s rights and child protection. Child Abuse Review. 2002; 11(6): 345–358.

8. O’Hagan K. Culture, cultural identity, and cultural sensitivity in child and family social work. Child and Family Social Work. 1999; 4(4): 269–281.

9. Hofstede GH. 2001. http://www.clearlycultural.com/geert-hofstede-cultural-dimensions/individualism/

10. Hofstede GH. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications. 1980.

11. Sawrikar P, Katz I. How useful is the term “Culturally And Linguistically Diverse (CALD)” in the Australian social policy discourse? Refereed Conference Paper, Australian Social Policy Conference (ASPC), Sydney. 2009.

12. Bartolomei L, Eckert R, Pittaway E. “What happens there … follows us here”: Resettled but still at risk: Refugee women and girls in Australia. Refuge. 2014; 30(2): 45–56.

13. Zannettino L. “…There is no war here; it is only the relationship that makes us scared”: Factors having an impact on domestic violence in Liberian refugee communities in South Australia. Violence Against Women. 2012; 18(7): 807–828. doi: 10.1177/1077801212455162 22886374

14. Berry JW. Acculturation as varieties of adaptation. In Padilla A. M.(Ed.), Acculturation: Theory, models, and some new findings. Boulder, CO: Westview. 1980.

15. Tajfel H, Turner JC. The social psychology of intergroup relations. Brooks-Cole. 1979.

16. Burman E, Smailes SL, Chantler K. ‘Culture’ as a barrier to service provision and delivery: Domestic violence services for minoritized women. Critical Social Policy. 2004; 24(3): 332–357.

17. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Cultural diversity in Australia—Reflecting a Nation: Stories from the 2011 Census (Cat. No. 2071.0). Canberra: Author. 2012–13.

18. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Personal Safety (Cat. No. 4906.0). Canberra: Author. 2012.

19. Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety (ANROWS). 2012.

20. Australian Institute of Criminology. Homicide in Australia: 2010–11 to 2011–12: National Homicide Monitoring Program report. Monitoring Report No. 23. Authors: Bryant W, Cussen T: Canberra. 2015.

21. Phillips J, Vandenbroek P. Domestic, family and sexual violence in Australia: An overview of the issues. Research Paper Series 2014–15. Parliamentary Library. 2014.

22. National Plan to Reduce Violence against Women and their Children 2010–2022: https://www.dss.gov.au/women/programs-services/reducing-violence/the-national-plan-to-reduce-violence-against-women-and-their-children-2010-2022

23. Tjaden P, Thoennes N. Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women survey: Research in brief (NCJ18371). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. 2000.

24. Ackerman J, Love TP. Ethnic group differences in police notification about intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 2014; 20(2): 162–185. doi: 10.1177/1077801214521327 24692437

25. Kriẑ K, Skivenes M. Child‐centric or family focused? A study of child welfare workers’ perceptions of ethnic minority children in England and Norway. Child and Family Social Work, 2012; 17(4): 448–457.

26. Rees S, Pease B. Domestic violence in refugee families in Australia: Rethinking settlement policy and practice. Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies, 2007; 5(2): 1–19.

27. Yoshihama M, Blazevski J, Bybee D. Enculturation and attitudes toward intimate partner violence and gender roles in an Asian Indian population: Implications for community-based prevention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 2014; 53(3–4): 249–260. doi: 10.1007/s10464-014-9627-5 24515653

28. Zarza MJ, Ponsoda V, Carrillo R. Predictors of violence and lethality among Latina immigrants: Implications for assessment and treatment. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma. 2009; 18(1): 1–16.

29. Ahmad F, Driver N, McNally MJ, Stewart D. “Why doesn’t she seek help for partner abuse?” An exploratory study with South Asian immigrant women. Social Science and Medicine, 2009; 69(4): 613–622. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.06.011 19576669

30. Santiago-Rivera AL, Arredondo P, Gallardo-Cooper M. Counseling Latinos and la familia. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. 2002.

31. Adames SB, Campbell R. Immigrant Latinas’ conceptualizations of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women. 2005; 11(10): 1341–1364. doi: 10.1177/1077801205280191 16135693

32. Guru S. Working with Asian perpetrators of domestic violence — The British experience. Practice (UK). 2006; 18(3): 153–166.

33. Osofsky JD. Prevalence of children’s exposure to domestic violence and child maltreatment: Implications for prevention and intervention. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. 2003; 6(3): 161–170. doi: 10.1023/a:1024958332093 14620577

34. Kallivayalil D. Narratives of suffering of South Asian immigrant survivors of domestic violence. Violence Against Women. 2010; 16(7): 789–811. doi: 10.1177/1077801210374209 20558770

35. Loya RM. The role of sexual violence in creating and maintaining economic insecurity among asset-poor women of color. Violence Against Women. 2014; 20(11): 1299–1320. doi: 10.1177/1077801214552912 25288596

36. Bhuyan R, Velagapudi K. From one “dragon sleigh” to another: Advocating for immigrant women facing violence in Kansas. Affilia. 2013; 28(1): 65–78.

37. Taft AJ, Small R, Hoang KA. Intimate partner violence in Vietnam and among Vietnamese diaspora communities in western societies: A comprehensive review. Journal of Family Studies. 2008; 14(2–3): 167–182.

38. Gray L, Easteal P, Bartels L. Immigrant women and family violence: Will the new exceptions help or hinder victims? Alternative Law Journal. 2014; 39(3): 167–171.

39. Rudrappa S. Radical caring in an ethnic shelter: South Asian American women workers at Apna Ghar, Chicago. Gender and Society. 2004; 18(5): 588–609.

40. Giglio M. Child protection and cultural difference: issues for NESB — non-English speaking background — communities. Child Abuse Prevention. 1997; 5(2), 4–7.

41. Kanagaratnam P, Mason R, Hyman I, Manuel L, Berman H, Toner B. Burden of womanhood: Tamil women’s perceptions of coping with intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence. 2012; 27: 647–658.

42. Lee MY, Law PFM. Perception of sexual violence against women in Asian American communities. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Diversity in Social Work. 2001; 10(2): 3–25.

43. Yamawaki N, Ostenson J, Brown CR. The functions of gender role traditionality, ambivalent sexism, injury, and frequency of assault on domestic violence perception: A study between Japanese and American college students. Violence Against Women. 2009; 15(9): 1126–1142. doi: 10.1177/1077801209340758 19675366

44. Sawrikar P, Katz I. Enhancing family and relationship service accessibility and delivery to culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) families in Australia, Refereed Issues paper prepared for the Australian Family Relationships Clearinghouse (AFRC), Australian Institute of Family Studies (AIFS). 2008; Issue No. 3.

45. Nesci A. Overcoming barriers to providing domestic violence services for women from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. Parity. 2006; 19(2): 44.

46. Raj A, Silverman JG. Intimate partner violence against South-Asian women in greater Boston. Journal of American Medical Women Association. 2002; 57(2): 111–114.

47. Kanuha V. Women of color in battering relationships. In Comas-Diaz L. & Greene B. (Eds.), Women of color: Integrating ethnic and gender identities in psychotherapy (pp. 428–454). New York, NY: Guilford. 1994.

48. Yick AG. Role of culture and context: Ethical issues in research with Asian Americans and immigrants in intimate violence. Journal of Family Violence. 2007; 22: 277–285.

49. Ahmed B, Reavey P, Majumdar A. Constructions of ‘culture’ in accounts of South Asian women survivors of sexual violence. Feminism and Psychology. 2009; 19(1): 7–28.

50. Huisman K, Martinez J, Wilson C. Training police officers on domestic violence and racism. Violence Against Women. 2005; 11(6): 792–821. doi: 10.1177/1077801205276110 16043572

51. Weston-Scheuber K. Looking out for ‘our women’: Cultural background and gendered violence in Australia. James Cook University Law Review. 2007; 14: 129–160.


Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 12