Having pity on our victims to save ourselves: Compassion reduces self-critical emotions and self-blame about past harmful behavior among those who highly identify with their past self

Autoři: Ernst Willem Meerholz aff001;  Russell Spears aff001;  Kai Epstude aff001
Působiště autorů: Department of Social Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands aff001
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(12)
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223945


Previous research has shown that people often separate the present self from past selves. Applying knowledge gained from intergroup research to the interpersonal domain, we argue that the degree to which people identify with their past self (self-identification) influences their reaction when recalling a past event during which they harmed another person. Because they feel close to their past self, we expected this to be threatening for high self-identifiers, and expected them to be motivated to avoid self-critical emotions and blame. Using four meta-analyses, conducted on a set of seven experimental studies, we investigated four ways in which high self-identifiers can distance themselves from the event: by feeling compassion, by taking a third-person rather than first-person perspective, by emphasizing ways in which their present self is different to their past self, and by disidentifying with the past self altogether. We found the strongest interaction effects for compassion: whereas a compassion manipulation increased self-critical emotions and self-blame about the past event for low self-identifiers, it decreased them for high self-identifiers. We argue that this occurs because the other-focused nature of compassion allows high self-identifiers subtly to shift the focus away from their harmful behavior. Our concept of past self-identification had stronger effects than a measure of self-continuity beliefs. It also correlated only moderately with the latter, suggesting they are distinct concepts. Our findings suggest that, ironically, the most effective way to protect the self against reminders of an undesirable past, may be to have compassion for our victims.

Klíčová slova:

Psychology – Behavior – Emotions – Memory – Collective human behavior – Social research – Memory recall


1. James W. Principles of Psychology. New York: Dover; 1950 [Original work published 1890.]

2. Ross M. The relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories. Psychol Rev. 1989;96:341–357.

3. Wilson AE, Ross M. The identity function of autobiographical memory: Time is on our side. Memory. 2003;11(2):137–149. doi: 10.1080/741938210 12820827

4. Higgins ET. Self digest: Self-knowledge serving self-regulatory functions. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;71:1062–1083. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.71.6.1062 8979379

5. Baumeister RF. The self. In: Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Lindzey G, editors. Handbook of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1998. p. 680–740.

6. Libby LK, Eibach RP. Looking back in time: Self-concept change affects visual perspective in autobiographical memory. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002;82:167–179.

7. Kotlewska I, Nowicka A. Present self, past self and close-other: Event-related potential study of face and name detection. Biol Psychol. 2015;110:201–211. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.07.015 26234961

8. Ellemers N, Spears R, Doosje B. Self and social identity. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:161–186. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135228 11752483

9. McGarty C, Pedersen A, Leach CW, Mansell T, Waller J, Bliuc AM. Group-based guilt as a predictor of commitment to apology. Br J Soc Psychol. 2005;44:659–680. doi: 10.1348/014466604X18974 16368025

10. Meerholz EW, Spears R, Epstude K. The ‘other’ side of compassion: How the self avoids responsibility for past wrongs. Groningen: University of Groningen, 2018.

11. Zebel S, Doosje B, Spears R. How perspective-taking helps and hinders group-based guilt as a function of group identification. Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2009;12(1):61–78.

12. Batson CD, Polycarpou MP, Harmon-Jones E, Imhoff HJ, Mitchener EC, Bednar LL, Klein TR, Highberger L. Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997;72(1):105–118. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.72.1.105 9008376

13. Lazarus RS. Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991.

14. Iyer A, Leach CW, Crosby F. White guilt and racial compensation: The benefits and limits of self-focus. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003;29:117–129. doi: 10.1177/0146167202238377 15272965

15. Batson CD, Dyck JL, Brandt JR, Batson JG, Powell AL, McMaster MR, Griffitt C. Five studies testing two new egoistic alternatives to the empathy-altruism hypothesis. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;55:52–77.

16. Thomas EF, McGarty CA. The role of efficacy and moral outrage norms in creating the potential for international development activism through group-based interaction. Br J Soc Psychol. 2009; 48(1):115–134.

17. Nigro G, Neisser U. Point of view in personal memories. Cogn Psychol. 1983;15:467–482.

18. Fergusson PA. Writing about traumatic events using the third person pronoun: Psychological and health effects. Ontario, Canada: University of Waterloo, 1993.

19. Kross E, Ayduk O. Self-distancing: Theory, research, and current directions. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 2017;55:81–136.

20. Kross E, Bruehlman-Senecal E, Park J, Burson A, Dougherty A, Shablack H, et al. Self-talk as a regulatory mechanism: How you do it matters. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014;106:304–324. doi: 10.1037/a0035173 24467424

21. Wallace-Hadrill SMA, Kamboj SK. The impact of perspective change as a cognitive reappraisal strategy on affect: A systematic review. Front Psychol. 2016;7:304–324. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00304

22. Libby LK, Eibach RP. Visual perspective in mental imagery: A representational tool that functions in judgment, emotion, and self-insight. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 2011;44:185–245.

23. Libby LK, Valenti G, Pfent A, Eibach RP. Seeing failure in your life: Imagery perspective determines whether self-esteem shapes reactions to recalled and imagined failure. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011;101:1157–1173. doi: 10.1037/a0026105 22059844

24. Hanko K, Crusius J, Mussweiler T. When I and me are different: Assimilation and contrast in temporal self-comparisons. Eur Rev Soc Psychol. 2010;40(1):160–168.

25. Schimmack U. The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles. Psychol Methods. 2012;17:551–566. doi: 10.1037/a0029487 22924598

26. Francis G. The frequency of excess success for articles in Psychological Science. Psychon Bull Rev. 2014;21:1180–1187. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0601-x 24638826

27. Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT. Conceptualizing and evaluating the replication of research results. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2016;66:68–80.

28. Lakens D, Etz AJ. Too true to be bad: When sets of studies with significant and nonsignificant findings are probably true. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2017;8:875–881. doi: 10.1177/1948550617693058 29276574

29. Tuk MA, Zhang K, Sweldens S. The propagation of self-control: Self-control in one domain simultaneously improves self-control in other domains. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015;144:639–654. doi: 10.1037/xge0000065 25822462

30. Zhang C, Lakens D, IJsselsteijn WA. The illusion of nonmediation in telecommunication: Voice intensity biases distance judgments to a communication partner. Acta Psychol. 2015;157:101–105.

31. Leach CW, van Zomeren M, Zebel S, Vliek M, Pennekamp SF, Doosje B, Ouwerkerk JP, Spears R. Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008;95:144–165. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144 18605857

32. Kuppens T, Easterbrook MJ, Spears R, Manstead ASR. Life at both ends of the ladder: Education-based identification and its association with well-being and social attitudes. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015;4:1260–1275.

33. Doosje B, Branscombe NR, Spears R, Manstead A. Guilty by association: When one’s group has a negative history. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;75:872–886.

34. Branscombe NR, Slugoski B, Kappen DM. The measurement of collective guilt: What it is and what it is not. In: Branscombe NR, Doosje B, editors. Collective guilt: International perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

35. Iyer A, Schmader T, Lickel B. Why individuals protest the perceived transgressions of their country: The role of anger, shame and guilt. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007;33:572–587. doi: 10.1177/0146167206297402 17400836

36. Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression based approach.New York, The Guilford Press, 2013.

37. Johnson BT. DSTAT: 1.10: Software for the meta-analytic review of research literatures (Version 1.10). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1993.

38. Thomas J, Graziosi S, Higgins S, Coe R, Torgerson C, Newman M. Teaching meta-analysis using MetaLight. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5(571).

39. Sani F, Bowe M, Herrera M. Perceived collective continuity and social well-being. Eur Rev Soc Psychol.2008;38(2):365–374.

40. Trivers R. The folly of fools: The logic of deceit and self-deception in human life. New York: Basic Books, 2011.

Článok vyšiel v časopise


2019 Číslo 12