Longitudinal Doppler references for monochorionic twins and comparison with singletons

Autoři: Daniela Casati aff001;  Marcella Pellegrino aff002;  Ivan Cortinovis aff003;  Elena Spada aff004;  Mariano Lanna aff001;  Stefano Faiola aff001;  Irene Cetin aff002;  Maria Angela Rustico aff001
Působiště autorů: Fetal Therapy Unit 'Umberto Nicolini', Vittore Buzzi Children's Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy aff001;  Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vittore Buzzi Children's Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy aff002;  Laboratory G.A. Maccacaro, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan Milan, Italy aff003;  Neonatal Unit, University of Turin, City of Health and Science of Turin, Turin, Italy aff004
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(12)
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226090



To construct monochorionic (MC) twin-specific longitudinal Doppler references for umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA-PI), middle cerebral artery (MCA) PI and peak systolic velocity (PSV) and ductus venosus (DV) PI derived from a strictly selected cohort of uncomplicated MC twins. The secondary aim of the study was to compare our findings with singleton reference charts.


A retrospective evaluation was made of all consecutive uncomplicated MC twin pregnancies referred to our Unit from 2010 to 2018. Fortnightly serial examinations were performed of UA-PI, MCA-PI, MCA-PSV and DV-PI, according with the clinical protocol, from 20 to 37 weeks of gestation. We included cases with at least four ultrasound examinations, delivery at our hospital and complete neonatal follow up. A two-step method was used to trace the estimated centile curves: estimation of the median was performed with appropriate fractional polynomials by a multilevel model and estimation of the external centiles through the residuals (quantile regression). The comparison with singletons was made by plotting the references derived from the present study on the referred charts commonly used for singletons.


The study group comprised 150 uncomplicated MC twin pairs. Estimated centiles (3rd, 5th, 10th, 50th, 90th, 95th, 97th) of UA-PI, MCA-PI, MCA-PSV and DV-PI in function of the gestational age are presented. The comparison with singletons showed substantial differences, with higher UA-PI and lower MCA-PI and PSV median values in MC twins. Median DV PI values were similar to the values for singletons, while the upper centiles were higher in MC twins.


This study sets out MC twin-specific longitudinal references for UA-PI, MCA-PI, MCA-PSV and DV-PI derived from the largest series of uncomplicated MC twin pregnancies presently available. The comparison with singleton reference values underscores the deviation from physiology that is intrinsic to these unique pregnancies and supports the need for MC twin-specific charts.

Klíčová slova:

Cerebral arteries – Fetuses – Charts – Labor and delivery – Neonates – Pregnancy – Twins – Umbilical arteries


1. Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Dowswell T. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 6. Art. No.: CD007529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007529.pub4 28613398

2. Frusca T, Todros T, Lees C, Bilardo CM; TRUFFLE Investigators. Outcome in early-onset fetal growth restriction is best combining computerized fetal heart rate analysis with ductus venosus Doppler: insights from the Trial of Umbilical and Fetal Flow in Europe. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2S):S783–S789. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.226 29422211

3. Bhide A, Acharya G, Bilardo CM, Brezinka C, Cafici D, Hernandez-Andrade E, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: use of Doppler ultrasonography in obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;41(2):233–39 doi: 10.1002/uog.12371 23371348

4. Oros D, Ruiz-Martinez S, Staines-Urias E, Conde-Agudelo A, Villar J, Fabre E, et al. Reference ranges for Doppler indices of umbilical and middle cerebral arteries and cerebroplacental ratio: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Aug 20. doi: 10.1002/uog.20102 30126005

5. Acharya G, Wilsgaard T, Berntsen GK, Maltau JM, Kiserud T. Reference ranges for serial measurements of umbilical artery Doppler indices in the second half of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Mar;192(3):937–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.09.019 15746695

6. Ebbing C, Rasmussen S, Kiserud T. Middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities and pulsatility index and the cerebroplacental pulsatility ratio: longitudinal reference ranges and terms for serial measurements. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Sep;30(3):287–96. doi: 10.1002/uog.4088 17721916

7. Kessler J, Rasmussen S, Hanson M, Kiserud T. Longitudinal reference ranges for ductus venosus flow velocities and waveform indices. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;28(7):890–8.

8. Mari G. Middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity for the diagnosis of fetal anemia: the untold story. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr;25(4):323–30. doi: 10.1002/uog.1882 15789353

9. Ciobanu A, Wright A, Syngelaki A, Wright D, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH. Fetal Medicine Foundation reference ranges for umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery pulsatility index and cerebroplacental ratio. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Oct 24. doi: 10.1002/uog.20157 [Epub ahead of print] 30353583

10. Devoe LD. Antenatal fetal assessment: multifetal gestation–an overview. Semin Perinatol 2008; 32: 281–287 doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2008.04.011 18652929

11. Ghi T, Prefumo F, Fichera A, Lanna M, Periti E, Persico N, et al. Società Italiana di Ecografia Ostetrica e Ginecologica Working Group on Fetal Biometric Charts. Development of customized fetal growth charts in twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;216(5):514.e1–514.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.176 Epub 2017 Jan 6. 28065816

12. Mulcahy C, McAuliffe FM, Breathnach F, Geary M, Daly S, Higgins J, et al. Umbilical and fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler reference ranges in a twin population followed longitudinally from 24 to 38 weeks' gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct;44(4):461–7. doi: 10.1002/uog.13302 Epub 2014 Sep 5. 24407772

13. Hack KE, Derks JB, Elias SG, Franx A, Roos EJ, Voerman SK, et al. Increased perinatal mortality and morbidity in monochorionic versus dichorionic twin pregnancies: clinical implications of a large Dutch cohort study. BJOG 2008;115:58–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01556.x 17999692

14. Lewi L, Jani J, Blickstein I, Huber A, Gucciardo L, Van Mieghem T, et al. The outcome of monochorionic diamniotic twin gestations in the era of invasive fetal therapy: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:514.e1–8.

15. Lewi L, Deprest J, Hecher K. The vascular anastomoses in monochorionic twin pregnancies and their clinical consequences. AJOG Expert Reviews 2013b; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.09.025.

16. Kristiansen MK, Joensen BS, Ekelund CK, Petersen OB, Sandager P, Danish Fetal Medicine Study Group Perinatal outcome after first-trimester risk assessment in monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies: a population-based register study. BJOG. 2015 Sep;122(10):1362–9. Epub 2015 Feb 25 doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13326 25716370

17. van Klink JM, van Steenis A, Steggerda SJ, Genova L, Sueters M, Oepkes D, et al. Single fetal demise in monochorionic pregnancies: incidence and patterns of cerebral injury. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014

18. Rustico MA, Lanna M, Faiola S, Casati D, Spaccini L, Righini A, et al. Major Discordant Structural Anomalies in Monochorionic Twins: Spectrum and Outcomes. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2018 Dec;21(6):546–555. doi: 10.1017/thg.2018.58 Epub 2018 Oct 30. 30375322

19. Royston P, Altman DG. Design and analysis of longitudinal studies of fetal size. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 6:307–312. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.06050307.x 8590199

20. Royston P, Wright EM. How to construct ‘normal ranges’ for fetal variables. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 11: 30–38. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.11010030.x 9511193

21. Klaritsch P, Deprest J, Van Mieghem T, Gucciardo L, Done E, Jani J, et al. Reference ranges for middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity in monochorionic diamniotic twins: a longitudinal study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34: 149–154. doi: 10.1002/uog.6436 19644951

22. Bertino E, Spada E, Occhi L, Coscia A, Giuliani F, Gagliardi L, et al. Neonatal Anthropometric Charts: The Italian neonatal study compared with other European studies. JPGN, 2010; 51: 353–361 doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181da213e 20601901

23. Khalil A, Rodgers M, Baschat A, Bhide A, Gratacos E, Hecher K, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy; Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;47: 247–263 doi: 10.1002/uog.15821 26577371

24. Ananth CV, Vintzileos AM, Shen-Schwarz S, Smulian JC, Lai YL. Standards of birth weight in twin gestations stratified by placental chorionicity. Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jun;91(6):917–24.

25. Royston P, Altman DG. Using Fractional Polynomials of Continuous Covariates: Parsimonious Parametric Modelling. Appl. Statist. (1994) 43, No. 43, pp. 429–467

26. Altman DG. Construction of age-related reference centiles using absolute residuals. Statistics in Medicine, vol. 12,917–924 (1993) doi: 10.1002/sim.4780121003 8337548

27. SAS/STAT® 9.22 User’s Guide. The QUANTREG Procedure (Book Excerpt). SAS Institute Inc. 2010. SAS/STAT® 9.22 User’s Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.

28. Suzuki S. & Sheu C-F. Using PROC MIXED in Hierarchical Linear Models: Examples from two- and three- level school-effect analysis, and meta-analysis research, PROC MIXED, SAS software, Depaul University, Chicago

29. Bell BA., Ene M., Smiley W., Schoeneberger JA. A Multilevel Model Primer Using SAS® PROC MIXED. SAS Global Forum 2013. Statistics and Data Analysis; Paper 433–2013.

30. Quintero RA, Morales WJ, Allen MH, Bornick PW, Johnson PK, Kruger M. Staging of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. J Perinatol. 1999 Dec;19(8 Pt 1):550–5.

31. Gratacós E, Lewi L, Carreras E, Lewi L, Carreras E, Becker J, et al. Incidence and characteristics of umbilical artery intermittent absent and/or reversed end-diastolic flow in complicated and uncomplicated monochorionic twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23:456–460. doi: 10.1002/uog.1013 15133795

32. Slaghekke F, Kist WJ, Oepkes D, Pasman SA, Middeldorp JM, Klumper FJ, et al. Twin anemia-polycythemia sequence: diagnostic criteria, classification, perinatal management and outcome. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2010;27(4):181–90 doi: 10.1159/000304512 20339296

33. Dashe JS, Ramus RM, Santos-Ramos R, McIntire DD, Twickler DM. Middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity in monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies. J Ultrasound Med. 2007 Feb;26(2):195–200. doi: 10.7863/jum.2007.26.2.195 17255181

34. Clerici G., Luzietti R., Cutuli A., Di Rienzo GC. Cerebral hemodynamics and fetal behavioural states. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19: 340–343

35. Tollenaar LSA, Lopriore E, Middeldorp JM, Haak MC, Klumper FJ, Oepkes D, et al. Improved prediction of twin anemia-polycythemia sequence by delta middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity: new antenatal classification system. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;53(6):788–793. doi: 10.1002/uog.20096 Epub 2019 May 6. 30125414

36. Stirrup OT, Khalil A, D'Antonio F, Thilaganathan B; Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK). Fetal growth reference ranges in twin pregnancy: analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;45(3):301–7. doi: 10.1002/uog.14640 Epub 2014 Aug 25. 25052857

37. Ghi T, Prefumo F, Fichera A, Lanna M, Periti E, Persico N et al. Società Italiana di Ecografia Ostetrica e Ginecologica Working Group on Fetal Biometric Charts. Development of customized fetal growth charts in twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;216(5):514.e1–514.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.176 Epub 2017 Jan 6. 28065816

Článok vyšiel v časopise


2019 Číslo 12