Belief in conspiracy theories: The predictive role of schizotypy, Machiavellianism, and primary psychopathy

Autoři: Evita March aff001;  Jordan Springer aff002
Působiště autorů: School of Health and Life Sciences, Federation University Australia, Berwick, Australia aff001;  School of Health and Life Sciences, Federation University Australia, Ballarat, Australia aff002
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(12)
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225964


A conspiracy theory refers to an alternative explanation of an event involving a conspirator plot organised by powerful people or organisations. Belief in conspiracy theories is related to negative societal outcomes such as poor medical decisions and a decrease in prosocial behaviour. Given these negative outcomes, researchers have explored predictors of belief in conspiracy theories in an attempt to understand and possibly manage these beliefs. In the current study, we explored the utility of personality in predicting belief in conspiracy theories. The aim of the current study was to explore the utility of the odd beliefs/magical thinking subtype of schizotypy, Machiavellianism, grandiose narcissism, vulnerable narcissism, primary psychopathy, and secondary psychopathy in predicting belief in conspiracy theories. Participants (N = 230; 44.7% male, 55.3% female) completed an anonymous, confidential online questionnaire which comprised demographics and measures of personality traits and belief in conspiracy theories. The total regression model indicated odd beliefs/magical thinking, trait Machiavellianism, and primary psychopathy were significant, positive predictors of belief in conspiracy theories. No other predictors reached significance. Results of the current study highlight individuals who might be more susceptible to believing conspiracy theories. Specifically, these results indicate that the individual more likely to believe in conspiracy theories may have unusual patterns of thinking and cognitions, be strategic and manipulative, and display interpersonal and affective deficits.

Klíčová slova:

Emotions – Personality – Personality disorders – Personality tests – Personality traits – Prosocial behavior – Psychometrics – Questionnaires


1. Brotherton R, French CC, Pickering AD. Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: The generic conspiracist beliefs scale. Front Psychol. 2013;4: 279. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279 23734136

2. Swami V, Voracek M, Stieger S, Tran US, Furnham A. Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories. Cognition. 2014;133: 572–585. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.006 25217762

3. Uscinski JE, Parent JM. American conspiracy theories. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014.

4. Van der Linden S. The conspiracy-effect: Exposure to conspiracy theories (about global warming) decreases pro-social behavior and science acceptance. Pers Individ Dif. 2015;87: 171–173. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.045

5. Swami V, Chamorro‐Premuzic T, Furnham A. Unanswered questions: A preliminary investigation of personality and individual difference predictors of 9/11 conspiracist beliefs. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2010;24: 749–761. doi: 10.1002/acp.1583

6. Uscinski JE, Klofstad C, Atkinson MD. What drives conspiratorial beliefs? The role of informational cues and predispositions. Polit Res Q. 2016;69: 57–71. doi: 10.1177/1065912915621621

7. van Prooijen JW. Why education predicts decreased belief in conspiracy theories. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2017;31: 50–58. doi: 10.1002/acp.3301 28163371

8. Swami V, Furnham A, Smyth N, Weis L, Lay A, Clow A. Putting the stress on conspiracy theories: Examining associations between psychological stress, anxiety, and belief in conspiracy theories. Pers Individ Dif. 2016;99: 72–76. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.084

9. Brotherton R, Eser S. Bored to fears: Boredom proneness, paranoia, and conspiracy theories. Pers Individ Dif. 2015;80: 1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.011

10. Barron D, Furnham A, Weis L, Morgan KD, Towell T, Swami V. The relationship between schizotypal facets and conspiracist beliefs via cognitive processes. Psychiatry Res. 2018;259: 15–20. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.10.001 29024855

11. Nelson MT, Seal ML, Pantelis C, Phillips LJ. Evidence of a dimensional relationship between schizotypy and schizophrenia: A systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37: 317–327. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.01.004 23313650

12. Barron D, Morgan K, Towell T, Altemeyer B, Swami V. Associations between schizotypy and belief in conspiracist ideation. Pers Individ Dif. 2014;70: 156–159. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.040

13. Bruder M, Haffke P, Neave N, Nouripanah N, Imhoff R. Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire. Front Psychol. 2013;4: 225. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225 23641227

14. Cichocka A, Marchlewska M, de Zavala AG. Does self-love or self-hate predict conspiracy beliefs? Narcissism, self-esteem, and the endorsement of conspiracy theories. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2016; 7: 157–166. doi: 10.1177/1948550615616170

15. Douglas KM, Sutton RM. Does it take one to know one? Endorsement of conspiracy theories is influenced by personal willingness to conspire. Br J Soc Psychol. 2011;50: 544–552. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02018.x 21486312

16. Paulhus DL, Williams KM. The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. J Res Pers. 2002;36: 556–563. doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6

17. Jakobwitz S, Egan V. The dark triad and normal personality traits. Pers Individ Dif. 2006;40: 331–339. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.07.006

18. Vernon PA, Villani VC, Vickers LC, Harris JA. A behavioral genetic investigation of the Dark Triad and the Big 5. Pers Individ Dif. 2008;44: 445–452. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.09.007

19. Swami V. Social psychological origins of conspiracy theories: the case of the Jewish conspiracy theory in Malaysia. Front Psychol. 2012;3: 280. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00280 22888323

20. March E. Psychopathy, sadism, empathy, and the motivation to cause harm: New evidence confirms malevolent nature of the Internet Troll. Pers Individ Dif. 2019;141: 133–137. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.01.001

21. Miller JD, Dir A, Gentile B, Wilson L, Pryor L, Campbell WK. Searching for a vulnerable Dark Triad: Comparing factor 2 psychopathy, vulnerable narcissism, and borderline personality disorder. J Pers. 2010;78: 1529–1564. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00660.x 20663024

22. Ahn H, Kwolek EA, Bowman ND. Two faces of narcissism on SNS: The distinct effects of vulnerable and grandiose narcissism on SNS privacy control. Comput Human Behav. (2015). 45, 375–381. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.032

23. Miller JD, Gentile B, Wilson L, Campbell WK. Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism and the DSM–5 pathological personality trait model. J Pers Assess. 2013;95: 284–290. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.685907 22594764

24. Zeigler-Hill V, Enjaian B, Essa L. The role of narcissistic personality features in sexual aggression. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2013;32: 186–199. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2013.32.2.186

25. Douglas KM, Sutton RM, Cichocka A. The psychology of conspiracy theories. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2017;26: 538–542. doi: 10.1177/0963721417718261 29276345

26. Dean AC, Altstein LL, Berman ME, Constans JI, Sugar CA, McCloskey MS. Secondary psychopathy, but not primary psychopathy, is associated with risky decision-making in noninstitutionalized young adults. Pers Individ Dif. 2013;54: 272–277. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.09.009 23185100

27. Skeem J, Johansson P, Andershed H, Kerr M, Louden JE. Two subtypes of psychopathic violent offenders that parallel primary and secondary variants. J Abnorm Psychol. 2007;116: 395–209. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.116.2.395 17516770

28. Newman JP, MacCoon DG, Vaughn LJ, Sadeh N. Validating a distinction between primary and secondary psychopathy with measures of Gray’s BIS and BAS constructs. J Abnorm Psychol. 2005;114: 319–323. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.114.2.319 15869363

29. Christie R, Geis FI. Studies in Machiavellianism. 1st ed. New York: Academic Press; 1970.

30. Schoenleber M, Roche MJ, Wetzel E, Pincus AL, Roberts BW. Development of a brief version of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory. Psychol Assess. 2015;27: 1520–1526. doi: 10.1037/pas0000158 26011478

31. Levenson MR, Kiehl KA, Fitzpatrick CM. Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;68: 151–158. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.68.1.151 7861311

32. Raine A. The SPQ: A scale for the assessment of Schizotypal personality based on DSM-III-R Criteria. Schizophr Bull. 1991;17: 555–564. doi: 10.1093/schbul/17.4.555 1805349

33. Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). London, UK: Sage Publications; 2017.

34. Swami V, Coles R, Stieger S, Pietschnig J, Furnham A, Rehim S, et al. Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real‐world and fictitious conspiracy theories. Br J Psychol. 2011;102: 443–463. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02004.x 21751999

35. Giammarco EA, Vernon PA. Interpersonal guilt and the dark triad. Pers Individ Dif. 2015;81: 96–101. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.046

36. Hutter K, Füller J, Hautz J, Bilgram V, Matzler K. Machiavellianism or Morality: Which Behavior Pays Off In Online Innovation Contests? J Manage Inform Syst. 2015;32: 197–228. doi: 10.1080/07421222.2015.1099181

37. Raskin R, Hall CS. A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychol Rep. 1979;45: 590. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1979.45.2.590 538183

38. Gentile B, Miller JD, Hoffman BJ, Reidy DE, Zeichner A, Campbell WK. A test of two brief measures of grandiose narcissism: The Narcissistic Personality Inventory–13 and the Narcissistic Personality Inventory-16. Psychol Assess. 2013;25: 1120–1136. doi: 10.1037/a0033192 23815119

39. Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1965.

40. Lobato E, Mendoza J, Sims V, Chin M. Examining the relationship between conspiracy theories, paranormal beliefs, and pseudoscience acceptance among a university population. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2014;28: 617–625. doi: 10.1002/acp.3042

41. Sedgwick P. Cross sectional studies: advantages and disadvantages. BMJ. 2014;348: 2276. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2276

42. Orosz G, Krekó P, Paskuj B, Tóth-Király I, Bőthe B, Roland-Lévy C. Changing conspiracy beliefs through rationality and ridiculing. Front Psychol. 2016;7: 1525. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01525 27790164

Článok vyšiel v časopise


2019 Číslo 12