Authors: Shuaixi Zhou aff001; Shuheng Ni aff001; Jinhong Dai aff001; Qiujie Zhou aff001; Renchao Zhou aff001; Ying Liu aff001 Authors place of work: State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Plant Resources, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China aff001 Published in the journal: PLoS ONE 15(1) Category: Research Article doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227625
Natural hybridization plays important roles in plant evolution and speciation. In this study, we sequenced ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (nrITS), four low-copy nuclear genes (Dbr1, SOS4a, SOS4b and PCRF1) and the chloroplast intergenic spacer trnV-trnM to test the hypothesis of hybridization between two species of Phyllagathis and Sporoxeia (Sonerileae/Dissochaeteae, Melastomataceae). Our results provided compelling evidence for the hybridization hypothesis. All hybrid individuals sampled were first-generation hybrids. The failure of flower production in the F1 hybrid individuals may work as the barrier preventing later-generation hybridization or backcross. Analysis of the chloroplast trnV-trnM sequences showed that the hybridization is bidirectional with S. petelotii as the major maternal parent. Several factors, such as sympatry, similar habitat preference, overlapping flowering season and shared pollinators, might have contributed to this hybridization event. The "intergeneric" hybridization reported in this study suggests close relationship between P. longicalcarata and S. petelotii.
Haplotypes – Sequence alignment – Leaves – Flowers – Chloroplasts – Inflorescences – Hybridization – Introgression
Hybridization plays an important role in evolution and speciation [1–4], leading to various evolutionary consequences such as transfer of adaptive traits between species [3, 5–7], evolution of new lineages [4, 8], reinforcement of reproductive barriers [9, 10], species refusion [11, 12] and even extinction of rare species [13, 14]. Hybridization is widespread in flowering plants [15–17]. According to [18], at least 25% of plant species are involved in hybridization and potential introgression with other species. Nevertheless, hybrids are not uniformly distributed across different groups of vascular plants [15, 19, 20] and hybridization of species within genera are far more common than those between genera. In this paper, we report a case of hybridization within Myrtales, an order with low hybridization propensity [20].
Phyllagathis longicalcarata C. Hansen and Sporoxeia petelotii (Merr.) C. Hansen are two members of Sonerileae/Dissochaeteae, Melastomataceae (Myrtales). Both species are distributed in southeastern Yunnan, China and northern Vietnam and they co-occur in the forest of Fenshuiling National Nature Reserve in Jinping County, southeastern Yunnan. Field observations show that P. longicalcarata and S. petelotii are morphologically distinct from each other, differing markedly in indumentum, number of foliar veins, architecture of inflorescence, flower size, and morphology of calyx and placentas. As shown in Figs 1 and 2, the stems, leaves, inflorescence and calyx lobes of P. longicalcarata are densely hirsute with long, spreading, multiseriate trichomes, while those of S. petelotii are sparsely pubescent with very short, appressed uniseriate trichomes and glabrescent at maturity. The two species bear 7 and 5 veins, respectively. The inflorescences of P. longicalcarata are terminal (Figs 1A and 2A), while those of S. petelotii are axillary or present at petiole scars on leafless branchlets (Figs 1B and 2B), which is characteristic of Sporoxeia W. W. Smith. In addition, P. longicalcarata has larger flowers, hirsute hypanthium with spreading, branched trichomes, triangular-ovate, green calyx lobes, and thready placentas, while S. petelotii has smaller flowers, glabrescent hypanthium, broadly ovate, pink calyx lobes, and unthready placentas (Fig 2).
During a field survey in 2018, we encountered a group of plant individuals (> 20) in Ma-an-di, Jinping County, southeastern Yunnan, growing alongside with P. longicalcarata and S. petelotii at the forest margin between 1800 and 2100 m in elevation. Their stems and leaves are sparsely villous with spreading, multiseriate trichomes, and the leaf blade bears 5 veins, or 7 veins with the outermost pair inconspicuous (Fig 3), all of which are intermediate between P. longicalcarata and S. petelotii (densely hirsute, 7 veins vs. sparsely pubescent or glabrescent, 5 veins) (Fig 1). However, we have not found any reproductive organs in these individuals. Based on the above data, we hypothesize that the individuals in question represent hybrids between P. longicalcarata and S. petelotii.
In this study, we sequence nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (nrITS), four low-copy nuclear genes (Dbr1, SOS4a, SOS4b and PCRF1), and one chloroplast intergenic spacer (trnV-trnM) to (1) test the hybrid origin of the morphologically intermediate individuals, (2) examine the extent of hybridization when the hybrid origin is verified, and (3) determine the direction of the hybridization event.
Sample collection from the protected area is approved by the Management Bureau of Fenshuiling National Nature Reserve, Jinping, China.
We sampled one population each of P. longicalcarata (20 individuals), S. petelotii (20 individuals) and the putative hybrid (14 individuals) from Ma-an-di, Jinping County, southeastern Yunnan, China. All samples were collected along the trailside between 1800 and 2100 m a.s.l. where they co-occur. Fresh leaves were sampled for subsequent DNA extraction.
Genomic DNA was extracted from fresh leaf samples using Magen Plant DNA Extraction Kit (Magen, Guangzhou, China). Nuclear ribosomal ITS region, Dbr1, two copies of SOS4 (SOS4a, SOS4b), PCRF1 and the chloroplast intergenic spacer (trnV-trnM) were amplified and sequenced using the primers listed in Table 1. We purified the PCR products using the Pearl Gel Extraction Kit (Pearl Bio-tech, Guangzhou, China) and then directly sequenced them on an ABI 3730 DNA automated sequencer with the BigDye chemistry (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). For sequences with more than one polymorphic site and insertion/deletion polymorphisms, PCR products were cloned and sequenced to phase the haplotypes. We conducted ligation reactions with a pMD18-T&A Cloning Kit (Takara, Dalian, China) and selected eight positive colonies for each individual for sequencing. The sequences of all haplotypes were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers MN380832–MN380893.
Sequences obtained were aligned using SeqMan v.7.1.0 (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, WI) and manually checked. We used DnaSP v. 6 [21] to summarize the haplotypes for each gene. The haplotype network for each gene was then constructed using Network v. 5.0 (www.fluxus-engineering.com) with the median-joining algorithm [22].
Sequence analyses for each gene were presented below. All differentially fixed nucleotide substitutions and indels were summarized in Tables A–F in S1 File. Sequence alignment was provided in S1 Alignment.
The aligned nrITS sequences from P. longicalcarata, S. petelotii and their putative hybrid was 657 bp in length. No intraspecific polymorphism was detected for P. longicalcarata and S. petelotii. We found seven differentially fixed nucleotide substitutions between P. longicalcarata and S. petelotii. For the putative hybrid, all individuals showed chromatogram peak additivity at all these fixed sites. Two haplotypes were detected for each individual of the putative hybrid, matching with that of P. longicalcarata and S. petelotii, respectively (Fig 4).
The length of the partial Dbr1 gene was 505 bp after alignment. Two differentially fixed nucleotide substitutions and two differentially fixed indels were detected between P. longicalcarata and S. petelotii, with the putative hybrid showing chromatogram additivity at all these sites. We detected five haplotypes in P. longicalcarata and two in S. petelotii. There were five haplotypes in the putative hybrid, four of which were shared with P. longicalcarata and one was shared with S. petelotii (Fig 4).
After sequence alignment, the partial SOS4a gene was 529 bp long. There were four fixed nucleotide substitutions and one fixed indel between P. longicalcarata and S. petelotii, with the putative hybrid showing chromatogram peak additivity at all these sites. We detected seven haplotypes in P. longicalcarata and five in S. petelotii. Of the eight haplotypes in the putative hybrid, three and four were shared with P. longicalcarata and S. petelotii, respectively, and one was unique to itself (Fig 4).
The length of the partial SOS4b gene was 263 bp. Two fixed nucleotide substitutions were detected between P. longicalcarata and S. petelotii, with the putative hybrid showing chromatogram additivity at each of the two sites. Five haplotypes in P. longicalcarata and four in S. petelotii were detected. Of the nine haplotypes in the putative hybrid, four and three were shared with P. longicalcarata and S. petelotii, respectively, and the remaining two were unique to itself (Fig 4).
The aligned sequence of the partial PCRF1 gene was 271 bp in length. Four fixed nucleotide substitutions and one fixed indel were observed between P. longicalcarata and S. petelotii, with the putative hybrid showing chromatogram additivity at all these sites. No intraspecific polymorphism was detected for P. longicalcarata and S. petelotii. Again, two haplotypes were detected for each individual of the putative hybrid, matching with that of P. longicalcarata and S. petelotii, respectively (Fig 4).
The length of the chloroplast trnV-trnM was 815 bp for the three taxa. No intraspecific sequence variation was detected in P. longicalcarata and S. petelotii, whereas six fixed nucleotide substitutions were found between them. Of the 14 individuals of the putative hybrid sampled, 11 had the same sequence as S. petelotii and the remaining three had identical sequence to P. longicalcarata (Fig 4).
The putative hybrid grows sympatrically with P. longicalcarata and S. petelotii and shows obvious morphological intermediacy between the two species. In this study, we use sequence data of nrITS, Dbr1, SOS4a, SOS4b, PCRF1, and chloroplast trnV-trnM to test the hybrid origin hypothesis of the putative hybrid. Multiple individuals of P. longicalcarata (20), S. petelotii (20) and the putative hybrid (14) were analyzed. We detected multiple differentially fixed nucleotide substitutions and indels at the five nuclear genes and chloroplast trnV-trnM, indicating that P. longicalcarata and S. petelotii were well separated at these regions. For the biparentally inherited nuclear genes, all individuals of the putative hybrid sampled showed perfect chromatogram additivity at all the fixed sites, while for the uniparentally inherited chloroplast trnV-trnM, all 14 individuals shared identical sequence with either P. longicalcarata or S. petelotii. Network analysis showed that all but three haplotypes of the putative hybrid were shared with its putative parental species at these six markers. The three unique haplotypes of the putative hybrid, one at the SOS4a gene and two at the SOS4b gene, have only one mutational step from those of its putative parental species and might come from unsampled polymorphisms of the parental species. Our results provide compelling evidence for the natural hybridization between P. longicalcarata and S. petelotii and the hybrid origin of the tested individuals.
Introgression is one of the common outcomes of natural hybridization and it may lead to increase of genetic diversity, adaptive gene transfer or extinction of rare species. However, in our case, every hybrid individual sampled is heterozygous at all five nuclear markers, with two haplotypes matching with its parental species, suggesting that all hybrid individuals sampled were first-generation (F1) hybrids, with no sign of later-generation hybrids or backcross progeny. We also carried out a field survey to investigate the flowering and fruiting of the hybrid, focusing only on the potential mature individuals (50 to120 cm in height). However, neither flowers nor fruits were observed on these individuals from April 2018 to October 2019. The two parental species, P. longicalcarata and S. petelotii, are quite different in terms of inflorescence position (terminal vs. axillary, often on old wood). It is probable that hybridization between the two species with different inflorescence positions has caused complex gene interaction on inflorescence development in the hybrids, and thus the failure of flower production. This should, in turn, work as the barrier preventing later-generation hybridization and backcrossing to either parental species for the hybrids. Since all these hybrid individuals are F1s, the direction of hybridization can be inferred by chloroplast markers. Analysis of the chloroplast trnV-trnM showed that 11 individuals of the hybrid shared the same chlorotype with S. petelotii and the remaining three with P. longicalcarata. Therefore, the hybridization between P. longicalcarata and S. petelotii is bidirectional with the latter species as the major maternal parent.
Several factors might have contributed to natural intergeneric hybridization between P. longicalcarata and S. petelotii. First, the two species were both endemic to northern Vietnam and Jinping county, southeastern Yunnan, China. They prefer similar shady and moist habitats, often occurring along small trails under forest with their elevation range overlapping above 1800 m. Field observation showed that at least in Jinping, the onset of flowering in both species started in June, with P. longicalcarata flowering only about one week earlier than S. petelotii. Shared pollinators are also possible, as the flowers of P. longicalcarata and S. petelotii are ca. 2 cm and 1 cm in diameter respectively, and therefore both can be visited by medium to small size bees.
Cases of natural hybridization had been reported for some genera in Melastomataceae [23–26]. Most of them (if not all) are interspecific hybridizations and many are from the tribe Melastomateae. This study represents the first report of natural hybridization between species of two traditional genera in Sonerileae/Dissochaeteae. Phyllagathis and Sporoxeia are morphologically distinct in inflorescence position (terminal vs. axillary). However, previous phylogenetic analyses, together with reconstruction of morphological characters [27], clearly indicated that many of the characters traditionally used in generic delimitation are highly homoplasious and extensive taxonomic reshuffling at the generic level would be needed to achieve monophyly. The most recent study clearly shows the taxonomic complexity and polyphyly of Phyllagathis and Sporoxeia and that the relationship between the parental species, P. longicalcarata and S. petelotii, is much closer than expected [28]. Both species appear to be nested in a mixed clade with P. hispidissima (C. Chen) C. Chen and other Sporoxeia species [28]. The "intergeneric" hybridization reported in this study provides another line of evidence for the close relationship between P. longicalcarata and S. petelotii, urging for more comprehensive phylogenetic studies aimed at clarifying the delimitation of Phyllagathis and Sporoxeia, in addition to many other taxa within the Sonerileae/Dissochaeteae.
S1 Alignment [txt] Sequence alignment of nrITS, , , , and .
S1 File [docx] Differentially fixed nucleotide substitutions and indels detected in nrITS (Table A), (Table B), (Table C), (Table D), (Table E) and (Table F).
1. Gross BL, Rieseberg LH. The ecological genetics of homoploid hybrid speciation. J Hered. 2005;96 : 241–252. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esi026 15618301
2. Soltis PS, Soltis DE. The role of hybridization in plant speciation. Ann Rev Plant Biol. 2009;60 : 561–588.
3. Abbott R, Albach D, Ansell S, Arntzen JW, Baird SJ, Bierne N, et al. Hybridization and speciation. J Evol Biol. 2013;26(2):229–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02599.x 23323997
4. Goulet BE, Roda F, Hopkins R. Hybridization in plants: old ideas, new techniques. Plant Physiol. 2017;173 : 65–78. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01340 27895205
5. Whitney KD, Randell RA, Rieseberg LH. Adaptive introgression of herbivore resistance traits in the weedy sunflower Helianthus annuus. Am Nat. 2006;167 : 794–807. doi: 10.1086/504606 16649157
6. Arnold ML, Martin NH. Adaptation by introgression. J Biol. 2009;8(9):82. doi: 10.1186/jbiol176 19833002
7. Campbell LG, Snow AA, Sweeney P. When divergent life histories hybridize: insights into adaptive life-history traits in annual weed. New Phytol. 2009;173 : 648–660.
8. Mallet J. Hybrid speciation. Nature. 2007;446 : 279–283. doi: 10.1038/nature05706 17361174
9. Dobzhansky T. Genetics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press; 1937.
10. Servedio MR, Noor MAF. The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2003;34 : 339–346.
11. Kleindorfer S, O’Connor JA, Dudaniec RY, Myers SA, Robertson J, Sulloway FJ. Species collapse via hybridization in Darwin’s tree finches. Amer Nat. 2014;183 : 325–341.
12. Kearns AM, Restani M, Szabo I, Schrøder-Nielsen A, Kim JA, Richardson HM, et al. Genomic evidence of speciation reversal in ravens. Nature Comm. 2018;9 : 906.
13. Huxel GR. Rapid displacement of native species by invasive species: effects of hybridization. Biol Conserv. 1999;89 : 143–152.
14. Todesco M, Pascual MA, Owens GL, Ostevik KL, Moyers BT, Hübner S, et al. Hybridization and extinction. Evolu Appl. 2016;9 : 892–908.
15. Arnold ML. Natural Hybridization and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997.
16. Arnold ML. Evolution through Genetic Exchange. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
17. Rieseberg LH. Hybrid origins of plant species. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 1997;28 : 359–389.
18. Mallet J. Hybridization as an invasion of the genome. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005;20 : 229–237. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.02.010 16701374
19. Grant V. Plant Speciation, second ed. New York: Columbia University Press; 1981.
20. Whitney KD, Ahern JR, Campbell LG, Albert LP, King MS. Patterns of hybridization in plants. Persp Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 2010;12 : 175–182.
21. Rozas J, Ferrer-Mata A, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Guirao-Rico S, Librado P, Ramos-Onsins SE, et al. DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Mol Biol Evol. 2017;34(12):3299–3302. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx248 29029172
22. Bandelt HJ, Forster P, Röhl A. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 1999;16 : 37–48. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026036 10331250
23. Almeda F. Systematics of the genus Monochaetum (Melastomataceae) in Mexico and Central America. Univ Calif Publ Bot. 1978;75 : 1–134.
24. Renner SS. Reproductive biology of Bellucia (Melastomataceae). Acta Amazon. 1986;16 : 197–218.
25. Ionta GM, Judd WS, Williams NH, Whitten WM. Phylogenetic relationships in Rhexia (Melastomataceae): evidence from DNA sequence data and morphology. Int J Plant Sci. 2007;168 : 1055–1066.
26. Zhou Q, Cai Y, Ng W, Wu W, Wang F, Zhou R. Molecular evidence for natural hybridization between two Melastoma species endemic to Hainan and their widespread congeners. Biodiv Sci. 2017;25 : 638–646.
27. Zhou QJ, Lin CW, Dai JH, Zhou RC, Liu Y. Exploring the generic delimitation of Phyllagathis and Bredia (Melastomataceae): A combined nuclear and chloroplast DNA analysis. J Syst Evol. 2019;57 : 256–267.
28. Zhou QJ, Lin CW, Ng WL, Dai JH, Denda T, Zhou RC, et al. Analyses of plastome sequences improve phylogenetic resolution and provide new insight into the evolutionary history of Asian Sonerileae/Dissochaeteae. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10 : 1477 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01477 31824528
Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova
Nemáte účet? Registrujte sa
Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.
