Two angles of overqualification-the deviant behavior and creative performance: The role of career and survival job


Autoři: Nasib Dar aff001;  Wali Rahman aff001
Působiště autorů: Department of Business Administration, Sarhad University of Science & Information Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan aff001
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 15(1)
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226677

Souhrn

Overqualification has both positive and negative outcomes; however, extant literature exhibits a tilt in favor of its negative aspect against its positive side. This tilted approach results in derision of a condition which could produce positive results. We argue, through empirical evidence, that there might be some circumstances/conditions, like the intentions of employees about their current job, that may play an important role in enabling organizations to be benefitted from the surplus KSAs of the overqualified employees and overqualification can be used as a tool to mitigate the effects of its negative consequences. To empirically test this condition, a sample of 193 teachers and 193 students have been selected through cluster sampling technique. The results exhibited that if overqualified employees perceive their current job as a career job then there is a more likelihood that they will be involved in some innovative and creative behaviors instead of deviating negatively from the organization norms. The results provide some new research insights that could be used to better understand the phenomenon of overqualification. The results of the study have practical implications for HR managers.

Klíčová slova:

Behavior – Careers – Employment – Jobs – Questionnaires – Social theory – Supervisors – Teachers


Zdroje

1. Liu S, Luksyte A, Zhou L, Shi J, Wang M. Overqualification and counterproductive work behaviors: Examining a moderated mediation model. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2015;36(2):250–71.

2. Erdogan B, Bauer TN. Perceived overqualification and its outcomes: The moderating role of empowerment. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2009;94(2):557. doi: 10.1037/a0013528 19271809

3. Maynard DC, Parfyonova NM. Perceived overqualification and withdrawal behaviours: Examining the roles of job attitudes and work values. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 2013;86(3):435–55.

4. Shen K, Kuhn P. Do Chinese employers avoid hiring overqualified workers? Evidence from an internet job board. Labor Market Issues in China: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2013. p. 1–30.

5. Görg H, Strobl E. The incidence of visible underemployment: Evidence for Trinidad and Tobago. Journal of Development Studies. 2003;39(3):81–100.

6. Feldman DC, Leana CR, Bolino MC. Underemployment and relative deprivation among remployed executives. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 2002;75(4):453–71.

7. Burris BH. The human effects of underemployment. Social Problems. 1983;31(1):96–110.

8. Maynard DC, Joseph TA, Maynard AM. Underemployment, job attitudes, and turnover intentions. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2006;27(4):509–36.

9. Allan P. Looking for work after forty: Job search experiences of older unemployed managers and professionals. Journal of Employment Counseling. 1990;27:113–21.

10. Bills DB. The mutability of educational credentials as hiring criteria: How employers evaluate atypically highly credentialed job candidates. Work and Occupations. 1992;19(1):79–95.

11. Gallo A. Should you hire an overqualified candidate2011.

12. Fine S, Nevo B. Too smart for their own good? A study of perceived cognitive overqualification in the workforce. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2008;19(2):346–55.

13. Johnson GJ, Johnson WR. Perceived overqualification and dimensions of job satisfaction: A longitudinal analysis. The Journal of Psychology. 2000;134(5):537–55. doi: 10.1080/00223980009598235 11034134

14. Luksyte A, Spitzmueller C, Maynard DC. Why do overqualified incumbents deviate? Examining multiple mediators. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2011;16(3):279–96. doi: 10.1037/a0022709 21728436

15. Luksyte A, Spitzmueller C. When are overqualified employees creative? It depends on contextual factors. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2015;37(5):635–53.

16. van Dijk H, Shantz A, Alfes K. Welcome to the bright side: Why, how, and when overqualification enhances performance. Human Resource Management Review. 2019.

17. Fine S, Nevo B. A phenomenon of overqualification in personnel psychology. International Journal of Testing. 2008;7(4):327–52.

18. Hu J, Erdogan B, Bauer TN, Jiang K, Liu S, Li Y. There are lots of big fish in this pond: The role of peer overqualification on task significance, perceived fit, and performance for overqualified employees. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2015;100(4):1228–38. doi: 10.1037/apl0000008 25546266

19. Erdogan B, Bauer TN, Peiró JM, Truxillo DM. Overqualified employees: Making the best of a potentially bad situation for individuals and organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 2011;4(2):215–32.

20. Dooley D, Prause J, Ham-Rowbottom KA. Underemployment and depression: longitudinal relationships. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 2000;41:421–36. 11198566

21. Prause J, Dooley D. Effect of underemployment on school-leavers' self-esteem. Journal of Adolescence. 1997;20(3):243–60. doi: 10.1006/jado.1997.0083 9208345

22. Johnson GJ, Johnson WR. Perceived overqualification and psychological well-being. The Journal of Social Psychology. 1996;136(4):435–45. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1996.9714025 8855378

23. Huiras J, Uggen C, McMorris B. Career jobs, survival jobs, and employee deviance: A social investment model of workplace misconduct. The Sociological Quarterly. 2000;41(2):245–63.

24. Johnson MP. Commitment to Personal Relationships. In: Jones W, Perlman D, editors. Advances in Personal Relationships. London: Kingsley; 1991. p. 117–44.

25. Ulmer JT. Revisiting stebbins: Labeling and commitment to deviance. The Sociological Quarterly. 1994;35:135–57.

26. Bolino MC, Feldman DC. The antecedents and consequences of underemployment among expatriates. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2000;21:889–911.

27. Verhaest D, Omey E. The impact of overeducation and its measurement. Social Indicators Research. 2006;77(3):419–48.

28. Adams JS. Inequity in social exchange. In: Berkowitz L, editor. Advances in experimental social psychology. ed. San Diego,: CA: Academic Press; 1965. p. 267–99.

29. Crosby F. A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review. 1976;83(2):85–113.

30. Tajfel H. Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology. 1982;33(1):1–39.

31. Becker GS. Human capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. 3 ed: University of Chicago press; 1983.

32. Bandura A. Social learning Theory: New York: General Learning Press.; 1971.

33. Edwards JR, Rothbard NP. Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. Academy of Management Review. 2000;25(1):178–99.

34. Small SA, Riley D. Toward a multidimensional assessment of work spillover into family life. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1990;52:51–61.

35. Robinson SL, Bennett RJ. A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal. 1995;38(2):555–72.

36. Anderson N, Potočnik K, Zhou J. Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management. 2014;40(5):1297–333.

37. Oldham GR, Cummings A. Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal. 1996;39(3):607–34.

38. Harari MB, Manapragada A, Viswesvaran C. Who thinks they're a big fish in a small pond and why does it matter? A meta-analysis of perceived overqualification. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2017;102:28–47.

39. Van Iddekinge CH, Aguinis H, Mackey JD, DeOrtentiis PS. A meta-analysis of the interactive, additive, and relative effects of cognitive ability and motivation on performance. Journal of Management. 2017;44(1):249–79.

40. Liu S, Wang M. Perceived overqualification: A review and recommendations for research and practice. The role of the economic crisis on occupational stress and well being: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2012. p. 1–42.

41. Erdogan B, Kraimer ML, Liden RC. Work value congruence and intrinsic career success: The compensatory roles of leader‐member exchange and perceived organizational support. Personnel Psychology. 2004;57(2):305–32.

42. Sekaran U. Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. 5th ed: Wiley-India; 2006.

43. Reisinger Y, Mavondo F. Structural equation modeling. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing. 2007;21(4):41–71.

44. Bennett RJ, Robinson SL. Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2000;85(3):349–60. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.349 10900810

45. Tierney P, Farmer SM, Graen GB. An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology. 1999;52(3):591–620.

46. Appelbaum SH, Deguire KJ, Lay M. The relationship of ethical climate to deviant workplace behaviour. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society. 2005;5(4):43–55.

47. Greenberg L, Barling J. Employee theft. Trends in organizational behavior. 1996;3:49–64.

48. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods. 2008;40(3):879–91. doi: 10.3758/brm.40.3.879 18697684

49. Spector PE, Fox S, Penney LM, Bruursema K, Goh A, Kessler S. The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal? Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2006;68(3):446–60.

50. Berry CM, Ones DS, Sackett PR. Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2007;92(2):410–24. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.410 17371088

51. Fox S, Spector PE, Goh A, Bruursema K, Kessler SR. The deviant citizen: Measuring potential positive relations between counterproductive work behaviour and organizational citizenship behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 2012;85(1):199–220.

52. Mount M, Ilies R, Johnson E. Relationship of personality traits and counterproductive work behaviors: The mediating effects of job satisfaction. Personnel Psychology. 2006;59(3):591–622.

53. Baron RA, Neuman JH, Geddes D. Social and personal determinants of workplace aggression: Evidence for the impact of perceived injustice and the Type A behavior pattern. Aggressive Behavior. 1999;25(4):281–96.

54. Spector PE, Fox S. The Stressor-Emotion Model of Counterproductive Work Behavior. In: Fox S, Spector PE, editors. Counterproductive workplace behavior: Investigations of actors and targets Washington, DC: APA.; 2005. p. 151–74.


Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS One


2020 Číslo 1

Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle

Tejto téme sa ďalej venujú…


Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Význam nutraceutik u kardiovaskulárních onemocnění
nový kurz
Autori:

Faktory ovlivňující léčbu levotyroxinem

Kurz originály vs. generika

Autori: MUDr. Petr Výborný, CSc., FEBO

Autori: MUDr. Jiří Horažďovský, Ph.D

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa