Abnormal Dosage of Ultraconserved Elements Is Highly Disfavored in Healthy Cells but Not Cancer Cells

1. BejeranoG, PheasantM, MakuninI, StephenS, KentWJ, et al. (2004) Ultraconserved elements in the human genome. Science 304 : 1321–1325 doi:10.1126/science.1098119

2. DertiA, RothFP, ChurchGM, WuC-T (2006) Mammalian ultraconserved elements are strongly depleted among segmental duplications and copy number variants. Nat Genet 38 : 1216–1220 doi:10.1038/ng1888

3. FisherS, GriceEA, VintonRM, BesslingSL, McCallionAS (2006) Conservation of RET regulatory function from human to zebrafish without sequence similarity. Science 312 : 276–279 doi:10.1126/science.1124070

4. ViselA, PrabhakarS, AkiyamaJA, ShoukryM, LewisKD, et al. (2008) Ultraconservation identifies a small subset of extremely constrained developmental enhancers. Nat Genet 40 : 158–160 doi:10.1038/ng.2007.55

5. Meireles-FilhoACA, StarkA (2009) Comparative genomics of gene regulation-conservation and divergence of cis-regulatory information. Curr Opin Genet Dev 19 : 565–570 doi:10.1016/j.gde.2009.10.006

6. JaegerSA, ChanET, BergerMF, StottmannR, HughesTR, et al. (2010) Conservation and regulatory associations of a wide affinity range of mouse transcription factor binding sites. Genomics 95 : 185–195 doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2010.01.002

7. WeirauchMT, HughesTR (2010) Conserved expression without conserved regulatory sequence: the more things change, the more they stay the same. Trends Genet 26 : 66–74 doi:10.1016/j.tig.2009.12.002

8. TaherL, McGaugheyDM, MaraghS, AneasI, BesslingSL, et al. (2011) Genome-wide identification of conserved regulatory function in diverged sequences. Genome research 21 : 1139–1149 doi:10.1101/gr.119016.110

9. KeightleyPD, KryukovGV, SunyaevS, HalliganDL, GaffneyDJ (2005) Evolutionary constraints in conserved nongenic sequences of mammals. Genome Res 15 : 1373–1378 doi:10.1101/gr.3942005

10. KryukovGV, SchmidtS, SunyaevS (2005) Small fitness effect of mutations in highly conserved non-coding regions. Hum Mol Genet 14 : 2221–2229 doi:10.1093/hmg/ddi226

11. DrakeJA, BirdC, NemeshJ, ThomasDJ, Newton-ChehC, et al. (2006) Conserved noncoding sequences are selectively constrained and not mutation cold spots. Nat Genet 38 : 223–227 doi:10.1038/ng1710

12. ChenCTL, WangJC, CohenBA (2007) The strength of selection on ultraconserved elements in the human genome. Am J Hum Genet 80 : 692–704 doi:10.1086/513149

13. KatzmanS, KernAD, BejeranoG, FewellG, FultonL, et al. (2007) Human genome ultraconserved elements are ultraselected. Science 317 : 915 doi:10.1126/science.1142430

14. SakurabaY, KimuraT, MasuyaH, NoguchiH, SezutsuH, et al. (2008) Identification and characterization of new long conserved noncoding sequences in vertebrates. Mamm Genome 19 : 703–712 doi:10.1007/s00335-008-9152-7

15. HalliganDL, OliverF, GuthrieJ, StemshornKC, HarrB, et al. (2011) Positive and negative selection in murine ultra-conserved noncoding elements. Mol Biol Evol 28 : 2651–2660 doi:10.1093/molbev/msr093

16. ChiangCWK, LiuC-T, LettreG, LangeLA, JorgensenNW, et al. (2012) Ultraconserved Elements in the Human Genome: Association and Transmission Analyses of Highly Constrained SNPs. Genetics 192 : 253–266 doi:10.1534/genetics.112.141945

17. PoulinF, NobregaMA, Plajzer-FrickI, HoltA, AfzalV, et al. (2005) In vivo characterization of a vertebrate ultraconserved enhancer. Genomics 85 : 774–781 doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2005.03.003

18. WoolfeA, GoodsonM, GoodeDK, SnellP, McEwenGK, et al. (2005) Highly conserved non-coding sequences are associated with vertebrate development. PLoS Biol 3: e7 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030007

19. PennacchioLA, AhituvN, MosesAM, PrabhakarS, NobregaMA, et al. (2006) In vivo enhancer analysis of human conserved non-coding sequences. Nature 444 : 499–502 doi:10.1038/nature05295

20. LampeX, SamadOA, GuiguenA, MatisC, RemacleS, et al. (2008) An ultraconserved Hox-Pbx responsive element resides in the coding sequence of Hoxa2 and is active in rhombomere 4. 36 : 3214–3225 doi:10.1093/nar/gkn148

21. PoitrasL, YuM, Lesage-PelletierC, MacdonaldRB, GagnéJ-P, et al. (2010) An SNP in an ultraconserved regulatory element affects Dlx5/Dlx6 regulation in the forebrain. Development 137 : 3089–3097 doi:10.1242/dev.051052

22. McBrideDJ, BuckleA, van HeyningenV, KleinjanDA (2011) DNaseI Hypersensitivity and Ultraconservation Reveal Novel, Interdependent Long-Range Enhancers at the Complex Pax6 Cis-Regulatory Region. PLoS ONE 6: e28616 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028616

23. PaulsS, SmithSF, ElgarG (2012) Lens development depends on a pair of highly conserved Sox21 regulatory elements. Dev Biol 365 : 310–318 doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.02.025

24. BhatiaS, BenganiH, FishM, BrownA, DiviziaMT, et al. (2013) Disruption of Autoregulatory Feedback by a Mutation in a Remote, Ultraconserved PAX6 Enhancer Causes Aniridia. Am J Hum Genet 93 : 1126–1134 doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.10.028

25. ChiangCWK, DertiA, SchwartzD, ChouMF, HirschhornJN, et al. (2008) Ultraconserved Elements: Analyses of Dosage Sensitivity, Motifs and Boundaries. Genetics 180 : 2277–2293 doi:10.1534/genetics.108.096537

26. ViturawongT, MeissnerF, ButterF, MannM (2013) A DNA-Centric Protein Interaction Map of Ultraconserved Elements Reveals Contribution of Transcription Factor Binding Hubs to Conservation. Cell Rep 5 : 531–545 doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2013.09.022

27. KritsasK, WuestSE, HupaloD, KernAD, WickerT, et al. (2012) Computational analysis and characterization of UCE-like elements (ULEs) in plant genomes. Genome research 22 : 2455–2466 doi:10.1101/gr.129346.111

28. WuCT, MorrisJR (1999) Transvection and other homology effects. Curr Opin Genet Dev 9 : 237–246 doi:10.1016/S0959-437X(99)80035-5

29. DuncanIW (2002) Transvection effects in Drosophila. Annual Review of Genetics 36 : 521–556 doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.36.060402.100441

30. KennisonJA, JWS (2002) Transvection in Drosophila. Advances in genetics: 399–420. doi:10.1016/s0065-2660(02)46014-2

31. BacherCP, GuggiariM, BrorsB, AuguiS, ClercP, et al. (2006) Transient colocalization of X-inactivation centres accompanies the initiation of X inactivation. Nat Cell Biol 8 : 293–299 doi:10.1038/ncb1365

32. XuN, TsaiC-L, LeeJT (2006) Transient homologous chromosome pairing marks the onset of X inactivation. Science 311 : 1149–1152 doi:10.1126/science.1122984

33. KoemanJM, RussellRC, TanM-H, PetilloD, WestphalM, et al. (2008) Somatic pairing of chromosome 19 in renal oncocytoma is associated with deregulated EGLN2-mediated [corrected] oxygen-sensing response. PLoS Genetics 4: e1000176 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000176

34. DonohoeME, SilvaSS, PinterSF, XuN, LeeJT (2009) The pluripotency factor Oct4 interacts with Ctcf and also controls X-chromosome pairing and counting. Nature 460 : 128–132 doi:10.1038/nature08098

35. BrandtVL, HewittSL, SkokJA (2010) It takes two: communication between homologous alleles preserves genomic stability during V(D)J recombination. Nucleus 1 : 23–29 doi:10.4161/nucl.1.1.10595

36. GandhiM, EvdokimovaVN, T CuencoK, NikiforovaMN, KellyLM, et al. (2012) Homologous chromosomes make contact at the sites of double-strand breaks in genes in somatic G0/G1-phase human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109 : 9454–9459 doi:10.1073/pnas.1205759109

37. KruegerC, KingMR, KruegerF, BrancoMR, OsborneCS, et al. (2012) Pairing of homologous regions in the mouse genome is associated with transcription but not imprinting status. PLoS ONE 7: e38983 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038983

38. GandhiM, EvdokimovaVN, CuencoKT, BakkenistCJ, NikiforovYE (2013) Homologous chromosomes move and rapidly initiate contact at the sites of double-strand breaks in genes in G0-phase human cells. Cell Cycle 12 : 547–552 doi:10.4161/cc.23754

39. ConradDF, PintoD, RedonR, FeukL, GokcumenO, et al. (2010) Origins and functional impact of copy number variation in the human genome. Nature 464 : 704–712 doi:10.1038/nature08516

40. McLeanC, BejeranoG (2008) Dispensability of mammalian DNA. Genome Res 18 : 1743–1751 doi:10.1101/gr.080184.108

41. MartínezF, MonfortS, RosellóM, OltraS, BlesaD, et al. (2010) Enrichment of ultraconserved elements among genomic imbalances causing mental delay and congenital anomalies. BMC Med Genomics 3 : 54 doi:10.1186/1755-8794-3-54

42. CalinGA, LiuC-G, FerracinM, HyslopT, SpizzoR, et al. (2007) Ultraconserved Regions Encoding ncRNAs Are Altered in Human Leukemias and Carcinomas. Cancer Cell 12 : 215–229 doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2007.07.027

43. CalinGA, SevignaniC, DumitruCD, HyslopT, NochE, et al. (2004) Human microRNA genes are frequently located at fragile sites and genomic regions involved in cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101 : 2999–3004 doi:10.1073/pnas.0307323101

44. ScaruffiP (2011) The transcribed-ultraconserved regions: a novel class of long noncoding RNAs involved in cancer susceptibility. ScientificWorldJournal 11 : 340–352 doi:10.1100/tsw.2011.35

45. LujambioA, PortelaA, LizJ, MeloSA, RossiS, et al. (2010) CpG island hypermethylation-associated silencing of non-coding RNAs transcribed from ultraconserved regions in human cancer. Oncogene 29 : 6390–6401 doi:10.1038/onc.2010.361

46. MestdaghP, FredlundE, PattynF, RihaniA, Van MaerkenT, et al. (2010) An integrative genomics screen uncovers ncRNA T-UCR functions in neuroblastoma tumours. Oncogene 29 : 3583–3592 doi:10.1038/onc.2010.106

47. BraconiC, ValeriN, KogureT, GaspariniP, HuangN, et al. (2011) Expression and functional role of a transcribed noncoding RNA with an ultraconserved element in hepatocellular carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108 : 786–791 doi:10.1073/pnas.1011098108

48. SanaJ, HankeovaS, SvobodaM, KissI, VyzulaR, et al. (2012) Expression Levels of Transcribed Ultraconserved Regions uc.73 and uc.388 Are Altered in Colorectal Cancer. Oncology 82 : 114–118 doi:10.1159/000336479

49. FerdinJ, NishidaN, WuX, NicolosoMS, ShahMY, et al. (2013) HINCUTs in cancer: hypoxia-induced noncoding ultraconserved transcripts. Cell Death Differ 20 : 1675–1687 doi:10.1038/cdd.2013.119

50. HudsonRS, YiM, VolfovskyN, PrueittRL, EspositoD, et al. (2013) Transcription signatures encoded by ultraconserved genomic regions in human prostate cancer. Mol Cancer 12 : 13 doi:10.1186/1476-4598-12-13

51. LizJ, PortelaA, SolerM, GómezA, LingH, et al. (2014) Regulation of pri-miRNA Processing by a Long Noncoding RNA Transcribed from an Ultraconserved Region. Mol Cell. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2014.05.005

52. BirchlerJA, VeitiaRA (2007) The gene balance hypothesis: from classical genetics to modern genomics. Plant Cell 19 : 395–402 doi:10.1105/tpc.106.049338

53. BirchlerJA, VeitiaRA (2012) Gene balance hypothesis: connecting issues of dosage sensitivity across biological disciplines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109 : 14746–14753 doi:10.1073/pnas.1207726109

54. SheltzerJM, AmonA (2011) The aneuploidy paradox: costs and benefits of an incorrect karyotype. Trends Genet. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2011.07.003

55. LupskiJR, StankiewiczP (2005) Genomic disorders: molecular mechanisms for rearrangements and conveyed phenotypes. PLoS Genetics 1: e49 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0010049

56. MatsuzakiH, WangP-H, HuJ, RavaR, FuGK (2009) High resolution discovery and confirmation of copy number variants in 90 Yoruba Nigerians. Genome Biol 10: R125 doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-11-r125

57. ShaikhTH, GaiX, PerinJC, GlessnerJT, XieH, et al. (2009) High-resolution mapping and analysis of copy number variations in the human genome: a data resource for clinical and research applications. Genome research 19 : 1682–1690 doi:10.1101/gr.083501.108

58. DrmanacR, SparksAB, CallowMJ, HalpernAL, BurnsNL, et al. (2010) Human genome sequencing using unchained base reads on self-assembling DNA nanoarrays. Science 327 : 78–81 doi:10.1126/science.1181498

59. Genomes Project Consortium, DurbinRM, AbecasisGR, AltshulerDL, AutonA, et al. (2010) A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature 467 : 1061–1073 doi:10.1038/nature09534

60. CampbellCD, SampasN, TsalenkoA, SudmantPH, KiddJM, et al. (2011) Population-genetic properties of differentiated human copy-number polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 88 : 317–332 doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.02.004

61. JakobssonM, ScholzSW, ScheetP, GibbsJR, VanLiereJM, et al. (2008) Genotype, haplotype and copy-number variation in worldwide human populations. Nature 451 : 998–1003 doi:10.1038/nature06742

62. McCarrollSA, KuruvillaFG, KornJM, CawleyS, NemeshJ, et al. (2008) Integrated detection and population-genetic analysis of SNPs and copy number variation. Nat Genet 40 : 1166–1174 doi:10.1038/ng.238

63. PiotrowskiA, BruderCEG, AnderssonR, Diaz de StåhlT, MenzelU, et al. (2008) Somatic mosaicism for copy number variation in differentiated human tissues. Hum Mutat 29 : 1118–1124 doi:10.1002/humu.20815

64. ForsbergLA, RasiC, RazzaghianHR, PakalapatiG, WaiteL, et al. (2012) Age-related somatic structural changes in the nuclear genome of human blood cells. Am J Hum Genet 90 : 217–228 doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.12.009

65. JacobsKB, YeagerM, ZhouW, WacholderS, WangZ, et al. (2012) Detectable clonal mosaicism and its relationship to aging and cancer. Nat Genet 44 : 651–658 doi:10.1038/ng.2270

66. LaurieCC, LaurieCA, RiceK, DohenyKF, ZelnickLR, et al. (2012) Detectable clonal mosaicism from birth to old age and its relationship to cancer. Nat Genet 44 : 642–650 doi:10.1038/ng.2271

67. O'HuallachainM, KarczewskiKJ, WeissmanSM, UrbanAE, SnyderMP (2012) Extensive genetic variation in somatic human tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109 : 18018–18023 doi:10.1073/pnas.1213736109

68. McConnellMJ, LindbergMR, BrennandKJ, PiperJC, VoetT, et al. (2013) Mosaic copy number variation in human neurons. Science 342 : 632–637 doi:10.1126/science.1243472

69. XuB, RoosJL, LevyS, van RensburgEJ, GogosJA, et al. (2008) Strong association of de novo copy number mutations with sporadic schizophrenia. Nat Genet 40 : 880–885 doi:10.1038/ng.162

70. ItsaraA, WuH, SmithJD, NickersonDA, RomieuI, et al. (2010) De novo rates and selection of large copy number variation. Genome research 20 : 1469–1481 doi:10.1101/gr.107680.110

71. MalhotraD, McCarthyS, MichaelsonJJ, VacicV, BurdickKE, et al. (2011) High frequencies of de novo CNVs in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Neuron 72 : 951–963 doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.007

72. SandersSJ, Ercan-SencicekAG, HusV, LuoR, MurthaMT, et al. (2011) Multiple recurrent de novo CNVs, including duplications of the 7q11.23 Williams syndrome region, are strongly associated with autism. Neuron 70 : 863–885 doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.002

73. BeroukhimR, MermelCH, PorterD, WeiG, RaychaudhuriS, et al. (2010) The landscape of somatic copy-number alteration across human cancers. Nature 463 : 899–905 doi:10.1038/nature08822

74. MermelCH, SchumacherSE, HillB, MeyersonML, BeroukhimR, et al. (2011) GISTIC2.0 facilitates sensitive and confident localization of the targets of focal somatic copy-number alteration in human cancers. Genome Biol 12: R41 doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-4-r41

75. TaylorBS, BarretinaJ, SocciND, DecarolisP, LadanyiM, et al. (2008) Functional copy-number alterations in cancer. PLoS ONE 3: e3179 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003179

76. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2008) Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature 455 : 1061–1068 doi:10.1038/nature07385

77. WalterMJ, PaytonJE, RiesRE, ShannonWD, DeshmukhH, et al. (2009) Acquired copy number alterations in adult acute myeloid leukemia genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106 : 12950–12955 doi:10.1073/pnas.0903091106

78. BullingerL, KrönkeJ, SchönC, RadtkeI, UrlbauerK, et al. (2010) Identification of acquired copy number alterations and uniparental disomies in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia using high-resolution single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis. Leukemia 24 : 438–449 doi:10.1038/leu.2009.263

79. TaylorBS, SchultzN, HieronymusH, GopalanA, XiaoY, et al. (2010) Integrative genomic profiling of human prostate cancer. Cancer Cell 18 : 11–22 doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2010.05.026

80. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2011) Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature 474 : 609–615 doi:10.1038/nature10166

81. CurtisC, ShahSP, ChinS-F, TurashviliG, RuedaOM, et al. (2012) The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups. Nature 486 : 346–352 doi:10.1038/nature10983

82. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2012) Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumors. Nature 490: pp.61–pp.70.

83. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2012) Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature 487 : 330–337 doi:10.1038/nature11252

84. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2012) Comprehensive genomic characterization of squamous cell lung cancers. Nature 489: pp.519–pp.525.

85. Nik-ZainalS, AlexandrovLB, WedgeDC, Van LooP, GreenmanCD, et al. (2012) Mutational Processes Molding the Genomes of 21 Breast Cancers. Cell 149 : 979–993 doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.024

86. RobinsonG, ParkerM, KranenburgTA, LuC, ChenX, et al. (2012) Novel mutations target distinct subgroups of medulloblastoma. Nature 488 : 43–48 doi:10.1038/nature11213

87. WalkerLC, KrauseL, kConFabInvestigators, SpurdleAB, WaddellN (2012) Germline copy number variants are not associated with globally acquired copy number changes in familial breast tumours. Breast Cancer Res Treat 134 : 1005–1011 doi:10.1007/s10549-012-2024-6

88. ZhangJ, DingL, HolmfeldtL, WuG, HeatleySL, et al. (2012) The genetic basis of early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Nature 481 : 157–163 doi:10.1038/nature10725

89. HolmfeldtL, WeiL, Diaz-FloresE, WalshM, ZhangJ, et al. (2013) The genomic landscape of hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Genet 45 : 242–252 doi:10.1038/ng.2532

90. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2013) Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature 497 : 67–73 doi:10.1038/nature12113

91. WeischenfeldtJ, SimonR, FeuerbachL, SchlangenK, WeichenhanD, et al. (2013) Integrative genomic analyses reveal an androgen-driven somatic alteration landscape in early-onset prostate cancer. Cancer Cell 23 : 159–170 doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2013.01.002

92. McLeanCY, BristorD, HillerM, ClarkeSL, SchaarBT, et al. (2010) GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions. Nat Biotechnol 28 : 495–501 doi:10.1038/nbt.1630

93. MakuninIV, PheasantM, SimonsC, MattickJS (2007) Orthologous microRNA genes are located in cancer-associated genomic regions in human and mouse. PLoS ONE 2: e1133 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001133

94. DengS, CalinGA, CroceCM, CoukosG, ZhangL (2008) Mechanisms of microRNA deregulation in human cancer. Cell Cycle 7 : 2643–2646 doi:10.4161/cc.7.17.6597

95. ENCODE Project Consortium, BernsteinBE, BirneyE, DunhamI, GreenED, et al. (2012) An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489 : 57–74 doi:10.1038/nature11247

96. KorenA, PolakP, NemeshJ, MichaelsonJJ, SebatJ, et al. (2012) Differential relationship of DNA replication timing to different forms of human mutation and variation. Am J Hum Genet 91 : 1033–1040 doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.10.018

97. MaysharY, Ben-DavidU, LavonN, BiancottiJ-C, YakirB, et al. (2010) Identification and classification of chromosomal aberrations in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 7 : 521–531 doi:10.1016/j.stem.2010.07.017

98. LaurentLC, UlitskyI, SlavinI, TranH, SchorkA, et al. (2011) Dynamic changes in the copy number of pluripotency and cell proliferation genes in human ESCs and iPSCs during reprogramming and time in culture. Cell Stem Cell 8 : 106–118 doi:10.1016/j.stem.2010.12.003

99. PasiCE, Dereli-ÖzA, NegriniS, FriedliM, FragolaG, et al. (2011) Genomic instability in induced stem cells. Cell Death Differ 18 : 745–753 doi:10.1038/cdd.2011.9

100. HusseinSM, BatadaNN, VuoristoS, ChingRW, AutioR, et al. (2011) Copy number variation and selection during reprogramming to pluripotency. Nature 471 : 58–62 doi:10.1038/nature09871

101. Martins-TaylorK, NislerBS, TaapkenSM, ComptonT, CrandallL, et al. (2011) Recurrent copy number variations in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 29 : 488–491 doi:10.1038/nbt.1890

102. Dekel-NaftaliM, Aviram-GoldringA, LitmanovitchT, ShamashJ, Reznik-WolfH, et al. (2012) Screening of human pluripotent stem cells using CGH and FISH reveals low-grade mosaic aneuploidy and a recurrent amplification of chromosome 1q. Eur J Hum Genet 20 : 1248–1255 doi:10.1038/ejhg.2012.128

103. AbyzovA, MarianiJ, PalejevD, ZhangY, HaneyMS, et al. (2012) Somatic copy number mosaicism in human skin revealed by induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 492 : 438–442 doi:10.1038/nature11629

104. YoungMA, LarsonDE, SunC-W, GeorgeDR, DingL, et al. (2012) Background mutations in parental cells account for most of the genetic heterogeneity of induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 10 : 570–582 doi:10.1016/j.stem.2012.03.002

105. QuinlanAR, BolandMJ, LeibowitzML, ShumilinaS, PehrsonSM, et al. (2011) Genome sequencing of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells reveals retroelement stability and infrequent DNA rearrangement during reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 9 : 366–373 doi:10.1016/j.stem.2011.07.018

106. ChengL, HansenNF, ZhaoL, DuY, ZouC, et al. (2012) Low incidence of DNA sequence variation in human induced pluripotent stem cells generated by nonintegrating plasmid expression. Cell Stem Cell 10 : 337–344 doi:10.1016/j.stem.2012.01.005

107. LuJ, LiH, HuM, SasakiT, BacceiA, et al. (2014) The Distribution of Genomic Variations in Human iPSCs Is Related to Replication-Timing Reorganization during Reprogramming. Cell Rep. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.03.007

108. SoliminiNL, XuQ, MermelCH, LiangAC, SchlabachMR, et al. (2012) Recurrent Hemizygous Deletions in Cancers May Optimize Proliferative Potential. Science. doi:10.1126/science.1219580

109. DavoliT, XuAW, MengwasserKE, SackLM, YoonJC, et al. (2013) Cumulative Haploinsufficiency and Triplosensitivity Drive Aneuploidy Patterns and Shape the Cancer Genome. Cell. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.011

110. ScaruffiP, StiglianiS, MorettiS, CocoS, De VecchiC, et al. (2009) Transcribed-ultra conserved region expression is associated with outcome in high-risk neuroblastoma. BMC Cancer 9 : 441 doi:10.1186/1471-2407-9-441

111. KogureT, YanIK, LinW-L, PatelT (2013) Extracellular Vesicle-Mediated Transfer of a Novel Long Noncoding RNA TUC339: A Mechanism of Intercellular Signaling in Human Hepatocellular Cancer. Genes Cancer 4 : 261–272 doi:10.1177/1947601913499020

112. AhituvN, ZhuY, ViselA, HoltA, AfzalV, et al. (2007) Deletion of ultraconserved elements yields viable mice. PLoS Biol 5: e234 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050234

113. SchmidtS, GerasimovaA, KondrashovFA, AdzhubeiIA, AdzuhbeiIA, et al. (2008) Hypermutable non-synonymous sites are under stronger negative selection. PLoS Genetics 4: e1000281 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000281

114. MichaelsonJJ, ShiY, GujralM, ZhengH, MalhotraD, et al. (2012) Whole-genome sequencing in autism identifies hot spots for de novo germline mutation. Cell 151 : 1431–1442 doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.019

115. Eyre-Walker A, Eyre-Walker YC (2014) How Much of the Variation in the Mutation Rate Along the Human Genome Can Be Explained? G3 (Bethesda). doi:10.1534/g3.114.012849.

116. AwadallaP, GauthierJ, MyersRA, CasalsF, HamdanFF, et al. (2010) Direct measure of the de novo mutation rate in autism and schizophrenia cohorts. Am J Hum Genet 87 : 316–324 doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.07.019

117. Wellcome Trust Case ControlConsortium, CraddockN, HurlesME, CardinN, PearsonRD, et al. (2010) Genome-wide association study of CNVs in 16,000 cases of eight common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature 464 : 713–720 doi:10.1038/nature08979

118. KozomaraA, Griffiths-JonesS (2011) miRBase: integrating microRNA annotation and deep-sequencing data. Nucleic acids research 39: D152–D157 doi:10.1093/nar/gkq1027