#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Sex-specific -regulatory Variation on the X Chromosome


Theory provides contrasting predictions with respect to the relative magnitude of standing genetic variation on the X chromosome and the autosomes. While most classic population genetics theory suggests a dearth of variation on the X chromosome, theory which concerns selection operating differently in males and females sometimes suggests the opposite. In support of classic theory we find that genetic variants influencing gene expression far from where they are located in the genome (trans-acting) are depleted on the X chromosome. Trans-acting genetic variants with a larger effect in females than in males do, however, depart from this pattern. Allelic variants with a trans-acting female-biased effect are primarily located in regions where the dosage compensation machinery is less active. This suggests that the intrinsic properties of dosage compensation influence the accumulation of different types of trans-factors and/or their propensity to accumulate mutations. These findings have general implications for the evolution of the X chromosome, but may also have relevance for the evolution of sexual dimorphism.


Vyšlo v časopise: Sex-specific -regulatory Variation on the X Chromosome. PLoS Genet 11(2): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005015
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005015

Souhrn

Theory provides contrasting predictions with respect to the relative magnitude of standing genetic variation on the X chromosome and the autosomes. While most classic population genetics theory suggests a dearth of variation on the X chromosome, theory which concerns selection operating differently in males and females sometimes suggests the opposite. In support of classic theory we find that genetic variants influencing gene expression far from where they are located in the genome (trans-acting) are depleted on the X chromosome. Trans-acting genetic variants with a larger effect in females than in males do, however, depart from this pattern. Allelic variants with a trans-acting female-biased effect are primarily located in regions where the dosage compensation machinery is less active. This suggests that the intrinsic properties of dosage compensation influence the accumulation of different types of trans-factors and/or their propensity to accumulate mutations. These findings have general implications for the evolution of the X chromosome, but may also have relevance for the evolution of sexual dimorphism.


Zdroje

1. Vicoso B, Charlesworth B. Evolution on the X chromosome: unusual patterns and processes. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2006;7(8):645–53. 16847464

2. Ellegren H. The different levels of genetic diversity in sex chromosomes and autosomes. Trends in Genetics. 2009;25(6):278–84. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2009.04.005 19481288

3. Mank JE. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism: lessons from the genome. The American naturalist. 2009;173(2):141–50. doi: 10.1086/595754 20374139

4. Haldane J. The effect of variation on fitness. The American naturalist. 1937;71(735):337–49.

5. Avery PJ. The population genetics of haplo-diploids and X-linked genes. Genetical Research. 1984;44(3):321–41.

6. Charlesworth B, Coyne JA, Barton NH. The relative rates of evolution of sex chromosomes and autosomes. The American naturalist. 1987;130(1):113–46.

7. Orr HA, Betancourt AJ. Haldane’s sieve and adaptation from the standing genetic variation. Genetics. 2001;157:875–84. 11157004

8. Hill WG, Robertson A. The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genetical Research. 1966;8(3):269–94. 5980116

9. Charlesworth B, Morgan M, Charlesworth D. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics. 1993;134(4):1289–303. 8375663

10. Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D. Elements of Evolutionary Genetics. Roberts and Company Publishers; 2010.

11. Cutter AD, Payseur BA. Genomic signatures of selection at linked sites: unifying the disparity among species. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2013;69:1172–85.

12. Charlesworth B. The effect of life-history and mode of inheritance on neutral genetic variability. Genetical Research. 2001;77:153–66. 11355571

13. Kidwell JF, Clegg MT, Stewart FM. Regions of stable equilibria for models of differential selection in the two sexes under random mating. Genetics. 1977;85:171–83. 838269

14. Rice WR. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution. 1984;38(4):735–42.

15. Prout T. How well does opposing selection maintain variation? In: Singh RS, CB K, editors. Evolutionary Genetics: from molecules to morphology. Cambridge University Press; 2000. pp. 157–81.

16. Fry JD. The genomic location of sexually antagonistic variation: some cautionary comments. Evolution. 2009;64:1510–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00898.x 19922443

17. Fisher RA. The evolution of dominance. Biological Reviews. 1931;6:345–68.

18. Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D. Sex differences in fitness and selection for centric fusions between sex-chromosomes and autosomes. Genetical Research. 1980;35(2):205–14. 6930353

19. Fairbairn DJ, Roff DA. The quantitative genetics of sexual dimorphism: assessing the importance of sex-linkage. Heredity. 2006;97(5):319–28. 16941018

20. Connallon T, Clark AG. Association between sex-biased gene expression and mutations with sex-specific phenotypic consequences in Drosophila. Genome Biology and Evolution. 2011;3:151–5. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evr004 21292631

21. Morrow EH, Connallon T. Implications of sex-specific selection for the genetic basis of disease. Evol Appl. 2013;6(8):1208–17. doi: 10.1111/eva.12097 24478802

22. Connallon T, Clark AG. Sex linkage, sex-specific selection, and the role of recombination in the evolution of sexually dimorphic gene expression. Evolution;. 2010;64(12):3417–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01136.x 20874735

23. Turelli M, Orr HA. Dominance, epistasis and the genetics of postzygotic isolation. Genetics. 2000;154(4):1663–79. 10747061

24. Kirkpatrick M, Hall DW. Male‐biased mutation, sex linkage, and the rate of adaptive evolution. Evolution. 2004;58(2):437–40. 15068360

25. Mank JE. Sex chromosome dosage compensation: definitely not for everyone. Trends in genetics. 2013;29:677–83. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2013.07.005 23953923

26. Carrel L, Willard HF. X-inactivation profile reveals extensive variability in X-linked gene expression in females. Nature. 2005;434:400–4. 15772666

27. Yang F, Babak T, Shendure J, Disteche CM. Global survey of escape from X inactivation by RNA-sequencing in mouse. Genome Research. 2010;20(5):614–22. doi: 10.1101/gr.103200.109 20363980

28. Vicoso B, Emerson JJ, Zektser Y, Mahajan S, Bachtrog D. Comparative sex chromosome genetics in snakes: Differentiation, evolutionary strata and lack of dosage compensation. PLoS Biology. 2013;11(8):e1001643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001643 24015111

29. Meisel RP, Malone JH, Clark AG. Faster-X evolution of Gene Expression in Drosophila. PLoS Genetics. 2012;8(10):e1003013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003013 23071459

30. Mackay TFC, Richards S, Stone EA, Barbadilla A, Ayroles JF, Zhu D, et al. The Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel. Nature. 2012;482(7384):173–8. doi: 10.1038/nature10811 22318601

31. Langley C, Stevens K, Cardeno C, Lee YC, Schrider D, Pool JE, et al. Population genomics of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2012;192:533–98. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.142018 22673804

32. Ayroles JF, Carbone MA, Stone EA, Jordan KW, Lyman RF, Magwire MM, et al. Systems genetics of complex traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature Genetics. 2009;41(3):299–307. doi: 10.1038/ng.332 19234471

33. Cowley DE, Atchley WR, Rutledge JJ. Quantitative genetics of Drosophila melanogaster I. Sexual dimorphism in genetic parameters for wing traits. Genetics. 1986;114:549–66. 17246348

34. Cowley DE, Atchley WR. Quantitative genetics of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Heritabilities and genetic correlations between sexes for head and thorax traits. Genetics. 1988;119:421–33. 17246429

35. Gibson JR, Chippindale AK, Rice WR. The X chromosome is a hot spot for sexually antagonistic fitness variation. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002;269:499–505.

36. Innocenti P, Morrow EH. The Sexually Antagonistic Genes of Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Biology. 2010;8(3):e1000335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000335 20305719

37. Parisi M, Nuttall R, Naiman D, Bouffard G, Malley J, Andrews J, et al. Paucity of genes on the Drosophila X chromosome showing male-biased expression. Science. 2003;299:697–700. 12511656

38. Ranz JM, Castillo-Davis CI, Meiklejohn CD, Hartl DL. Sex-dependent gene expression and evolution of the Drosophila transcriptome. Science. 2003;300:1742–5. 12805547

39. Meiklejohn CD, Presgraves DC. Little Evidence for Demasculinization of the Drosophila X Chromosome among Genes Expressed in the Male Germline. Genome Biology and Evolution. 2012;4(10):895–904.

40. Ellegren H, Parsch J. The evolution of sex-biased genes and sex-biased gene expression. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2007;8:689–98. 17680007

41. Dean R, Mank JE. The role of sex chromosomes in sexual dimorphism: discordance between molecular and phenotypic data. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2014;27:1443–53. 25105198

42. Griffin RM, Dean R, Grace JL, Ryden P, Friberg U. The shared genome Is a pervasive constraint on the evolution of sex-biased gene expression. Molecular biology and evolution. 2013;30:2168–76. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst121 23813981

43. Chenoweth SF, Rundle HD, Blows MW. Genetic Constraints and the Evolution of Display Trait Sexual Dimorphism by Natural and Sexual Selection. The American naturalist. 2008;171(1):22–34. doi: 10.1086/523946 18171148

44. Massouras ET, Waszak SM, Albarca-Aguilera M, Hens K, Holcombe W, Ayroles JF, et al. Genomic Variation and Its Impact on Gene Expression in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genetics. 2012;8(11):e1003055. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003055 23189034

45. Conrad T, Akhtar A. Dosage compensation in Drosophila melanogaster- epigenetic fine-tuning of chromosome-wide transcription. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2012;13(2):123–34. doi: 10.1038/nrg3124 22251873

46. Straub T, Zabel A, Gilfillan GD, Feller C, Becker PB. Different chromatin interfaces of the Drosophila dosage compensation complex revealed by high-shear ChIP-seq. Genome Research. 2013;23(3):473–85. doi: 10.1101/gr.146407.112 23233545

47. Meiklejohn CD, Landeen EL, Cook JM, Kingan SB, Presgraves DC. Sex Chromosome-Specific Regulation in the Drosophila Male Germline But Little Evidence for Chromosomal Dosage Compensation or Meiotic Inactivation. PLoS Biology. 2011;9(8):e1001126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001126 21857805

48. Chintapalli VR, Wang J, Dow JA. Using FlyAtlas to identify better Drosophila melanogaster models of human disease. Nature Genetics. 2007;39(6):715–20. 17534367

49. Bachtrog D, Toda NRT, Lockton S. Dosage Compensation and Demasculinization of X Chromosomes in Drosophila. Current biology. 2010;20(16):1476–81. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.076 20705467

50. Vensko SP, Stone EA. No Evidence for a Global Male-Specific Lethal Complex-Mediated Dosage Compensation Contribution to the Demasculinization of the Drosophila melanogaster X Chromosome. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(8):e103659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103659 25093841

51. Yang X, Schadt EE, Wang S, Wang H, Arnold AP, Ingram-Drake L, et al. Tissue-specfic expression and regulation of sexually dimorphic genes in mice. Genome Research. 2006;16:995–1004. 16825664

52. Mank JE, Hultin-Rosenberg L, Zwahlen M, Ellegren H. Pleiotropic constraint hampers the resolution of sexual antagonism in vertebrate gene expression. The American naturalist. 2008;171(1):35–43. doi: 10.1086/523954 18171149

53. Catalan A, Hutter S, Parsch J. Population and sex differences in Drosophila melanogaster brain gene expression. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:654. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-654 23170910

54. Chang PL, Dunham JP, Nuzhdin SV, Arbeitman MN. Somatic sex-specific transcriptome differences in Drosophila revealed by whole transcriptome sequencing. BMC Genomics. 2011;12(1):364.

55. Park JH, Gail MH, Weinberg CR, Carroll RJ, Chung C, Wang Z, et al. Distribution of allele frequencies and effect sizes and their interrelationships for common genetic susceptibility variants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(44):18026–31. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1114759108 22003128

56. Williams TM, Carroll SB. Genetic and molecular insights into the development and evolution of sexual dimorphism. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2009;10:797–805. doi: 10.1038/nrg2687 19834484

57. Christiansen AE, Keisman EL, Ahmad SM, Baker BS. Sex comes in from the cold: the integration of sex and pattern. Trends in genetics. 2002;18:510–6. 12350340

58. Dean R, Perry JC, Pizzari T, Mank JE, Wigby S. Experimental evolution of a novel sexually antagonistic allele. PLoS Genetics. 2012;8(8):e1002917. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002917 22956914

59. Bedford T, Hartl DL. Optimization of gene expression by natural selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(4):1133–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812009106 19139403

60. Simmons MJ, Crow JF. Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations. Annual Review of Genetics. 1977;11:49–78. 413473

61. Lynch M, Walsh B. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer; 1998.

62. Orr HA. The population genetics of beneficial mutations. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010;365(1544):1195–201. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0282 20308094

63. Wright AE, Mank JE. The scope and strength of sex-specific selection in genome evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2013;26(9):1841–54. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12201 23848139

64. Meisel RP, Connallon T. The faster-X effect: integrating theory and data. Trends in Genetics. 2013;29(9):537–44. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2013.05.009 23790324

65. Thornton K. X chromosomes and autosomes evolve at similar rates in Drosophila: No evidence for faster-X protein evolution. Genome Research. 2006;16(4):498–504. 16520459

66. Hu TT, Eisen MB, Thornton KR, Andolfatto P. A second-generation assembly of the Drosophila simulans genome provides new insights into patterns of lineage-specific divergence. Genome Research. 2013;23(1):89–98. doi: 10.1101/gr.141689.112 22936249

67. Goldman TD, Arbeitman MN. Genomic and functional studies of Drosophila sex hierarchy regulated gene expression in adult head and nervous system. PLoS Genetics. 2007;3(11):2278–95.

68. Wijchers PJ, Festenstein RJ. Epigenetic regulation of autosomal gene expression by sex chromosomes. Trends in genetics. 2011;27(4):132–40. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2011.01.004 21334089

69. Arnold AP. The end of gonad-centric sex determination in mammals. Trends in genetics. 2012;28(2):55–61. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2011.10.004 22078126

70. Lemos B, Araripe LO, Hartl DL. Polymorphic Y chromosomes harbor cryptic variation with manifold functional consequences. Science. 2008;319(5859):91–3. doi: 10.1126/science.1148861 18174442

71. Davies W, Wilkinson LS. It is not all hormones: Alternative explanations for sexual differentiation of the brain. Brain Research. 2006;1126(1):36–45. 17101121

72. Rice W, Friberg U, Gavrilets S. Homosexuality as a consequence of epigenetically canalized sexual development. The Quaterly Review of Biology. 2012;87:343–68. 23397798

73. Arnold AP, Chen X, Link JC, Itoh Y, Reue K. Cell-autonomous sex determination outside of the gonad. Developmental Dynamics. 2013;242(4):371–9. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.23936 23361913

74. Itoh Y, Arnold AP. X chromosome regulation of autosomal gene expression in bovine blastocysts. Chromosoma. 2014;123:481–9. doi: 10.1007/s00412-014-0461-1 24817096

75. Erickson JW, Quintero JJ. Indirect effects of ploidy suggest X chromosome dose, not the XA ratio, signals sex in Drosophila. PLoS Biology. 2007;5(12):2821–30.

76. Schvarzstein M, Spence AM. The C. elegans Sex-Determining GLI Protein TRA-1A Is Regulated by Sex-Specific Proteolysis. Developmental Cell. 2006;11(5):733–40. 17084364

77. Starostina NG, Lim J-M, Schvarzstein M, Wells L, Spence AM, Kipreos ET. A CUL-2 Ubiquitin Ligase Containing Three FEM Proteins Degrades TRA-1 to Regulate C. elegans Sex Determination. Developmental Cell. 2007;13(1):127–39. 17609115

78. Zhang Y, Sturgill D, Parisi M, Kumar S, Oliver B. Constraint and turnover in sex-biased gene expression in the genus Drosophila. Nature. 2007;450(7167):233–7. 17994089

79. Meiklejohn CD, Coolon JD, Hartl DL, Wittkopp PJ. The roles of cis- and trans-regulation in the evolution of regulatory incompatibilities and sexually dimorphic gene expression. Genome Research. 2014;24(1):84–95. doi: 10.1101/gr.156414.113 24043293

80. Coolon JD, Webb W, Wittkopp PJ. Sex specific effects of cis-regulatory variants in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2013;195:1419–22. doi: 10.1534/genetics.113.156331 24097411

81. Parsch J, Ellegren H. The evolutionary causes and consequences of sex-biased gene expression. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2013;14:83–7. doi: 10.1038/nrg3376 23329110

82. Morris KV, Mattick JS. The rise of regulatory RNA. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2014;15:423–37. doi: 10.1038/nrg3722 24776770

83. Kim YK, Kim VN. Processing of intronic microRNAs. The EMBO Journal. 2007;26:775–83. 17255951

84. Rearick D, Prakash A, McSweeny A, Shepard SS, Fedorova L, Fedorov A. Critical association of ncRNA with introns. Nucleic Acids Research. 2011;39(6):2357–66. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1080 21071396

85. Ladewig E, Okamura K, Flynt AS, Westholm JO, Lai EC. Discovery of hundreds of mirtrons in mouse and human small RNA data. Genome Research. 2012;22:1634–45. doi: 10.1101/gr.133553.111 22955976

86. St Laurent G, Shtokalo D, Tackett MR, Yang Z, Eremina T, Wahlestedt C, et al. Intronic RNAs constitute the major fraction of the non-coding RNA in mammalian cells. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:504. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-504 23006825

87. Gardner EJ, Nizami ZF, Talbot C, Gall JG. Stable intronic sequence RNA (sisRNA), a new class of noncoding RNA from the oocyte nucleus of Xenopus tropicalis. Genes and development. 2012;26(22):2550–9. doi: 10.1101/gad.202184.112 23154985

88. Ruby JG, Calvin HJ, Bartel DP. Intronic microRNA precursors that bypass Drosha processing. Nature. 2007;448(7149):83–6. 17589500

89. Chung WJ, Agius P, Westholm JO, Chen M, Okamura K, Robine N, et al. Computational and experimental identification of mirtrons in Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans. Genome Research. 2011;21:286–300. doi: 10.1101/gr.113050.110 21177960

90. Huang ZP, Zhou H, He HL, Chen CL, Liang D, Qu LH. Genome-wide analyses of two families of snoRNA genes from Drosophila melanogaster, demonstrating the extensive utilization of introns for coding of snoRNAs. RNA. 2005;11(8):1303–16. 15987805

91. Reinius B, Shi C, Hengshuo L, Sandhu KS, Radomska KJ, Rosen GD, et al. Female biased expression of long non-coding RNAs in domains that escape X-inactivation in mouse. BMC Genomics. 2010;11(1):614.

92. Lopes AM, Arnold-Croop SE, Amorim A, Carrel L. Clustered transcripts that escape X inactivation at mouse XqD. Mamm Genome. 2011;22(9–10):572–82. doi: 10.1007/s00335-011-9357-z 21953412

93. Irizarry RA, Bolstad BM, Collin F, Cope LM, Hobbs B, Speed TP. Summaries of affymetrix GeneChip probe level data. Nucleic Acids Research. 2003;31(4):e15. 12582260

94. Bryois J, Buil A, Evans DM, Kemp JP, Montgomery SB, Conrad DF, et al. Cis and Trans Effects of Human Genomic Variants on Gene Expression. PLoS Genetics. 2014;10(7):e1004461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004461 25010687

95. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2011. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/

Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicína

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Genetics


2015 Číslo 2
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Získaná hemofilie - Povědomí o nemoci a její diagnostika
nový kurz

Eozinofilní granulomatóza s polyangiitidou
Autori: doc. MUDr. Martina Doubková, Ph.D.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#