1. SlagsvoldT, PattniK, MalerodL, StenmarkH (2006) Endosomal and non-endosomal functions of ESCRT proteins. Trends Cell Biol 16: 317–326.
2. BieniaszPD (2006) Late budding domains and host proteins in enveloped virus release. Virology 344: 55–63.
3. CarltonJG, Martin-SerranoJ (2009) The ESCRT machinery: new functions in viral and cellular biology. Biochem Soc Trans 37: 195–199.
4. ChenBJ, LambRA (2008) Mechanisms for enveloped virus budding: can some viruses do without an ESCRT? Virology 372: 221–232.
5. VottelerJ, SundquistWI (2013) Virus budding and the ESCRT pathway. Cell Host Microbe 14: 232–241.
6. WelschS, MullerB, KrausslichHG (2007) More than one door - Budding of enveloped viruses through cellular membranes. FEBS Lett 581: 2089–2097.
7. HorganCP, HanscomSR, KellyEE, McCaffreyMW (2012) Tumor susceptibility gene 101 (TSG101) is a novel binding-partner for the class II Rab11-FIPs. PLoS One 7: e32030.
8. MoritaE, SandrinV, ChungHY, MorhamSG, GygiSP, et al. (2007) Human ESCRT and ALIX proteins interact with proteins of the midbody and function in cytokinesis. EMBO J 26: 4215–4227.
9. TuC, Ortega-CavaCF, WinogradP, StantonMJ, ReddiAL, et al. (2010) Endosomal-sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT) pathway-dependent endosomal traffic regulates the localization of active Src at focal adhesions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 16107–16112.
10. AmitI, YakirL, KatzM, ZwangY, MarmorMD, et al. (2004) Tal, a Tsg101-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase, regulates receptor endocytosis and retrovirus budding. Genes Dev 18: 1737–1752.
11. FengGH, LihCJ, CohenSN (2000) TSG101 protein steady-state level is regulated posttranslationally by an evolutionarily conserved COOH-terminal sequence. Cancer Res 60: 1736–1741.
12. JiaoJ, SunK, WalkerWP, BagherP, CotaCD, et al. (2009) Abnormal regulation of TSG101 in mice with spongiform neurodegeneration. Biochim Biophys Acta 1792: 1027–1035.
13. KimBY, OlzmannJA, BarshGS, ChinLS, LiL (2007) Spongiform neurodegeneration-associated E3 ligase Mahogunin ubiquitylates TSG101 and regulates endosomal trafficking. Mol Biol Cell 18: 1129–1142.
14. McDonaldB, Martin-SerranoJ (2008) Regulation of Tsg101 expression by the steadiness box: a role of Tsg101-associated ligase. Mol Biol Cell 19: 754–763.
15. MalerodL, PedersenNM, Sem WegnerCE, LobertVH, LeitheE, et al. (2011) Cargo-dependent degradation of ESCRT-I as a feedback mechanism to modulate endosomal sorting. Traffic 12: 1211–1226.
16. Sanchez A GT, Feldmann H (2007) Filoviridae: Marburg and Ebola viruses. In: Knipe DM HP, editor. Fields Virology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Williams. pp. 1409–1448.
17. BradfuteSB, DyeJMJr, BavariS (2011) Filovirus vaccines. Hum Vaccin 7: 701–711.
18. BharatTA, RichesJD, KolesnikovaL, WelschS, KrahlingV, et al. (2011) Cryo-electron tomography of Marburg virus particles and their morphogenesis within infected cells. PLoS Biol 9: e1001196.
19. MühlbergerE, LotferingB, KlenkHD, BeckerS (1998) Three of the four nucleocapsid proteins of Marburg virus, NP, VP35, and L, are sufficient to mediate replication and transcription of Marburg virus-specific monocistronic minigenomes. J Virol 72: 8756–8764.
20. FeldmannH, VolchkovVE, VolchkovaVA, StroherU, KlenkHD (2001) Biosynthesis and role of filoviral glycoproteins. J Gen Virol 82: 2839–2848.
21. GeisbertTW, JahrlingPB (1995) Differentiation of filoviruses by electron microscopy. Virus Res 39: 129–150.
22. KolesnikovaL, MuhlbergerE, RyabchikovaE, BeckerS (2000) Ultrastructural organization of recombinant Marburg virus nucleoprotein: comparison with Marburg virus inclusions. J Virol 74: 3899–3904.
23. HoenenT, ShabmanRS, GrosethA, HerwigA, WeberM, et al. (2012) Inclusion bodies are a site of ebolavirus replication. J Virol 86: 11779–11788.
24. DolnikO, KolesnikovaL, BeckerS (2008) Filoviruses: Interactions with the host cell. Cell Mol Life Sci 65: 756–776.
25. KolesnikovaL, BerghoferB, BambergS, BeckerS (2004) Multivesicular bodies as a platform for formation of the Marburg virus envelope. J Virol 78: 12277–12287.
26. SchudtG, KolesnikovaL, DolnikO, SodeikB, BeckerS (2013) Live-cell imaging of Marburg virus-infected cells uncovers actin-dependent transport of nucleocapsids over long distances. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: 14402–14407.
27. KolesnikovaL, BohilAB, CheneyRE, BeckerS (2007) Budding of Marburgvirus is associated with filopodia. Cell Microbiol 9: 939–951.
28. WelschS, KolesnikovaL, KrahlingV, RichesJD, BeckerS, et al. (2010) Electron tomography reveals the steps in filovirus budding. PLoS Pathog 6: e1000875.
29. KolesnikovaL, StreckerT, MoritaE, ZieleckiF, MittlerE, et al. (2009) Vacuolar protein sorting pathway contributes to the release of Marburg virus. J Virol 83: 2327–2337.
30. UrataS, NodaT, KawaokaY, MorikawaS, YokosawaH, et al. (2007) Interaction of Tsg101 with Marburg virus VP40 depends on the PPPY motif, but not the PT/SAP motif as in the case of Ebola virus, and Tsg101 plays a critical role in the budding of Marburg virus-like particles induced by VP40, NP, and GP. J Virol 81: 4895–4899.
31. DolnikO, KolesnikovaL, StevermannL, BeckerS (2010) Tsg101 is recruited by a late domain of the nucleocapsid protein to support budding of Marburg virus-like particles. J Virol 84: 7847–7856.
32. MorrisCR, StantonMJ, MantheyKC, OhKB, WagnerKU (2012) A knockout of the Tsg101 gene leads to decreased expression of ErbB receptor tyrosine kinases and induction of autophagy prior to cell death. PLoS One 7: e34308.
33. MittlerE, KolesnikovaL, HerwigA, DolnikO, BeckerS (2013) Assembly of the Marburg virus envelope. Cell Microbiol 15: 270–284.
34. BeckerS, RinneC, HofsassU, KlenkHD, MühlbergerE (1998) Interactions of Marburg virus nucleocapsid proteins. Virology 249: 406–417.
35. RemyI, GalarneauA, MichnickSW (2002) Detection and visualization of protein interactions with protein fragment complementation assays. Methods Mol Biol 185: 447–459.
36. MacDonaldML, LamerdinJ, OwensS, KeonBH, BilterGK, et al. (2006) Identifying off-target effects and hidden phenotypes of drugs in human cells. Nat Chem Biol 2: 329–337.
37. DussuptV, JavidMP, Abou-JaoudeG, JadwinJA, de La CruzJ, et al. (2009) The nucleocapsid region of HIV-1 Gag cooperates with the PTAP and LYPXnL late domains to recruit the cellular machinery necessary for viral budding. PLoS Pathog 5: e1000339.
38. GottlingerHG, DorfmanT, SodroskiJG, HaseltineWA (1991) Effect of mutations affecting the p6 gag protein on human immunodeficiency virus particle release. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88: 3195–3199.
39. JayakarHR, MurtiKG, WhittMA (2000) Mutations in the PPPY motif of vesicular stomatitis virus matrix protein reduce virus budding by inhibiting a late step in virion release. J Virol 74: 9818–9827.
40. ObiangL, RauxH, OuldaliM, BlondelD, GaudinY (2011) Phenotypes of vesicular stomatitis virus mutants with mutations in the PSAP motif of the matrix protein. J Gen Virol
41. WirblichC, TanGS, PapaneriA, GodlewskiPJ, OrensteinJM, et al. (2008) PPEY motif within the rabies virus (RV) matrix protein is essential for efficient virion release and RV pathogenicity. J Virol 82: 9730–9738.
42. KolesnikovaL, MittlerE, SchudtG, Shams-EldinH, BeckerS (2012) Phosphorylation of Marburg virus matrix protein VP40 triggers assembly of nucleocapsids with the viral envelope at the plasma membrane. Cell Microbiol 14: 182–197.
43. AggarwalA, IemmaTL, ShihI, NewsomeTP, McAlleryS, et al. (2012) Mobilization of HIV spread by diaphanous 2 dependent filopodia in infected dendritic cells. PLoS Pathog 8: e1002762.
44. LehmannMJ, ShererNM, MarksCB, PypaertM, MothesW (2005) Actin- and myosin-driven movement of viruses along filopodia precedes their entry into cells. J Cell Biol 170: 317–325.
45. ShererNM, LehmannMJ, Jimenez-SotoLF, HorensavitzC, PypaertM, et al. (2007) Retroviruses can establish filopodial bridges for efficient cell-to-cell transmission. Nat Cell Biol 9: 310–315.
46. BrandtDT, GrosseR (2007) Get to grips: steering local actin dynamics with IQGAPs. EMBO Rep 8: 1019–1023.
47. Pelikan-ConchaudronA, Le ClaincheC, DidryD, CarlierMF (2011) The IQGAP1 protein is a calmodulin-regulated barbed end capper of actin filaments: possible implications in its function in cell migration. J Biol Chem 286: 35119–35128.
48. GladueDP, HolinkaLG, Fernandez-SainzIJ, PraratMV, O'DonnellV, et al. (2011) Interaction between Core protein of classical swine fever virus with cellular IQGAP1 protein appears essential for virulence in swine. Virology 412: 68–74.
49. LeungJ, YuehA, AppahFSJr, YuanB, de los SantosK, et al. (2006) Interaction of Moloney murine leukemia virus matrix protein with IQGAP. EMBO J 25: 2155–2166.
50. LuJ, QuY, LiuY, JambusariaR, HanZ, et al. (2013) Host IQGAP1 and Ebola virus VP40 interactions facilitate virus-like particle egress. J Virol 87: 7777–7780.
51. LiuY, LeeMS, OlsonMA, HartyRN (2011) Bimolecular Complementation to Visualize Filovirus VP40-Host Complexes in Live Mammalian Cells: Toward the Identification of Budding Inhibitors. Adv Virol 2011.
52. RenX, HurleyJH (2011) Proline-rich regions and motifs in trafficking: from ESCRT interaction to viral exploitation. Traffic 12: 1282–1290.
53. UrataS, YasudaJ Regulation of Marburg virus (MARV) budding by Nedd4.1: a different WW domain of Nedd4.1 is critical for binding to MARV and Ebola virus VP40. J Gen Virol 91: 228–234.
54. RauchS, Martin-SerranoJ (2011) Multiple interactions between the ESCRT machinery and arrestin-related proteins: implications for PPXY-dependent budding. J Virol 85: 3546–3556.
55. DemirovDG, OnoA, OrensteinJM, FreedEO (2002) Overexpression of the N-terminal domain of TSG101 inhibits HIV-1 budding by blocking late domain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 955–960.
56. ImYJ, KuoL, RenX, BurgosPV, ZhaoXZ, et al. (2010) Crystallographic and functional analysis of the ESCRT-I/HIV-1 Gag PTAP interaction. Structure 18: 1536–1547.
57. DaveyNE, TraveG, GibsonTJ (2011) How viruses hijack cell regulation. Trends Biochem Sci 36: 159–169.
58. MateerSC, McDanielAE, NicolasV, HabermacherGM, LinMJ, et al. (2002) The mechanism for regulation of the F-actin binding activity of IQGAP1 by calcium/calmodulin. J Biol Chem 277: 12324–12333.
59. NabhanJF, HuR, OhRS, CohenSN, LuQ (2012) Formation and release of arrestin domain-containing protein 1-mediated microvesicles (ARMMs) at plasma membrane by recruitment of TSG101 protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 4146–4151.
60. KrahlingV, DolnikO, KolesnikovaL, Schmidt-ChanasitJ, JordanI, et al. (2010) Establishment of fruit bat cells (Rousettus aegyptiacus) as a model system for the investigation of filoviral infection. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4: e802.
61. Hierholzer JC, and R. A. Killington (1996) Virus isolation and quantitation; Kangro BWMaHO, editor. London, United Kingdom: Academic Press Limited 36–38 p.
62. KolesnikovaL, BambergS, BerghoferB, BeckerS (2004) The matrix protein of Marburg virus is transported to the plasma membrane along cellular membranes: exploiting the retrograde late endosomal pathway. J Virol 78: 2382–2393.
63. MastronardeDN (2005) Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J Struct Biol 152: 36–51.
64. KremerJR, MastronardeDN, McIntoshJR (1996) Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J Struct Biol 116: 71–76.
65. WeibelER, KistlerGS, ScherleWF (1966) Practical stereological methods for morphometric cytology. J Cell Biol 30: 23–38.