Single Nucleotide Variants in Transcription Factors Associate More Tightly with Phenotype than with Gene Expression

English version České info

There have been major efforts in the study of human disease to identify genetic polymorphisms that cause changes in gene expression. The assumption underlying these studies is that gene expression changes will be responsible for the disease. However, it is unclear if we can predict how a polymorphism affects the variation in disease based on the extent to which it explains variation in gene expression. We have taken advantage of four genetic polymorphisms that affect the ability of budding yeast cells to form spores. The variants were identified in naturally occurring strains, subject to natural selection pressures in the wild, and not from lab strains. These variants lie in factors that control gene expression, which gives us power to compare how the polymorphisms affect variation in both gene expression and the downstream phenotype. We find that the amount of variation in gene expression explained by the variants does not correlate with the amount of variation observed in spore formation, which has implications for studies that attempt to infer the effect of a polymorphism on phenotypic variation by studying its effect on gene expression variation.

Vyšlo v časopise: Single Nucleotide Variants in Transcription Factors Associate More Tightly with Phenotype than with Gene Expression. PLoS Genet 10(5): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004325
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004325

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. StrangerBE, StahlEA, RajT (2011) Progress and promise of genome-wide association studies for human complex trait genetics. Genetics 187 : 367–383.

2. LitiG, LouisEJ (2012) Advances in quantitative trait analysis in yeast. PLoS Genet 8: e1002912.

3. FlintJ, MackayTF (2009) Genetic architecture of quantitative traits in mice, flies, and humans. Genome Res 19 : 723–733.

4. MauranoMT, HumbertR, RynesE, ThurmanRE, HaugenE, et al. (2012) Systematic localization of common disease-associated variation in regulatory DNA. Science 337 : 1190–1195.

5. BremRB, YvertG, ClintonR, KruglyakL (2002) Genetic dissection of transcriptional regulation in budding yeast. Science 296 : 752–755.

6. CheungVG, ConlinLK, WeberTM, ArcaroM, JenKY, et al. (2003) Natural variation in human gene expression assessed in lymphoblastoid cells. Nat Genet 33 : 422–425.

7. BremRB, KruglyakL (2005) The landscape of genetic complexity across 5,700 gene expression traits in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102 : 1572–1577.

8. GagneurJ, StegleO, ZhuC, JakobP, TekkedilMM, et al. (2013) Genotype-environment interactions reveal causal pathways that mediate genetic effects on phenotype. PLoS Genet 9: e1003803.

9. SmithEN, KruglyakL (2008) Gene-environment interaction in yeast gene expression. PLoS Biol 6: e83.

10. YvertG, BremRB, WhittleJ, AkeyJM, FossE, et al. (2003) Trans-acting regulatory variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the role of transcription factors. Nat Genet 35 : 57–64.

11. NicaAC, DermitzakisET (2013) Expression quantitative trait loci: present and future. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 368 : 20120362.

12. GiladY, RifkinSA, PritchardJK (2008) Revealing the architecture of gene regulation: the promise of eQTL studies. Trends Genet 24 : 408–415.

13. MajewskiJ, PastinenT (2011) The study of eQTL variations by RNA-seq: from SNPs to phenotypes. Trends Genet 27 : 72–79.

14. JansenRC, NapJP (2001) Genetical genomics: the added value from segregation. Trends Genet 17 : 388–391.

15. CurtisC, ShahSP, ChinSF, TurashviliG, RuedaOM, et al. (2012) The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups. Nature 486 : 346–352.

16. NicolaeDL, GamazonE, ZhangW, DuanS, DolanME, et al. (2010) Trait-associated SNPs are more likely to be eQTLs: annotation to enhance discovery from GWAS. PLoS Genet 6: e1000888.

17. LiQ, SeoJH, StrangerB, McKennaA, Pe'erI, et al. (2013) Integrative eQTL-based analyses reveal the biology of breast cancer risk loci. Cell 152 : 633–641.

18. GrundbergE, SmallKS, HedmanAK, NicaAC, BuilA, et al. (2012) Mapping cis -⁠ and trans-regulatory effects across multiple tissues in twins. Nat Genet 44 : 1084–1089.

19. CooksonW, LiangL, AbecasisG, MoffattM, LathropM (2009) Mapping complex disease traits with global gene expression. Nat Rev Genet 10 : 184–194.

20. GerkeJP, ChenCT, CohenBA (2006) Natural isolates of Saccharomyces cerevisiae display complex genetic variation in sporulation efficiency. Genetics 174 : 985–997.

21. HonigbergSM, PurnapatreK (2003) Signal pathway integration in the switch from the mitotic cell cycle to meiosis in yeast. J Cell Sci 116 : 2137–2147.

22. KassirY, AdirN, Boger-NadjarE, RavivNG, Rubin-BejeranoI, et al. (2003) Transcriptional regulation of meiosis in budding yeast. Int Rev Cytol 224 : 111–171.

23. VershonAK, PierceM (2000) Transcriptional regulation of meiosis in yeast. Curr Opin Cell Biol 12 : 334–339.

24. DeutschbauerAM, DavisRW (2005) Quantitative trait loci mapped to single-nucleotide resolution in yeast. Nat Genet 37 : 1333–1340.

25. Ben-AriG, ZenvirthD, ShermanA, DavidL, KlutsteinM, et al. (2006) Four linked genes participate in controlling sporulation efficiency in budding yeast. PLoS Genet 2: e195.

26. TomarP, BhatiaA, RamdasS, DiaoL, BhanotG, et al. (2013) Sporulation genes associated with sporulation efficiency in natural isolates of yeast. PLoS One 8: e69765.

27. GerkeJ, LorenzK, CohenB (2009) Genetic interactions between transcription factors cause natural variation in yeast. Science 323 : 498–501.

28. GerkeJ, LorenzK, RamnarineS, CohenB (2010) Gene-environment interactions at nucleotide resolution. PLoS Genet 6: e1001144.

29. SmithHE, DriscollSE, SiaRA, YuanHE, MitchellAP (1993) Genetic evidence for transcriptional activation by the yeast IME1 gene product. Genetics 133 : 775–784.

30. Rubin-BejeranoI, MandelS, RobzykK, KassirY (1996) Induction of meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends on conversion of the transcriptional represssor Ume6 to a positive regulator by its regulated association with the transcriptional activator Ime1. Mol Cell Biol 16 : 2518–2526.

31. CovitzPA, MitchellAP (1993) Repression by the yeast meiotic inhibitor RME1. Genes Dev 7 : 1598–1608.

32. LuL, RobertsG, SimonK, YuJ, HudsonAP (2003) Rsf1p, a protein required for respiratory growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 43 : 263–272.

33. RobertsGG3rd, HudsonAP (2009) Rsf1p is required for an efficient metabolic shift from fermentative to glycerol-based respiratory growth in S. cerevisiae. Yeast 26 : 95–110.

34. JambhekarA, AmonA (2008) Control of meiosis by respiration. Curr Biol 18 : 969–975.

35. MitchellAP, DriscollSE, SmithHE (1990) Positive control of sporulation-specific genes by the IME1 and IME2 products in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 10 : 2104–2110.

36. WangZ, GersteinM, SnyderM (2009) RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet 10 : 57–63.

37. LevinJZ, YassourM, AdiconisX, NusbaumC, ThompsonDA, et al. (2010) Comprehensive comparative analysis of strand-specific RNA sequencing methods. Nat Methods 7 : 709–715.

38. ToungJM, MorleyM, LiM, CheungVG (2011) RNA-sequence analysis of human B-cells. Genome Res 21 : 991–998.

39. AndersenG, BjornbergO, PolakovaS, PynyahaY, RasmussenA, et al. (2008) A second pathway to degrade pyrimidine nucleic acid precursors in eukaryotes. J Mol Biol 380 : 656–666.

40. DengC, SaundersWS (2001) RIM4 encodes a meiotic activator required for early events of meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Genet Genomics 266 : 497–504.

41. Garcia-AlvarezN, TeichertU, WolfDH (1987) Proteinase yscD mutants of yeast. Isolation and characterization. Eur J Biochem 163 : 339–346.

42. SmithHE, SuSS, NeigebornL, DriscollSE, MitchellAP (1990) Role of IME1 expression in regulation of meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 10 : 6103–6113.

43. CheungVG, SpielmanRS (2009) Genetics of human gene expression: mapping DNA variants that influence gene expression. Nat Rev Genet 10 : 595–604.

44. OrozcoLD, BennettBJ, FarberCR, GhazalpourA, PanC, et al. (2012) Unraveling inflammatory responses using systems genetics and gene-environment interactions in macrophages. Cell 151 : 658–670.

45. RockmanMV, KruglyakL (2006) Genetics of global gene expression. Nat Rev Genet 7 : 862–872.

46. WaddingtonCH (1942) Canalization of development and the inheritance of acquired characters. Nature 150 : 563–565.

47. AriasAM, HaywardP (2006) Filtering transcriptional noise during development: concepts and mechanisms. Nat Rev Genet 7 : 34–44.

48. FuJ, KeurentjesJJ, BouwmeesterH, AmericaT, VerstappenFW, et al. (2009) System-wide molecular evidence for phenotypic buffering in Arabidopsis. Nat Genet 41 : 166–167.

49. RajA, RifkinSA, AndersenE, van OudenaardenA (2010) Variability in gene expression underlies incomplete penetrance. Nature 463 : 913–918.

50. ClemmonsAW, WassermanSA (2013) Combinatorial effects of transposable elements on gene expression and phenotypic robustness in Drosophila melanogaster development. G3 (Bethesda) 3 : 1531–1538.

51. RubinsteinA, GurevichV, Kasulin-BonehZ, PnueliL, KassirY, et al. (2007) Faithful modeling of transient expression and its application to elucidating negative feedback regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104 : 6241–6246.

52. AndersonSF, SteberCM, EspositoRE, ColemanJE (1995) UME6, a negative regulator of meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, contains a C-terminal Zn2Cys6 binuclear cluster that binds the URS1 DNA sequence in a zinc-dependent manner. Protein Sci 4 : 1832–1843.

53. HughesTR, MartonMJ, JonesAR, RobertsCJ, StoughtonR, et al. (2000) Functional discovery via a compendium of expression profiles. Cell 102 : 109–126.

54. WilhelmBT, LandryJR (2009) RNA-Seq-quantitative measurement of expression through massively parallel RNA-sequencing. Methods 48 : 249–257.

55. LangmeadB, TrapnellC, PopM, SalzbergSL (2009) Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol 10: R25.

56. AndersS, HuberW (2010) Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol 11: R106.

57. EdgarR, DomrachevM, LashAE (2002) Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res 30 : 207–210.

58. Team RC (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

59. BenjaminiY, HochbergY (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 57 : 289–300.

60. Huang daW, ShermanBT, LempickiRA (2009) Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res 37 : 1–13.

61. Huang daW, ShermanBT, ZhengX, YangJ, ImamichiT, et al. (2009) Extracting biological meaning from large gene lists with DAVID. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics Chapter 13: Unit 13 11.