Extensive Diversity of Prion Strains Is Defined by Differential Chaperone Interactions and Distinct Amyloidogenic Regions

English version České info

Protein conformational disorders, including many neurodegenerative diseases, result when a protein misfolds and undergoes a conformational change to form self-templating aggregates, called amyloid. Interestingly, the proteins that misfold in these diseases tend to form a wide variety of distinct aggregate structures. In prion diseases, these different amyloid conformations are called prion strains. The different conformations of prion strains are responsible for modulating disease progression, pathology, and transmission. Previous work with yeast prions has provided tremendous insight into how distinct prion conformers can cause such phenotypic variability. Here, we used a set of [RNQ+] prion variants to show the complex web of interactions involved in the propagation of distinct aggregate structures. We found that several different non-adjacent regions of Rnq1, even outside the prion-forming domain, make varying contributions to the propagation of distinct variants of the [RNQ+] prion. Moreover, our data support the hypothesis that the [RNQ+] variants differentially interact with the molecular chaperone Sis1. These data strongly suggest that the variable phenotypic manifestations of different aggregate conformations depend upon a unique set of primary structural elements and differential interactions with host cofactors.

Vyšlo v časopise: Extensive Diversity of Prion Strains Is Defined by Differential Chaperone Interactions and Distinct Amyloidogenic Regions. PLoS Genet 10(5): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004337
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004337

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. SelkoeDJ (2003) Folding proteins in fatal ways. Nature 426 : 900–904.

2. MillerG (2009) Neurodegeneration. Could they all be prion diseases? Science 326 : 1337–1339.

3. SotoC (2012) Transmissible Proteins: Expanding the Prion Heresy. Cell 149 : 968–977.

4. ColbyDW, PrusinerSB (2011) Prions. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 3: a006833.

5. PanKM, BaldwinM, NguyenJ, GassetM, SerbanA, et al. (1993) Conversion of alpha-helices into beta-sheets features in the formation of the scrapie prion proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90 : 10962–10966.

6. SawayaMR, SambashivanS, NelsonR, IvanovaMI, SieversSA, et al. (2007) Atomic structures of amyloid cross-beta spines reveal varied steric zippers. Nature 447 : 453–457.

7. WiltziusJJW, LandauM, NelsonR, SawayaMR, ApostolMI, et al. (2009) Molecular mechanisms for protein-encoded inheritance. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16 : 973–978.

8. PetkovaAT, LeapmanRD, GuoZ, YauW-M, MattsonMP, et al. (2005) Self-propagating, molecular-level polymorphism in Alzheimer's beta-amyloid fibrils. Science 307 : 262–265.

9. CollingeJ, ClarkeAR (2007) A general model of prion strains and their pathogenicity. Science 318 : 930–936.

10. GuoJL, CovellDJ, DanielsJP, IbaM, StieberA, et al. (2013) Distinct α-Synuclein Strains Differentially Promote Tau Inclusions in Neurons. Cell 154 : 103–117.

11. SafarJG (2012) Molecular pathogenesis of sporadic prion diseases in man. Prion 6 : 108–115.

12. LiebmanSW, ChernoffYO (2012) Prions in yeast. Genetics 191 : 1041–1072.

13. PatinoMM, LiuJJ, GloverJR, LindquistS (1996) Support for the prion hypothesis for inheritance of a phenotypic trait in yeast. Science 273 : 622–626.

14. PaushkinSV, KushnirovVV, SmirnovVN, Ter-AvanesyanMD (1996) Propagation of the yeast prion-like [psi+] determinant is mediated by oligomerization of the SUP35-encoded polypeptide chain release factor. EMBO J 15 : 3127–3134.

15. DerkatchIL, ChernoffYO, KushnirovVV, Inge-VechtomovSG, LiebmanSW (1996) Genesis and variability of [PSI] prion factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 144 : 1375–1386.

16. McGlincheyRP, KryndushkinD, WicknerRB (2011) Suicidal [PSI+] is a lethal yeast prion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108 : 5337–5341.

17. Kochneva-PervukhovaNV, ChechenovaMB, ValouevIA, KushnirovVV, SmirnovVN, et al. (2001) [Psi(+)] prion generation in yeast: characterization of the “strain” difference. Yeast 18 : 489–497.

18. LinJ-Y, LiaoT-Y, LeeH-C, KingC-Y (2011) Inter-Allelic Prion Propagation Reveals Conformational Relationships among a Multitude of [PSI] Strains. PLoS Genet 7: e1002297.

19. TanakaM, ChienP, NaberN, CookeR, WeissmanJS (2004) Conformational variations in an infectious protein determine prion strain differences. Nature 428 : 323–328.

20. TanakaM, CollinsSR, ToyamaBH, WeissmanJS (2006) The physical basis of how prion conformations determine strain phenotypes. Nature 442 : 585–589.

21. ToyamaBH, KellyMJS, GrossJD, WeissmanJS (2007) The structural basis of yeast prion strain variants. Nature 449 : 233–237.

22. KrishnanR, LindquistSL (2005) Structural insights into a yeast prion illuminate nucleation and strain diversity. Nature 435 : 765–772.

23. KingC-Y, Diaz-AvalosR (2004) Protein-only transmission of three yeast prion strains. Nature 428 : 319–323.

24. Ter-AvanesyanMD, KushnirovVV, DagkesamanskayaAR, DidichenkoSA, ChernoffYO, et al. (1993) Deletion analysis of the SUP35 gene of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals two non-overlapping functional regions in the encoded protein. Mol Microbiol 7 : 683–692.

25. Ter-AvanesyanMD, DagkesamanskayaAR, KushnirovVV, SmirnovVN (1994) The SUP35 omnipotent suppressor gene is involved in the maintenance of the non-Mendelian determinant [psi+] in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 137 : 671–676.

26. KingOD, GitlerAD, ShorterJ (2012) The tip of the iceberg: RNA-binding proteins with prion-like domains in neurodegenerative disease. Brain research 1462 : 61–80.

27. AlbertiS, HalfmannR, KingO, KapilaA, LindquistS (2009) A systematic survey identifies prions and illuminates sequence features of prionogenic proteins. Cell 137 : 146–158.

28. BradleyME, LiebmanSW (2004) The Sup35 domains required for maintenance of weak, strong or undifferentiated yeast [PSI+] prions. Mol Microbiol 51 : 1649–1659.

29. KryndushkinDS, AlexandrovIM, Ter-AvanesyanMD, KushnirovVV (2003) Yeast [PSI+] prion aggregates are formed by small Sup35 polymers fragmented by Hsp104. J Biol Chem 278 : 49636–49643.

30. ChangH-Y, LinJ-Y, LeeH-C, WangH-L, KingC-Y (2008) Strain-specific sequences required for yeast [PSI+] prion propagation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105 : 13345–13350.

31. LegnameG, NguyenH-OB, PeretzD, CohenFE, DeArmondSJ, et al. (2006) Continuum of prion protein structures enciphers a multitude of prion isolate-specified phenotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103 : 19105–19110.

32. ColbyDW, GilesK, LegnameG, WilleH, BaskakovIV, et al. (2009) Design and construction of diverse mammalian prion strains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106 : 20417–20422.

33. HuangVJ, SteinKC, TrueHL (2013) Spontaneous Variants of the [RNQ+] Prion in Yeast Demonstrate the Extensive Conformational Diversity Possible with Prion Proteins. PLoS ONE 8: e79582.

34. KalastavadiT, TrueHL (2010) Analysis of the [RNQ+] prion reveals stability of amyloid fibers as the key determinant of yeast prion variant propagation. J Biol Chem 285 : 20748–20755.

35. PeretzD, ScottMR, GrothD, WilliamsonRA, BurtonDR, et al. (2001) Strain-specified relative conformational stability of the scrapie prion protein. Protein Sci 10 : 854–863.

36. AyersJI, SchuttCR, ShikiyaRA, AguzziA, KincaidAE, et al. (2011) The strain-encoded relationship between PrP replication, stability and processing in neurons is predictive of the incubation period of disease. PLoS Pathog 7: e1001317.

37. CobbNJ, ApostolMI, ChenS, SmirnovasV, SurewiczWK (2014) Conformational Stability of Mammalian Prion Protein Amyloid Fibrils Is Dictated by a Packing Polymorphism within the Core Region. J Biol Chem 289 : 2643–2650.

38. DerkatchIL, BradleyME, MasseSV, ZadorskySP, PolozkovGV, et al. (2000) Dependence and independence of [PSI(+)] and [PIN(+)]: a two-prion system in yeast? EMBO J 19 : 1942–1952.

39. DerkatchIL, BradleyME, ZhouP, ChernoffYO, LiebmanSW (1997) Genetic and environmental factors affecting the de novo appearance of the [PSI+] prion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 147 : 507–519.

40. DerkatchIL, BradleyME, HongJY, LiebmanSW (2001) Prions affect the appearance of other prions: the story of [PIN(+)]. Cell 106 : 171–182.

41. OsherovichLZ, WeissmanJS (2001) Multiple Gln/Asn-rich prion domains confer susceptibility to induction of the yeast [PSI(+)] prion. Cell 106 : 183–194.

42. SondheimerN, LindquistS (2000) Rnq1: an epigenetic modifier of protein function in yeast. Mol Cell 5 : 163–172.

43. SteinKC, TrueHL (2011) The [RNQ+] prion: a model of both functional and pathological amyloid. Prion 5 : 291–298.

44. BradleyME, EdskesHK, HongJY, WicknerRB, LiebmanSW (2002) Interactions among prions and prion “strains” in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99 Suppl 4 : 16392–16399.

45. BradleyME, LiebmanSW (2003) Destabilizing interactions among [PSI(+)] and [PIN(+)] yeast prion variants. Genetics 165 : 1675–1685.

46. WestergardL, TrueHL (2014) Wild yeast harbour a variety of distinct amyloid structures with strong prion-inducing capabilities. Mol Microbiol 92 : 183–193.

47. DerkatchIL, UptainSM, OuteiroTF, KrishnanR, LindquistSL, et al. (2004) Effects of Q/N-rich, polyQ, and non-polyQ amyloids on the de novo formation of the [PSI+] prion in yeast and aggregation of Sup35 in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101 : 12934–12939.

48. VitrenkoYA, GrachevaEO, RichmondJE, LiebmanSW (2007) Visualization of aggregation of the Rnq1 prion domain and cross-seeding interactions with Sup35NM. J Biol Chem 282 : 1779–1787.

49. BardillJP, TrueHL (2009) Heterologous prion interactions are altered by mutations in the prion protein Rnq1p. J Mol Biol 388 : 583–596.

50. VitrenkoYA, PavonME, StoneSI, LiebmanSW (2007) Propagation of the [PIN+] prion by fragments of Rnq1 fused to GFP. Curr Genet 51 : 309–319.

51. BagriantsevS, LiebmanSW (2004) Specificity of prion assembly in vivo. [PSI+] and [PIN+] form separate structures in yeast. J Biol Chem 279 : 51042–51048.

52. SharmaJ, LiebmanSW (2013) Exploring the Basis of [PIN+] Variant Differences in [PSI+] Induction. J Mol Biol 425 : 3046–3059.

53. TiptonKA, VergesKJ, WeissmanJS (2008) In vivo monitoring of the prion replication cycle reveals a critical role for Sis1 in delivering substrates to Hsp104. Mol Cell 32 : 584–591.

54. SondheimerN, LopezN, CraigEA, LindquistS (2001) The role of Sis1 in the maintenance of the [RNQ+] prion. EMBO J 20 : 2435–2442.

55. AronR, HigurashiT, SahiC, CraigEA (2007) J-protein co-chaperone Sis1 required for generation of [RNQ+] seeds necessary for prion propagation. EMBO J 26 : 3794–3803.

56. BagriantsevSN, GrachevaEO, RichmondJE, LiebmanSW (2008) Variant-specific [PSI+] infection is transmitted by Sup35 polymers within [PSI+] aggregates with heterogeneous protein composition. Mol Biol Cell 19 : 2433–2443.

57. SerioTR, LindquistSL (2000) Protein-only inheritance in yeast: something to get [PSI+]-ched about. Trends Cell Biol 10 : 98–105.

58. UptainSM, SawickiGJ, CaugheyB, LindquistS (2001) Strains of [PSI(+)] are distinguished by their efficiencies of prion-mediated conformational conversion. EMBO J 20 : 6236–6245.

59. StansfieldI, JonesKM, TuiteMF (1995) The end in sight: terminating translation in eukaryotes. Trends Biochem Sci 20 : 489–491.

60. KabaniM, MelkiR (2011) Yeast prions assembly and propagation: contributions of the prion and non-prion moieties and the nature of assemblies. Prion 5 : 277–284.

61. ShibataS, KurahashiH, NakamuraY (2009) Localization of prion-destabilizing mutations in the N-terminal non-prion domain of Rnq1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Prion 3 : 250–258.

62. KurahashiH, PackC-G, ShibataS, OishiK, SakoY, et al. (2011) [PSI(+)] aggregate enlargement in rnq1 nonprion domain mutants, leading to a loss of prion in yeast. Genes Cells 16 : 576–589.

63. LiebmanSW, BagriantsevSN, DerkatchIL (2006) Biochemical and genetic methods for characterization of [PIN+] prions in yeast. METHODS 39 : 23–34.

64. Maurer-StrohS, DebulpaepM, KuemmererN, López de la PazM, MartinsIC, et al. (2010) Exploring the sequence determinants of amyloid structure using position-specific scoring matrices. Nat Chem Biol 7 : 237–242.

65. TartagliaGG, VendruscoloM (2008) The Zyggregator method for predicting protein aggregation propensities. Chem Soc Rev 37 : 1395–1401.

66. TrovatoA, ChitiF, MaritanA, SenoF (2006) Insight into the structure of amyloid fibrils from the analysis of globular proteins. PLoS Comput Biol 2: e170.

67. Conchillo-SoléO, de GrootNS, AvilésFX, VendrellJ, DauraX, et al. (2007) AGGRESCAN: a server for the prediction and evaluation of “hot spots” of aggregation in polypeptides. BMC Bioinformatics 8 : 65.

68. Fernandez-EscamillaA-M, RousseauF, SchymkowitzJ, SerranoL (2004) Prediction of sequence-dependent and mutational effects on the aggregation of peptides and proteins. Nat Biotech 22 : 1302–1306.

69. OsherovichLZ, CoxBS, TuiteMF, WeissmanJS (2004) Dissection and design of yeast prions. PLoS Biol 2: E86.

70. KadnarML, ArticovG, DerkatchIL (2010) Distinct type of transmission barrier revealed by study of multiple prion determinants of Rnq1. PLoS Genet 6: e1000824.

71. PechmannS, LevyED, TartagliaGG, VendruscoloM (2009) Physicochemical principles that regulate the competition between functional and dysfunctional association of proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106 : 10159–10164.

72. DouglasPM, TreuschS, RenH-Y, HalfmannR, DuennwaldML, et al. (2008) Chaperone-dependent amyloid assembly protects cells from prion toxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105 : 7206–7211.

73. BardillJP, DulleJE, FisherJR, TrueHL (2009) Requirements of Hsp104p activity and Sis1p binding for propagation of the [RNQ(+)] prion. Prion 3 : 151–160.

74. RüdigerS, Schneider-MergenerJ, BukauB (2001) Its substrate specificity characterizes the DnaJ co-chaperone as a scanning factor for the DnaK chaperone. EMBO J 20 : 1042–1050.

75. SrinivasanSR, GilliesAT, ChangL, ThompsonAD, GestwickiJE (2012) Molecular chaperones DnaK and DnaJ share predicted binding sites on most proteins in the E. coli proteome. Mol Biosyst 8 : 2323.

76. DosztányiZ, MészárosB, SimonI (2009) ANCHOR: web server for predicting protein binding regions in disordered proteins. Bioinformatics 25 : 2745–2746.

77. MészárosB, SimonI, DosztányiZ (2009) Prediction of protein binding regions in disordered proteins. PLoS Comput Biol 5: e1000376.

78. KryndushkinDS, EngelA, EdskesH, WicknerRB (2011) Molecular chaperone Hsp104 can promote yeast prion generation. Genetics 188 : 339–348.

79. LancasterAK, BardillJP, TrueHL, MaselJ (2010) The spontaneous appearance rate of the yeast prion [PSI+] and its implications for the evolution of the evolvability properties of the [PSI+] system. Genetics 184 : 393–400.

80. ChernoffYO, LindquistSL, OnoB, Inge-VechtomovSG, LiebmanSW (1995) Role of the chaperone protein Hsp104 in propagation of the yeast prion-like factor [psi+]. Science 268 : 880–884.

81. AllenKD, WegrzynRD, ChernovaTA, MüllerS, NewnamGP, et al. (2005) Hsp70 chaperones as modulators of prion life cycle: novel effects of Ssa and Ssb on the Saccharomyces cerevisiae prion [PSI+]. Genetics 169 : 1227–1242.

82. AngersRC, KangH-E, NapierD, BrowningS, SewardT, et al. (2010) Prion strain mutation determined by prion protein conformational compatibility and primary structure. Science 328 : 1154–1158.

83. OhhashiY, ItoK, ToyamaBH, WeissmanJS, TanakaM (2010) Differences in prion strain conformations result from non-native interactions in a nucleus. Nat Chem Biol 6 : 225–230.

84. LiuJ-J, SondheimerN, LindquistSL (2002) Changes in the middle region of Sup35 profoundly alter the nature of epigenetic inheritance for the yeast prion [PSI+]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99 Suppl 4 : 16446–16453.

85. MaddeleinML, WicknerRB (1999) Two prion-inducing regions of Ure2p are nonoverlapping. Mol Cell Biol 19 : 4516–4524.

86. LakhaniVV, DingF, DokholyanNV (2010) Polyglutamine induced misfolding of huntingtin exon1 is modulated by the flanking sequences. PLoS Comput Biol 6: e1000772.

87. DarnellG, OrgelJPRO, PahlR, MeredithSC (2007) Flanking polyproline sequences inhibit beta-sheet structure in polyglutamine segments by inducing PPII-like helix structure. J Mol Biol 374 : 688–704.

88. PadrickSB, MirankerAD (2001) Islet amyloid polypeptide: identification of long-range contacts and local order on the fibrillogenesis pathway. J Mol Biol 308 : 783–794.

89. ReumersJ, Maurer-StrohS, SchymkowitzJ, RousseauFD (2009) Protein sequences encode safeguards against aggregation. Hum Mutat 30 : 431–437.

90. KrzewskaJ, TanakaM, BurstonSG, MelkiR (2007) Biochemical and functional analysis of the assembly of full-length Sup35p and its prion-forming domain. J Biol Chem 282 : 1679–1686.

91. GloverJR, KowalAS, SchirmerEC, PatinoMM, LiuJJ, et al. (1997) Self-seeded fibers formed by Sup35, the protein determinant of [PSI+], a heritable prion-like factor of S. cerevisiae. Cell 89 : 811–819.

92. BaxaU, KellerPW, ChengN, WallJS, StevenAC (2011) In Sup35p filaments (the [PSI+] prion), the globular C-terminal domains are widely offset from the amyloid fibril backbone. Mol Microbiol 79 : 523–532.

93. FrederickKK, DebelouchinaGT, KayatekinC, DorminyT, JacavoneAC, et al. (2014) Distinct Prion Strains Are Defined by Amyloid Core Structure and Chaperone Binding Site Dynamics. Chem Biol 21 : 295–305.

94. RossED, MintonA, WicknerRB (2005) Prion domains: sequences, structures and interactions. Nat Cell Biol 7 : 1039–1044.

95. ToombsJA, LissNM, CobbleKR, Ben-MusaZ, RossED (2011) [PSI+] maintenance is dependent on the composition, not primary sequence, of the oligopeptide repeat domain. PLoS ONE 6: e21953.

96. HelsenCW, GloverJR (2012) Insight into molecular basis of curing of [PSI+] prion by overexpression of 104-kDa heat shock protein (Hsp104). J Biol Chem 287 : 542–556.

97. BorchseniusAS, MüllerS, NewnamGP, Inge-VechtomovSG, ChernoffYO (2006) Prion variant maintained only at high levels of the Hsp104 disaggregase. Curr Genet 49 : 21–29.

98. BorchseniusAS, WegrzynRD, NewnamGP, Inge-VechtomovSG, ChernoffYO (2001) Yeast prion protein derivative defective in aggregate shearing and production of new ‘seeds’. EMBO J 20 : 6683–6691.

99. AlexandrovAI, PolyanskayaAB, SerpionovGV, Ter-AvanesyanMD, KushnirovVV (2012) The Effects of Amino Acid Composition of Glutamine-Rich Domains on Amyloid Formation and Fragmentation. PLoS ONE 7: e46458.

100. HinesJK, HigurashiT, SrinivasanM, CraigEA (2011) Influence of prion variant and yeast strain variation on prion-molecular chaperone requirements. Prion 5 : 238–244.

101. WestergardL, TrueHL (2014) Extracellular environment modulates the formation and propagation of particular amyloid structures. Mol Microbiol doi:10.1111/mmi.12579

102. SupattaponeS (2013) Elucidating the role of cofactors in mammalian prion propagation. Prion 8 : 102–107.

103. PetkovaAT, IshiiY, BalbachJJ, AntzutkinON, LeapmanRD, et al. (2002) A structural model for Alzheimer's beta -amyloid fibrils based on experimental constraints from solid state NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99 : 16742–16747.

104. ParhamSN, ResendeCG, TuiteMF (2001) Oligopeptide repeats in the yeast protein Sup35p stabilize intermolecular prion interactions. EMBO J 20 : 2111–2119.