-
Články
- Časopisy
- Kurzy
- Témy
- Kongresy
- Videa
- Podcasty
S Phase–Coupled E2f1 Destruction Ensures Homeostasis in Proliferating Tissues
Precise control of cell cycle regulators is critical for normal development and tissue homeostasis. E2F transcription factors are activated during G1 to drive the G1-S transition and are then inhibited during S phase by a variety of mechanisms. Here, we genetically manipulate the single Drosophila activator E2F (E2f1) to explore the developmental requirement for S phase–coupled E2F down-regulation. Expression of an E2f1 mutant that is not destroyed during S phase drives cell cycle progression and causes apoptosis. Interestingly, this apoptosis is not exclusively the result of inappropriate cell cycle progression, because a stable E2f1 mutant that cannot function as a transcription factor or drive cell cycle progression also triggers apoptosis. This observation suggests that the inappropriate presence of E2f1 protein during S phase can trigger apoptosis by mechanisms that are independent of E2F acting directly at target genes. The ability of S phase-stabilized E2f1 to trigger apoptosis requires an interaction between E2f1 and the Drosophila pRb homolog, Rbf1, and involves induction of the pro-apoptotic gene, hid. Simultaneously blocking E2f1 destruction during S phase and inhibiting the induction of apoptosis results in tissue overgrowth and lethality. We propose that inappropriate accumulation of E2f1 protein during S phase triggers the elimination of potentially hyperplastic cells via apoptosis in order to ensure normal development of rapidly proliferating tissues.
Vyšlo v časopise: S Phase–Coupled E2f1 Destruction Ensures Homeostasis in Proliferating Tissues. PLoS Genet 8(8): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002831
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002831Souhrn
Precise control of cell cycle regulators is critical for normal development and tissue homeostasis. E2F transcription factors are activated during G1 to drive the G1-S transition and are then inhibited during S phase by a variety of mechanisms. Here, we genetically manipulate the single Drosophila activator E2F (E2f1) to explore the developmental requirement for S phase–coupled E2F down-regulation. Expression of an E2f1 mutant that is not destroyed during S phase drives cell cycle progression and causes apoptosis. Interestingly, this apoptosis is not exclusively the result of inappropriate cell cycle progression, because a stable E2f1 mutant that cannot function as a transcription factor or drive cell cycle progression also triggers apoptosis. This observation suggests that the inappropriate presence of E2f1 protein during S phase can trigger apoptosis by mechanisms that are independent of E2F acting directly at target genes. The ability of S phase-stabilized E2f1 to trigger apoptosis requires an interaction between E2f1 and the Drosophila pRb homolog, Rbf1, and involves induction of the pro-apoptotic gene, hid. Simultaneously blocking E2f1 destruction during S phase and inhibiting the induction of apoptosis results in tissue overgrowth and lethality. We propose that inappropriate accumulation of E2f1 protein during S phase triggers the elimination of potentially hyperplastic cells via apoptosis in order to ensure normal development of rapidly proliferating tissues.
Zdroje
1. HanahanD, WeinbergRA (2011) Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144 : 646–674.
2. van den HeuvelS, DysonNJ (2008) Conserved functions of the pRB and E2F families. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9 : 713–724.
3. BerckmansB, De VeylderL (2009) Transcriptional control of the cell cycle. Curr Opin Plant Biol 12 : 599–605.
4. LoganN, GrahamA, ZhaoX, FisherR, MaitiB, et al. (2005) E2F-8: an E2F family member with a similar organization of DNA-binding domains to E2F-7. Oncogene 24 : 5000–5004.
5. BurkhartDL, SageJ (2008) Cellular mechanisms of tumour suppression by the retinoblastoma gene. Nat Rev Cancer 8 : 671–682.
6. DynlachtBD, FloresO, LeesJA, HarlowE (1994) Differential regulation of E2F transactivation by cyclin/cdk2 complexes. Genes Dev 8 : 1772–1786.
7. KrekW, EwenME, ShirodkarS, AranyZ, KaelinWGJr, et al. (1994) Negative regulation of the growth-promoting transcription factor E2F-1 by a stably bound cyclin A-dependent protein kinase. Cell 78 : 161–172.
8. KrekW, XuG, LivingstonDM (1995) Cyclin A-kinase regulation of E2F-1 DNA binding function underlies suppression of an S phase checkpoint. Cell 83 : 1149–1158.
9. CampaneroMR, FlemingtonEK (1997) Regulation of E2F through ubiquitin-proteasome-dependent degradation: stabilization by the pRB tumor suppressor protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94 : 2221–2226.
10. MartiA, WirbelauerC, ScheffnerM, KrekW (1999) Interaction between ubiquitin-protein ligase SCFSKP2 and E2F-1 underlies the regulation of E2F-1 degradation. Nature cell biology 1 : 14–19.
11. LiJ, RanC, LiE, GordonF, ComstockG, et al. (2008) Synergistic function of E2F7 and E2F8 is essential for cell survival and embryonic development. Dev Cell 14 : 62–75.
12. OusephMM, LiJ, ChenHZ, PecotT, WenzelP, et al. (2012) Atypical E2F Repressors and Activators Coordinate Placental Development. Dev Cell 22 : 849–862.
13. IngramL, MunroS, CouttsAS, La ThangueNB (2011) E2F-1 regulation by an unusual DNA damage-responsive DP partner subunit. Cell death and differentiation 18 : 122–132.
14. DuW, DysonN (1999) The role of RBF in the introduction of G1 regulation during Drosophila embryogenesis. The EMBO journal 18 : 916–925.
15. DuronioRJ, O'FarrellPH, XieJE, BrookA, DysonN (1995) The transcription factor E2F is required for S phase during Drosophila embryogenesis. Genes Dev 9 : 1445–1455.
16. BrookA, XieJE, DuW, DysonN (1996) Requirements for dE2F function in proliferating cells and in post-mitotic differentiating cells. EMBO J 15 : 3676–3683.
17. NeufeldTP, de la CruzAF, JohnstonLA, EdgarBA (1998) Coordination of growth and cell division in the Drosophila wing. Cell 93 : 1183–1193.
18. AmbrusAM, NicolayBN, RashevaVI, SucklingRJ, FrolovMV (2007) dE2F2-independent rescue of proliferation in cells lacking an activator dE2F1. Mol Cell Biol 27 : 8561–8570.
19. FrolovMV, HuenDS, StevauxO, DimovaD, Balczarek-StrangK, et al. (2001) Functional antagonism between E2F family members. Genes & development 15 : 2146–2160.
20. AsanoM, NevinsJR, WhartonRP (1996) Ectopic E2F expression induces S phase and apoptosis in Drosophila imaginal discs. Genes Dev 10 : 1422–1432.
21. DuW, XieJE, DysonN (1996) Ectopic expression of dE2F and dDP induces cell proliferation and death in the Drosophila eye. EMBO J 15 : 3684–3692.
22. DuronioRJ, BrookA, DysonN, O'FarrellPH (1996) E2F-induced S phase requires cyclin E. Genes Dev 10 : 2505–2513.
23. MoonNS, Di StefanoL, DysonN (2006) A gradient of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling determines the sensitivity of rbf1 mutant cells to E2F-dependent apoptosis. Mol Cell Biol 26 : 7601–7615.
24. MoonNS, Di StefanoL, MorrisEJ, PatelR, WhiteK, et al. (2008) E2F and p53 induce apoptosis independently during Drosophila development but intersect in the context of DNA damage. PLoS Genet 4: e1000153 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000153.
25. MoonNS, FrolovMV, KwonEJ, Di StefanoL, DimovaDK, et al. (2005) Drosophila E2F1 has context-specific pro - and antiapoptotic properties during development. Dev Cell 9 : 463–475.
26. WichmannA, UyetakeL, SuTT (2010) E2F1 and E2F2 have opposite effects on radiation-induced p53-independent apoptosis in Drosophila. Dev Biol 346 : 80–89.
27. DimovaDK, StevauxO, FrolovMV, DysonNJ (2003) Cell cycle-dependent and cell cycle-independent control of transcription by the Drosophila E2F/RB pathway. Genes Dev 17 : 2308–2320.
28. TruscottM, IslamAB, Lopez-BigasN, FrolovMV (2011) mir-11 limits the proapoptotic function of its host gene, dE2f1. Genes Dev 25 : 1820–1834.
29. ShibutaniS, SwanhartLM, DuronioRJ (2007) Rbf1-independent termination of E2f1-target gene expression during early Drosophila embryogenesis. Development 134 : 467–478.
30. HericheJK, AngD, BierE, O'FarrellPH (2003) Involvement of an SCFSlmb complex in timely elimination of E2F upon initiation of DNA replication in Drosophila. BMC Genet 4 : 9.
31. ReisT, EdgarBA (2004) Negative regulation of dE2F1 by cyclin-dependent kinases controls cell cycle timing. Cell 117 : 253–264.
32. ShibutaniST, de la CruzAF, TranV, TurbyfillWJ3rd, ReisT, et al. (2008) Intrinsic negative cell cycle regulation provided by PIP box - and Cul4Cdt2-mediated destruction of E2f1 during S phase. Dev Cell 15 : 890–900.
33. AbbasT, DuttaA (2011) CRL4Cdt2: master coordinator of cell cycle progression and genome stability. Cell cycle 10 : 241–249.
34. HavensCG, WalterJC (2011) Mechanism of CRL4Cdt2, a PCNA-dependent E3 ubiquitin ligase. Genes Dev 25 : 1568–1582.
35. Garcia-BellidoA, MerriamJR (1971) Parameters of the wing imaginal disc development of Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol 24 : 61–87.
36. MartinFA, Perez-GarijoA, MorataG (2009) Apoptosis in Drosophila: compensatory proliferation and undead cells. Int J Dev Biol 53 : 1341–1347.
37. Perez-GarijoA, MartinFA, StruhlG, MorataG (2005) Dpp signaling and the induction of neoplastic tumors by caspase-inhibited apoptotic cells in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102 : 17664–17669.
38. RyooHD, GorencT, StellerH (2004) Apoptotic cells can induce compensatory cell proliferation through the JNK and the Wingless signaling pathways. Dev Cell 7 : 491–501.
39. HuhJR, GuoM, HayBA (2004) Compensatory proliferation induced by cell death in the Drosophila wing disc requires activity of the apical cell death caspase Dronc in a nonapoptotic role. Curr Biol 14 : 1262–1266.
40. HavensCG, WalterJC (2009) Docking of a specialized PIP Box onto chromatin-bound PCNA creates a degron for the ubiquitin ligase CRL4Cdt2. Mol Cell 35 : 93–104.
41. de la CruzAF, EdgarBA (2008) Flow cytometric analysis of Drosophila cells. Methods Mol Biol 420 : 373–389.
42. ZhengN, FraenkelE, PaboCO, PavletichNP (1999) Structural basis of DNA recognition by the heterodimeric cell cycle transcription factor E2F-DP. Genes Dev 13 : 666–674.
43. LoganN, DelavaineL, GrahamA, ReillyC, WilsonJ, et al. (2004) E2F-7: a distinctive E2F family member with an unusual organization of DNA-binding domains. Oncogene 23 : 5138–5150.
44. WengL, ZhuC, XuJ, DuW (2003) Critical role of active repression by E2F and Rb proteins in endoreplication during Drosophila development. EMBO J 22 : 3865–3875.
45. RoyzmanI, AustinRJ, BoscoG, BellSP, Orr-WeaverTL (1999) ORC localization in Drosophila follicle cells and the effects of mutations in dE2F and dDP. Genes Dev 13 : 827–840.
46. DynlachtBD, BrookA, DembskiM, YenushL, DysonN (1994) DNA-binding and trans-activation properties of Drosophila E2F and DP proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91 : 6359–6363.
47. RoignantJY, TreismanJE (2009) Pattern formation in the Drosophila eye disc. Int J Dev Biol 53 : 795–804.
48. FirthLC, BakerNE (2005) Extracellular signals responsible for spatially regulated proliferation in the differentiating Drosophila eye. Dev Cell 8 : 541–551.
49. CayirliogluP, WardWO, Silver KeySC, DuronioRJ (2003) Transcriptional repressor functions of Drosophila E2F1 and E2F2 cooperate to inhibit genomic DNA synthesis in ovarian follicle cells. Mol Cell Biol 23 : 2123–2134.
50. NicholsonSC, GilbertMM, NicolayBN, FrolovMV, MobergKH (2009) The archipelago tumor suppressor gene limits rb/e2f-regulated apoptosis in developing Drosophila tissues. Curr Biol 19 : 1503–1510.
51. Tanaka-MatakatsuM, XuJ, ChengL, DuW (2009) Regulation of apoptosis of rbf mutant cells during Drosophila development. Dev Biol 326 : 347–356.
52. BilakA, SuTT (2009) Regulation of Drosophila melanogaster pro-apoptotic gene hid. Apoptosis 14 : 943–949.
53. GretherME, AbramsJM, AgapiteJ, WhiteK, StellerH (1995) The head involution defective gene of Drosophila melanogaster functions in programmed cell death. Genes Dev 9 : 1694–1708.
54. ChenP, NordstromW, GishB, AbramsJM (1996) grim, a novel cell death gene in Drosophila. Genes Dev 10 : 1773–1782.
55. MillerLK (1997) Baculovirus interaction with host apoptotic pathways. Journal of cellular physiology 173 : 178–182.
56. RusconiJC, HaysR, CaganRL (2000) Programmed cell death and patterning in Drosophila. Cell death and differentiation 7 : 1063–1070.
57. ZielkeN, KimKJ, TranV, ShibutaniST, BravoMJ, et al. (2011) Control of Drosophila endocycles by E2F and CRL4(CDT2). Nature 480 : 123–127.
58. ThackerSA, BonnettePC, DuronioRJ (2003) The contribution of E2F-regulated transcription to Drosophila PCNA gene function. Curr Biol 13 : 53–58.
59. BrodskyMH, WeinertBT, TsangG, RongYS, McGinnisNM, et al. (2004) Drosophila melanogaster MNK/Chk2 and p53 regulate multiple DNA repair and apoptotic pathways following DNA damage. Molecular and cellular biology 24 : 1219–1231.
60. DuronioRJ, O'FarrellPH (1995) Developmental control of the G1 to S transition in Drosophila: cyclin E is a limiting downstream target of E2F. Genes Dev 9 : 1456–1468.
61. LeeH, RagusanoL, MartinezA, GillJ, DimovaDK (2012) A dual Role for the dREAM/MMB complex in the regulation of differentiation-specific E2F/RB target genes. Mol Cell Biol
62. GeorletteD, AhnS, MacAlpineDM, CheungE, LewisPW, et al. (2007) Genomic profiling and expression studies reveal both positive and negative activities for the Drosophila Myb MuvB/dREAM complex in proliferating cells. Genes Dev 21 : 2880–2896.
63. MilesWO, TschopK, HerrA, JiJY, DysonNJ (2012) Pumilio facilitates miRNA regulation of the E2F3 oncogene. Genes Dev 26 : 356–368.
64. HsiehJK, FredersdorfS, KouzaridesT, MartinK, LuX (1997) E2F1-induced apoptosis requires DNA binding but not transactivation and is inhibited by the retinoblastoma protein through direct interaction. Genes & development 11 : 1840–1852.
65. PhillipsAC, BatesS, RyanKM, HelinK, VousdenKH (1997) Induction of DNA synthesis and apoptosis are separable functions of E2F-1. Genes Dev 11 : 1853–1863.
66. AligianniS, LacknerDH, KlierS, RusticiG, WilhelmBT, et al. (2009) The fission yeast homeodomain protein Yox1p binds to MBF and confines MBF-dependent cell-cycle transcription to G1-S via negative feedback. PLoS Genet 5: e1000626 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000626.
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicína
Článek Mutational Signatures of De-Differentiation in Functional Non-Coding Regions of Melanoma GenomesČlánek Rescuing Alu: Recovery of Inserts Shows LINE-1 Preserves Alu Activity through A-Tail ExpansionČlánek Genetics and Regulatory Impact of Alternative Polyadenylation in Human B-Lymphoblastoid CellsČlánek Retrovolution: HIV–Driven Evolution of Cellular Genes and Improvement of Anticancer Drug ActivationČlánek The Mi-2 Chromatin-Remodeling Factor Regulates Higher-Order Chromatin Structure and Cohesin DynamicsČlánek Identification of Human Proteins That Modify Misfolding and Proteotoxicity of Pathogenic Ataxin-1
Článok vyšiel v časopisePLOS Genetics
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
2012 Číslo 8- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
-
Všetky články tohto čísla
- Mutational Signatures of De-Differentiation in Functional Non-Coding Regions of Melanoma Genomes
- Rescuing Alu: Recovery of Inserts Shows LINE-1 Preserves Alu Activity through A-Tail Expansion
- Genetics and Regulatory Impact of Alternative Polyadenylation in Human B-Lymphoblastoid Cells
- Chromosome Territories Meet a Condensin
- It's All in the Timing: Too Much E2F Is a Bad Thing
- Fine-Mapping and Initial Characterization of QT Interval Loci in African Americans
- Genome Patterns of Selection and Introgression of Haplotypes in Natural Populations of the House Mouse ()
- A Combinatorial Amino Acid Code for RNA Recognition by Pentatricopeptide Repeat Proteins
- Advances in Quantitative Trait Analysis in Yeast
- Experimental Evolution of a Novel Sexually Antagonistic Allele
- Variation of Contributes to Dog Breed Skull Diversity
- , a Gene Involved in Axonal Pathfinding, Is Mutated in Patients with Kallmann Syndrome
- A Single Origin for Nymphalid Butterfly Eyespots Followed by Widespread Loss of Associated Gene Expression
- Cryptocephal, the ATF4, Is a Specific Coactivator for Ecdysone Receptor Isoform B2
- Retrovolution: HIV–Driven Evolution of Cellular Genes and Improvement of Anticancer Drug Activation
- The PARN Deadenylase Targets a Discrete Set of mRNAs for Decay and Regulates Cell Motility in Mouse Myoblasts
- A Sexual Ornament in Chickens Is Affected by Pleiotropic Alleles at and , Selected during Domestication
- Use of Allele-Specific FAIRE to Determine Functional Regulatory Polymorphism Using Large-Scale Genotyping Arrays
- Novel Loci for Metabolic Networks and Multi-Tissue Expression Studies Reveal Genes for Atherosclerosis
- The Genetic Basis of Pollinator Adaptation in a Sexually Deceptive Orchid
- Uncovering the Genome-Wide Transcriptional Responses of the Filamentous Fungus to Lignocellulose Using RNA Sequencing
- Inheritance Beyond Plain Heritability: Variance-Controlling Genes in
- The Metabochip, a Custom Genotyping Array for Genetic Studies of Metabolic, Cardiovascular, and Anthropometric Traits
- Reprogramming to Pluripotency Can Conceal Somatic Cell Chromosomal Instability
- Condensin II Promotes the Formation of Chromosome Territories by Inducing Axial Compaction of Polyploid Interphase Chromosomes
- PTEN Negatively Regulates MAPK Signaling during Vulval Development
- A Dynamic Response Regulator Protein Modulates G-Protein–Dependent Polarity in the Bacterium
- Population Genomics of the Facultatively Mutualistic Bacteria and
- Components of a Fanconi-Like Pathway Control Pso2-Independent DNA Interstrand Crosslink Repair in Yeast
- Polysome Profiling in Liver Identifies Dynamic Regulation of Endoplasmic Reticulum Translatome by Obesity and Fasting
- Stromal Liver Kinase B1 [STK11] Signaling Loss Induces Oviductal Adenomas and Endometrial Cancer by Activating Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Complex 1
- Reprogramming of H3K27me3 Is Critical for Acquisition of Pluripotency from Cultured Tissues
- Transgene Induced Co-Suppression during Vegetative Growth in
- Hox and Sex-Determination Genes Control Segment Elimination through EGFR and Activity
- A Quantitative Comparison of the Similarity between Genes and Geography in Worldwide Human Populations
- Minibrain/Dyrk1a Regulates Food Intake through the Sir2-FOXO-sNPF/NPY Pathway in and Mammals
- Comparative Analysis of Regulatory Elements between and by Genome-Wide Transcription Start Site Profiling
- Simple Methods for Generating and Detecting Locus-Specific Mutations Induced with TALENs in the Zebrafish Genome
- S Phase–Coupled E2f1 Destruction Ensures Homeostasis in Proliferating Tissues
- Cell-Nonautonomous Signaling of FOXO/DAF-16 to the Stem Cells of
- The Mi-2 Chromatin-Remodeling Factor Regulates Higher-Order Chromatin Structure and Cohesin Dynamics
- Comparative Analysis of the Genomes of Two Field Isolates of the Rice Blast Fungus
- Role of Mex67-Mtr2 in the Nuclear Export of 40S Pre-Ribosomes
- Genetic Modulation of Lipid Profiles following Lifestyle Modification or Metformin Treatment: The Diabetes Prevention Program
- HAL-2 Promotes Homologous Pairing during Meiosis by Antagonizing Inhibitory Effects of Synaptonemal Complex Precursors
- SLX-1 Is Required for Maintaining Genomic Integrity and Promoting Meiotic Noncrossovers in the Germline
- Phylogenetic and Transcriptomic Analysis of Chemosensory Receptors in a Pair of Divergent Ant Species Reveals Sex-Specific Signatures of Odor Coding
- Reduced Prostasin (CAP1/PRSS8) Activity Eliminates HAI-1 and HAI-2 Deficiency–Associated Developmental Defects by Preventing Matriptase Activation
- Dissecting the Gene Network of Dietary Restriction to Identify Evolutionarily Conserved Pathways and New Functional Genes
- Identification of Human Proteins That Modify Misfolding and Proteotoxicity of Pathogenic Ataxin-1
- and Link Transcription of Phospholipid Biosynthetic Genes to ER Stress and the UPR
- CDK9 and H2B Monoubiquitination: A Well-Choreographed Dance
- Rare Copy Number Variations in Adults with Tetralogy of Fallot Implicate Novel Risk Gene Pathways
- Ccdc94 Protects Cells from Ionizing Radiation by Inhibiting the Expression of
- NOL11, Implicated in the Pathogenesis of North American Indian Childhood Cirrhosis, Is Required for Pre-rRNA Transcription and Processing
- Human Developmental Enhancers Conserved between Deuterostomes and Protostomes
- A Luminal Glycoprotein Drives Dose-Dependent Diameter Expansion of the Hindgut Tube
- Melanophore Migration and Survival during Zebrafish Adult Pigment Stripe Development Require the Immunoglobulin Superfamily Adhesion Molecule Igsf11
- Dynamic Distribution of Linker Histone H1.5 in Cellular Differentiation
- Combining Comparative Proteomics and Molecular Genetics Uncovers Regulators of Synaptic and Axonal Stability and Degeneration
- Chemical Genetics Reveals a Specific Requirement for Cdk2 Activity in the DNA Damage Response and Identifies Nbs1 as a Cdk2 Substrate in Human Cells
- Experimental Relocation of the Mitochondrial Gene to the Nucleus Reveals Forces Underlying Mitochondrial Genome Evolution
- Rates of Gyrase Supercoiling and Transcription Elongation Control Supercoil Density in a Bacterial Chromosome
- Mutations in a P-Type ATPase Gene Cause Axonal Degeneration
- A General G1/S-Phase Cell-Cycle Control Module in the Flowering Plant
- Multiple Roles and Interactions of and in Development of the Respiratory System
- UNC-40/DCC, SAX-3/Robo, and VAB-1/Eph Polarize F-Actin during Embryonic Morphogenesis by Regulating the WAVE/SCAR Actin Nucleation Complex
- Epigenetic Remodeling of Meiotic Crossover Frequency in DNA Methyltransferase Mutants
- Modulating the Strength and Threshold of NOTCH Oncogenic Signals by
- Loss of Axonal Mitochondria Promotes Tau-Mediated Neurodegeneration and Alzheimer's Disease–Related Tau Phosphorylation Via PAR-1
- Acetyl-CoA-Carboxylase Sustains a Fatty Acid–Dependent Remote Signal to Waterproof the Respiratory System
- ATXN2-CAG42 Sequesters PABPC1 into Insolubility and Induces FBXW8 in Cerebellum of Old Ataxic Knock-In Mice
- Cohesin Rings Devoid of Scc3 and Pds5 Maintain Their Stable Association with the DNA
- The MicroRNA Inhibits Calcium Signaling by Targeting the TIR-1/Sarm1 Adaptor Protein to Control Stochastic L/R Neuronal Asymmetry in
- Rapid-Throughput Skeletal Phenotyping of 100 Knockout Mice Identifies 9 New Genes That Determine Bone Strength
- The Genes Define Unique Classes of Two-Partner Secretion and Contact Dependent Growth Inhibition Systems
- PLOS Genetics
- Archív čísel
- Aktuálne číslo
- Informácie o časopise
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle- Dissecting the Gene Network of Dietary Restriction to Identify Evolutionarily Conserved Pathways and New Functional Genes
- It's All in the Timing: Too Much E2F Is a Bad Thing
- Variation of Contributes to Dog Breed Skull Diversity
- The PARN Deadenylase Targets a Discrete Set of mRNAs for Decay and Regulates Cell Motility in Mouse Myoblasts
Prihlásenie#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#Zabudnuté hesloZadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.
- Časopisy