Dynamic Distribution of Linker Histone H1.5 in Cellular Differentiation

English version České info

Linker histones are essential components of chromatin, but the distributions and functions of many during cellular differentiation are not well understood. Here, we show that H1.5 binds to genic and intergenic regions, forming blocks of enrichment, in differentiated human cells from all three embryonic germ layers but not in embryonic stem cells. In differentiated cells, H1.5, but not H1.3, binds preferentially to genes that encode membrane and membrane-related proteins. Strikingly, 37% of H1.5 target genes belong to gene family clusters, groups of homologous genes that are located in proximity to each other on chromosomes. H1.5 binding is associated with gene repression and is required for SIRT1 binding, H3K9me2 enrichment, and chromatin compaction. Depletion of H1.5 results in loss of SIRT1 and H3K9me2, increased chromatin accessibility, deregulation of gene expression, and decreased cell growth. Our data reveal for the first time a specific and novel function for linker histone subtype H1.5 in maintenance of condensed chromatin at defined gene families in differentiated human cells.

Vyšlo v časopise: Dynamic Distribution of Linker Histone H1.5 in Cellular Differentiation. PLoS Genet 8(8): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002879
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002879

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. LeeH, HabasR, Abate-ShenC (2004) MSX1 cooperates with histone H1b for inhibition of transcription and myogenesis. Science 304: 1675–1678.

2. HappelN, DoeneckeD (2009) Histone H1 and its isoforms: contribution to chromatin structure and function. Gene 431: 1–12.

3. NollM, KornbergRD (1977) Action of micrococcal nuclease on chromatin and the location of histone H1. J Mol Biol 109: 393–404.

4. AllanJ, HartmanPG, Crane-RobinsonC, AvilesFX (1980) The structure of histone H1 and its location in chromatin. Nature 288: 675–679.

5. ZhouYB, GerchmanSE, RamakrishnanV, TraversA, MuyldermansS (1998) Position and orientation of the globular domain of linker histone H5 on the nucleosome. Nature 395: 402–405.

6. FanY, NikitinaT, ZhaoJ, FleuryTJ, BhattacharyyaR, et al. (2005) Histone H1 depletion in mammals alters global chromatin structure but causes specific changes in gene regulation. Cell 123: 1199–1212.

7. KrishnakumarR, GambleMJ, FrizzellKM, BerrocalJG, KininisM, et al. (2008) Reciprocal binding of PARP-1 and histone H1 at promoters specifies transcriptional outcomes. Science 319: 819–821.

8. SjoblomT, JonesS, WoodLD, ParsonsDW, LinJ, et al. (2006) The consensus coding sequences of human breast and colorectal cancers. Science 314: 268–274.

9. SanchoM, DianiE, BeatoM, JordanA (2008) Depletion of human histone H1 variants uncovers specific roles in gene expression and cell growth. PLoS Genet 4: e1000227 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000227.

10. CaoR, WangL, WangH, XiaL, Erdjument-BromageH, et al. (2002) Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in Polycomb-group silencing. Science 298: 1039–1043.

11. GuentherMG, LevineSS, BoyerLA, JaenischR, YoungRA (2007) A chromatin landmark and transcription initiation at most promoters in human cells. Cell 130: 77–88.

12. KarumbayaramS, NovitchBG, PattersonM, UmbachJA, RichterL, et al. (2009) Directed differentiation of human-induced pluripotent stem cells generates active motor neurons. Stem Cells 27: 806–811.

13. HenningsH, MichaelD, ChengC, SteinertP, HolbrookK, et al. (1980) Calcium regulation of growth and differentiation of mouse epidermal cells in culture. Cell 19: 245–254.

14. ZhangB, KirovS, SnoddyJ (2005) WebGestalt: an integrated system for exploring gene sets in various biological contexts. Nucleic Acids Res 33: W741–748.

15. VaqueroA, ScherM, LeeD, Erdjument-BromageH, TempstP, et al. (2004) Human SirT1 interacts with histone H1 and promotes formation of facultative heterochromatin. Mol Cell 16: 93–105.

16. WenB, WuH, ShinkaiY, IrizarryRA, FeinbergAP (2009) Large histone H3 lysine 9 dimethylated chromatin blocks distinguish differentiated from embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet 41: 246–250.

17. EfroniS, DuttaguptaR, ChengJ, DehghaniH, HoeppnerDJ, et al. (2008) Global transcription in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2: 437–447.

18. ZhouY, KimJ, YuanX, BraunT (2011) Epigenetic modifications of stem cells: a paradigm for the control of cardiac progenitor cells. Circ Res 109: 1067–1081.

19. HeintzmanND, HonGC, HawkinsRD, KheradpourP, StarkA, et al. (2009) Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression. Nature 459: 108–112.

20. TroskoJE, RuchRJ (1998) Cell-cell communication in carcinogenesis. Front Biosci 3: d208–236.

21. HuangCH, YeM (2010) The Rh protein family: gene evolution, membrane biology, and disease association. Cell Mol Life Sci 67: 1203–1218.

22. DzikJM (2010) The ancestry and cumulative evolution of immune reactions. Acta Biochim Pol 57: 443–466.

23. CaoL, YuW, WuY, YuL (2009) The evolution, complex structures and function of septin proteins. Cell Mol Life Sci 66: 3309–3323.

24. Th'ngJP, SungR, YeM, HendzelMJ (2005) H1 family histones in the nucleus. Control of binding and localization by the C-terminal domain. J Biol Chem 280: 27809–27814.

25. HappelN, DoeneckeD, Sekeri-PataryasKE, SourlingasTG (2008) H1 histone subtype constitution and phosphorylation state of the ageing cell system of human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Exp Gerontol 43: 184–199.

26. GarciaBA, BusbySA, BarberCM, ShabanowitzJ, AllisCD, et al. (2004) Characterization of phosphorylation sites on histone H1 isoforms by tandem mass spectrometry. J Proteome Res 3: 1219–1227.

27. McBryantSJ, LuX, HansenJC (2010) Multifunctionality of the linker histones: an emerging role for protein-protein interactions. Cell Res 20: 519–528.

28. MombaertsP, WangF, DulacC, ChaoSK, NemesA, et al. (1996) Visualizing an olfactory sensory map. Cell 87: 675–686.

29. MagklaraA, YenA, ColquittBM, ClowneyEJ, AllenW, et al. (2011) An epigenetic signature for monoallelic olfactory receptor expression. Cell 145: 555–570.

30. MeissnerA, WernigM, JaenischR (2007) Direct reprogramming of genetically unmodified fibroblasts into pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 25: 1177–1181.

31. BrambrinkT, ForemanR, WelsteadGG, LengnerCJ, WernigM, et al. (2008) Sequential expression of pluripotency markers during direct reprogramming of mouse somatic cells. Cell Stem Cell 2: 151–159.

32. MaheraliN, SridharanR, XieW, UtikalJ, EminliS, et al. (2007) Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Cell Stem Cell 1: 55–70.

33. FerrariR, PellegriniM, HorwitzGA, XieW, BerkAJ, et al. (2008) Epigenetic reprogramming by adenovirus e1a. Science 321: 1086–1088.

34. BrownDT, IzardT, MisteliT (2006) Mapping the interaction surface of linker histone H1(0) with the nucleosome of native chromatin in vivo. Nat Struct Mol Biol 13: 250–255.

35. ElkabetzY, PanagiotakosG, Al ShamyG, SocciND, TabarV, et al. (2008) Human ES cell-derived neural rosettes reveal a functionally distinct early neural stem cell stage. Genes Dev 22: 152–165.

36. LowryWE, BlanpainC, NowakJA, GuaschG, LewisL, et al. (2005) Defining the impact of beta-catenin/Tcf transactivation on epithelial stem cells. Genes Dev 19: 1596–1611.

37. Richard-FoyH, HagerGL (1987) Sequence-specific positioning of nucleosomes over the steroid-inducible MMTV promoter. EMBO J 6: 2321–2328.

38. EnverT, BrewerAC, PatientRK (1985) Simian virus 40-mediated cis induction of the Xenopus beta-globin DNase I hypersensitive site. Nature 318: 680–683.

39. Qianjin LuBR DNaseI Hypersensitivity Analysis of Chromatin Structure. Methods in Molecular Biology 77–86.

40. KupershmidtI, SuQJ, GrewalA, SundareshS, HalperinI, et al. (2010) Ontology-based meta-analysis of global collections of high-throughput public data. PLoS ONE 5: e13066 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013066.