The decision to replicate its DNA is of crucial importance for every cell and, in many organisms, is decisive for the progression through the entire cell cycle. A comparison of animals versus yeast has shown that, although most of the involved cell-cycle regulators are divergent in both clades, they fulfill a similar role and the overall network topology of G1/S regulation is highly conserved. Using germline development as a model system, we identified a regulatory cascade controlling entry into S phase in the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana, which, as a member of the Plantae supergroup, is phylogenetically only distantly related to Opisthokonts such as yeast and animals. This module comprises the Arabidopsis homologs of the animal transcription factor E2F, the plant homolog of the animal transcriptional repressor Retinoblastoma (Rb)-related 1 (RBR1), the plant-specific F-box protein F-BOX-LIKE 17 (FBL17), the plant specific cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors KRPs, as well as CDKA;1, the plant homolog of the yeast and animal Cdc2+/Cdk1 kinases. Our data show that the principle of a double negative wiring of Rb proteins is highly conserved, likely representing a universal mechanism in eukaryotic cell-cycle control. However, this negative feedback of Rb proteins is differently implemented in plants as it is brought about through a quadruple negative regulation centered around the F-box protein FBL17 that mediates the degradation of CDK inhibitors but is itself directly repressed by Rb. Biomathematical simulations and subsequent experimental confirmation of computational predictions revealed that this regulatory circuit can give rise to hysteresis highlighting the here identified dosage sensitivity of CDK inhibitors in this network.
Vyšlo v časopise: A General G1/S-Phase Cell-Cycle Control Module in the Flowering Plant. PLoS Genet 8(8): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002847 Kategorie: Research Article prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002847
1. Olson JS, WattsJA, AllisonLJ (1983) Carbon in live vegetation of major world ecosystems (ORNL-5862). Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
2. De VeylderL, BeeckmanT, InzéD (2007) The ins and outs of the plant cell cycle. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8 : 655–665.
3. GutierrezC (2005) Coupling cell proliferation and development in plants. Nat Cell Biol 7 : 535–541.
4. NurseP (2000) A long twentieth century of the cell cycle and beyond. Cell 100 : 71–78.
5. MorganDO (1997) Cyclin-dependent kinases: engines, clocks, and microprocessors. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 13 : 261–291.
6. PinesJ (1995) Cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases: a biochemical view. Biochem J 308 : 697–711.
7. VandepoeleK, RaesJ, De VeylderL, RouzéP, RombautsS, et al. (2002) Genome-wide analysis of core cell cycle genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 14 : 903–916.
8. DissmeyerN, NowackMK, PuschS, StalsH, InzéD, et al. (2007) T-loop phosphorylation of Arabidopsis CDKA;1 is required for its function and can be partially substituted by an aspartate residue. Plant Cell 19 : 972–985.
9. NowackMK, GriniPE, JakobyMJ, LafosM, KonczC, et al. (2006) A positive signal from the fertilization of the egg cell sets off endosperm proliferation in angiosperm embryogenesis. Nat Genet 38 : 63–67.
10. IwakawaH, ShinmyoA, SekineM (2006) Arabidopsis CDKA;1, a cdc2 homologue, controls proliferation of generative cells in male gametogenesis. Plant J 45 : 819–831.
11. DissmeyerN, WeimerAK, PuschS, De SchutterK, KameiCL, et al. (2009) Control of cell proliferation, organ growth, and DNA damage response operate independently of dephosphorylation of the Arabidopsis Cdk1 homolog CDKA;1. Plant Cell 21 : 3641–3654.
12. NowackMK, HarashimaH, DissmeyerN, ZhaoX, BouyerD, et al. (2012) Genetic framework of cyclin-dependent kinase function in Arabidopsis. Dev Cell 22 : 1030–1040.
13. DissmeyerN, WeimerAK, De VeylderL, NovakB, SchnittgerA (2010) The regulatory network of cell-cycle progression is fundamentally different in plants versus yeast or metazoans. Plant Signal Behav 5 : 1613–1618.
14. CoolsT, IantchevaA, WeimerAK, BoensS, TakahashiN, et al. (2011) The Arabidopsis thaliana checkpoint kinase WEE1 protects against premature vascular differentiation during replication stress. Plant Cell 23 : 1435–1448.
15. VerkestA, WeinlC, InzéD, De VeylderL, SchnittgerA (2005) Switching the cell cycle. Kip-related proteins in plant cell cycle control. Plant Physiol 139 : 1099–1106.
16. WangH, ZhouY, FowkeLC (2006) The emerging importance of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors in the regulation of the plant cell cycle and related processes. Can J Bot 84 : 640–650.
17. ChurchmanML, BrownML, KatoN, KirikV, HülskampM, et al. (2006) SIAMESE, a plant-specific cell cycle regulator, controls endoreplication onset in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 18 : 3145–3157.
18. PeresA, ChurchmanML, HariharanS, HimanenK, VerkestA, et al. (2007) Novel plant-specific cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors induced by biotic and abiotic stresses. J Biol Chem 282 : 25588–25596.
19. TwellD (2011) Male gametogenesis and germline specification in flowering plants. Sex Plant Reprod 24 : 149–160.
20. McCormickS (2004) Control of male gametophyte development. Plant Cell 16: S142–S153.
21. ChenZ, HafidhS, PohSH, TwellD, BergerF (2009) Proliferation and cell fate establishment during Arabidopsis male gametogenesis depends on the Retinoblastoma protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106 : 7257–7262.
22. JohnstonAJ, MatveevaE, KirioukhovaO, GrossniklausU, GruissemW (2008) A dynamic reciprocal RBR-PRC2 regulatory circuit controls Arabidopsis gametophyte development. Curr Biol 18 : 1680–1686.
23. GustiA, BaumbergerN, NowackM, PuschS, EislerH, et al. (2009) The Arabidopsis thaliana F-box protein FBL17 is essential for progression through the second mitosis during pollen development. PLoS ONE 4: e4780 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004780.
24. KimHJ, OhSA, BrownfieldL, HongSH, RyuH, et al. (2008) Control of plant germline proliferation by SCFFBL17 degradation of cell cycle inhibitors. Nature 455 : 1134–1137.
25. LiuJ, ZhangY, QinG, TsugeT, SakaguchiN, et al. (2008) Targeted degradation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor ICK4/KRP6 by RING-type E3 ligases is essential for mitotic cell cycle progression during Arabidopsis gametogenesis. Plant Cell 20 : 1538–1554.
26. ZhouY, WangH, GilmerS, WhitwillS, KellerW, et al. (2002) Control of petal and pollen development by the plant cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor ICK1 in transgenic Brassica plants. Planta 215 : 248–257.
27. BramsiepeJ, WesterK, WeinlC, RoodbarkelariF, KasiliR, et al. (2010) Endoreplication controls cell fate maintenance. PLoS Genet 6: e1000996 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000996.
28. AwSJ, HamamuraY, ChenZ, SchnittgerA, BergerF (2010) Sperm entry is sufficient to trigger division of the central cell but the paternal genome is required for endosperm development in Arabidopsis. Development 137 : 2683–2690.
29. NowackMK, ShirzadiR, DissmeyerN, DolfA, EndlE, et al. (2007) Bypassing genomic imprinting allows seed development. Nature 447 : 312–315.
30. FriedmanWE (1999) Expression of the cell cycle in sperm of Arabidopsis: implications for understanding patterns of gametogenesis and fertilization in plants and other eukaryotes. Development 126 : 1065–1075.
31. De BondtHL, RosenblattJ, JancarikJ, JonesHD, MorganDO, et al. (1993) Crystal structure of cyclin-dependent kinase 2. Nature 363 : 595–602.
32. HarashimaH, ShinmyoA, SekineM (2007) Phosphorylation of threonine 161 in plant cyclin-dependent kinase A is required for cell division by activation of its associated kinase. Plant J 52 : 435–448.
33. AnzolaJM, SiebererT, OrtbauerM, ButtH, KorbeiB, et al. (2010) Putative Arabidopsis Transcriptional Adaptor Protein (PROPORZ1) is required to modulate histone acetylation in response to auxin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107 : 10308–10313.
34. RoodbarkelariF, BramsiepeJ, WeinlC, MarquardtS, NovákB, et al. (2010) CULLIN 4-RING FINGER-LIGASE plays a key role in the control of endoreplication cycles in Arabidopsis trichomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107 : 15275–15280.
35. VandepoeleK, VliegheK, FlorquinK, HennigL, BeemsterGTS, et al. (2005) Genome-wide identification of potential plant E2F target genes. Plant Physiol 139 : 316–328.
36. WeinbergRA (1995) The retinoblastoma protein and cell cycle control. Cell 81 : 323–330.
37. DysonN (1998) The regulation of E2F by pRB-family proteins. Genes Dev 12 : 2245–2262.
38. IngouffM, JullienPE, BergerF (2006) The female gametophyte and the endosperm control cell proliferation and differentiation of the seed coat in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 18 : 3491–3501.
39. NakaiT, KatoK, ShinmyoA, SekineM (2006) Arabidopsis KRPs have distinct inhibitory activity toward cyclin D2-associated kinases, including plant-specific B-type cyclin-dependent kinase. FEBS Lett 580 : 336–340.
40. HemerlyA, de Almeida EnglerJ, BergouniouxC, Van MontaguM, et al. (1995) Dominant negative mutants of the Cdc2 kinase uncouple cell division from iterative plant development. EMBO J 14 : 3925–3936.
41. Leiva-NetoJT, GrafiG, SabelliPA, DanteRA, WooY-m, et al. (2004) A dominant negative mutant of cyclin-dependent kinase A reduces endoreduplication but not cell size or gene expression in maize endosperm. Plant Cell 16 : 1854–1869.
42. MendenhallMD, RichardsonHE, ReedSI (1988) Dominant negative protein kinase mutations that confer a G1 arrest phenotype. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85 : 4426–4430.
43. van den HeuvelS, HarlowE (1993) Distinct roles for cyclin-dependent kinases in cell cycle control. Science 262 : 2050–2054.
44. GaamoucheT, ManesC-LdO, KwiatkowskaD, BerckmansB, KoumproglouR, et al. (2010) Cyclin-dependent kinase activity maintains the shoot apical meristem cells in an undifferentiated state. Plant J 64 : 26–37.
45. HemerlyAS, FerreiraPCG, Van MontaguM, EnglerG, InzéD (2000) Cell division events are essential for embryo patterning and morphogenesis: studies on dominant-negative cdc2aAt mutants of Arabidopsis. Plant J 23 : 123–130.
46. ShaW, MooreJ, ChenK, LassalettaAD, YiC-S, et al. (2003) Hysteresis drives cell-cycle transitions in Xenopus laevis egg extracts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100 : 975–980.
47. DonnellyPM, BonettaD, TsukayaH, DenglerRE, DenglerNG (1999) Cell cycling and cell enlargement in developing leaves of Arabidopsis. Dev Biol 215 : 407–419.
48. Colón-CarmonaA, YouR, Haimovitch-GalT, DoernerP (1999) Spatio-temporal analysis of mitotic activity with a labile cyclin-GUS fusion protein. Plant J 20 : 503–508.
49. SchnittgerA, SchöbingerU, StierhofY-D, HülskampM (2002) Ectopic B-type cyclin expression induces mitotic cycles in endoreduplicating Arabidopsis trichomes. Curr Biol 12 : 415–420.
50. WeinlC, MarquardtS, KuijtSJH, NowackMK, JakobyMJ, et al. (2005) Novel functions of plant cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, ICK1/KRP1, can act non-cell-autonomously and inhibit entry into mitosis. Plant Cell 17 : 1704–1722.
51. VerkestA, ManesCL, VercruysseS, MaesS, Van Der SchuerenE, et al. (2005) The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor KRP2 controls the onset of the endoreduplication cycle during Arabidopsis leaf development through inhibition of mitotic CDKA;1 kinase complexes. Plant Cell 17 : 1723–1736.
52. ZhouY, LiGY, BrandizziF, FowkeLC, WangH (2003) The plant cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor ICK1 has distinct functional domains for in vivo kinase inhibition, protein instability and nuclear localization. Plant J 35 : 476–489.
53. WangH, QiQ, SchorrP, CutlerAJ, CrosbyWL, FowkeLC (1998) ICK1, a cyclin-dependent protein kinase inhibitor from Arabidopsis thaliana interacts with both Cdc2a and CycD3, and its expression is induced by abscisic acid. Plant J 15 : 501–510.
54. DysonHJ, WrightPE (2005) Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6 : 197–208.
55. GaleaCA, WangY, SivakolunduSG, KriwackiRW (2008) Regulation of cell division by intrinsically unstructured proteins: intrinsic flexibility, modularity, and signaling conduits. Biochemistry 47 : 7598–7609.
56. LarkinJC, MarksMD, NadeauJ, SackF (1997) Epidermal cell fate and patterning in leaves. Plant Cell 9 : 1109–1120.
57. RayA, JamesMK, LarochelleS, FisherRP, BlainSW (2009) p27Kip1 inhibits cyclin D-cyclin-dependent kinase 4 by two independent modes. Mol Cell Biol 29 : 986–999.
58. CostanzoM, NishikawaJL, TangX, MillmanJS, SchubO, et al. (2004) CDK activity antagonizes Whi5, an inhibitor of G1/S transcription in yeast. Cell 117 : 899–913.
59. KeelingPJ, BurgerG, DurnfordDG, LangBF, LeeRW, et al. (2005) The tree of eukaryotes. Trends Ecol Evol 20 : 670–676.
60. CrossFR, BuchlerNE, SkotheimJM (2011) Evolution of networks and sequences in eukaryotic cell cycle control. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 366 : 3532–3544.
61. SabelliPA, LarkinsBA (2009) Regulation and function of retinoblastoma-related plant genes. Plant Science 177 : 540–548.
62. de BruinRA, McDonaldWH, KalashnikovaTI, YatesJIII, WittenbergC (2004) Cln3 activates G1-specific transcription via phosphorylation of the SBF bound repressor Whi5. Cell 117 : 887–898.
63. SkotheimJM, Di TaliaS, SiggiaED, CrossFR (2008) Positive feedback of G1 cyclins ensures coherent cell cycle entry. Nature 454 : 291–296.
64. AssoianRK, YungY (2008) A reciprocal relationship between Rb and Skp2: implications for restriction point control, signal transduction to the cell cycle and cancer. Cell cycle 7 : 24–27.
65. MorenoS, NurseP (1994) Regulation of progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle by the rum1+ gene. Nature 367 : 236–242.
66. JakobyMJ, WeinlC, PuschS, KuijtSJ, MerkleT, et al. (2006) Analysis of the subcellular localization, function and proteolytic control of the Arabidopsis CDK inhibitor ICK1/KRP1. Plant Physiol 141 : 1293–1305.
67. AlexanderMP (1969) Differential staining of aborted and nonaborted pollen. Stain Technol 44 : 117–122.
68. BouyerD, RoudierF, HeeseM, AndersenED, GeyD, et al. (2011) Polycomb repressive complex 2 controls the embryo-to-seedling phase transition. PLoS Genet 7: e1002014 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002014.
69. HeymanJ, Van den DaeleH, De WitK, BoudolfV, BerckmansB, et al. (2011) Arabidopsis ULTRAVIOLET-B-INSENSITIVE4 maintains cell division activity by temporal inhibition of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome. Plant Cell 23 : 4394–4410.
70. RamakersC, RuijterJM, DeprezRHL, MoormanAFM (2003) Assumption-free analysis of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) data. Neurosci Lett 339 : 62–66.
71. RuijterJM, RamakersC, HoogaarsWMH, KarlenY, BakkerO, et al. (2009) Amplification efficiency: linking baseline and bias in the analysis of quantitative PCR data. Nucleic Acids Res 37: e45.
72. HellemansJ, MortierG, De PaepeA, SpelemanF, VandesompeleJ (2007) qBase relative quantification framework and software for management and automated analysis of real-time quantitative PCR data. Genome Biol 8: R19.
Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova
Nemáte účet? Registrujte sa
Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.
