Friends, relatives, sanity, and health: The costs of politics

Autoři: Kevin B. Smith aff001;  Matthew V. Hibbing aff002;  John R. Hibbing aff001
Působiště autorů: Department of Political Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States of America aff001;  Department of Political Science, University of California-Merced, Merced, CA, United States of America aff002
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(9)
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221870


Political scientists have long known that political involvement exacts costs but they have typically defined these costs in relatively narrow, largely economic terms. Though anecdotal evidence suggests that the costs of politics may in fact extend beyond economics to frayed personal relationships, compromised emotional stability, and even physical problems, no systematic evidence on these broader costs exists. We construct and validate batteries of survey items that delineate the physical, social, and emotional costs of political engagement and administer these items to a demographically representative sample of U.S. adults. The results suggest that a large number of Americans believe their physical health has been harmed by their exposure to politics and even more report that politics has resulted in emotional costs and lost friendships.

Klíčová slova:

Adults – Behavior – Behavioral and social aspects of health – Emotions – Health economics – Mental health and psychiatry – Political aspects of health – Surveys


1. Downs A. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row; 1957.

2. Riker W.H., and Ordeshook P. C. A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” Am Pol Sci Review. 1968. 62 (1): 25–42.

3. Aldrich J. H. Rational Choice and Turnout.” Am J Pol Sci. 1993. 37 (1): 246–78.

4. Olson M. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press; 1965.

5. Brennan G., and L. Democracy and Decisions: the Pure Theory of Electoral Preference. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1993.

6. Hersh, E. D. The Problem With Participatory Democracy Is the Participants. The New York Times. 2014 Jun 29. Available from:

7. Blakely T.S., Kennedy B.P., and Kawachi I. Socioeconomic Inequality in Voting Participation and Self-Rated Health. Am J Public Health. 2001. 91(1): 99–104. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.1.99 11189832

8. Kawachi I., and Berkman L. Social Cohesion, Social Capital and Health. In Social Epidemiology, eds, Lisa Berman and Ichiro Kawachi. New York: Oxford University Press: 174–190; 2000.

9. Williams D.R., and Medlock M.M. Health Effects of Dramatic Societal Events: Ramifications of the Recent Presidential Election. New Eng J of Medicine. 2017. 373: 2295–99.

10. Williams D. R. and Mohammed S. A. Racism and Health I: Pathways and Scientific Evidence. 2013 Am Behav Scientist 57(8): 1152–1173.

11. American Psychological Association. Coping With Change. 2017. Available from:

12. Chapman University Survey of American Fears. October 11, 2016. Available from:

13. Chokshi, N. Americans are among the Most Stressed People in the World, Poll Finds. The New York Times. 2019 April 25. Available from:

14. Hagan M., Sladek M., Luecken L. and Doane L. Event-Related Clinical Distress in College Students. J Am College Health. 2018. Available from:

15. Goldman L., Lim M., Chen Q., Jin P., Muennig P., and Vagelos A. Independent Relationship of Changes in Death Rates with Changes in US Presidential Voting. J Gen Internal Medicine. 2018. Available from:

16. Stosny, S. He once called it ‘election stress disorder.’ Now the therapist says we’re suffering from this. The Washington Post 2017 Feb 6. Available From:

17. Skinner H. and Allen B. Alcohol Dependence Syndrome: Measurement and Validation. J Abnormal Psych. 1982. 91(3): 199–209.

18. Boudreau C., and Lupia A. 2013. Political Knowledge. In Handbook of Experimental Political Science, eds. Druckman J., Green D., Kuklinski J., and Lupia A. New York: Cambridge University Press, 171–186; 2013.

19. Barabas J., Jerit J., Pollock W., Rainey C. The Question(s) of Political Knowledge. Am Pol Sci Rev. 2014. 108 (4): 840–855.

20. Ansolabehere S., and Schaffner B. Does Survey Mode Still Matter? Findings from a 2010 Multi-Mode Comparison. Pol Analy. 2017. 22 (3): 285–303.

21. Bytzek E. and Bieber I. Does Survey Mode Matter for Studying Electoral Behaviour? Evidence from the 2009 German Longitudinal Election Study. Elect Stud. 2016. 43: 41–51.

22. Chang L, and Krosnick J. National Surveys Via Rdd Telephone Interviewing Versus the Internet: Comparing Sample Representativeness and Response Quality. Pub Op Quart. 2009. 73 (4): 641–678.

23. Harris, K. The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, Waves I & II. 2009. Database: Data Sharing for Demographic Research. Available from:

24. Abramowitz A. The Disappearing Center. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press. 2010.

25. Klar M., and Kasser T. Some Benefits of Being an Activist: Measuring Activism and Its Role in Psychological Well-Being. Political Psychology. 2009. 30 (5): 755–77.

Článok vyšiel v časopise


2019 Číslo 9

Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle

Tejto téme sa ďalej venujú…


Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Faktory ovlivňující léčbu levotyroxinem
nový kurz

Kurz originály vs. generika

Autori: MUDr. Petr Výborný, CSc., FEBO

Autori: MUDr. Jiří Horažďovský, Ph.D

Klinická farmakokinetika betablokátorů

Všetky kurzy
Zabudnuté heslo

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.


Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa