Reduced Crossover Interference and Increased ZMM-Independent Recombination in the Absence of Tel1/ATM

English version České info

Meiosis is the type of cell division used by sexually reproducing organisms to create gametes (eggs and sperm, in animals). During meiosis, the two copies of each chromosome swap segments of DNA, forming reciprocal exchanges called crossovers. Crossovers are needed to help ensure that each gamete inherits a copy of every chromosome. Exchange occurs at deliberately induced double-strand DNA breaks, a subset of which become crossovers. In this study we investigate the role of the Tel1/ATM checkpoint kinase in modulating meiotic recombination in budding yeast. We find that in the absence of Tel1, recombination is increased, crossover distribution is altered, and crossovers are less dependent on the Zip3 protein, which mediates the major crossover pathway in yeast. We also find evidence which we infer indicates that Tel1, the helicase Sgs1, and the crossover-promoting proteins Zip3 and Msh4 influence how breaks are positioned throughout the genome. These results are consistent with a role for Tel1 in regulating the spacing of breaks along chromosomes. Our results also suggest that crossover-committed sites may suppress break formation in surrounding areas. Such a feedback mechanism would allow cells to achieve a sufficient number of crossovers without sustaining excess DNA breaks, which are inherently risky.

Vyšlo v časopise: Reduced Crossover Interference and Increased ZMM-Independent Recombination in the Absence of Tel1/ATM. PLoS Genet 11(8): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005478
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005478

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. Berchowitz LE, Copenhaver GP (2010) Genetic interference: don't stand so close to me. Curr Genomics 11 : 91–102. doi: 10.2174/138920210790886835 20885817

2. Sturtevant AH (1913) A Third Group of Linked Genes in Drosophila Ampelophila. Science 37 : 990–992. 17833164

3. Keeney S (2008) Spo11 and the Formation of DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Meiosis. Genome Dyn Stab 2 : 81–123. 21927624

4. Allers T, Lichten M (2001) Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis. Cell 106 : 47–57. 11461701

5. Borner GV, Kleckner N, Hunter N (2004) Crossover/noncrossover differentiation, synaptonemal complex formation, and regulatory surveillance at the leptotene/zygotene transition of meiosis. Cell 117 : 29–45. 15066280

6. Hunter N, Kleckner N (2001) The single-end invasion: an asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double-Holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination. Cell 106 : 59–70. 11461702

7. Agarwal S, Roeder GS (2000) Zip3 provides a link between recombination enzymes and synaptonemal complex proteins. Cell 102 : 245–255. 10943844

8. Chua PR, Roeder GS (1998) Zip2, a meiosis-specific protein required for the initiation of chromosome synapsis. Cell 93 : 349–359. 9590170

9. Fung JC, Rockmill B, Odell M, Roeder GS (2004) Imposition of crossover interference through the nonrandom distribution of synapsis initiation complexes. Cell 116 : 795–802. 15035982

10. Henderson KA, Keeney S (2004) Tying synaptonemal complex initiation to the formation and programmed repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101 : 4519–4524. 15070750

11. Serrentino ME, Chaplais E, Sommermeyer V, Borde V (2013) Differential association of the conserved SUMO ligase Zip3 with meiotic double-strand break sites reveals regional variations in the outcome of meiotic recombination. PLoS Genet 9: e1003416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003416 23593021

12. Lynn A, Soucek R, Borner GV (2007) ZMM proteins during meiosis: crossover artists at work. Chromosome Res 15 : 591–605. 17674148

13. Wang S, Zickler D, Kleckner N, Zhang L (2015) Meiotic crossover patterns: obligatory crossover, interference and homeostasis in a single process. Cell Cycle 14 : 305–314. doi: 10.4161/15384101.2014.991185 25590558

14. Zhang L, Espagne E, de Muyt A, Zickler D, Kleckner NE (2014) Interference-mediated synaptonemal complex formation with embedded crossover designation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111: E5059–5068. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1416411111 25380597

15. Zhang L, Liang Z, Hutchinson J, Kleckner N (2014) Crossover patterning by the beam-film model: analysis and implications. PLoS Genet 10: e1004042. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004042 24497834

16. Zhang L, Wang S, Yin S, Hong S, Kim KP, Kleckner N (2014) Topoisomerase II mediates meiotic crossover interference. Nature 511 : 551–556. doi: 10.1038/nature13442 25043020

17. Joshi N, Barot A, Jamison C, Borner GV (2009) Pch2 links chromosome axis remodeling at future crossover sites and crossover distribution during yeast meiosis. PLoS Genet 5: e1000557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000557 19629172

18. Lao JP, Cloud V, Huang CC, Grubb J, Thacker D, Lee CY, et al. (2013) Meiotic crossover control by concerted action of Rad51-Dmc1 in homolog template bias and robust homeostatic regulation. PLoS Genet 9: e1003978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003978 24367271

19. Lisby M, Rothstein R (2009) Choreography of recombination proteins during the DNA damage response. DNA Repair (Amst) 8 : 1068–1076.

20. Lange J, Pan J, Cole F, Thelen MP, Jasin M, Keeney S (2011) ATM controls meiotic double-strand-break formation. Nature 479 : 237–240. doi: 10.1038/nature10508 22002603

21. Joyce EF, Pedersen M, Tiong S, White-Brown SK, Paul A, Campbell SD, et al. (2011) Drosophila ATM and ATR have distinct activities in the regulation of meiotic DNA damage and repair. J Cell Biol 195 : 359–367. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201104121 22024169

22. Carballo JA, Panizza S, Serrentino ME, Johnson AL, Geymonat M, Borde V, et al. (2013) Budding yeast ATM/ATR control meiotic double-strand break (DSB) levels by down-regulating Rec114, an essential component of the DSB-machinery. PLoS Genet 9: e1003545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003545 23825959

23. Garcia V, Gray S, Allison RM, Cooper TJ, Neale MJ (2015) Tel1-mediated interference suppresses clustered meiotic double-strand-break formation. Nature 520 : 114–118. doi: 10.1038/nature13993 25539084

24. Zhang L, Kim KP, Kleckner NE, Storlazzi A (2011) Meiotic double-strand breaks occur once per pair of (sister) chromatids and, via Mec1/ATR and Tel1/ATM, once per quartet of chromatids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108 : 20036–20041. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117937108 22123968

25. Argunhan B, Farmer S, Leung WK, Terentyev Y, Humphryes N, Tsubouchi T, et al. (2013) Direct and indirect control of the initiation of meiotic recombination by DNA damage checkpoint mechanisms in budding yeast. PLoS One 8: e65875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065875 23762445

26. Blitzblau HG, Hochwagen A (2013) ATR/Mec1 prevents lethal meiotic recombination initiation on partially replicated chromosomes in budding yeast. Elife 2: e00844. doi: 10.7554/eLife.00844 24137535

27. Barchi M, Mahadevaiah S, Di Giacomo M, Baudat F, de Rooij DG, Burgoyne PS, et al. (2005) Surveillance of different recombination defects in mouse spermatocytes yields distinct responses despite elimination at an identical developmental stage. Mol Cell Biol 25 : 7203–7215. 16055729

28. Barlow C, Liyanage M, Moens PB, Tarsounas M, Nagashima K, Brown K, et al. (1998) Atm deficiency results in severe meiotic disruption as early as leptonema of prophase I. Development 125 : 4007–4017. 9735362

29. Di Giacomo M, Barchi M, Baudat F, Edelmann W, Keeney S, Jasin M (2005) Distinct DNA-damage-dependent and -independent responses drive the loss of oocytes in recombination-defective mouse mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102 : 737–742. 15640358

30. Barchi M, Roig I, Di Giacomo M, de Rooij DG, Keeney S, Jasin M (2008) ATM promotes the obligate XY crossover and both crossover control and chromosome axis integrity on autosomes. PLoS Genet 4: e1000076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000076 18497861

31. Bellani MA, Romanienko PJ, Cairatti DA, Camerini-Otero RD (2005) SPO11 is required for sex-body formation, and Spo11 heterozygosity rescues the prophase arrest of Atm−/ −⁠ spermatocytes. J Cell Sci 118 : 3233–3245. 15998665

32. Joshi N, Brown MS, Bishop DK, Borner GV (2015) Gradual implementation of the meiotic recombination program via checkpoint pathways controlled by global DSB levels. Mol Cell 57 : 797–811. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.12.027 25661491

33. Cooper TJ, Wardell K, Garcia V, Neale MJ (2014) Homeostatic regulation of meiotic DSB formation by ATM/ATR. Exp Cell Res 329 : 124–131. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.07.016 25116420

34. Fan QQ, Xu F, White MA, Petes TD (1997) Competition between adjacent meiotic recombination hotspots in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 145 : 661–670. 9055076

35. Robine N, Uematsu N, Amiot F, Gidrol X, Barillot E, Nicolas A, et al. (2007) Genome-wide redistribution of meiotic double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 27 : 1868–1880. 17189430

36. Wu TC, Lichten M (1995) Factors that affect the location and frequency of meiosis-induced double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 140 : 55–66. 7635308

37. Xu L, Kleckner N (1995) Sequence non-specific double-strand breaks and interhomolog interactions prior to double-strand break formation at a meiotic recombination hot spot in yeast. EMBO J 14 : 5115–5128. 7588640

38. Carballo JA, Johnson AL, Sedgwick SG, Cha RS (2008) Phosphorylation of the axial element protein Hop1 by Mec1/Tel1 ensures meiotic interhomolog recombination. Cell 132 : 758–770. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.035 18329363

39. Cartagena-Lirola H, Guerini I, Viscardi V, Lucchini G, Longhese MP (2006) Budding Yeast Sae2 is an In Vivo Target of the Mec1 and Tel1 Checkpoint Kinases During Meiosis. Cell Cycle 5 : 1549–1559. 16861895

40. Cheng YH, Chuang CN, Shen HJ, Lin FM, Wang TF (2013) Three distinct modes of Mec1/ATR and Tel1/ATM activation illustrate differential checkpoint targeting during budding yeast early meiosis. Mol Cell Biol 33 : 3365–3376. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00438-13 23775120

41. Ho HC, Burgess SM (2011) Pch2 acts through Xrs2 and Tel1/ATM to modulate interhomolog bias and checkpoint function during meiosis. PLoS Genet 7: e1002351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002351 22072981

42. Keeney S, Lange J, Mohibullah N (2014) Self-organization of meiotic recombination initiation: general principles and molecular pathways. Annu Rev Genet 48 : 187–214. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-120213-092304 25421598

43. Henzel JV, Nabeshima K, Schvarzstein M, Turner BE, Villeneuve AM, Hillers KJ (2011) An asymmetric chromosome pair undergoes synaptic adjustment and crossover redistribution during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis: implications for sex chromosome evolution. Genetics 187 : 685–699. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.124958 21212235

44. Nabeshima K, Villeneuve AM, Hillers KJ (2004) Chromosome-wide regulation of meiotic crossover formation in Caenorhabditis elegans requires properly assembled chromosome axes. Genetics 168 : 1275–1292. 15579685

45. Hayashi M, Mlynarczyk-Evans S, Villeneuve AM (2010) The synaptonemal complex shapes the crossover landscape through cooperative assembly, crossover promotion and crossover inhibition during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis. Genetics 186 : 45–58. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.115501 20592266

46. Kauppi L, Barchi M, Lange J, Baudat F, Jasin M, Keeney S (2013) Numerical constraints and feedback control of double-strand breaks in mouse meiosis. Genes Dev 27 : 873–886. doi: 10.1101/gad.213652.113 23599345

47. Thacker D, Mohibullah N, Zhu X, Keeney S (2014) Homologue engagement controls meiotic DNA break number and distribution. Nature 510 : 241–246. doi: 10.1038/nature13120 24717437

48. Wojtasz L, Daniel K, Roig I, Bolcun-Filas E, Xu H, Boonsanay V, et al. (2009) Mouse HORMAD1 and HORMAD2, two conserved meiotic chromosomal proteins, are depleted from synapsed chromosome axes with the help of TRIP13 AAA-ATPase. PLoS Genet 5: e1000702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000702 19851446

49. Anderson CM, Chen SY, Dimon MT, Oke A, DeRisi JL, Fung JC (2011) ReCombine: a suite of programs for detection and analysis of meiotic recombination in whole-genome datasets. PLoS One 6: e25509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025509 22046241

50. Chen SY, Tsubouchi T, Rockmill B, Sandler JS, Richards DR, Vader G, et al. (2008) Global analysis of the meiotic crossover landscape. Dev Cell 15 : 401–415. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.07.006 18691940

51. Mancera E, Bourgon R, Brozzi A, Huber W, Steinmetz LM (2008) High-resolution mapping of meiotic crossovers and non-crossovers in yeast. Nature 454 : 479–485. doi: 10.1038/nature07135 18615017

52. Qi J, Wijeratne AJ, Tomsho LP, Hu Y, Schuster SC, Ma H (2009) Characterization of meiotic crossovers and gene conversion by whole-genome sequencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Genomics 10 : 475. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-475 19832984

53. Oke A, Anderson CM, Yam P, Fung JC (2014) Controlling Meiotic Recombinational Repair—Specifying the Roles of ZMMs, Sgs1 and Mus81/Mms4 in Crossover Formation. PLoS Genet 10: e1004690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004690 25329811

54. Jessop L, Rockmill B, Roeder GS, Lichten M (2006) Meiotic chromosome synapsis-promoting proteins antagonize the anti-crossover activity of Sgs1. PLoS Genet 2: e155. 17002499

55. Oh SD, Lao JP, Hwang PY, Taylor AF, Smith GR, Hunter N (2007) BLM ortholog, Sgs1, prevents aberrant crossing-over by suppressing formation of multichromatid joint molecules. Cell 130 : 259–272. 17662941

56. Rockmill B, Fung JC, Branda SS, Roeder GS (2003) The Sgs1 helicase regulates chromosome synapsis and meiotic crossing over. Curr Biol 13 : 1954–1962. 14614820

57. Libuda DE, Uzawa S, Meyer BJ, Villeneuve AM (2013) Meiotic chromosome structures constrain and respond to designation of crossover sites. Nature 502 : 703–706. doi: 10.1038/nature12577 24107990

58. Lynn A, Koehler KE, Judis L, Chan ER, Cherry JP, Schwartz S, et al. (2002) Covarian of synaptonemal complex length and mammalian meiotic exchange rates. Science 296 : 22222225.

59. Mets DG, Meyer BJ (2009) Condensins regulate meiotic DNA break distribution, thus crossover frequency, by controlling chromosome structure. Cell 139 : 73–86. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.035 19781752

60. Yokoo R, Zawadzki KA, Nabeshima K, Drake M, Arur S, Villeneuve AM (2012) COSA-1 reveals robust homeostasis and separable licensing and reinforcement steps governing meiotic crossovers. Cell 149 : 75–87. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.052 22464324

61. Youds JL, Mets DG, McIlwraith MJ, Martin JS, Ward JD, NJ ON, et al. (2010) RTEL-1 enforces meiotic crossover interference and homeostasis. Science 327 : 1254–1258. doi: 10.1126/science.1183112 20203049

62. Terasawa M, Ogawa T, Tsukamoto Y, Ogawa H (2008) Sae2p phosphorylation is crucial for cooperation with Mre11p for resection of DNA double-strand break ends during meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Genet Syst 83 : 209–217. 18670132

63. de los Santos T, Hunter N, Lee C, Larkin B, Loidl J, Hollingsworth NM (2003) The Mus81/Mms4 endonuclease acts independently of double-Holliday junction resolution to promote a distinct subset of crossovers during meiosis in budding yeast. Genetics 164 : 81–94. 12750322

64. Stahl FW, Foss HM, Young LS, Borts RH, Abdullah MF, Copenhaver GP (2004) Does crossover interference count in Saccharomyces cerevisiae? Genetics 168 : 35–48. 15454525

65. Zalevsky J, MacQueen AJ, Duffy JB, Kemphues KJ, Villeneuve AM (1999) Crossing over during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis requires a conserved MutS-based pathway that is partially dispensable in budding yeast. Genetics 153 : 1271–1283. 10545458

66. Schwacha A, Kleckner N (1997) Interhomolog bias during meiotic recombination: meiotic functions promote a highly differentiated interhomolog-only pathway. Cell 90 : 1123–1135. 9323140

67. Gray S, Allison RM, Garcia V, Goldman AS, Neale MJ (2013) Positive regulation of meiotic DNA double-strand break formation by activation of the DNA damage checkpoint kinase Mec1(ATR). Open Biol 3 : 130019. doi: 10.1098/rsob.130019 23902647

68. Rockmill B, Lefrancois P, Voelkel-Meiman K, Oke A, Roeder GS, Fung JC (2013) High throughput sequencing reveals alterations in the recombination signatures with diminishing Spo11 activity. PLoS Genet 9: e1003932. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003932 24204324

69. Pan J, Sasaki M, Kniewel R, Murakami H, Blitzblau HG, Tischfield SE, et al. (2011) A hierarchical combination of factors shapes the genome-wide topography of yeast meiotic recombination initiation. Cell 144 : 719–731. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.009 21376234

70. Craven RJ, Greenwell PW, Dominska M, Petes TD (2002) Regulation of genome stability by TEL1 and MEC1, yeast homologs of the mammalian ATM and ATR genes. Genetics 161 : 493–507. 12072449

71. Greenwell PW, Kronmal SL, Porter SE, Gassenhuber J, Obermaier B, Petes TD (1995) TEL1, a gene involved in controlling telomere length in S. cerevisiae, is homologous to the human ataxia telangiectasia gene. Cell 82 : 823–829. 7671310

72. Suetomi K, Mochizuki M, Suzuki S, Yamamoto H, Yamamoto K (2010) Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mec1, tel1, and mre11 mutations on spontaneous and methylmethane sulfonate-induced genome instability. Genes Genet Syst 85 : 1–8. 20410660

73. Anderson LK, Reeves A, Webb LM, Ashley T (1999) Distribution of crossing over on mouse synaptonemal complexes using immunofluorescent localization of MLH1 protein. Genetics 151 : 1569–1579. 10101178

74. Falque M, Mercier R, Mezard C, de Vienne D, Martin OC (2007) Patterns of recombination and MLH1 foci density along mouse chromosomes: modeling effects of interference and obligate chiasma. Genetics 176 : 1453–1467. 17483430

75. Holloway JK, Booth J, Edelmann W, McGowan CH, Cohen PE (2008) MUS81 generates a subset of MLH1-MLH3-independent crossovers in mammalian meiosis. PLoS Genet 4: e1000186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000186 18787696

76. Svetlanov A, Baudat F, Cohen PE, de Massy B (2008) Distinct functions of MLH3 at recombination hot spots in the mouse. Genetics 178 : 1937–1945. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.084798 18430927

77. Buhler C, Borde V, Lichten M (2007) Mapping meiotic single-strand DNA reveals a new landscape of DNA double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Biol 5: e324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060104 18076285

78. Rockmill B (2009) Chromosome spreading and immunofluorescence methods in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Mol Biol 558 : 3–13. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-103-5_1 19685315