Efficacy of collagen and elastin matrix in the treatment of complex lower extremity wounds

Autori: K. N. Manjunath; V. Nisarga; M. S. Venkatesh; P. Sanmathi; S. Shanthkumar
Pôsobisko autorov: Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ramaiah Medical College, Bangalore, India
Vyšlo v časopise: ACTA CHIRURGIAE PLASTICAE, 66, 3, 2024, pp. 98-103
doi: https://doi.org/10.48095/ccachp202498

Zdroje

1. Espriella CM., Gerardo RG., Fernando BV., et al. Management of complex wounds with dermal substitute assisted by a negative pressure system. Modern Plastic Surgery. 2023, 13 (4): 95–105.

2. Ferreira MC., Tuma P. Jr, Carvalho VF., et al. Complex wounds. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2006, 61 (6): 571–578.

3. Yang JD., Cho IG., Kwon JH., et al. Feasibility of the use of RapiGraft and skin grafting in reconstructive surgery. Arch Plast Surg. 2016, 43 (5): 418–423.

4. Baumann L., Bernstein EF., Weiss AS., et al. Clinical relevance of elastin in the structure and function of skin. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2021, 3 (3): ojab019.

5. Loder S., Levi B., Clark A. Skin grafting. In: Peter Neligan Plastic surgery, 5th ed. Elsevier Inc: 2024, p. 301.

6. Urciuolo F., Casale C., Imparato G., et al. Bioengineered skin substitutes: the role of extracellular matrix and vascularization in the healing of deep wounds. J Clin Med. 2019, 8 (12): 2083.

7. Watt FM., Fujiwara H. Cell-extracellular matrix interactions in normal and diseased skin. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011, 3 (4): a005124.

8. Kirsner RS., Bohn G., Driver VR., et al. Human acellular dermal wound matrix: evidence and experience. Int Wound J. 2015, 12 (6): 646–654.

9. Schultz GS., Davidson JM., Kirsner RS., et al. Dynamic reciprocity in the wound microenvironment. Wound Repair Regen. 2011, 19 (2): 134–148.

10. Yildirimer L., Thanh NT., Seifalian AM. Skin regeneration scaffolds: a multimodal bottom-up approach. Trends Biotechnol. 2012, 30 (12): 638–648.

11. Vecin NM., Kirsner RS. Skin substitutes as treatment for chronic wounds: current and future directions. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023, 10 : 1154567.

12. Kumar P., Gupta A. Updated classification of skin substitutes. Indian J Plast Surg. 2023, 56 (4): 388–389.

13. Davison-Kotler E., Sharma V., Kang NV., et al. A universal classification system of skin substitutes inspired by factorial design. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2018, 24 (4): 279–288.

14. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Cultured epithelial autograft product classification. [online]. Available from: https: //www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfPCD/ classification.cfm?id=6224.

15. Debels H., Hamdi M., Abberton K., et al. Dermal matrices and bioengineered skin substitutes: a critical review of current options. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015, 3 (1): e284.

16. Melman L., Jenkins ED., Hamilton NA., et al. Early biocompatibility of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biologic meshes in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair. Hernia. 2011, 15 (2): 157–164.

17. Eppley BL. Experimental assessment of the revascularization of acellular human dermis for soft-tissue augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001, 107 (3): 757–762.

18. Campbell KT., Burns NK., Ensor J., et al. Metrics of cellular and vascular infiltration of human acellular dermal matrix in ventral hernia repairs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012, 129 (4): 888–896.

19. Xu H., Wan H., Sandor M., et al. Host response to human acellular dermal matrix transplantation in a primate model of abdominal wall repair. Tissue Eng Part A. 2008, 14 (12): 2009–2019.

20. Urciuolo F., Casale C., Imparato G., et al. Bioengineered skin substitutes: the role of extracellular matrix and vascularization in the healing of deep wounds. J Clin Med. 2019, 8 (12): 2083.

21. Min JH., Yun IS., Lew DH., et al. The use of matriderm and autologous skin graft in the treatment of full thickness skin defects. Arch Plast Surg. 2014, 41 (4): 330–336.

22. Hahn HM., Jeong YS., Lee IJ., et al. Efficacy of split-thickness skin graft combined with novel sheet-type reprocessed micronized acellular dermal matrix. BMC Surg. 2022, 22 (1): 358.

23. Kang SW., Park JK., Shon HC., et al. Skin graft using MatriDerm® for plantar defects after excision of skin cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2019, 11 : 2947–2950.

24. Timmermans FW., Middelkoop E. Invasive techniques in scar management: skin substitutes. In: Téot L., Mustoe TA., Middelkoop E., et al. Textbook on Scar Management. Springer, Cham (CH): 2020.

25. Lee KC., Bamford A., Gardiner F., et al. Burns objective scar scale (BOSS): Validation of an objective measurement devices based burn scar scale panel. Burns. 2020, 46 (1): 110–120.

26. Lempert M., Halvachizadeh S., Salfelder CC., et al. Long-term experience with a collagen-elastin scaffold in combination with split-thickness skin grafts for the treatment of full-thickness soft tissue defects: improvements in outcome –⁠ a retrospective cohort study and case report. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022, 407 (1): 327–335. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021 -⁠ 02224-7.

27. Ryssel H., Germann G., Kloeters O., et al. Dermal substitution with Matriderm (^®) in burns on the dorsum of the hand. Burns. 2010, 36 (8): 1248–1253.

28. Watfa W., di Summa PG., Meuli J., et al. MatriDerm decreases donor site morbidity after radial forearm free flap harvest in transgender surgery. J Sex Med. 2017, 14 (10): 1277–1284.

Assoc. Prof. Kalapurmat N. Manjunath, MD

Department of Plastic

and Reconstructive Surgery

Ramaiah Medical College Hospital

MSR Nagar

MSRIT post, New BEL Road

Bangalore –⁠ 560054

Karnataka, India

drknmanjunath@gmail.com

Submitted: 9. 7. 2024

Accepted: 29. 9. 2024