Delayed two stage breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix

Autori: M. Chotárová ¹; D. Mitevová ¹; F. Čaniga ¹; R. Trška ^1,2; D. Palenčár ^1,2
Pôsobisko autorov: Department of Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Bratislava, Slovakia ¹; Department of Plastic Surgery, Medical Faculty, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia ²
Vyšlo v časopise: ACTA CHIRURGIAE PLASTICAE, 66, 3, 2024, pp. 104-111
doi: https://doi.org/10.48095/ccachp2024104

Zdroje

1. Duncan DI. Correction of implant rippling using allograft dermis. Aesthet Surg J. 2001, 21 (1): 81–84.

2. Baxter RA. Intracapsular allogenic dermal grafts for breast implant-related problems. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003, 112 (6): 1692–1696; discussion 1697–1698.

3. Breuing KH., Warren SM. Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings. Ann Plast Surg. 2005, 55 (3): 232–239.

4. Macadam SA., Lennox PA. Acellular dermal matrices: use in reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery. Can J Plast Surg. 2012, 20 (2): 75–89.

5. Sbitany H., Sandeen SN., Amalfi AN., et al. Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: a head-to-head comparison of outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009, 124 (6): 1735–1740.

6. Hanna KR., DeGeorge BR. Jr, Mericli AF., et al. Comparison study of two types of expander-based breast reconstruction: acellular dermal matrix-assisted versus total submuscular placement. Ann Plast Surg. 2013, 70 (1): 10–15.

7. Scheflan M., Colwell AS. Tissue Reinforcement in Implant-based Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2014, 2 (8): e192.

8. Cabalag MS., Rostek M., Miller GS., et al. Alloplastic adjuncts in breast reconstruction. Gland Surg. 2016, 5 (2): 158–173. doi: 10.3978/ j.issn.2227-684X.2015.06.02.

9. Konowitz SJ., Robb GL. Radiation therapy and breast reconstruction: a critical review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009, 124 (2): 395–408.

10. Chun YS., Verma K., Rosen H., et al. Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010, 125 (2): 429–436.

11. Antony AK., McCarthy CM., Cordeiro PG., et al. Acellular human dermis implantation in 153 immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstructions: determining the incidence and significant predictors of complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010, 125 (6): 1606–1614.

12. Tasoulis MK., Teoh V., Khan A., et al. Acellular dermal matrices as an adjunct to implant breast reconstruction: Analysis of outcomes and complications. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020, 46 (4 Pt A): 511–515.

13. Seth AK., Hirsch EM., Fine NA., et al. Utility of acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction in the setting of radiation: a comparative analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012, 130 (4): 750–758.

14. Quinn TT., Miller GS., Rostek M., et al. Prosthetic breast reconstruction: indications and update. Gland Surg. 2016, 5 (2): 174–186.

15. Ricci JA., Epstein S., Momoh AO., et al. A meta-analysis of implant-based breast reconstruction and timing of adjuvant radiation therapy. J Surg Res. 2017, 218 : 108–116.

16. Selber JC., Wren JH., Garvey PB., et al. Critical Evaluation of risk factors and early complications in 564 consecutive two-stage implant-based breast reconstructions using acellular dermal matrix at a single center. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015, 136 (1): 10–20.

17. Hallberg H., Rafnsdottir S., Selvaggi G., et al. Benefits and risks with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and mesh support in immediate breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2018, 52 (3): 130–147.

18. Voineskos SH., Frank SG., Cordeiro PG. Breast reconstruction following conservative mastectomies: predictors of complications and outcomes. Gland Surg. 2015, 4 (6): 484–496.

19. Sbitany H., Serletti JM. Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction: a systematic and critical review of efficacy and associated morbidity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011, 128 (6): 1162–1169.

20. Slavin SA., Lin SJ. The use of acellular dermal matrices in revisional breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012, 130 (5 Suppl 2): 70S–85S.

21. Dragúňová J., Kabát P., Babál P., et al. Development of a new method for the preparation of an acellular allodermis, quality control and cytotoxicity testing. Cell Tissue Bank. 2017, 18 (2): 153–166. doi: 10.1007/s10561-017 -⁠ 9625-6.

22. Chepla KJ., Dagget JR., Soltanian HT. The partial AlloDerm sling: reducing allograft costs associated with breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012, 65 (7): 924–930.

23. Cheng A., Saint-Cyr M. Comparison of different ADM materials in breast surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 2012, 39 (2): 167–175.

24. Darby S., McGale P., Correa C., et al. Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet. 2011, 378 (9804): 1707–1716.

25. García-Solbas S., Lorenzo-Liñán MÁ., Castro-Luna G. Long-term quality of life (BREAST-Q) in patients with mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021, 18 (18): 9707.

26. Brewster AM., Peterson S., Cantor S., et al. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and breast cancer: clinical and psychosocial outcomes. Patient-Centered Outcomes [online]. Washington (DC): Research Institute (PCORI). 2018.

27. Národné centrum zdravotníckych informácií. NCZI: Počet novodiagnostikovaných zhubných nádorov v Slovenskej republike. [online]. Available from: https: //www.nczisk.sk/Aktuality/Pages/NCZI-Pocet-novodiagnostikovanych-zhubnych-nadorov-v-Slovenskej-republike.aspx.

28. Hoejvig JH., Pedersen NJ., Gramkow CS., et al. Delayed two-stage breast reconstruction: the impact of radiotherapy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019, 72 (11): 1763–1768.

29. Lardi AM., Ho-Asjoe M., Junge K., et al. Capsular contracture in implant based breast reconstruction-the effect of porcine acellular dermal matrix. Gland Surg. 2017, 6 (1): 49–56.

30. Salzberg CA., Ashikari AY., Berry C., et al. Acellular dermal matrix-assisted direct-to-implant breast reconstruction and capsular contracture: a 13-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016, 138 (2): 329–337.

31. Nahabedian MY. Acellular dermal matrices in primary breast reconstruction: principles, concepts, and indications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012, 130 (5 Suppl 2): 44S–53S.

32. Skovsted Yde S., Brunbjerg ME., Damsgaard TE. Acellular dermal matrices in breast reconstructions –⁠ a literature review. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2016, 50 (4): 187–196.

33. Wong AK., Schonmeyer BH., Singh P., et al. Histologic analysis of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in acellular human dermis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008, 121 (4): 1144–1152.

34. Bohac M., Varga I., Polak S., et al. Delayed post mastectomy breast reconstructions with allogeneic acellular dermal matrix prepared by a new decellularizationmethod. Cell Tissue Bank. 2018, 19 (1): 61–68.

35. Garcia O. Jr, Scott JR. Analysis of acellular dermal matrix integration and revascularization following tissue expander breast reconstruction in a clinically relevant large-animal model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013, 131 (5): 741e–751e.

36. Lin KY., Blechman AB., Brenin DR. Implant-based, two-stage breast reconstruction in the setting of radiation injury: an outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012, 129 (4): 817–823.

37. Wilson RL., Kirwan CC., O’Donoghue JM., et al. BROWSE: A multicentre comparison of nine year outcomes in acellular dermal matrix based and complete submuscular implant-based immediate breast reconstruction-aesthetics, capsular contracture and patient reported outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022, 48 (1): 73–81.

38. Kim IK., Park SO., Chang H., et al. Inhibition mechanism of acellular dermal matrix on capsule formation in expander-implant breast reconstruction after postmastectomy radiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018, 25 (8): 2279–2287.

39. Rieger UM., Mesina J., Kalbermatten DF., et al. Bacterial biofilms and capsular contracture in patients with breast implants. Br J Surg. 2013, 100 (6): 768–774.

40. Stevens WG., Nahabedian MY., Calobrace MB., et al. Risk factor analysis for capsular contracture: a 5-year Sientra study analysis using round, smooth, and textured im -⁠ plants for breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013, 132 (5): 1115–1123.

41. Borrelli MR., Irizzary D., Patel RA., et al. Pro-fibrotic CD26-positive fibroblasts are present in greater abundance in breast capsule tissue of irradiated breasts. Aesthet Surg J. 2020, 40 (4): 369–379.

42. Pannucci CJ., Antony AK., Wilkins EG. The impact of acellular dermal matrix on tissue expander/implant loss in breast reconstruction: an analysis of the tracking outcomes and operations in plastic surgery database. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013, 132 (1): 1–10.

43. Nava MB., Pennati AE., Lozza L., et al. Outcome of different timings of radiotherapy in implant-based breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011, 128 (2): 353–359.

44. Lam TC., Hsieh F., Salinas J., et al. Two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction after mastectomy with or without prior postmastectomy radiotherapy. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017, 5 (9): e1489.

45. Albornoz CR., Bach PB., Mehrara BJ., et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013, 131 (1): 15–23.

46. Lam TC., Hsieh F., Boyages J. The effects of postmastectomy adjuvant radiotherapy on immediate two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013, 132 (3): 511–518.

47. Lee KT., Mun GH. Prosthetic breast reconstruction in previously irradiated breasts: a meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2015, 112 (5): 468–475.

48. Dikmans RE., Negenborn VL., Bouman MB., et al. Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017, 18 (2): 251–258.

49. Dubin MG., Feldman M., Ibrahim HZ., et al. Allograft dermal implant (AlloDerm) in a previously irradiated field. Laryngoscope. 2000, 110 (6): 934–937.

50. Cavallo JA., Gangopadhyay N., Dudas J., et al. Remodeling characteristics and collagen distributions of biologic scaffold materials biopsied from postmastectomy breast reconstruction sites. Ann Plast Surg. 2015, 75 (1): 74–83.

51. Potter S., Browning D., Savović J., et al. Systematic review and critical appraisal of the impact of acellular dermal matrix use on the outcomes of implant-based breast reconstruction. Br J Surg. 2015, 102 (9): 1010–1025.

52. Stein MJ., Chung A., Arnaout A., et al. Complication rates of acellular dermal matrix in immediate breast reconstruction with radiation: a single-institution retrospective comparison study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020, 73 (12): 2156–2163.

53. Seth AK., Silver HR., Hirsch EM., et al. Comparison of delayed and immediate tissue expander breast reconstruction in the setting of postmastectomy radiation therapy. Ann Plast Surg. 2015, 75 (5): 503–507.

Martina Chotárová, MD

Department of Plastic Surgery

University Hospital Bratislava

Ružinovská 6

826 06 Bratislava

Slovakia

mchotarova@yahoo.com

Submitted: 21. 2. 2024

Accepted: 28. 9. 2024