-
Články
- Časopisy
- Kurzy
- Témy
- Kongresy
- Videa
- Podcasty
Improving Clinical Risk Stratification at Diagnosis in Primary Prostate Cancer: A Prognostic Modelling Study
Vincent Gnanapragasam and colleagues test the performance of a new 5-category risk stratification scheme for primary prostate cancer, using data from large cohorts of men with localised or locally-advanced disease.
Vyšlo v časopise: Improving Clinical Risk Stratification at Diagnosis in Primary Prostate Cancer: A Prognostic Modelling Study. PLoS Med 13(8): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002063
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002063Souhrn
Vincent Gnanapragasam and colleagues test the performance of a new 5-category risk stratification scheme for primary prostate cancer, using data from large cohorts of men with localised or locally-advanced disease.
Zdroje
1. World Health Organization. Global Health Observatory (GHO) data: cancer mortality and morbidity. 2016 [cited 27 May 2016]. Available: http://www.who.int/gho/ncd/mortality_morbidity/cancer_text/en/.
2. Mistry M, Parkin DM, Ahmad AS, Sasieni P. Cancer incidence in the United Kingdom: projections to the year 2030. Br J Cancer. 2011;105 : 1795–1803. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.430 22033277
3. Ke Zhou C, Check DP, Lortet-Tieulent J, Laversanne M, Jemal A, Ferlay J, et al. Prostate cancer incidence in 43 populations worldwide: an analysis of time trends overall and by age group. Int J Cancer. 2015;138 : 1388–1400. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29894 26488767
4. Center MM, Jemal A, Lortet-Tieulent J, Ward E, Ferlay J, Brawley O, et al. International variation in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates. Eur Urol. 2012;61 : 1079–1092. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.054 22424666
5. D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Fondurulia J, Chen M-H, Kaplan I, et al. Pretreatment nomogram for prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17 : 168–172. 10458230
6. Thompson I, Thrasher JB, Aus G, Burnett AL, Canby-Hagino ED, Cookson MS, et al. Guideline for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer: 2007 update. J Urol. 2007;177 : 2106–2131. 17509297
7. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Prostate cancer: diagnosis and treatment. NICE guidelines [CG175]. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2014.
8. Mohler JL, Kantoff PW, Armstrong AJ, Bahnson RR, Cohen M, D’Amico AV, et al. Prostate cancer, version 2.2014. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014;12 : 686–718. 24812137
9. Reese AC, Pierorazio PM, Han M, Partin AW. Contemporary evaluation of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network prostate cancer risk classification system. Urology. 2012;80 : 1075–1079. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.07.040 22995570
10. Hernandez DJ, Nielsen ME, Han M, Partin AW. Contemporary evaluation of the D’Amico risk classification of prostate cancer. Urology. 2007;70 : 931–935. 18068450
11. Epstein JI, Zelefsky MJ, Sjoberg DD, Nelson JB, Egevad L, Magi-Galluzzi C, et al. A contemporary prostate cancer grading system: a validated alternative to the Gleason score. Eur Urol. 2016;69 : 428–435. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.046 26166626
12. Greenberg DC, Wright KA, Lophathanon A, Muir KR, Gnanapragasam VJ. Changing presentation of prostate cancer in a UK population—10 year trends in prostate cancer risk profiles in the East of England. Br J Cancer. 2013;109 : 2115–2120. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.589 24071596
13. Falzarano SM, Magi-Galluzzi C. Prostate cancer staging and grading at radical prostatectomy over time. Adv Anat Pathol. 2011;18 : 159–164. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0b013e31820cb506 21326013
14. Cooperberg MR, Pasta DJ, Elkin EP, Litwin MS, Latini DM, Du Chane J, et al. The University of California, San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score: a straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2005;173 : 1938–1942. 15879786
15. Rodrigues G, Lukka H, Warde P, Brundage M, Souhami L, Crook J, et al. The prostate cancer risk stratification (ProCaRS) project: recursive partitioning risk stratification analysis. Radiother Oncol. 2013;109 : 204–210. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.07.020 24231239
16. Joniau S, Briganti A, Gontero P, Gandaglia G, Tosco L, Fieuws S, et al. Stratification of high-risk prostate cancer into prognostic categories: a European multi-institutional study. Eur Urol. 2015;67 : 157–164. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.020 24486307
17. Loeb S, Montorsi F, Catto JW. Future-proofing Gleason grading: what to call Gleason 6 prostate cancer? Eur Urol. 2015;68 : 1–2. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.038 25769986
18. Department of Health. Delivering the cancer reform strategy. 2010 Nov 18 [cited 27 May 2016]. London: National Audit Office. Available: http://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/1011568.pdf.
19. Newson RB. Comparing the predictive power of survival models using Harrell’s c or Somers’ D. Stata J. 2010;10 : 339–358.
20. Lambert PC. Estimating and modelling cumulative incidence functions using time-dependent weights [presentation]. 2013 UK Stata Users Group Meeting; 12–13 Sep 2013; London, UK.
21. Dall’Era MA, Albertsen PC, Bangma C, Carroll PR, Carter HB, Cooperberg MR, et al. Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol. 2012;62 : 976–983. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.072 22698574
22. Godtman RA, Holmberg E, Khatami A, Stranne J, Hugosson J. Outcome following active surveillance of men with screen-detected prostate cancer. Results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate cancer screening trial. Eur Urol. 2013;63 : 101–107. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.066 22980443
23. Lukka H, Warde P, Pickles T, Morton G, Brundage M, Souhami L, et al. Controversies in prostate cancer radiotherapy: consensus development. Can J Urol. 2001;8 : 1314–1322. 11564274
24. Han M, Partin AW, Zahurak M, Piantadosi S, Epstein JI, Walsh PC. Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 2003;169 : 517–523. 12544300
25. Roach M, Lu J, Pilepich MV, Asbell SO, Mohiuddin M, Terry R, et al. Four prognostic groups predict long-term survival from prostate cancer following radiotherapy alone on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group clinical trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;47 : 609–615. 10837943
26. Cooperberg MR, Broering JM, Carroll PR. Risk assessment for prostate cancer metastasis and mortality at the time of diagnosis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101 : 878–887. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp122 19509351
27. Greenberg DC, Lophatananon A, Wright KA, Muir KR, Gnanapragasam VJ. Trends and outcome from radical therapy for primary non-metastatic prostate cancer in a UK population. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0119494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119494 25742020
28. Reese AC, Cooperberg MR, Carroll PR. Minimal impact of clinical stage on prostate cancer prognosis among contemporary patients with clinically localized disease. J Urol. 2010;184 : 114–119. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.025 20478578
29. Reese AC, Sadetsky N, Carroll PR, Cooperberg MR. Inaccuracies in assignment of clinical stage for localized prostate cancer. Cancer. 2011;117 : 283–289. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25596 21210472
30. Fraser M, Berlin A, Bristow RG, van der Kwast T. Genomic, pathological, and clinical heterogeneity as drivers of personalized medicine in prostate cancer. Urol Oncol. 2015;33 : 85–94. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.10.020 24768356
31. Boström PJ, Bjartell AS, Catto JW, Eggener SE, Lilja H, Loeb S, et al. Genomic predictors of outcome in prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015;68 : 1033–1044. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.008 25913390
32. Klein EA, Cooperberg MR, Magi-Galluzzi C, Simko JP, Falzarano SM, Maddala T, et al. A 17-gene assay to predict prostate cancer aggressiveness in the context of Gleason grade heterogeneity, tumor multifocality, and biopsy undersampling. Eur Urol. 2014;66 : 550–560. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.05.004 24836057
33. Cullen J, Rosner IL, Brand TC, Zhang N, Tsiatis AC, Moncur J, et al. A biopsy-based 17-gene genomic prostate score predicts recurrence after radical prostatectomy and adverse surgical pathology in a racially diverse population of men with clinically low - and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015;68 : 123–131. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.030 25465337
34. Cuzick J, Stone S, Fisher G, Yang ZH, North BV, Berney DM, et al. Validation of an RNA cell cycle progression score for predicting death from prostate cancer in a conservatively managed needle biopsy cohort. Br J Cancer. 2015;113 : 382–389. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.223 26103570
Štítky
Interné lekárstvo
Článok vyšiel v časopisePLOS Medicine
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
2016 Číslo 8- Statinová intolerance
- Genetický podklad a screening familiární hypercholesterolémie
- Vztah mezi statiny a rizikem vzniku nádorových onemocnění − metaanalýza
- Pleiotropní účinky statinů na kardiovaskulární systém
- Metabolit živočišné stravy produkovaný střevní mikroflórou zvyšuje riziko závažných kardiovaskulárních příhod
-
Všetky články tohto čísla
- Dementia across the Lifespan and around the Globe—Pathophysiology, Prevention, Treatment, and Societal Impact: A Call for Papers
- Progress and Challenges in Scaling Up Laboratory Monitoring of HIV Treatment
- Facility-Based Delivery during the Ebola Virus Disease Epidemic in Rural Liberia: Analysis from a Cross-Sectional, Population-Based Household Survey
- Availability and Use of HIV Monitoring and Early Infant Diagnosis Technologies in WHO Member States in 2011–2013: Analysis of Annual Surveys at the Facility Level
- Duration of Adulthood Overweight, Obesity, and Cancer Risk in the Women’s Health Initiative: A Longitudinal Study from the United States
- Improving Clinical Risk Stratification at Diagnosis in Primary Prostate Cancer: A Prognostic Modelling Study
- Genetically Predicted Body Mass Index and Breast Cancer Risk: Mendelian Randomization Analyses of Data from 145,000 Women of European Descent
- Social Dancing and Incidence of Falls in Older Adults: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
- Genetic and Environmental Risk for Chronic Pain and the Contribution of Risk Variants for Major Depressive Disorder: A Family-Based Mixed-Model Analysis
- Long-Term Outcomes Associated with Traumatic Brain Injury in Childhood and Adolescence: A Nationwide Swedish Cohort Study of a Wide Range of Medical and Social Outcomes
- On Risk Estimation versus Risk Stratification in Early Prostate Cancer
- Make Data Sharing Routine to Prepare for Public Health Emergencies
- Assessment of Adverse Events in Protocols, Clinical Study Reports, and Published Papers of Trials of Orlistat: A Document Analysis
- Concussions and Repercussions
- South Asia as a Reservoir for the Global Spread of Ciprofloxacin-Resistant : A Cross-Sectional Study
- Building from the HIV Response toward Universal Health Coverage
- Transitioning to Country Ownership of HIV Programs in Rwanda
- Accelerating the Uptake and Timing of Antiretroviral Therapy Initiation in Sub-Saharan Africa: An Operations Research Agenda
- Glycemic Control and the Risk of Tuberculosis: A Cohort Study
- Adjuvant Trastuzumab in HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer by Age and Hormone Receptor Status: A Cost-Utility Analysis
- Uptake of Home-Based HIV Testing, Linkage to Care, and Community Attitudes about ART in Rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: Descriptive Results from the First Phase of the ANRS 12249 TasP Cluster-Randomised Trial
- An Audit and Feedback Intervention for Reducing Antibiotic Prescribing in General Dental Practice: The RAPiD Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
- Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment in North Korea: Is Scale-Up Possible?
- Associations between Mental Health and Ebola-Related Health Behaviors: A Regionally Representative Cross-sectional Survey in Post-conflict Sierra Leone
- Pancreatic Cancer Surgical Resection Margins: Molecular Assessment by Mass Spectrometry Imaging
- Integrated Delivery of Antiretroviral Treatment and Pre-exposure Prophylaxis to HIV-1–Serodiscordant Couples: A Prospective Implementation Study in Kenya and Uganda
- Measuring Burden of Unhealthy Behaviours Using a Multivariable Predictive Approach: Life Expectancy Lost in Canada Attributable to Smoking, Alcohol, Physical Inactivity, and Diet
- Comparison of Outcomes before and after Ohio's Law Mandating Use of the FDA-Approved Protocol for Medication Abortion: A Retrospective Cohort Study
- Core Outcomes for Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Consensus Study
- Adverse Renal, Endocrine, Hepatic, and Metabolic Events during Maintenance Mood Stabilizer Treatment for Bipolar Disorder: A Population-Based Cohort Study
- PLOS Medicine
- Archív čísel
- Aktuálne číslo
- Informácie o časopise
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle- Glycemic Control and the Risk of Tuberculosis: A Cohort Study
- Transitioning to Country Ownership of HIV Programs in Rwanda
- Dementia across the Lifespan and around the Globe—Pathophysiology, Prevention, Treatment, and Societal Impact: A Call for Papers
- Social Dancing and Incidence of Falls in Older Adults: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
Prihlásenie#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#Zabudnuté hesloZadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.
- Časopisy