Rescheduling Behavioral Subunits of a Fixed Action Pattern by Genetic Manipulation of Peptidergic Signaling

English version České info

In Drosophila, the pupal ecdysis behavioral sequence is composed of three distinct steps: pre-ecdysis, ecdysis, and post-ecdysis. We hypothesize that release of ecdysis-triggering-hormone (ETH) from endocrine Inka cells drives these stereotypical behaviors through sequential activation of peptidergic ETH receptor (ETHR) neuron ensembles in the central nervous system (CNS). There are many questions about how a single hormone orchestrates a stepwise behavioral sequence. Here we present evidence implicating two central ETHR ensembles—kinin and CAMB—causally in pre-ecdysis and ecdysis behaviors. Using calcium imaging, we show a sequential pattern of activity in kinin and CAMB neurons that is temporally correlated with pre-ecdysis and ecdysis behaviors, respectively. Genetic manipulation of kinin and CAMB neurons demonstrates that timing of the behaviors is a function of: 1) sensitivity to the hormone, and 2) upstream inhibitory inputs. These findings provide insights into the molecular bases of behavioral orchestration by central peptidergic ensembles.

Vyšlo v časopise: Rescheduling Behavioral Subunits of a Fixed Action Pattern by Genetic Manipulation of Peptidergic Signaling. PLoS Genet 11(9): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005513
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005513

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. Carew TJ. Behavioral neurobiology: the cellular organization of natural behavior. 2000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034578.g005

2. Kim Y-J, Zitnan D, Galizia CG, Cho K-H, Adams ME. A command chemical triggers an innate behavior by sequential activation of multiple peptidergic ensembles. Current Biology. 2006;16 : 1395–1407. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.06.027 16860738

3. Kim Y-J, Zitnan D, Cho K-H, Schooley DA, Mizoguchi A, Adams ME. Central peptidergic ensembles associated with organization of an innate behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103 : 14211–14216. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603459103 16968777

4. Zitnan D, Zitnanová I, Spalovská I, Takác P, Park Y, Adams ME. Conservation of ecdysis-triggering hormone signalling in insects. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2003;206 : 1275–1289. doi: 10.1242/jeb.00261 12624163

5. Park Y. Two Subtypes of Ecdysis-triggering Hormone Receptor in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2003;278 : 17710–17715. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M301119200 12586820

6. Roller L, Zitnanová I, Dai L, Simo L, Park Y, Satake H, et al. Ecdysis triggering hormone signaling in arthropods. Peptides. 2010;31 : 429–441. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2009.11.022 19951734

7. Lahr EC, Dean D, Ewer J. Genetic analysis of ecdysis behavior in Drosophila reveals partially overlapping functions of two unrelated neuropeptides. Journal of Neuroscience. 2012;32 : 6819–6829. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5301-11.2012 22593051

8. Park JH. Targeted ablation of CCAP neuropeptide-containing neurons of Drosophila causes specific defects in execution and circadian timing of ecdysis behavior. Development. 2003;130 : 2645–2656. doi: 10.1242/dev.00503 12736209

9. Chou Y-H, Spletter ML, Yaksi E, Leong JCS, Wilson RI, Luo L. Diversity and wiring variability of olfactory local interneurons in the Drosophila antennal lobe. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13 : 439–449. doi: 10.1038/nn.2489 20139975

10. Alkhori L, Öst A, Alenius M. The corepressor Atrophin specifies odorant receptor expression in Drosophila. FASEB J. Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology; 2014;28 : 1355–1364. doi: 10.1096/fj.13-240325

11. Estes PS, Daniel SG, McCallum AP, Boehringer AV, Sukhina AS, Zwick RA, et al. Motor neurons and glia exhibit specific individualized responses to TDP-43 expression in a Drosophila model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Dis Model Mech. The Company of Biologists Limited; 2013;6 : 721–733. doi: 10.1242/dmm.010710

12. Weitkunat M, Schnorrer F. A guide to study Drosophila muscle biology. Methods. 2014;68 : 2–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.02.037 24625467

13. Luo CW, Dewey EM, Sudo S, Ewer J, Hsu SY, Honegger HW, et al. Bursicon, the insect cuticle-hardening hormone, is a heterodimeric cystine knot protein that activates G protein-coupled receptor LGR2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102 : 2820–2825. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409916102 15703293

14. Park Y, Filippov V, Gill SS, Adams ME. Deletion of the ecdysis-triggering hormone gene leads to lethal ecdysis deficiency. Development. 2002;129 : 493–503. 11807040

15. Zitnan D, Adams ME. Excitatory and inhibitory roles of central ganglia in initiation of the insect ecdysis behavioural sequence. J Exp Biol. 2000;203 : 1329–1340. 10729281

16. Katanaev VL, Ponzielli R, Sémériva M, Tomlinson A. Trimeric G protein-dependent frizzled signaling in Drosophila. Cell. 2005;120 : 111–122. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.014 15652486

17. Ferris J, Ge H, Liu L, Roman G. G(o) signaling is required for Drosophila associative learning. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9 : 1036–1040. doi: 10.1038/nn1738 16845387

18. Peabody NC, Pohl JB, Diao F, Vreede AP, Sandstrom DJ, Wang H, et al. Characterization of the decision network for wing expansion in Drosophila using targeted expression of the TRPM8 channel. Journal of Neuroscience. 2009;29 : 3343–3353. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4241-08.2009 19295141

19. Bainbridge SP, Bownes M. Staging the metamorphosis of Drosophila melanogaster. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1981;66 : 57–80. 6802923

20. Holman GM, Cook BJ, Nachman RJ. Isolation, primary structure and synthesis of two neuropeptides from Leucophaea maderae: Members of a new family of cephalomyotropins. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1986;84C: 205–211.

21. Hayes TK, Pannabecker TL, Hinckley DJ, Holman GM, Nachman RJ, Petzel DH, et al. Leucokinins, a new family of ion transport stimulators and inhibitors in insect Malpighian tubules. Life sciences. 1989;44 : 1259–1266. Available: http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=2716471&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks 2716471

22. Al-Anzi B, Armand E, Nagamei P, Olszewski M, Sapin V, Waters C, et al. The leucokinin pathway and its neurons regulate meal size in Drosophila. Curr Biol. 2010;20 : 969–978. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.039 20493701

23. Okusawa S, Kohsaka H, Nose A. Serotonin and Downstream Leucokinin Neurons Modulate Larval Turning Behavior in Drosophila. J Neurosci. Society for Neuroscience; 2014;34 : 2544–2558. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3500-13.2014

24. Lopez-Arias B, Dorado B, Herrero P. Blockade of the release of the neuropeptide leucokinin to determine its possible functions in fly behavior: Chemoreception assays. Peptides. 2011;32 : 545–552. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2010.07.002 20621142

25. Liu Y, Luo J, Carlsson MA, Nässel DR. Serotonin and insulin-like peptides modulate leucokinin-producing neurons that affect feeding and water homeostasis in Drosophila. J Comp Neurol. 2015;523 : 1840–1863. doi: 10.1002/cne.23768 25732325

26. Baker JD, McNabb SL, Truman JW. The hormonal coordination of behavior and physiology at adult ecdysis in Drosophila melanogaster. J Exp Biol. 1999;202 : 3037–3048. 10518485

27. Fuse M, Truman JW. Modulation of ecdysis in the moth Manduca sexta: the roles of the suboesophageal and thoracic ganglia. J Exp Biol. 2002;205 : 1047–1058. 11919264

28. Sharma Y, Cheung U, Larsen EW, Eberl DF. PPTGAL, a convenient Gal4 P-element vector for testing expression of enhancer fragments in drosophila. genesis. 2002;34 : 115–118. doi: 10.1002/gene.10127 12324963

29. Giordano E, Rendina R, Peluso I, Furia M. RNAi triggered by symmetrically transcribed transgenes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2002;160 : 637–648. 11861567

30. Suster ML, Seugnet L, Bate M, Sokolowski MB. Refining GAL4-driven transgene expression in Drosophila with a GAL80 enhancer-trap. genesis. 2004;39 : 240–245. doi: 10.1002/gene.20051 15286996

31. Yang C-H, Rumpf S, Xiang Y, Gordon MD, Song W, Jan LY, et al. Control of the postmating behavioral switch in Drosophila females by internal sensory neurons. Neuron. 2009;61 : 519–526. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.12.021 19249273