-
Články
- Časopisy
- Kurzy
- Témy
- Kongresy
- Videa
- Podcasty
Firearm-Related Injury and Death: A U.S. Health Care Crisis in Need of Health Care Professionals
The U.
S.-based Editors of ICMJE journals call for health-care professionals to act against the public health crisis of injury and death from guns.
Published in the journal: Firearm-Related Injury and Death: A U.S. Health Care Crisis in Need of Health Care Professionals. PLoS Med 14(10): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002430
Category: Editorial
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002430Summary
The U.
S.-based Editors of ICMJE journals call for health-care professionals to act against the public health crisis of injury and death from guns.What would happen if on one day more than 50 people died and over 10 times that many were harmed by an infectious disease in the United States? Likely, our nation’s esteemed and highly capable public health infrastructure would gear up to care for those harmed and study the problem. There would be a rush to identify the cause, develop interventions, and refine them continually until the threat is eliminated or at least contained. In light of the risks to public health (after all, over 500 people have been harmed already!), health care professionals would sound the alarm. We would demand funding. We would go to conferences to learn what is known and what we should do. We would form committees at our institutions to plan local responses to protect our communities. The United States would spend millions or more in short order to assure public safety, and no elected officials would conceive of getting in the way. Rather, they would compete to be calling the loudest for the funds and focus required to protect our people. Americans should be proud of our prowess at and commitment to addressing public health crises.
Yet, here we are again with another editorial about the public health crisis of firearm-related injury and death following what used to be unthinkable, this time a mass murder and casualties at a concert in Las Vegas. We’ve written it all before. The staggering numbers killed annually. The numbers left permanently disabled. The families left to cope with the loss of loved ones or to care for those broken but not killed by a bullet. As health care professionals, we seem powerless. This public health crisis seems beyond the reach of our tools.
Is there really nothing health care professionals can do? We think there is a lot. We need to each ask ourselves what we have done to apply our knowledge and skills to help address the problem since the moment of silence that followed the last mass shooting. More silence is not the answer. Have we demanded funding to adequately study the problem and test solutions? Have we participated in such studies? Have we mobilized forces at our institutions to plan strategies to lower the risks in our communities? Have we talked to our patients about gun safety and effectively challenged policies that would enforce our silence on this matter? Some of our colleagues have. We should be proud of them, but they need all of our help. And so do our patients.
Here’s a short list of how health care professionals can use our skills and voices to fight the threat that firearms present to health in the United States.
Educate yourself. Read the background materials and proposals for sensible firearm legislation from health care professional organizations. Make a phone call and write a letter to your local, state, and federal legislators to tell them how you feel about gun control. Now. Don’t wait. And do it again at regular intervals. Attend public meetings with these officials and speak up loudly as a health care professional. Demand answers, commitments, and follow-up. Go to rallies. Join, volunteer for, or donate to organizations fighting for sensible firearm legislation. Ask candidates for public office where they stand and vote for those with stances that mitigate firearm-related injury.
Meet with the leaders at your own institutions to discuss how to leverage your organization’s influence with local, state, and federal governments. Don’t let concerns for perceived political consequences get in the way of advocating for the well-being of your patients and the public. Let your community know where your institution stands and what you are doing. Tell the press.
Educate yourself about gun safety. Ask your patients if there are guns at home. How are they stored? Are there children or others at risk for harming themselves or others? Direct them to resources to decrease the risk for firearm injury, just as you already do for other health risks. Ask if your patients believe having guns at home makes them safer, despite evidence that they increase the risk for homicide, suicide, and accidents.
Don’t be silent. We don’t need more moments of silence to honor the memory of those who have been killed. We need to honor their memory by preventing a need for such moments. As health care professionals, we don’t throw up our hands in defeat because a disease seems to be incurable. We work to incrementally and continuously reduce its burden. That’s our job.
Will yet another commentary about the ravages of firearm-related harm change anything? Probably not—our journals have published far too many following prior firearm-enabled catastrophes. The only thing that will change the world for the better is a group of people who believe that they can change the world. With regard to firearm-related injury and death, let’s each be part of that group.
Štítky
Interné lekárstvo
Článok vyšiel v časopisePLOS Medicine
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
2017 Číslo 10- Statinová intolerance
- Projekt MedPed
- Index SAMS-CI pro odhad souvislosti myopatií s léčbou statiny
- Statiny indukovaná myopatie: Jak na diferenciální diagnostiku?
- Hydroresponzivní krytí v epitelizační fázi hojení rány
-
Všetky články tohto čísla
- Improving tuberculosis diagnosis: Better tests or better healthcare?
- Fitness cost and benefit of antimicrobial resistance in : Multidisciplinary approaches are needed
- When cost-effective interventions are unaffordable: Integrating cost-effectiveness and budget impact in priority setting for global health programs
- Regional initiatives for malaria elimination: Building and maintaining partnerships
- Firearm-Related Injury and Death: A U.S. Health Care Crisis in Need of Health Care Professionals
- Gabapentin, opioids, and the risk of opioid-related death: A population-based nested case–control study
- Decommissioning care: The need for rigorous multifaceted evaluations of decisions to withdraw health services
- Tuberculosis detection and the challenges of integrated care in rural China: A cross-sectional standardized patient study
- Estimating the fitness cost and benefit of cefixime resistance in to inform prescription policy: A modelling study
- Elevated blood pressure and risk of mitral regurgitation: A longitudinal cohort study of 5.5 million United Kingdom adults
- A combination of plasma phospholipid fatty acids and its association with incidence of type 2 diabetes: The EPIC-InterAct case-cohort study
- The clinical utility and cost impact of cystatin C measurement in the diagnosis and management of chronic kidney disease: A primary care cohort study
- Quantifying underreporting of law-enforcement-related deaths in United States vital statistics and news-media-based data sources: A capture–recapture analysis
- Impact of disinvestment from weekend allied health services across acute medical and surgical wards: 2 stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trials
- Benefit and harm of intensive blood pressure treatment: Derivation and validation of risk models using data from the SPRINT and ACCORD trials
- Safety and immunogenicity of rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP Ebola vaccine in adults and children in Lambaréné, Gabon: A phase I randomised trial
- Intergenerational diabetes and obesity—A cycle to break?
- Associations between an IgG3 polymorphism in the binding domain for FcRn, transplacental transfer of malaria-specific IgG3, and protection against malaria during infancy: A birth cohort study in Benin
- Assessing the neuroprotective benefits for babies of antenatal magnesium sulphate: An individual participant data meta-analysis
- A novel electronic algorithm using host biomarker point-of-care tests for the management of febrile illnesses in Tanzanian children (e-POCT): A randomized, controlled non-inferiority trial
- Childhood stunting in relation to the pre- and postnatal environment during the first 2 years of life: The MAL-ED longitudinal birth cohort study
- Effectiveness of cervical screening after age 60 years according to screening history: Nationwide cohort study in Sweden
- PLOS Medicine
- Archív čísel
- Aktuálne číslo
- Informácie o časopise
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle- Assessing the neuroprotective benefits for babies of antenatal magnesium sulphate: An individual participant data meta-analysis
- Gabapentin, opioids, and the risk of opioid-related death: A population-based nested case–control study
- A combination of plasma phospholipid fatty acids and its association with incidence of type 2 diabetes: The EPIC-InterAct case-cohort study
- Quantifying underreporting of law-enforcement-related deaths in United States vital statistics and news-media-based data sources: A capture–recapture analysis
Prihlásenie#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#Zabudnuté hesloZadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.
- Časopisy