Reduced Emergency Department Utilization after Increased Access to Primary Care

English version České info

Sanjay Basu and Russell Phillips discuss the findings from Whittaker and colleagues on the link between extending primary care hours and emergency department utilization.

Vyšlo v časopise: Reduced Emergency Department Utilization after Increased Access to Primary Care. PLoS Med 13(9): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002114
Kategorie: Perspective
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002114

Souhrn

Sanjay Basu and Russell Phillips discuss the findings from Whittaker and colleagues on the link between extending primary care hours and emergency department utilization.

Zdroje

1. Shortliffe EC, Hamilton TS, Noroian EH. The Emergency Room and the Changing Pattern of Medical Care. N Engl J Med. 1958;258 : 20–25. doi: 10.1056/NEJM195801022580105 13493729

2. Katikireddi SV, McKee M, Craig P, Stuckler D. The NHS reforms in England: four challenges to evaluating success and failure. J R Soc Med. 2014;107 : 387–392. doi: 10.1177/0141076814550358 25271273

3. Cowling TE, Harris MJ, Watt HC, Gibbons DC, Majeed A. Access to general practice and visits to accident and emergency departments in England: cross-sectional analysis of a national patient survey. Br J Gen Pract J R Coll Gen Pract. 2014;64: e434–439. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X680533

4. Office of the Inspector General. Access to care: provider availability in Medicaid managed care [Internet]. Washington D.C.: Department of Health and Human Services; 2014 Nov. Report No.: OEI-02-13-00670. http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-02-13-00670.pdf

5. Ismail SA, Gibbons DC, Gnani S. Reducing inappropriate accident and emergency department attendances: a systematic review of primary care service interventions. Br J Gen Pract J R Coll Gen Pract. 2013;63: e813–820. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X675395

6. Whittaker W, Anselmi L, Kristensen SR, Lau Y-S, Bailey S, Bower P, et al. The impact of extending access to primary care on emergency department visits: a difference-in-differences analysis. PLoS Med. 2016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002113

7. Dimick JB, Ryan AM. Methods for evaluating changes in health care policy: The difference-in-differences approach. JAMA. 2014;312 : 2401–2402. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.16153 25490331

8. Stuart EA, Huskamp HA, Duckworth K, Simmons J, Song Z, Chernew M, et al. Using propensity scores in difference-in-differences models to estimate the effects of a policy change. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2014;14 : 166–182. doi: 10.1007/s10742-014-0123-z 25530705

9. Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J. Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program. J Am Stat Assoc. 2010;105 : 493–505.

10. Basu S, Rehkopf DH, Siddiqi A, Glymour MM, Kawachi I. Health Behaviors, Mental Health, and Health Care Utilization Among Single Mothers After Welfare Reforms in the 1990s. Am J Epidemiol. 2016;183 : 531–538. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv249 26946395

11. Rust G, Ye J, Baltrus P, Daniels E, Adesunloye B, Fryer GE. Practical barriers to timely primary care access: impact on adult use of emergency department services. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168 : 1705–1710. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.15.1705 18695087

12. O’Malley AS. After-Hours Access To Primary Care Practices Linked With Lower Emergency Department Use And Less Unmet Medical Need. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;32(1): 175–83. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0494