Associations between Extending Access to Primary Care and Emergency Department Visits: A Difference-In-Differences Analysis

William Whittaker and colleagues use difference-in-differences analysis to determine whether extending access to primary care is linked with fewer emergency department visits.

Vyšlo v časopise: Associations between Extending Access to Primary Care and Emergency Department Visits: A Difference-In-Differences Analysis. PLoS Med 13(9): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002113
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002113


William Whittaker and colleagues use difference-in-differences analysis to determine whether extending access to primary care is linked with fewer emergency department visits.


1. Health & Social Care Information Centre. Hospital Episode Statistics: Accident and Emergency Attendances in England 2013–14, 2015. [Accessed 27th July 2016].

2. Department of Health. Reference Costs 2013–14, HM Treasury 2014. [Accessed 27th July 2016].

3. Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q 2005;83:457–502. 16202000

4. Cowling TE, Harris MJ, Majeed A. Evidence and rhetoric about access to UK primary care. BMJ 2015; 350:h1513 doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1513 25828858

5. Cowling TE, Harris MJ, Watt HC, et al. Access to general practice and visits to accident and emergency (ED) departments in England: cross-sectional analysis of a national patient survey. Br J Gen Pract 2014; 64(624):e434–9 doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X680533 24982496

6. Monitor. Walk-in Centre Review: Final Report and Recommendations, 2014. [Accessed 4th November 2015].

7. Amiel C, Williams B, Ramzan F, et al. Reasons for attending an urban urgent care centre with minor illness: a questionnaire study. Emerg Med J 2014; doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-202016 [published Online First: 13 January 2014].

8. Ismail SA, Gibbons DC, Gnani S. Reducing inappropriate accident and emergency department attendances: a systematic review of primary care service interventions. Br J Gen Pract 2013;63(617):e813–20 doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X675395 24351497

9. Bottle A, Tsang C, Parsons C, et al. Association between patient and general practice characteristics and unplanned first-time admissions for cancer: observational study. Br J Cancer 2012;107:1213–9 doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.320 [published Online First: 24 July 2012]. 22828606

10. Brettell R, Soljak M, Cecil E, et al. Reducing heart failure admission rates in England 2004–2011 are not related to changes in primary care quality: national observational study. Eur J Heart Fail 2013;15:1335–42 doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hft107 [published Online First: 11 July 2013]. 23845798

11. Calderon-Larranaga A, Carney L, Soljak M, et al. Association of population and primary healthcare factors with hospital admission rates for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in England: national cross-sectional study. Thorax 2011;66(3):191–6 doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.147058 [published Online First: 12 November 2010]. 21076143

12. Calderon-Larranaga A, Soljak M, Cecil E, et al. Does higher quality of primary healthcare reduce hospital admissions for diabetes complications? A national observational study. Diabet Med 2014;31:657–65 doi: 10.1111/dme.12413 [published Online First: 26 March 2014]. 24533786

13. Calderón-Larrañaga A, Soljak M, Cowling TE, et al. Association of primary care factors with hospital admissions for epilepsy in England, 2004–10: national observational study. Seizure 2014;23(8):657–61 24997845

14. Soljak M, Calderon-Larranaga A, Sharma P, et al. Does higher quality primary health care reduce stroke admissions? A national cross-sectional study. Br J Gen Pract 2011;61:e801–7 doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X613142 22137417

15. Imbens GW, Wooldridge JM. Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. National Bureau of Economic Research 2008.

16. Lechner M. The Estimation of Causal Effects by Difference-in-Difference Methods. Foundations and Trends in Econometrics 2010;4(3):165–224 doi: 10.1561/0800000014

17. Meyer BD. Natural and Quasi-Experiments in Economics. J Bus Econ Stat 1995;13:151–161.

18. Rosenbaum P, Rubin D. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 1983; (70):41–55.

19. Health & Social Care Information Centre. General and Personal Medical Services, England– 2003–2013, As at 30 September, 2014. [Accessed 17th April 2016].

20. Ipsos MORI. GP Patient Survey—Technical Annex 2013–2014 annual report, Social Research Institute 2014. [Accessed 27th July 2016].

21. Dehejia RH, Wahba S. Propensity Score Matching Methods for Nonexperimental Causal Studies. The Review of Economics and Statistics 2002:84(1):151–161.

22. Heckman JJ, Ichimura H, Todd PE. Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme. Review of Economic Studies 1997:64:605–654.

23. Sommers BD, Long SK, Baicker K. Changes in mortality after Massachusetts health care reform: A quasi-experimental study. Annals of Internal Medicine 2014; 60(9):585–593 doi: 10.7326/M13-2275

24. Leuven E, Sianesi B. PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing. 2003 Version 4.0.11.

25. Burbidge JB, Magee L, Robb AL. Alternative Transformations to Handle Extreme Values of the Dependent Variable. J Am Stat Assoc 1988;83:123–127 doi: 10.2307/2288929

26. Harrison MJ, Dusheiko M, Sutton M et al. Effect of a national primary care pay for performance scheme on emergency hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: controlled longitudinal study. BMJ 2014;349:g6423 doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6423 [published Online First: 11 November 2014]. 25389120

27. Morris S, Hunter RM, Ramsay AI et al. Impact of centralising acute stroke services in English metropolitan areas on mortality and length of hospital stay: difference-in-differences analysis. BMJ 2014;349:g4757 doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4757 [published Online First: 5 August 2014]. 25098169

28. Austin PC. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Statistics in Medicine 2009;28:3083–3107. doi: 10.1002/sim.3697 19757444

29. Rubin DB. Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: Application to the tobacco litigation. Health Services & Outcomes Research Methodology 2001:2(3–4):169–188.

30. Abadie A, Imbens GW. Notes and comments: Matching on the estimated propensity score. Econometrica 2016;84(2):781–807.

31. Abadie A, Imbens GW. On the failure of the bootstrap for matching estimators. Econometrica 2008;76(6):1537–1557.

32. Dolton P, Pathania V. Can increased primary care access reduce demand for emergency care? Evidence from England’s 7-day GP opening. Journal of Health Economics 2016 [In Press]

33. Sutton M, Nikilova S, Boaden R et al. Reduced mortality with hospital pay for performance in England. New Engl J Med 2012;367:1821–8 doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1114951 [published Online First: 8 November 2012]. 23134382

34. Gravelle H, Dusheiko M, Sheaff R et al. Impact of case management (Evercare) on frail elderly patients: controlled before and after analysis of quantitative outcome data. BMJ 2007;334:31 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39020.413310.55 [published Online First: 15 November 2006]. 17107984

35. NIHR CLAHRC Greater Manchester. NHS Greater Manchester Primary Care Demonstrator Evaluation, 2015. [Accessed 4th November 2015].

36. Gulliford M, Figueroa-Munoz J, Morgan M et al. What does 'access to health care' mean? J Health Serv Res Policy 2002;7(3):186–8. 12171751

37. McIntyre D, Thiede M, Birch S. Access as a policy-relevant concept in low- and middle-income countries. Health Econ Policy and Law 2009;4(2):179–193 doi: 10.1017/S1744133109004836 [published Online First: 30 January 2009].

38. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. Medical Research Council complex interventions guidance, 2008. [Accessed 18th April 2016].

Interné lekárstvo

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Medicine

2016 Číslo 9
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Hereditární TTR amyloidóza – vzácné, nebo jen neodhalené onemocnění? 2. díl
nový kurz

Eozinofilní granulomatóza s polyangiitidou

Betablokátory a Ca antagonisté z jiného úhlu
Autori: prof. MUDr. Michal Vrablík, Ph.D., MUDr. Petr Janský

Autori: doc. MUDr. Petr Čáp, Ph.D.

Farmakoterapie akutní a chronické bolesti

Všetky kurzy
Zabudnuté heslo

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.


Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa