Best Practice in Systematic Reviews: The Importance of Protocols and Registration

article has not abstract

Vyšlo v časopise: Best Practice in Systematic Reviews: The Importance of Protocols and Registration. PLoS Med 8(2): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001009
Kategorie: Editorial
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001009

Souhrn

article has not abstract

Zdroje

1. De AngelisCDrazenJMFrizelleFAHaugCHoeyJ 2004 Clinical trial registration: A statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Ann Intern Med 141 477 478

2. RossJSMulveyGKHinesEMNissenSEKrumholzHM 2009 Trial publication after registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: A cross-sectional analysis. PLoS Med 6 e1000144 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000144

3. TriccoACPhamBBrehautJTetroeJCappelliM 2009 An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist. J Clin Epidemiol 62 617 623

4. KirkhamJJAltmanDGWilliamsonPR 2010 Bias due to changes in specified outcomes during the systematic review process. PLoS One 5 e9810 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009810

5. SilagyCAMiddletonPHopewellS 2002 Publishing protocols of systematic reviews: Comparing what was done to what was planned. JAMA 287 2831 2834

6. StrausSMoherD 2010 Registering systematic reviews. CMAJ 182 13 14

7. BoothAClarkeMGhersiDMoherDPetticrewM Stewart L 2011 An international registry of systematic-review protocols. Lancet 377 108 109

8. PROSPERO Register of Ongoing Systematic Reviews. Available: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO

9. LiberatiAAltmanDGTetzlaffJMulrowCGøtzschePC 2009 The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration PLoS Med 6 e1000100 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100