What Can We Conclude from Death Registration? Improved Methods for Evaluating Completeness
Background:
One of the fundamental building blocks for determining the burden of disease in populations is to reliably measure the level and pattern of mortality by age and sex. Where well-functioning registration systems exist, this task is relatively straightforward. Results from many civil registration systems, however, remain uncertain because of a lack of confidence in the completeness of death registration. Incomplete registration systems mean not all deaths are counted, and resulting estimates of death rates for the population are then underestimated. Death distribution methods (DDMs) are a suite of demographic methods that attempt to estimate the fraction of deaths that are registered and counted by the civil registration system. Although widely applied and used, the methods have at least three types of limitations. First, a wide range of variants of these methods has been applied in practice with little scientific literature to guide their selection. Second, the methods have not been extensively validated in real population conditions where violations of the assumptions of the methods most certainly occur. Third, DDMs do not generate uncertainty intervals.
Methods and Findings:
In this paper, we systematically evaluate the performance of 234 variants of DDM methods in three different validation environments where we know or have strong beliefs about the true level of completeness of death registration. Using these datasets, we identify three variants of the DDMs that generally perform the best. We also find that even these improved methods yield uncertainty intervals of roughly ± one-quarter of the estimate. Finally, we demonstrate the application of the optimal variants in eight countries.
Conclusions:
There continues to be a role for partial vital registration data in measuring adult mortality levels and trends, but such results should only be interpreted alongside all other data sources on adult mortality and the uncertainty of the resulting levels, trends, and age-patterns of adult death considered.
: Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary
Vyšlo v časopise:
What Can We Conclude from Death Registration? Improved Methods for Evaluating Completeness. PLoS Med 7(4): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000262
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000262
Souhrn
Background:
One of the fundamental building blocks for determining the burden of disease in populations is to reliably measure the level and pattern of mortality by age and sex. Where well-functioning registration systems exist, this task is relatively straightforward. Results from many civil registration systems, however, remain uncertain because of a lack of confidence in the completeness of death registration. Incomplete registration systems mean not all deaths are counted, and resulting estimates of death rates for the population are then underestimated. Death distribution methods (DDMs) are a suite of demographic methods that attempt to estimate the fraction of deaths that are registered and counted by the civil registration system. Although widely applied and used, the methods have at least three types of limitations. First, a wide range of variants of these methods has been applied in practice with little scientific literature to guide their selection. Second, the methods have not been extensively validated in real population conditions where violations of the assumptions of the methods most certainly occur. Third, DDMs do not generate uncertainty intervals.
Methods and Findings:
In this paper, we systematically evaluate the performance of 234 variants of DDM methods in three different validation environments where we know or have strong beliefs about the true level of completeness of death registration. Using these datasets, we identify three variants of the DDMs that generally perform the best. We also find that even these improved methods yield uncertainty intervals of roughly ± one-quarter of the estimate. Finally, we demonstrate the application of the optimal variants in eight countries.
Conclusions:
There continues to be a role for partial vital registration data in measuring adult mortality levels and trends, but such results should only be interpreted alongside all other data sources on adult mortality and the uncertainty of the resulting levels, trends, and age-patterns of adult death considered.
: Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary
Zdroje
1. MurrayCJ
LaaksoT
ShibuyaK
HillK
LopezAD
2007 Can we achieve Millennium Development Goal 4? New analysis of country trends and forecasts of under-5 mortality to 2015. Lancet 370 1040 1054
2. ObermeyerZ
ParkC
RajaratnamJK
GakidouE
LopezAD
2009 Measuring adult mortality using sibling survival: a new analytical method and new results for 44 countries, 1974–2006. PLoS Med 6 e1000260 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000260
3. MahapatraP
ShibuyaK
LopezAD
CoullareF
NotzonFC
2007 Civil registration systems and vital statistics: successes and missed opportunities. Lancet 370 1653 1663
4. MathersCD
FatDM
InoueM
RaoC
LopezAD
2005 Counting the dead and what they died from: an assessment of the global status of cause of death data. Bull World Health Organ 83 171 177
5. HillK
1987 Estimating census and death registration completeness. Asian Pac Popul Forum 1 8 13
6. BennettNG
HoriuchiS
1981 Estimating the completeness of death registration in a closed population. Popul Index 47 207 221
7. BrassW
CoaleAJ
1968 Methods of analysis and estimation.
BrassW
CoaleAJ
DemenyP
HeiselDF
LorimerF
The demography of tropical Africa Princeton (New Jersey) Princeton University Press
8. HillK
ChoiY
2004 Death distribution methods for estimating adult mortality: sensitivity analysis with simulated data errors. In: Proceedings of the Adult Mortality in Developing Countries Workshop; 8–11 July 2004; The Marconi Center, Marin County, California
9. HillK.
Methods for measuring adult mortality in developing countries: a comparative review. The Global Burden of Disease 2000 in Aging Populations Research Paper No. 01 .13. Cambridge: Harvard Burden of Disease Unit. Available: http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/burdenofdisease/publications/papers/Methods%20for%20Measuring%20Adult%20Mortality.pdf. Accessed 7 January 2009
10. PrestonS
CoaleAJ
TrussellJ
WeinsteinM
1980 Estimating the completeness of reporting of adult deaths in populations that are approximately stable. Popul Index 46 179 202
11. PrestonSH
HillK
1980 Estimating the completeness of death registration. Popul Stud (NY) 2 349 366
12. BanisterJ
HillK
2004 Mortality in China 1964–2000. Popul Stud (Camb) 58 55 75
13. EloIT
PrestonSH
1994 Estimating African-American mortality from inaccurate data. Demography 31 427 458
14. FeeneyG
2001 The impact of HIV/AIDS on adult mortality in Zimbabwe. Popul Dev Rev 27 771 780
15. HillK
VapattanawongP
PrasartkulP
PorapakkhamY
LimSS
LopezAD
2007 Epidemiologic transition interrupted: a reassessment of mortality trends in Thailand, 1980–2000. Int J Epidemiol 36 374 384
16. HillK
BarkerB
VosT
2007 Excess Indigenous mortality: are Indigenous Australians more severely disadvantaged than other Indigenous populations? Int J Epidemiol 36 580 589
17. MerliMG
1998 Mortality in Vietnam, 1979–1989. Demography 35 345 360
18. World Health Organization 2006 The World Health Report 2006: Working together for health Geneva World Health Organization Available: http://www.who.int/whr/2006/whr06_en.pdf. Accessed 22 September 2009
19. LopezAD
AhmadOB
GuillotM
FergusonBD
SalomonJA
2003 Life tables for 191 countries for 2000: data, methods, results.
MurrayCJL
EvansD
Health Systems Performance Assessment: Debates, Methods, and Empiricism Geneva World Health Organization
20. ThomasKJA
HillK
2007 Evaluating the performance of death distribution methods for estimating death registration completeness: applications to data from high-income countries. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America Issues in the Measurement of Mortality; 29–31 March 2007. New York: Population Association of America. Available: http://paa2007.princeton.edu/download.aspx?submissionId=72024. Accessed 10 Mar 2010
21. HillK
YouD
ChoiY
2009 Death distribution methods for estimating adult mortality: sensitivity analysis with simulated data error. Demogr Res 21 235 254
22. StataCorpLP
2008 Stata/SE 10.1 for Windows College Station (Texas) StataCorp
23. The World Bank Group 2009 The World Bank Country Classification. Available: http://go.worldbank.org/K2CKM78CC0. Accessed 25 September 2009
24. United Nations Statistics Division 1989 Demographic yearbook 1989 New York United Nations http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/products/dyb/dybsets/1989%20DYB.pdf. Accessed 7 January 2009
25. BhatPN
1990 Estimating transition probabilities of age misstatement. Demography 27 149 163
26. PrestonSH
LahiriS
1991 A short-cut method for estimating death registration completeness in destabilized populations. Math Popul Stud 3 39 51
27. United Nations Statistics Division 2009 Table 1c, Volume 1, Special Census Topic 2000 Round New York United Nations Available: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/products/dyb/DYBcensus/V1_Notes1c.pdf. Accessed 6 October 2009
28. EzzatiM
FriedmanAB
KulkarniSC
MurrayCJ
2008 The reversal of fortunes: trends in county mortality and cross-county mortality disparities in the United States. PLoS Med 5 e66 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050066
29. MurrayCJ
KulkarniS
EzzatiM
2005 Eight Americas: new perspectives on U.S. health disparities. Am J Prev Med 29 4 10
30. MurrayCJ
KulkarniSC
MichaudC
TomijimaN
BulzacchelliMT
2006 Eight Americas: investigating mortality disparities across races, counties, and race-counties in the United States. PLoS Med 3 e260 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030260
31. EricksenE
2001 An evaluation of the 2000 census. Section 3 in U.S. Census Monitoring Board: Final Report to Congress. Available: http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/cmb/cmbp/reports/final_report/fin_sec3_evaluation.pdf. Accessed 21 December 2009
32. Internal Revenue Service 2006 SOI tax stats - county-to-county migration data. Internal Revenue Service, United States Department of the Treasury. Available: http://www.irs.gov/taxstats/indtaxstats/article/0,,id=96816,00.html. Accessed 7 January 2009
33. CamarotaSA
2005 Immigrants at mid-decade: a snapshot of America's foreign-born population in 2005 Washington (D.C.) Center for Immigration Studies
34. Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat 2009 World Population Prospects: The 2008 Revision. Available: http://esa.un.org/unpp. Accessed 5 January 2010
35. United Nations Statistics Division. Demographic yearbook New York United Nations Available: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/products/dyb/dyb2.htm. Accessed 7 January 2009
36. World Health Organization. Mortality database Geneva World Health Organization Available: http://www.who.int/whosis/mort/en/. Accessed 7 January 2009
37. Minnesota Population Center Integrated Public Use Microdata Series. IPUMS. Available: http://usa.ipums.org/usa/. Accessed 7 January 2009
38. LopezAD
BeggS
BosE
2006 Demographic and epidemiological characteristics of major regions, 1990–2001.
LopezAD
MathersCD
EzzatiM
JamisonDT
MurrayCJL
Global burden of disease and risk factors New York, Washington (D.C.) Oxford University Press and the World Bank 17 44
39. Thailand National Statistical Office 1997 Report on the 1995–1996 Survey of Population Change Bangkok Thailand National Statistical Office
40. Chandra SekarC
DemingWE
1949 On a method of estimating birth and death rates and the extent of registration. J Am Stat Assoc 44 101 115
41. HookEB
RegalRR
1995 Capture-recapture methods in epidemiology: methods and limitations. Epidemiol Rev 17 243 264
42. YangG
HuJ
RaoKQ
MaJ
RaoC
2005 Mortality registration and surveillance in China: history, current situation and challenges. Popul Health Metr 3 3
43. EiseleTP
LindbladeKA
RosenDH
OdhiamboF
VululeJM
2003 Evaluating the completeness of demographic surveillance of children less than five years old in western Kenya: a capture-recapture approach. Am J Trop Med Hyg 69 92 97
44. PrestonSH
EloIT
1999 Effects of age misreporting on mortality estimates at older ages. Popul Stud (NY) 53 165 177
Štítky
Interné lekárstvoČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Medicine
2010 Číslo 4
- Mobilní aplikace jako nová možnost v prevenci napadení klíštětem
- Hydroresponzivní krytí v epitelizační fázi hojení rány
- Vztah mezi statiny a rizikem vzniku nádorových onemocnění − metaanalýza
- Myasthenia gravis: kombinace chirurgie a farmakoterapie jako nejefektivnější modalita?
- Parazitičtí červi v terapii Crohnovy choroby a dalších zánětlivých autoimunitních onemocnění
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Preoperative/Neoadjuvant Therapy in Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Response and Resection Percentages
- Economic Appraisal of Ontario's Universal Influenza Immunization Program: A Cost-Utility Analysis
- China's Engagement with Global Health Diplomacy: Was SARS a Watershed?
- Laboratory Capacity Building in Asia for Infectious Disease Research: Experiences from the South East Asia Infectious Disease Clinical Research Network (SEAICRN)