Comparative Effectiveness Research: Challenges for Medical Journals

article has not abstract

Vyšlo v časopise: Comparative Effectiveness Research: Challenges for Medical Journals. PLoS Med 7(4): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000269
Kategorie: Editorial
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000269

Souhrn

article has not abstract

Zdroje

1. Committee on Reviewing Evidence to Identify Highly Effective Clinical Services, Institute of Medicine 2008

EdenJ

WheatleyB

McNeilB

SoxH

Knowing What Works in Health Care: A Roadmap for the Nation Washington, DC National Academy Press Available: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12038. Accessed: 26 March 2010

2. MoynihanR

OxmanAD

LavisJN

PaulsenE

2008 Evidence-Informed Health Policy: Using Research to Make Health Systems Healthier. Rapport Nr 1-2008 Oslo Nasjonalt kunnskapssenter for helsetjenesten

3. WHO 2005 WHA 58.34 Ministerial Summit on Health Research. Available: http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA58/WHA58_34-en.pdf. Accessed 30 November 2009

4. UK Department of Health 2006 Best Research for Best Health: A new national health research strategy. Report 272605. Available: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4127127. Accessed: 26 March 2010

5. IOM (Institute of Medicine) 2009 Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research Washington, DC National Academy Press Available: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12648. Accessed: 26 March 2010

6. SimeraI

AltmanDG

MoherD

SchulzKF

HoeyJ

2008 Guidelines for reporting health research: The EQUATOR network's survey of guideline authors. PLoS Med 5 e139 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050139

7. PLoS Medicine 2009 Ensuring Integrity in Comparative Effectiveness Research: Accentuate the Negative. PLoS Med 6 e1000152 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000152