Informed Consent in the Genomics Era

1. TaylorT

1993

The anatomy of the Nuremberg Trials

London

Bloomsbury Publishing

703

2. KnoppersB

2005

Consent revisited: Points to consider.

Health Law Rev

13

33

38

3. PetersenA

2007

Biobanks “engagements”: Engendering trust or

engineering consent.

Genomics Soc Policy

3

31

43

4. FuntowiczSR

1993

Science for the post-normal age.

Futures

25

735

755

5. KrimskyS

2004

Science in the private interest. Has the lure of profits corrupted biomedical

research

Lanham (MD)

Rowman & Littlefield

272

6. KnoppersB

2005

Biobanking: International norms.

J Law Med Ethics

33

7

14

7. KnoppersB

2004

Biobanks: Simplifying consent.

Nat Rev Genet

5

485

8. GibbonsSHelgasonHKayeJNomperAWendelL

2005

Lessons from European population genetic databases: Comparing the law in

Estonia, Iceland, Sweden and the United Kingdom.

Eur J Health Law

12

103

133

9. WichmannHGiegerCIlligT

2005

KORA-gen—Resource for population genetics, controls and a broad

spectrum of disease phenotypes.

Gesundheitswesen

67

Suppl 1

S26

S30

10. EdwardsJ

2002

Taking public understanding seriously.

New Genet Soc

21

315

325

11. Medical Research Council, Wellcome Trust

2006

CIOMS guidelines “Special ethical considerations for

epidemiological research”: Response from the Medical Research Council and the

Wellcome Trust.

Available: http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/stellent/groups/corporatesite/@policy_communications/documents/web_document/WTX035295.pdf.

Accessed 13 August 2008

12. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization

2003

International declaration on human genetic data.

Available: http://portal.unesco.org/shs/en/ev.php-URL_ID=1882&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html.

Accessed 13 August 2008

13. WinickoffD

2000

The biobanks law and decode genetics: Rhetoric equals cash in Iceland.

Genewatch

13

4

6

14. CaulfieldT

2007

Biobanks and blanket consent: The proper place of the public good and

public perception rationales.

Kings Coll Law J

18

209

226

15. ArnasonV

2004

Coding and consent: Moral challenges of the database project in Iceland.

Bioethics

181

27

49

16. TuttonR

2004

Genetic databases: Socio-ethical issues in the collection and use of DNA

London

Routledge

208

17. LinZAltmanRBOwenAB

2006

Confidentiality in genome research.

Science

313

441

442

18. LunshofJEChadwickRVorhausDBChurchGM

2008

From genetic privacy to open consent.

Nat Genet

9

406

411

19. LedfordH

2007

Human-subjects research: Trial and error.

Nature

448

530

532

20. LidzCWAppelbaumPS

1988

Two models of implementing informed consent.

Arch Intern Med

148

1385

1389

21. VeatchRM

1987

The patient as partner. A theory of human-experimentation ethics

Indiana University Press

256

22. WeillC

2003

Can consultation of both, experts and the public help developing public

policy.

Sci Public Policy

30

199

203

23. KohaneISMandlKDTaylorPLHolmIANigrinDJ

2007

Reestablishing the researcher-patient compact.

Science

316

836

837

24. CaulfieldTMcGuireALChoMBuchananJABurgessM

2008

Research ethics recommendations for whole-genome research: Consensus

statement.

PLoS Biol

6

e73

doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060073

25. ArnoldKvan der WaltJ

2007

Ethical issues in human genetic research: The global experience.

In:

WeinerMPGabrielSBStephensJC

editors

Genetic variation. A laboratory manual

Cold Spring Harbor (NY)

Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press

472