The Origin Recognition Complex is required for site-specific replication initiation in eukaryotic chromosomes. Null mutations are lethal in yeast and metazoa, and hypomorphs induce genome instability, a hallmark of cancer. We exploited the unique biology of Tetrahymena to explore ORC's role in conventional and alternative replication programs. Modest experimental down-regulation of ORC1 induces genome instability in vegetative growing Tetrahymena, and diminishes the capacity to support developmentally regulated endoreplication and gene amplification, consistent with essential roles in all of these processes. ORC mutants fail to activate the ATR checkpoint response, and are compromised in their ability to elongate existing replication forks. Remarkably, ORC and MCM levels fluctuate in unexpected ways during wild type development. Most notably, programmed changes in ORC abundance do not reflect the impending DNA replication load. Relative to the vegetative cell cycle, ORC and MCM levels increase dramatically and are highest early in development, when the replication load is lowest. Conversely, ORC levels are lowest during genome-wide macronuclear endoreplication, when the replication load increases. Endocycling cells generate unconventional replication intermediates that distinguish them from vegetative ORC1 knockdown mutants. The collective data suggest that the dependence on ORC may be relaxed during late stages of macronuclear development.
Vyšlo v časopise: Developmental Regulation of the Origin Recognition Complex. PLoS Genet 11(1): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004875 Kategorie: Research Article prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004875
1. GibsonDG, BellSP, AparicioOM (2006) Cell cycle execution point analysis of ORC function and characterization of the checkpoint response to ORC inactivation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Cells 11 : 557–573 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2443.2006.00967.x
2. MéchaliM (2010) Eukaryotic DNA replication origins: many choices for appropriate answers. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11 : 728–738 doi:10.1038/nrm2976
3. Fernández-CidA, RieraA, TognettiS, HerreraMC, SamelS, et al. (2013) An ORC/Cdc6/MCM2-7 complex is formed in a multistep reaction to serve as a platform for MCM double-hexamer assembly. Mol Cell 50 : 577–588 doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2013.03.026
4. ShimadaK, PaseroP, GasserSM (2002) ORC and the intra-S-phase checkpoint: a threshold regulates Rad53p activation in S phase. Genes Dev 16 : 3236–3252 doi:10.1101/gad.239802
5. NieduszynskiCA, KnoxY, DonaldsonAD (2006) Genome-wide identification of replication origins in yeast by comparative genomics. Genes Dev 20 : 1874–1879 doi:10.1101/gad.385306
6. ChenZ, SpeckC, WendelP, TangC, StillmanB, et al. (2008) The architecture of the DNA replication origin recognition complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 : 10326–10331 doi:10.1073/pnas.0803829105
7. MacAlpineHK, GordânR, PowellSK, HarteminkAJ, MacAlpineDM (2010) Drosophila ORC localizes to open chromatin and marks sites of cohesin complex loading. Genome Res 20 : 201–211 doi:10.1101/gr.097873.109
8. OhtaniK, DeGregoriJ, LeoneG, HerendeenDR, KellyTJ, et al. (1996) Expression of the HsOrc1 gene, a human ORC1 homolog, is regulated by cell proliferation via the E2F transcription factor. Mol Cell Biol 16 : 6977–6984.
9. StoeberK, TlstyTD, HapperfieldL, ThomasGA, RomanovS, et al. (2001) DNA replication licensing and human cell proliferation. J Cell Sci 114 : 2027–2041.
10. TugalT, Zou-YangXH, GavinK, PappinD, CanasB, et al. (1998) The Orc4p and Orc5p subunits of the Xenopus and human origin recognition complex are related to Orc1p and Cdc6p. J Biol Chem 273 : 32421–32429.
11. MarheinekeK, HyrienO (2004) Control of replication origin density and firing time in Xenopus egg extracts: role of a caffeine-sensitive, ATR-dependent checkpoint. J Biol Chem 279 : 28071–28081 doi:10.1074/jbc.M401574200
12. TowerJ (2004) Developmental gene amplification and origin regulation. Annu Rev Genet 38 : 273–304 doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.143851
13. KarrerKM (2012) Nuclear dualism. Methods Cell Biol 109 : 29–52 doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-385967-9.00003-7
14. AparicioOM (2013) Location, location, location: it's all in the timing for replication origins. Genes Dev 27 : 117–128 doi:10.1101/gad.209999.112
15. BerezneyR, DubeyDD, HubermanJA (2000) Heterogeneity of eukaryotic replicons, replicon clusters, and replication foci. Chromosoma 108 : 471–484.
16. ColeE, SugaiT (2012) Developmental progression of Tetrahymena through the cell cycle and conjugation. Methods Cell Biol 109 : 177–236 doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-385967-9.00007-4
17. DoerderFP, DeBaultLE (1978) Life cycle variation and regulation of macronuclear DNA content in Tetrahymena thermophila. Chromosoma 69 : 1–19.
18. YaoM-C, FullerP, XiX (2003) Programmed DNA deletion as an RNA-guided system of genome defense. Science 300 : 1581–1584 doi:10.1126/science.1084737
19. ClaycombJM, Orr-WeaverTL (2005) Developmental gene amplification: insights into DNA replication and gene expression. Trends Genet 21 : 149–162 doi:10.1016/j.tig.2005.01.009
20. SmithJJ, YakisichJS, KaplerGM, ColeES, RomeroDP (2004) A beta-tubulin mutation selectively uncouples nuclear division and cytokinesis in Tetrahymena thermophila. Eukaryotic Cell 3 : 1217–1226 doi:10.1128/EC.3.5.1217-1226.2004
21. MasaiH, MatsumotoS, YouZ, Yoshizawa-SugataN, OdaM (2010) Eukaryotic chromosome DNA replication: where, when, and how? Annu Rev Biochem 79 : 89–130 doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.052308.103205
22. MohammadMM, DontiTR, Sebastian YakisichJ, SmithAG, KaplerGM (2007) Tetrahymena ORC contains a ribosomal RNA fragment that participates in rDNA origin recognition. EMBO J 26 : 5048–5060 doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601919
23. DontiTR, DattaS, SandovalPY, KaplerGM (2009) Differential targeting of Tetrahymena ORC to ribosomal DNA and non-rDNA replication origins. EMBO J 28 : 223–233 doi:10.1038/emboj.2008.282
24. MiaoW, XiongJ, BowenJ, WangW, LiuY, et al. (2009) Microarray analyses of gene expression during the Tetrahymena thermophila life cycle. PLoS ONE 4: e4429 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004429
25. MorrisonTL, YakisichJS, Cassidy-HanleyD, KaplerGM (2005) TIF1 Represses rDNA replication initiation, but promotes normal S phase progression and chromosome transmission in Tetrahymena. Mol Biol Cell 16 : 2624–2635 doi:10.1091/mbc.E05-02-0107
26. YakisichJS, SandovalPY, MorrisonTL, KaplerGM (2006) TIF1 activates the intra-S-phase checkpoint response in the diploid micronucleus and amitotic polyploid macronucleus of Tetrahymena. Mol Biol Cell 17 : 5185–5197 doi:10.1091/mbc.E06-05-0469
27. NamEA, CortezD (2011) ATR signalling: more than meeting at the fork. Biochem J 436 : 527–536 doi:10.1042/BJ20102162
28. CortezD (2005) Unwind and slow down: checkpoint activation by helicase and polymerase uncoupling. Genes Dev 19 : 1007–1012 doi:10.1101/gad.1316905
29. ForsburgSL (2008) The MCM helicase: linking checkpoints to the replication fork. Biochem Soc Trans 36 : 114–119 doi:10.1042/BST0360114
30. LoidlJ, MochizukiK (2009) Tetrahymena meiotic nuclear reorganization is induced by a checkpoint kinase-dependent response to DNA damage. Mol Biol Cell 20 : 2428–2437 doi:10.1091/mbc.E08-10-1058
31. MochizukiK, NovatchkovaM, LoidlJ (2008) DNA double-strand breaks, but not crossovers, are required for the reorganization of meiotic nuclei in Tetrahymena. J Cell Sci 121 : 2148–2158 doi:10.1242/jcs.031799
32. MacAlpineDM, ZhangZ, KaplerGM (1997) Type I elements mediate replication fork pausing at conserved upstream sites in the Tetrahymena thermophila ribosomal DNA minichromosome. Mol Cell Biol 17 : 4517–4525.
33. BrunsPJ, BrussardTE (1981) Nullisomic tetrahymena: eliminating germinal chromosomes. Science 213 : 549–551 doi:10.1126/science.213.4507.549
34. YakisichJS, KaplerGM (2006) Deletion of the Tetrahymena thermophila rDNA replication fork barrier region disrupts macronuclear rDNA excision and creates a fragile site in the micronuclear genome. Nucleic Acids Res 34 : 620–634 doi:10.1093/nar/gkj466
35. YinL, GaterST, KarrerKM (2010) A developmentally regulated gene, ASI2, is required for endocycling in the macronuclear anlagen of Tetrahymena. Eukaryotic Cell 9 : 1343–1353 doi:10.1128/EC.00089-10
36. KaplerGM, BlackburnEH (1994) A weak germ-line excision mutation blocks developmentally controlled amplification of the rDNA minichromosome of Tetrahymena thermophila. Genes Dev 8 : 84–95.
37. XiongJ, YuanD, FillinghamJS, GargJ, LuX, et al. (2011) Gene Network Landscape of the Ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila. PLoS ONE 6: e20124 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020124
38. MarshTC, ColeES, StuartKR, CampbellC, RomeroDP (2000) RAD51 is required for propagation of the germinal nucleus in Tetrahymena thermophila. Genetics 154 : 1587–1596.
39. ChungP-H, YaoM-C (2012) Tetrahymena thermophila JMJD3 homolog regulates H3K27 methylation and nuclear differentiation. Eukaryotic Cell 11 : 601–614 doi:10.1128/EC.05290-11
40. ZhangZ, MacAlpineDM, KaplerGM (1997) Developmental regulation of DNA replication: replication fork barriers and programmed gene amplification in Tetrahymena thermophila. Mol Cell Biol 17 : 6147–6156.
41. AlzuA, BermejoR, BegnisM, LuccaC, PicciniD, et al. (2012) Senataxin Associates with Replication Forks to Protect Fork Integrity across RNA-Polymerase-II-Transcribed Genes. Cell 151 : 835–846 doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.09.041
42. BrownellJE, ZhouJ, RanalliT, KobayashiR, EdmondsonDG, et al. (1996) Tetrahymena histone acetyltransferase A: a homolog to yeast Gcn5p linking histone acetylation to gene activation. Cell 84 : 843–851.
43. CleffmannG (1980) Chromatin elimination and the genetic organisation of the macronucleus in Tetrahymena thermophila. Chromosoma 78 : 313–325.
44. HarrisonJC, HaberJE (2006) Surviving the breakup: the DNA damage checkpoint. Annu Rev Genet 40 : 209–235 doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.40.051206.105231
45. SclafaniRA, HolzenTM (2007) Cell cycle regulation of DNA replication. Annu Rev Genet 41 : 237–280 doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306.130308
46. MohammadM, YorkRD, HommelJ, KaplerGM (2003) Characterization of a novel origin recognition complex-like complex: implications for DNA recognition, cell cycle control, and locus-specific gene amplification. Mol Cell Biol 23 : 5005–5017.
47. EdwardsMC, TutterAV, CveticC, GilbertCH, ProkhorovaTA, et al. (2002) MCM2-7 complexes bind chromatin in a distributed pattern surrounding the origin recognition complex in Xenopus egg extracts. 277 : 33049–33057 doi:10.1074/jbc.M204438200
48. ForsburgSL (2004) Eukaryotic MCM proteins: beyond replication initiation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 68 : 109–131.
49. GeXQ, JacksonDA, BlowJJ (2007) Dormant origins licensed by excess Mcm2-7 are required for human cells to survive replicative stress. Genes Dev 21 : 3331–3341 doi:10.1101/gad.457807
50. IbarraA, SchwobE, MéndezJ (2008) Excess MCM proteins protect human cells from replicative stress by licensing backup origins of replication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 : 8956–8961 doi:10.1073/pnas.0803978105
51. LeiM, KawasakiY, TyeBK (1996) Physical interactions among Mcm proteins and effects of Mcm dosage on DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 16 : 5081–5090.
52. CrevelG, HashimotoR, VassS, SherkowJ, YamaguchiM, et al. (2007) Differential requirements for MCM proteins in DNA replication in Drosophila S2 cells. PLoS ONE 2: e833 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000833
53. CayrouC, CoulombeP, VigneronA, StanojcicS, GanierO, et al. (2011) Genome-scale analysis of metazoan replication origins reveals their organization in specific but flexible sites defined by conserved features. Genome Res 21 : 1438–1449 doi:10.1101/gr.121830.111
54. BlumenthalAB, ClarkEJ (1977) Discrete sizes of replication intermediates in Drosophila cells. Cell 12 : 183–189.
55. ChalkerDL, YaoMC (2001) Nongenic, bidirectional transcription precedes and may promote developmental DNA deletion in Tetrahymena thermophila. Genes Dev 15 : 1287–1298 doi:10.1101/gad.884601
56. LiS, YinL, ColeES, UdaniRA, KarrerKM (2006) Progeny of germ line knockouts of ASI2, a gene encoding a putative signal transduction receptor in Tetrahymena thermophila, fail to make the transition from sexual reproduction to vegetative growth. Dev Biol 295 : 633–646 doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.03.048
57. SchaefferV, AlthauserC, ShcherbataHR, DengW-M, Ruohola-BakerH (2004) Notch-dependent Fizzy-related/Hec1/Cdh1 expression is required for the mitotic-to-endocycle transition in Drosophila follicle cells. Curr Biol 14 : 630–636 doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.040
58. SonnevilleR, QuerenetM, CraigA, GartnerA, BlowJJ (2012) The dynamics of replication licensing in live Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. J Cell Biol 196 : 233–246 doi:10.1083/jcb.201110080
59. ClaycombJM (2002) Visualization of replication initiation and elongation in Drosophila. J Cell Biol 159 : 225–236 doi:10.1083/jcb.200207046
60. SherN, StetinaVonJR, BellGW, MatsuuraS, RavidK, et al. (2013) Fundamental differences in endoreplication in mammals and Drosophila revealed by analysis of endocycling and endomitotic cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 : 9368–9373 doi:10.1073/pnas.1304889110
61. ParkSY, AsanoM (2008) The origin recognition complex is dispensable for endoreplication in Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 : 12343–12348 doi:10.1073/pnas.0805189105
62. DershowitzA, SnyderM, SbiaM, SkurnickJH, OngLY, et al. (2007) Linear derivatives of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome III can be maintained in the absence of autonomously replicating sequence elements. Mol Cell Biol 27 : 4652–4663 doi:10.1128/MCB.01246-06
63. HawkinsM, MallaS, BlytheMJ, NieduszynskiCA, AllersT (2013) Accelerated growth in the absence of DNA replication origins. Nature 503 : 544–547 doi:10.1038/nature12650
64. CayrouC, GrégoireD, CoulombeP, DanisE, MéchaliM (2012) Genome-scale identification of active DNA replication origins. Methods 57 : 158–164 doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.06.015
65. ChastainPD, HeffernanTP, NevisKR, LinL, KaufmannWK, et al. (2006) Checkpoint regulation of replication dynamics in UV-irradiated human cells. Cell Cycle 5 : 2160–2167.
66. Schwab RAV, Niedzwiedz W (2011) Visualization of DNA replication in the vertebrate model system DT40 using the DNA fiber technique. J Vis Exp: e3255. doi:10.3791/3255.
67. StewartJA, WangF, ChaikenMF, KasbekC, ChastainPD, et al. (2012) Human CST promotes telomere duplex replication and general replication restart after fork stalling. EMBO J 31 : 3537–3549 doi:10.1038/emboj.2012.215
Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova
Nemáte účet? Registrujte sa
Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.
