Chk2 and p53 Are Haploinsufficient with Dependent and Independent Functions to Eliminate Cells after Telomere Loss
The mechanisms that cells use to monitor telomere integrity, and the array of responses that may be induced, are not fully defined. To date there have been no studies in animals describing the ability of cells to survive and contribute to adult organs following telomere loss. We developed assays to monitor the ability of somatic cells to proliferate and differentiate after telomere loss. Here we show that p53 and Chk2 limit the growth and differentiation of cells that lose a telomere. Furthermore, our results show that two copies of the genes encoding p53 and Chk2 are required for the cell to mount a rapid wildtype response to a missing telomere. Finally, our results show that, while Chk2 functions by activating the p53-dependent apoptotic cascade, Chk2 also functions independently of p53 to limit survival. In spite of these mechanisms to eliminate cells that have lost a telomere, we find that such cells can make a substantial contribution to differentiated adult tissues.
Vyšlo v časopise:
Chk2 and p53 Are Haploinsufficient with Dependent and Independent Functions to Eliminate Cells after Telomere Loss. PLoS Genet 7(6): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002103
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002103
Souhrn
The mechanisms that cells use to monitor telomere integrity, and the array of responses that may be induced, are not fully defined. To date there have been no studies in animals describing the ability of cells to survive and contribute to adult organs following telomere loss. We developed assays to monitor the ability of somatic cells to proliferate and differentiate after telomere loss. Here we show that p53 and Chk2 limit the growth and differentiation of cells that lose a telomere. Furthermore, our results show that two copies of the genes encoding p53 and Chk2 are required for the cell to mount a rapid wildtype response to a missing telomere. Finally, our results show that, while Chk2 functions by activating the p53-dependent apoptotic cascade, Chk2 also functions independently of p53 to limit survival. In spite of these mechanisms to eliminate cells that have lost a telomere, we find that such cells can make a substantial contribution to differentiated adult tissues.
Zdroje
1. MullerHJ 1940 An analysis of the process of structural change in chromosomes of Drosophila. J Genet 40 1 66
2. McClintockB 1939 The Behavior in Successive Nuclear Divisions of a Chromosome Broken at Meiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 25 405 416
3. ArtandiSEDePinhoRA 2010 Telomeres and telomerase in cancer. Carcinogenesis 31 9 18
4. HensonJDReddelRR 2010 Assaying and investigating Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres activity in human cells and cancers. FEBS Lett 584 3800 3811
5. ShayJWWrightWE 2010 Telomeres and telomerase in normal and cancer stem cells. FEBS Lett 584 3819 3825
6. TitenSWGolicKG 2008 Telomere loss provokes multiple pathways to apoptosis and produces genomic instability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 180 1821 1832
7. McNameeLMBrodskyMH 2009 p53-independent apoptosis limits DNA damage-induced aneuploidy. Genetics 182 423 435
8. WichmannAJaklevicBSuTT 2006 Ionizing radiation induces caspase-dependent but Chk2- and p53-independent cell death in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103 9952 9957
9. TitenSWGolicKG 2010 Healing of euchromatic chromosome breaks by efficient de novo telomere addition in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 184 309 312
10. AhmadKGolicKG 1998 The transmission of fragmented chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 148 775 792
11. MasonJMChampionLEHookG 1997 Germ-line effects of a mutator, mu2, in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 146 1381 1397
12. AhmadKGolicKG 1999 Telomere loss in somatic cells of Drosophila causes cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Genetics 151 1041 1051
13. GolicKG 1994 Local transposition of P elements in Drosophila melanogaster and recombination between duplicated elements using a site-specific recombinase. Genetics 137 551 563
14. MichinomaeMKajiS 1973 Cell death during the development of the Bar eye discs in Drosophila melanogaster. Japan J Genetics 48 307 310
15. FristromD 1969 Cellular degeneration in the production of some mutant phenotypes in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Gen Genet 103 363 379
16. BiXWeiSCRongYS 2004 Telomere protection without a telomerase; the role of ATM and Mre11 in Drosophila telomere maintenance. Curr Biol 14 1348 1353
17. CenciGSiriacoGRaffaGDKellumRGattiM 2003 The Drosophila HOAP protein is required for telomere capping. Nature cell biology 5 82 84
18. CiapponiLCenciGGattiM 2006 The Drosophila Nbs protein functions in multiple pathways for the maintenance of genome stability. Genetics 173 1447 1454
19. FantiLGiovinazzoGBerlocoMPimpinelliS 1998 The heterochromatin protein 1 prevents telomere fusions in Drosophila. Molecular cell 2 527 538
20. GaoGWalserJCBeaucherMLMorcianoPWesolowskaN 2010 HipHop interacts with HOAP and HP1 to protect Drosophila telomeres in a sequence-independent manner. The EMBO journal 29 819 829
21. OikemusSRMcGinnisNQueiroz-MachadoJTukachinskyHTakadaS 2004 Drosophila atm/telomere fusion is required for telomeric localization of HP1 and telomere position effect. Genes Dev 18 1850 1861
22. SilvaETiongSPedersenMHomolaERoyouA 2004 ATM is required for telomere maintenance and chromosome stability during Drosophila development. Curr Biol 14 1341 1347
23. SongYHMireyGBetsonMHaberDASettlemanJ 2004 The Drosophila ATM ortholog, dATM, mediates the response to ionizing radiation and to spontaneous DNA damage during development. Curr Biol 14 1354 1359
24. CiapponiLCenciGDucauJFloresCJohnson-SchlitzD 2004 The Drosophila Mre11/Rad50 complex is required to prevent both telomeric fusion and chromosome breakage. Curr Biol 14 1360 1366
25. GorskiMMRomeijnRJEekenJCde JongAWvan VeenBL 2004 Disruption of Drosophila Rad50 causes pupal lethality, the accumulation of DNA double-strand breaks and the induction of apoptosis in third instar larvae. DNA Repair (Amst) 3 603 615
26. DronamrajuRMasonJM 2009 Recognition of double strand breaks by a mutator protein (MU2) in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet 5 e1000473 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000473
27. MasonJMStrobelEGreenMM 1984 mu-2: mutator gene in Drosophila that potentiates the induction of terminal deficiencies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81 6090 6094
28. GrafUWurglerFEKatzAJFreiHJuonH 1984 Somatic mutation and recombination test in Drosophila melanogaster. Environ Mutagen 6 153 188
29. PalmWde LangeT 2008 How shelterin protects mammalian telomeres. Annu Rev Genet 42 301 334
30. ChanSSChangS 2010 Defending the end zone: studying the players involved in protecting chromosome ends. FEBS Lett 584 3773 3778
31. KarlsederJBroccoliDDaiYHardySde LangeT 1999 p53- and ATM-dependent apoptosis induced by telomeres lacking TRF2. Science 283 1321 1325
32. AntoniLSodhaNCollinsIGarrettMD 2007 CHK2 kinase: cancer susceptibility and cancer therapy - two sides of the same coin? Nat Rev Cancer 7 925 936
33. BrodskyMHWeinertBTTsangGRongYSMcGinnisNM 2004 Drosophila melanogaster MNK/Chk2 and p53 regulate multiple DNA repair and apoptotic pathways following DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol 24 1219 1231
34. AkdemirFChristichASogameNChapoJAbramsJM 2007 p53 directs focused genomic responses in Drosophila. Oncogene 26 5184 5193
35. HohJJinSParradoTEdingtonJLevineAJ 2002 The p53MH algorithm and its application in detecting p53-responsive genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99 8467 8472
36. LevineAJ 1997 p53, the cellular gatekeeper for growth and division. Cell 88 323 331
37. ShilohY 2003 ATM and related protein kinases: safeguarding genome integrity. Nat Rev Cancer 3 155 168
38. VousdenKHPrivesC 2009 Blinded by the Light: The Growing Complexity of p53. Cell 137 413 431
39. Kenzelmann BrozDAttardiLD 2010 In vivo analysis of p53 tumor suppressor function using genetically engineered mouse models. Carcinogenesis 31 1311 1318
40. WellsBSYoshidaEJohnstonLA 2006 Compensatory proliferation in Drosophila imaginal discs requires Dronc-dependent p53 activity. Curr Biol 16 1606 1615
41. ShrivastavMDe HaroLPNickoloffJA 2008 Regulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice. Cell Res 18 134 147
42. VarleyJM 2003 Germline TP53 mutations and Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Hum Mutat 21 313 320
43. IwakumaTLozanoGFloresER 2005 Li-Fraumeni syndrome: a p53 family affair. Cell Cycle 4 865 867
44. DonehowerLA 2009 Using mice to examine p53 functions in cancer, aging, and longevity. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 1 a001081
45. VenkatachalamSShiYPJonesSNVogelHBradleyA 1998 Retention of wild-type p53 in tumors from p53 heterozygous mice: reduction of p53 dosage can promote cancer formation. EMBO J 17 4657 4667
46. DonehowerLA 1996 The p53-deficient mouse: a model for basic and applied cancer studies. Semin Cancer Biol 7 269 278
47. ArtandiSEDePinhoRA 2000 A critical role for telomeres in suppressing and facilitating carcinogenesis. Curr Opin Genet Dev 10 39 46
48. AbduUBrodskyMSchupbachT 2002 Activation of a meiotic checkpoint during Drosophila oogenesis regulates the translation of Gurken through Chk2/Mnk. Curr Biol 12 1645 1651
49. TakadaSKelkarATheurkaufWE 2003 Drosophila checkpoint kinase 2 couples centrosome function and spindle assembly to genomic integrity. Cell 113 87 99
50. XuJXinSDuW 2001 Drosophila Chk2 is required for DNA damage-mediated cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. FEBS Lett 508 394 398
51. MasrouhaNYangLHijalSLarochelleSSuterB 2003 The Drosophila chk2 gene loki is essential for embryonic DNA double-strand-break checkpoints induced in S phase or G2. Genetics 163 973 982
52. BakhratAPritchettTPeretzGMcCallKAbduU 2010 Drosophila Chk2 and p53 proteins induce stage-specific cell death independently during oogenesis. Apoptosis 15 1425 1434
53. MorenoE 2008 Is cell competition relevant to cancer? Nat Rev Cancer 8 141 147
54. MarygoldSJRooteJReuterGLambertssonAAshburnerM 2007 The ribosomal protein genes and Minute loci of Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Biol 8 R216
55. McEachernMJHaberJE 2006 Break-induced replication and recombinational telomere elongation in yeast. Annu Rev Biochem 75 111 135
56. HensonJDNeumannAAYeagerTRReddelRR 2002 Alternative lengthening of telomeres in mammalian cells. Oncogene 21 598 610
57. HagelstromRTBlagoevKBNiedernhoferLJGoodwinEHBaileySM 2010 Hyper telomere recombination accelerates replicative senescence and may promote premature aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107 15768 15773
58. BartekJLukasJ 2007 DNA damage checkpoints: from initiation to recovery or adaptation. Curr Biol 19 238 245
59. ClemensonCMarsolier-KergoatMC 2009 DNA damage checkpoint inactivation: adaptation and recovery. DNA repair 8 1101 1109
60. SandellLLZakianVA 1993 Loss of a yeast telomere: arrest, recovery, and chromosome loss. Cell 75 729 739
61. GalgoczyDJToczyskiDP 2001 Checkpoint adaptation precedes spontaneous and damage-induced genomic instability in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 21 1710 1718
62. SyljuasenRGJensenSBartekJLukasJ 2006 Adaptation to the ionizing radiation-induced G2 checkpoint occurs in human cells and depends on checkpoint kinase 1 and Polo-like kinase 1 kinases. Cancer Res 66 10253 10257
63. LaurenconAPurdyASekelskyJHawleyRSSuTT 2003 Phenotypic analysis of separation-of-function alleles of MEI-41, Drosophila ATM/ATR. Genetics 164 589 601
64. AhmadKGolicKG 1996 Somatic reversion of chromosomal position effects in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 144 657 670
65. RobertsonHMPrestonCRPhillisRWJohnson-SchlitzDMBenzWK 1988 A stable genomic source of P element transposase in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 118 461 470
66. RyderEBlowsFAshburnerMBautista-LlacerRCoulsonD 2004 The DrosDel collection: a set of P-element insertions for generating custom chromosomal aberrations in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 167 797 813
67. GattiMBonaccorsiSPimpinelliS 1994 Looking at Drosophila mitotic chromosomes. Methods Cell Biol 44 371 391
68. SongYHMireyGBetsonMHaberDASettlemanJ 2004 The Drosophila ATM ortholog, dATM, mediates the response to ionizing radiation and to spontaneous DNA damage during development. Curr Biol 14 1354 1359
69. OllmannMYoungLMDi ComoCJKarimFBelvinM 2000 Drosophila p53 is a structural and functional homolog of the tumor suppressor p53. Cell 101 91 101
70. BrodskyMHNordstromWTsangGKwanERubinGM 2000 Drosophila p53 binds a damage response element at the reaper locus. Cell 101 103 113
71. PetersMDeLucaCHiraoAStambolicVPotterJ 2002 Chk2 regulates irradiation-induced, p53-mediated apoptosis in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99 11305 11310
72. SogameNKimMAbramsJM 2003 Drosophila p53 preserves genomic stability by regulating cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100 4696 4701
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2011 Číslo 6
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Statistical Inference on the Mechanisms of Genome Evolution
- Recurrent Chromosome 16p13.1 Duplications Are a Risk Factor for Aortic Dissections
- Chromosomal Macrodomains and Associated Proteins: Implications for DNA Organization and Replication in Gram Negative Bacteria
- Maps of Open Chromatin Guide the Functional Follow-Up of Genome-Wide Association Signals: Application to Hematological Traits