#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Killer Bee Molecules: Antimicrobial Peptides as Effector Molecules to Target Sporogonic Stages of


A new generation of strategies is evolving that aim to block malaria transmission by employing genetically modified vectors or mosquito pathogens or symbionts that express anti-parasite molecules. Whilst transgenic technologies have advanced rapidly, there is still a paucity of effector molecules with potent anti-malaria activity whose expression does not cause detrimental effects on mosquito fitness. Our objective was to examine a wide range of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) for their toxic effects on Plasmodium and anopheline mosquitoes. Specifically targeting early sporogonic stages, we initially screened AMPs for toxicity against a mosquito cell line and P. berghei ookinetes. Promising candidate AMPs were fed to mosquitoes to monitor adverse fitness effects, and their efficacy in blocking rodent malaria infection in Anopheles stephensi was assessed. This was followed by tests to determine their activity against P. falciparum in An. gambiae, initially using laboratory cultures to infect mosquitoes, then culminating in preliminary assays in the field using gametocytes and mosquitoes collected from the same area in Mali, West Africa. From a range of 33 molecules, six AMPs able to block Plasmodium development were identified: Anoplin, Duramycin, Mastoparan X, Melittin, TP10 and Vida3. With the exception of Anoplin and Mastoparan X, these AMPs were also toxic to an An. gambiae cell line at a concentration of 25 µM. However, when tested in mosquito blood feeds, they did not reduce mosquito longevity or egg production at concentrations of 50 µM. Peptides effective against cultured ookinetes were less effective when tested in vivo and differences in efficacy against P. berghei and P. falciparum were seen. From the range of molecules tested, the majority of effective AMPs were derived from bee/wasp venoms.


Vyšlo v časopise: Killer Bee Molecules: Antimicrobial Peptides as Effector Molecules to Target Sporogonic Stages of. PLoS Pathog 9(11): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1003790
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003790

Souhrn

A new generation of strategies is evolving that aim to block malaria transmission by employing genetically modified vectors or mosquito pathogens or symbionts that express anti-parasite molecules. Whilst transgenic technologies have advanced rapidly, there is still a paucity of effector molecules with potent anti-malaria activity whose expression does not cause detrimental effects on mosquito fitness. Our objective was to examine a wide range of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) for their toxic effects on Plasmodium and anopheline mosquitoes. Specifically targeting early sporogonic stages, we initially screened AMPs for toxicity against a mosquito cell line and P. berghei ookinetes. Promising candidate AMPs were fed to mosquitoes to monitor adverse fitness effects, and their efficacy in blocking rodent malaria infection in Anopheles stephensi was assessed. This was followed by tests to determine their activity against P. falciparum in An. gambiae, initially using laboratory cultures to infect mosquitoes, then culminating in preliminary assays in the field using gametocytes and mosquitoes collected from the same area in Mali, West Africa. From a range of 33 molecules, six AMPs able to block Plasmodium development were identified: Anoplin, Duramycin, Mastoparan X, Melittin, TP10 and Vida3. With the exception of Anoplin and Mastoparan X, these AMPs were also toxic to an An. gambiae cell line at a concentration of 25 µM. However, when tested in mosquito blood feeds, they did not reduce mosquito longevity or egg production at concentrations of 50 µM. Peptides effective against cultured ookinetes were less effective when tested in vivo and differences in efficacy against P. berghei and P. falciparum were seen. From the range of molecules tested, the majority of effective AMPs were derived from bee/wasp venoms.


Zdroje

1. TrapeJF, TallA, DiagneN, NdiathO, LyAB, et al. (2011) Malaria morbidity and pyrethroid resistance after the introduction of insecticide-treated bednets and artemisinin-based combination therapies: a longitudinal study. Lancet Infect Dis 11: 925–932.

2. TakkenW, KnolsBG (2009) Malaria vector control: current and future strategies. Trends Parasitol 25: 101–104.

3. RamirezJL, GarverLS, DimopoulosG (2009) Challenges and approaches for mosquito targeted malaria control. Curr Mol Med 9: 116–130.

4. Abdul-GhaniR, Al-MekhlafiAM, AlabsiMS (2012) Microbial control of malaria: biological warfare against the parasite and its vector. Acta Trop 121: 71–84.

5. ItoJ, GhoshA, MoreiraLA, WimmerEA, Jacobs-LorenaM (2002) Transgenic anopheline mosquitoes impaired in transmission of a malaria parasite. Nature 417: 452–455.

6. IsaacsAT, JasinskieneN, TretiakovM, ThieryI, ZettorA, et al. (2012) Transgenic Anopheles stephensi coexpressing single-chain antibodies resist Plasmodium falciparum development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: E1922–1930.

7. RiehleMA, Jacobs-LorenaM (2005) Using bacteria to express and display anti-parasite molecules in mosquitoes: current and future strategies. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 35: 699–707.

8. JamesAA (2005) Gene drive systems in mosquitoes: rules of the road. Trends Parasitol 21: 64–67.

9. SinkinsSP, GouldF (2006) Gene drive systems for insect disease vectors. Nat Rev Genet 7: 427–435.

10. RiehleMA, SrinivasanP, MoreiraCK, Jacobs-LorenaM (2003) Towards genetic manipulation of wild mosquito populations to combat malaria: advances and challenges. J Exp Biol 206: 3809–3816.

11. Jacobs-LorenaM (2003) Interrupting malaria transmission by genetic manipulation of anopheline mosquitoes. J Vector Borne Dis 40: 73–77.

12. MeredithJM, BasuS, NimmoDD, Larget-ThieryI, WarrEL, et al. (2011) Site-specific integration and expression of an anti-malarial gene in transgenic Anopheles gambiae significantly reduces Plasmodium infections. PLoS One 6: e14587.

13. FuchsS, NolanT, CrisantiA (2013) Mosquito transgenic technologies to reduce Plasmodium transmission. Methods Mol Biol 923: 601–622.

14. MeredithJM, UnderhillA, McArthurCC, EgglestonP (2013) Next-generation site-directed transgenesis in the malaria vector mosquito Anopheles gambiae: self-docking strains expressing germline-specific phiC31 integrase. PLoS One 8: e59264.

15. MarshallJM, HayBA (2011) Inverse Medea as a novel gene drive system for local population replacement: a theoretical analysis. J Hered 102: 336–341.

16. MarshallJM, PittmanGW, BuchmanAB, HayBA (2011) Semele: a killer-male, rescue-female system for suppression and replacement of insect disease vector populations. Genetics 187: 535–551.

17. CarterV, HurdH (2010) Choosing anti-Plasmodium molecules for genetically modifying mosquitoes: focus on peptides. Trends Parasitol 26: 582–590.

18. WangS, Jacobs-LorenaM (2013) Genetic approaches to interfere with malaria transmission by vector mosquitoes. Trends Biotechnol 31: 185–193.

19. SindenRE, DawesEJ, AlaviY, WaldockJ, FinneyO, et al. (2007) Progression of Plasmodium berghei through Anopheles stephensi is density-dependent. PLoS Pathog 3: e195.

20. DrexlerAL, VodovotzY, LuckhartS (2008) Plasmodium development in the mosquito: biology bottlenecks and opportunities for mathematical modeling. Trends Parasitol 24: 333–336.

21. GiulianiA, PirriG, NicolettoSF (2007) Antimicrobial peptides: an overview of a promising class of therapeutics. Central European Journal of Biology 2: 1–33.

22. MartinE, GanzT, LehrerRI (1995) Defensins and other endogenous peptide antibiotics of vertebrates. J Leukoc Biol 58: 128–136.

23. SplithK, NeundorfI (2011) Antimicrobial peptides with cell-penetrating peptide properties and vice versa. Eur Biophys J 40: 387–397.

24. TossiA, SandriL, GiangasperoA (2000) Amphipathic, alpha-helical antimicrobial peptides. Biopolymers 55: 4–30.

25. BellA (2011) Antimalarial Peptides: The Long and the Short of it. Curr Pharm Des 17: 2719–2731.

26. AhmedAM, HurdH (2006) Immune stimulation and malaria infection impose reproductive costs in Anopheles gambiae via follicular apoptosis. Microbes Infect 8: 308–315.

27. CondeR, ZamudioFZ, RodriguezMH, PossaniLD (2000) Scorpine, an anti-malaria and anti-bacterial agent purified from scorpion venom. FEBS Lett 471: 165–168.

28. BevinsCL, ZasloffM (1990) Peptides from frog skin. Annu Rev Biochem 59: 395–414.

29. GwadzRW, KaslowD, LeeJY, MaloyWL, ZasloffM, et al. (1989) Effects of magainins and cecropins on the sporogonic development of malaria parasites in mosquitoes. Infect Immun 57: 2628–2633.

30. ParishLA, ColquhounDR, Ubaida MohienC, LyashkovAE, GrahamDR, et al. (2011) Ookinete-interacting proteins on the microvillar surface are partitioned into detergent resistant membranes of Anopheles gambiae midguts. J Proteome Res 10: 5150–5162.

31. LehaneMJ (1997) Peritrophic matrix structure and function. Annu Rev Entomol 42: 525–550.

32. MoreiraLA, WangJ, CollinsFH, Jacobs-LorenaM (2004) Fitness of anopheline mosquitoes expressing transgenes that inhibit Plasmodium development. Genetics 166: 1337–1341.

33. MarrelliMT, LiC, RasgonJL, Jacobs-LorenaM (2007) Transgenic malaria-resistant mosquitoes have a fitness advantage when feeding on Plasmodium-infected blood. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 5580–5583.

34. MarrelliMT, MoreiraCK, KellyD, AlpheyL, Jacobs-LorenaM (2006) Mosquito transgenesis: what is the fitness cost? Trends Parasitol 22: 197–202.

35. ArrighiRB, EbikemeC, JiangY, Ranford-CartwrightL, BarrettMP, et al. (2008) Cell-penetrating peptide TP10 shows broad-spectrum activity against both Plasmodium falciparum and Trypanosoma brucei brucei. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52: 3414–3417.

36. NotoPB, AbbadessaG, CassoneM, MateoGD, AgelanA, et al. (2008) Alternative stabilities of a proline-rich antibacterial peptide in vitro and in vivo. Protein Sci 17: 1249–1255.

37. TripetF, Aboagye-AntwiF, HurdH (2008) Ecological immunology of mosquito-malaria interactions. Trends Parasitol 24: 219–227.

38. AsthanaN, YadavSP, GhoshJK (2004) Dissection of antibacterial and toxic activity of melittin: a leucine zipper motif plays a crucial role in determining its hemolytic activity but not antibacterial activity. J Biol Chem 279: 55042–55050.

39. SenTZ, JerniganRL, GarnierJ, KloczkowskiA (2005) GOR V server for protein secondary structure prediction. Bioinformatics 21: 2787–2788.

40. VogelH, JahnigF (1986) The structure of melittin in membranes. Biophys J 50: 573–582.

41. EiriksdottirE, KonateK, LangelU, DivitaG, DeshayesS (2010) Secondary structure of cell-penetrating peptides controls membrane interaction and insertion. Biochim Biophys Acta 1798: 1119–1128.

42. WakamatsuK, OkadaA, MiyazawaT, OhyaM, HigashijimaT (1992) Membrane-bound conformation of mastoparan-X, a G-protein-activating peptide. Biochemistry 31: 5654–5660.

43. KonnoK, HisadaM, FontanaR, LorenziCC, NaokiH, et al. (2001) Anoplin, a novel antimicrobial peptide from the venom of the solitary wasp Anoplius samariensis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1550: 70–80.

44. MacielC, de Oliveira JuniorVX, FazioMA, Nacif-PimentaR, MirandaA, et al. (2008) Anti-Plasmodium activity of angiotensin II and related synthetic peptides. PLoS One 3: e3296.

45. ArrighiRB, NakamuraC, MiyakeJ, HurdH, BurgessJG (2002) Design and activity of antimicrobial peptides against sporogonic-stage parasites causing murine malarias. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46: 2104–2110.

46. DaganA, EfronL, GaidukovL, MorA, GinsburgH (2002) In vitro anti-Plasmodium effects of dermaseptin S4 derivatives. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46: 1059–1066.

47. PeschelA, SahlHG (2006) The co-evolution of host cationic antimicrobial peptides and microbial resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol 4: 529–536.

48. HarringtonJM (2011) Antimicrobial peptide killing of African trypanosomes. Parasite Immunol 33: 461–469.

49. McGwireBS, KulkarniMM (2010) Interactions of antimicrobial peptides with Leishmania and trypanosomes and their functional role in host parasitism. Exp Parasitol 126: 397–405.

50. CirimotichCM, DongY, ClaytonAM, SandifordSL, Souza-NetoJA, et al. (2011) Natural microbe-mediated refractoriness to Plasmodium infection in Anopheles gambiae. Science 332: 855–858.

51. BassC, WilliamsonMS, WildingCS, DonnellyMJ, FieldLM (2007) Identification of the main malaria vectors in the Anopheles gambiae species complex using a TaqMan real-time PCR assay. Malar J 6: 155.

52. Coutinho-AbreuIV, ZhuKY, Ramalho-OrtigaoM (2010) Transgenesis and paratransgenesis to control insect-borne diseases: current status and future challenges. Parasitol Int 59: 1–8.

53. WangS, GhoshAK, BongioN, StebbingsKA, LampeDJ, et al. (2012) Fighting malaria with engineered symbiotic bacteria from vector mosquitoes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 12734–12739.

54. KambrisZ, BlagboroughAM, PintoSB, BlagroveMS, GodfrayHC, et al. (2010) Wolbachia stimulates immune gene expression and inhibits Plasmodium development in Anopheles gambiae. PLoS Pathog 6: e1001143.

55. BoissiereA, TchioffoMT, BacharD, AbateL, MarieA, et al. (2012) Midgut microbiota of the malaria mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae and interactions with Plasmodium falciparum infection. PLoS Pathog 8: e1002742.

56. HoffmannAA, TurelliM (2013) Facilitating Wolbachia introductions into mosquito populations through insecticide-resistance selection. Proc Biol Sci 280: 20130371.

57. WiradharmaN, KhoeU, HauserCA, SeowSV, ZhangS, et al. (2011) Synthetic cationic amphiphilic alpha-helical peptides as antimicrobial agents. Biomaterials 32: 2204–2212.

58. ChenL, ChenW, YangH, LaiR (2010) A novel bioactive peptide from wasp venom. J Venom Res 1: 43–47.

59. Van VaerenberghM, CardoenD, FormesynEM, BrunainM, Van DriesscheG, et al. (2013) Extending the honey bee venome with the antimicrobial peptide apidaecin and a protein resembling wasp antigen 5. Insect Mol Biol 22: 199–210.

60. JahanN, HurdH (1997) The effects of infection with Plasmodium yoelii nigeriensis on the reproductive fitness of Anopheles stephensi. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 91: 365–369.

61. FanelloC, SantolamazzaF, della TorreA (2002) Simultaneous identification of species and molecular forms of the Anopheles gambiae complex by PCR-RFLP. Med Vet Entomol 16: 461–464.

62. FeldmannAM, BillingsleyPF, SavelkoulE (1990) Bloodmeal digestion by strains of Anopheles stephensi liston (Diptera: Culicidae) of differing susceptibility to Plasmodium falciparum. Parasitology 101 Pt 2: 193–200.

63. AlaviY, AraiM, MendozaJ, Tufet-BayonaM, SinhaR, et al. (2003) The dynamics of interactions between Plasmodium and the mosquito: a study of the infectivity of Plasmodium berghei and Plasmodium gallinaceum, and their transmission by Anopheles stephensi, Anopheles gambiae and Aedes aegypti. Int J Parasitol 33: 933–943.

64. MitriC, JacquesJC, ThieryI, RiehleMM, XuJ, et al. (2009) Fine pathogen discrimination within the APL1 gene family protects Anopheles gambiae against human and rodent malaria species. PLoS Pathog 5: e1000576.

65. HurdH, TaylorPJ, AdamsD, UnderhillA, EgglestonP (2005) Evaluating the costs of mosquito resistance to malaria parasites. Evolution 59: 2560–2572.

66. Hetru C, Hoffmann D, Bulet P (1998) Antimicrobial peptides from insects. In: Brey PT, Hultmark D, editors. Molecular Mechanisms of Immune Responses in Insects. London: Chapman & Hall. pp. 40–66.

67. CatterucciaF, NolanT, BlassC, MullerHM, CrisantiA, et al. (2000) Toward Anopheles transformation: Minos element activity in anopheline cells and embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 2157–2162.

68. CarterV, NacerAM, UnderhillA, SindenRE, HurdH (2007) Minimum requirements for ookinete to oocyst transformation in Plasmodium. Int J Parasitol 37: 1221–1232.

69. PonnuduraiT, LensenAH, LeeuwenbergAD, MeuwissenJH (1982) Cultivation of fertile Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes in semi-automated systems. 1. Static cultures. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 76: 812–818.

70. ErspamerV, ErspamerGF, InselviniM, NegriL (1972) Occurrence of bombesin and alytesin in extracts of the skin of three European discoglossid frogs and pharmacological actions of bombesin on extravascular smooth muscle. Br J Pharmacol 45: 333–348.

71. RosarioLM (1985) Differential effects of the K+ channel blockers apamin and quinine on glucose-induced electrical activity in pancreatic beta-cells from a strain of ob/ob (obese) mice. FEBS Lett 188: 302–306.

72. FredenhagenA, FendrichG, MarkiF, MarkiW, GrunerJ, et al. (1990) Duramycins B and C, two new lanthionine containing antibiotics as inhibitors of phospholipase A2. Structural revision of duramycin and cinnamycin. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 43: 1403–1412.

73. BargieriDY, LeiteJA, LopesSC, Sbrogio-AlmeidaME, BragaCJ, et al. (2010) Immunogenic properties of a recombinant fusion protein containing the C-terminal 19 kDa of Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein-1 and the innate immunity agonist FliC flagellin of Salmonella typhimurium. Vaccine 28: 2818–2826.

74. NakajimaT, YasuharaT, UzuS, WakamatsuK, MiyazawaT, et al. (1985) Wasp venom peptides; wasp kinins, new cytotrophic peptide families and their physico-chemical properties. Peptides 6 Suppl 3: 425–430.

75. SubbalakshmiC, KrishnakumariV, NagarajR, SitaramN (1996) Requirements for antibacterial and hemolytic activities in the bovine neutrophil derived 13-residue peptide indolicidin. FEBS Lett 395: 48–52.

76. Alvarez-BravoJ, KurataS, NatoriS (1995) Mode of action of an antibacterial peptide, KLKLLLLLKLK-NH2. J Biochem 117: 1312–1316.

77. HwangPM, ZhouN, ShanX, ArrowsmithCH, VogelHJ (1998) Three-dimensional solution structure of lactoferricin B, an antimicrobial peptide derived from bovine lactoferrin. Biochemistry 37: 4288–4298.

78. FritschG, SawatzkiG, TreumerJ, JungA, SpiraDT (1987) Plasmodium falciparum: inhibition in vitro with lactoferrin, desferriferrithiocin, and desferricrocin. Exp Parasitol 63: 1–9.

79. TanakaT, OmataY, SaitoA, ShimazakiK, YamauchiK, et al. (1995) Toxoplasma gondii: parasiticidal effects of bovine lactoferricin against parasites. Exp Parasitol 81: 614–617.

80. PoulterL, TerryAS, WilliamsDH, GiovanniniMG, MooreCH, et al. (1988) Levitide, a neurohormone-like peptide from the skin of Xenopus laevis. Peptide and peptide precursor cDNA sequences. J Biol Chem 263: 3279–3283.

81. ImuraY, ChodaN, MatsuzakiK (2008) Magainin 2 in action: distinct modes of membrane permeabilization in living bacterial and mammalian cells. Biophys J 95: 5757–5765.

82. LonglandCL, MeznaM, MichelangeliF (1999) The mechanism of inhibition of the Ca2+-ATPase by mastoparan. Mastoparan abolishes cooperative ca2+ binding. J Biol Chem 274: 14799–14805.

83. KooYS, KimJM, ParkIY, YuBJ, JangSA, et al. (2008) Structure-activity relations of parasin I, a histone H2A-derived antimicrobial peptide. Peptides 29: 1102–1108.

84. YasuharaT, IshikawaO, NakajimaT (1979) The studies on the active peptide in the skin of Rana rugosa. II. The structure of ranatensin-R, the new ranatensin analogue, and granuliberin-R, the new mast cell degranulating peptide. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 27: 492–498.

85. TakeshimaK, ChikushiA, LeeKK, YoneharaS, MatsuzakiK (2003) Translocation of analogues of the antimicrobial peptides magainin and buforin across human cell membranes. J Biol Chem 278: 1310–1315.

86. MangoniML, SaugarJM, DellisantiM, BarraD, SimmacoM, et al. (2005) Temporins, small antimicrobial peptides with leishmanicidal activity. J Biol Chem 280: 984–990.

87. KiefferAE, GoumonY, RuhO, Chasserot-GolazS, NullansG, et al. (2003) The N- and C-terminal fragments of ubiquitin are important for the antimicrobial activities. Faseb J 17: 776–778.

88. ErspamerV, NegriL, ErspamerGF, EndeanR (1975) Uperolein and other active peptides in the skin of the Australian leptodactylid frogs Uperoleia and Taudactylus. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 289: 41–54.

89. OtvosLJr, WadeJD, LinF, CondieBA, HanriederJ, et al. (2005) Designer antibacterial peptides kill fluoroquinolone-resistant clinical isolates. J Med Chem 48: 5349–5359.

90. BaeYS, KimY, ParkJC, SuhPG, RyuSH (2002) The synthetic chemoattractant peptide, Trp-Lys-Tyr-Met-Val-D-Met, enhances monocyte survival via PKC-dependent Akt activation. J Leukoc Biol 71: 329–338.

Štítky
Hygiena a epidemiológia Infekčné lekárstvo Laboratórium

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Pathogens


2013 Číslo 11
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz
nový kurz
Autori: MUDr. Tomáš Ürge, PhD.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#