Dual-Use Research and Technological Diffusion: Reconsidering the Bioterrorism Threat Spectrum

1. United Nations 2006 Uniting against terrorism: recommendations for a global counter-terrorism strategy, report of the Secretary-General. United Nations Report A/60/825. Geneva United Nations Available: http://www.un.org/unitingagainstterrorism/contents.htm. Accessed 10 December 2010

2. The Council of the European Union 2003 European Union strategy against the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Document no. 15708/3. Brussels: Council of the European Union. Available: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/03/st15/st15708.en03.pdf. Accessed 10 December 2010

3. United States Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism 2008 World at risk: the report of the Commission on the Prevention of WMD Proliferation and Terrorism. New York Vintage Books 160

4. Kurth CroninA

2003 Terrorist motivations for chemical and biological weapons use: placing the threat in context. Report for Congress. Available: http://www.fas.org/irp/crs/RL31831.pdf. Accessed 10 December 2010

5. BhattacharjeeY

2009 The danger within. Science 323 1282 1283

6. Service RF 2006 The race for the $1000 genome. Science 311 1544 1546

7. GarfinkelMS

WendyD

EpsteinGL

FriedmanRM

2007 Synthetic genomics: options for governance. Biosecur Bioterror 5 359 362

8. GibsonDG

GlassJI

LartigueC

NoskovVN

ChuangR-Y

2010 Creation of a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesized genome. Science 329 52 56

9. CelloJ

PaulAN

WimmerE

2002 Chemical synthesis of poliovirus cDNA: Generation of infective virus in the absence of a natural template. Science 297 1016 1018

10. SmithHO

HutchinsonCA3rd

PfannkochC

VenterJC

2003 Generating a synthetic genome by whole genome assembly: phiX174 bacteriophage from synthetic oligonucleotides. Proc Natl Aca Sci USA 100 15440 15445

11. RosengardAM

LiuY

NieZ

JimenezR

2002 Variola virus immune evasion design: Expression of a highly efficient inhibitor of human complement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99 8808 8813

12. TaubenbergerJK

ReidAH

LourensRM

WangR

JinG

2005 Characterization of the 1918 influenza virus polymerase genes. Nature 437 889 893

13. NSABB 2010 NSABB frequently asked questions. What is “dual use research” and “dual use research of concern”? Available: http://oba.od.nih.gov/biosecurity/nsabb_faq.html#NSABB_FAQ001. Accessed 10 December 2010

14. National Research Council 2004 Biotechnological research in an age of terrorism. Washington (D.C.) National Academies Press

15. KennedyD

2008 Science and security, again. Science 321 1019

16. SukJ

2008 Containing biological weapons, constraining biological research? Sci Pub Pol 35 2 5

17. SukJ

SemenzaJC

The Praeger handbook of environmental health 2011 Biodefence and bioterrorism.

FriisRH

Westport (Connecticut): Praeger Publishers In press

18. The Australia Group 2010 Australia Group Common control lists. Available: http://www.australiagroup.net/en/controllists.html. Accessed 10 December 2010

19. BhattacharjeeY

2009 U.S. promises to reduce delays in granting visas for scientists. Science 324 1377

20. GaudiosoJ

SalernoRM

2004 Biosecurity and research: minimizing adverse impacts. Science 304 687

21. AtlasRM

2002 National security and the biological research community. Science 298 753 754

22. American Association for the Advancement of Science 2010 Science and security in the post-9/11 environment. Foreign students and scholars. Available: http://www.aaas.org/spp/post911/visas/. Accessed 10 December 2010

23. RelmanDA

ChoffnesE

LemonSM

2006 In search of biosecurity. Science 311 1835

24. Beatrice-DiasM

Reyes-GonzalezL

VelosoFM

CasmanEA

2010 Effects of the USA PATRIOT Act and the 2002 Bioterrorism Preparedness Act on select agent research in the United States. Proc Natl Acad U S A 107 9556 9561

25. FranzDR

EhrlichSA

CasadevallA

ImperialeMJ

KeimPS

2009 The “nuclearization” of biology is a threat to health and security. Biosecur Bioterror 7 243 244

26. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control 2010 About us: our mission. Available: http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/About_us/Default.aspx. Accessed 10 December 2010

27. NightingaleP

2004 Technological capabilities, invisible infrastructure and the un-social construction of predictability: the overlooked fixed costs of useful research. Res Policy 33 1259 1284

28. MacKenzieD

SpinardiG

1996 Tacit knowledge and the uninvention of nuclear weapons.

MacKenzieD

Knowing machines: essays on technological change Cambridge (Massachusetts) MIT Press

29. VogelK

2008 Framing biosecurity: An alternative to the Biotech Revolution Model? Sci Pub Pol 35 45 54

30. TuckerJB

SandsA

1999 An unlikely threat. B Atom Sci 55 46 52

31. CarusWS

2001 Bioterrorism and biocrimes: the illicit use of biological agents since 1900. February 2001 revision. Washington (D.C.) Center for Counterproliferation Research, National Defense University Available: http://www.fas.org/irp/threat/cbw/carus.pdf. Accessed 10 December 2010

32. LeitenbergM

2005 Assessing the biological weapons and bioterrorism threat. Carlisle (Pennsylvania) Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College Available: http://www.cissm.umd.edu/papers/files/assessing_bw_threat.pdf. Accessed 10 December 2010

33. TörökTJ

TauxeRV

WiseRP

LivengoodJR

SokolowR

1997 A large community outbreak of salmonellosis caused by intentional contamination of restaurant salad bars. JAMA 278 389 395

34. CarlsonR

2003 The pace and proliferation of biological technologies. Biosecur Bioterror 1 203 214

35. RelmanDA

2010 The biological century: coming to terms with risk in the life sciences. Nat Immunol 11 275 278

36. ChoMK

RelmanDA

2010 Synthetic “life,” ethics, national security, and public discourse. Science 329 38 39

37. O'TooleT

InglesbyT

2009 Strategic priorities for U.S. biosecurity. Biosecur Bioterror 7 25 28

38. Commission of the European Union 2007 Green paper on bio-preparedness. Brussels: European Commission. Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2007:0399:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed 10 December 2010

39. Institute of Medicine 2003 Microbial threats to health: emergence, detection, and response. Washington (D.C.) National Academy Press

40. WoolhouseMEJ

Gowtage-SequeriaS

2005 Host range and emerging and reemerging pathogens. EID 11 1842 1847

41. JonesKE

PatelNG

LevyMA

StoreygardA

BalkJ

2008 Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature 451 990 994

42. The White House & US National Security Council 2009 National strategy for countering biological threats. Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/National_Strategy_for_Countering_BioThreats.pdf. Accessed 10 December 2010

43. United Nations Office at Geneva 2009 Report of the meeting of the states parties. Available: http://www.unog.ch/80256EDD006B8954/%28httpAssets%29/7C047AF3CA49AE1CC1257689005E0420/file/Draft-BWC_MSP_2009_Advance-Report.pdf. Accessed 10 December 2010