When Children Become Adults: Should Biobanks Re-Contact?

1. Henderson GE, Cadigan RJ, Edwards TP, Conlon I, Nelson AG, Evans JP, et al. Characterizing biobank organizations in the U.S.: results from a national survey. Genome Med. 2013 Jan 25. 5 : 3. doi: 10.1186/gm407 23351549

2. Kaiser J. Genetics. U.S. hospital launches large biobank of children’s DNA. Science. 2006;312 : 1584–1585.

3. Salvaterra E, Giorda R, Bassi MT, Borgatti R, Knudsen LE, Martinuzzi A, et al. Pediatric biobanking: a pilot qualitative survey of practices, rules, and researcher opinions in ten European countries. Biopreservation and Biobanking. 2012;10 : 29–36. doi: 10.1089/bio.2011.0037 24849751

4. Hens K, Cassiman JJ, Nys H, Dierickx K. Children, biobanks and the scope of parental consent. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011;19 : 735–739. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.29 21386873

5. Burke W, Diekema DS. Ethical issues arising from the participation of children in genetic research. J Pediatr. 2006;149: S34–S38. 16829241

6. Resnik D. Re-consent upon reaching the age of majority: ethical issues. Journal of clinical research best practices. 2014;10 : 2. http://firstclinical.com/journal/2014/1402_Reconsent.pdf.

7. Ries NM, LeGrandeur J, Caulfield T. Handling ethical, legal and social issues in birth cohort studies involving genetic research: responses from studies in six countries. BMC Med Ethics. 2010;11: doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-11-4

8. Children’s Cancer and Leukaemia Group. Parent/guardian information leaflet. 2013. https://www.securecloudhost.co.uk/cclg.org.uk/dynamic_files/PIS%20V2_0%2024%20May%202013%20(watermarked).pdf

9. Giesbertz NAA, Bredenoord AL, van Delden JJM. Consent procedures in pediatric biobanks. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015;23 : 1129–1134. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.267 25537361

10. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva: CIOMS; 2002.

11. World Medical Association. WMA Declaration of Helsinki—ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Fortaleza: WMA; 2013.

12. Hens K, Nys H, Cassiman JJ, Dierickx K. Biological sample collections from minors for genetic research: a systematic review of guidelines and position papers. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009;17 : 979–990. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.9 19223929

13. Helgesson G. Children, longitudinal studies, and informed consent. Med Health Care Philos. 2005;8 : 307–313. 16283493

14. Berlin I. Two concepts of liberty. In: Berlin I, editor. Four Essays on Liberty. London, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press; 1969. p. 118–172.

15. Bredenoord AL, Onland-Moret NC, van Delden JJM. Feedback of individual genetic results to research participants: in favor of a qualified disclosure policy. Hum Mutat. 2011;32 : 861–867. doi: 10.1002/humu.21518 21538687

16. Giesbertz NAA, Bredenoord AL, van Delden JJM. Inclusion of residual tissue in biobanks: opt-in or opt-out? PLoS Biol. 2012;10: e1001373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001373 22899893

17. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Respect for autonomy. In: Beauchamp TL, Childress JF, editors. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009. p. 99–148.

18. Bredenoord AL, de Vries MC, van Delden H. The right to an open future concerning genetic information. Am J Bioeth. 2014;14 : 21–23.

19. Bredenoord AL, Kroes HY, Cuppen E, Parker M, van Delden JJM. Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered. Trends Genet. 2011;27 : 41–47. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2010.11.004 21190750

20. Hens K, Van El CE, Borry P, Cambon-Thomsen A, Cornel MC, Forzano F, et al. Developing a policy for paediatric biobanks: principles for good practice. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21 : 2–7. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.99 22713814

21. Bredenoord AL, de Vries MC, van Delden JJM. Next-generation sequencing: does the next generation still have a right to an open future? Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14 : 306. 23729034

22. Goldenberg AJ, Hull SC, Botkin JR, Wilfond BS. Pediatric biobanks: approaching informed consent for continuing research after children grow up. J Pediatr. 2009;155 : 578–583. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.04.034 19595370

23. Gymrek M, McGuire AL, Golan D, Halperin E, Erlich Y. Identifying personal genomes by surname inference. Science. 2013;339 : 321–324. doi: 10.1126/science.1229566 23329047

24. Nissenbaum H. Privacy in Context. 1st ed. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2010.

25. Wolf LE, Bouley TA, McCulloch CE. Genetic research with stored biological materials: ethics and practice. IRB. 2010;32 : 7–18.

26. Gurwitz D, Fortier I, Lunshof JE, Knoppers BM. Children and population biobanks. Science. 2009;325 : 818–819. doi: 10.1126/science.1173284

27. Gurwitz D. Data re-identification: protect the children. Science. 2013;339 : 1033.

28. Hens K, Wright J, Dierickx K. Biobanks: oversight offers protection. Science. 2009;326 : 798–799.

29. Hansson MG, Maschke KJ. Biobanks: questioning distinctions. Science. 2009;326 : 797.

30. Brothers KB, Clayton EW. Biobanks: too long to wait for consent. Science. 2009;326 : 798.

31. Árnason V. Scientific citizenship, benefit, and protection in population-based research. In: Solbakk JH, Holm S, Hofmann B, editors. The Ethics of Research Biobanking. Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York: Springer Science + Buiness Media, LLC; 2009. pp. 131–141.

32. Linabery AM, Slater ME, Spector LG, Olshan AF, Stork SK, Roesler MA, et al. Feasibility of neonatal dried blood spot retrieval amid evolving state policies (2009–2010): a Children’s Oncology Group study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2011;25 : 549–558. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2011.01228.x 21980944

33. Parker L. Using human tissue: when do we need consent? J Med Ethics. 2011;37 : 759–761. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100043

34. Holm S. Informed consent and the biobanking of materials from children. Genomics, Society and Policy. 2005;1 : 16–26.

35. Giesbertz NAA, Bredenoord AL, van Delden JJM. Clarifying assent in pediatric research. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014;22 : 266–269. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.119 23756442