Variation in Caesarean Section Rates in the US: Outliers, Damned Outliers, and Statistics

article has not abstract

Vyšlo v časopise: Variation in Caesarean Section Rates in the US: Outliers, Damned Outliers, and Statistics. PLoS Med 11(10): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001746
Kategorie: Perspective
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001746

Souhrn

article has not abstract

Zdroje

1. BhuttaZA, YakoobMY, LawnJE, RizviA, FribergIK, et al. (2011) Stillbirths: what difference can we make and at what cost? Lancet 377 : 1523–1538.

2. Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists (2007) Birth after previous caesarean birth: greentop guideline No. 45. 1–17. London: RCOG Press. Available: http://www.rcog.org.uk/womens-health/clinical-guidance/birth-after-previous-caesarean-birth-green-top-45. Accessed 15 September 2014.

3. KozhimannilKB, ArcayaMC, SubramanianSV (2014) Patient Clinical Diagnoses and Hospital Variation in the Risk of Cesarean Delivery: Analyses of a National US Hospital Discharge Database. PLoS Med 11: e1001745.

4. GulmezogluAM, CrowtherCA, MiddletonP, HeatleyE (2012) Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6: CD004945.

5. BrennanDJ, RobsonMS, MurphyM, O'HerlihyC (2009) Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201 : 308.

6. CraneSS, WojtowyczMA, DyeTD, AubryRH, ArtalR (1997) Association between pre-pregnancy obesity and the risk of cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 89 : 213–216.

7. SmithGC, WhiteIR, PellJP, DobbieR (2005) Predicting cesarean section and uterine rupture among women attempting vaginal birth after prior cesarean section. PLoS Med 2: e252.

8. MartinJA, HamiltonBE, OstermanMJK, CurtinSC, MathewsMS (2012) Births: Final Data for 2012. Natl Vital Stat Rep 62 : 1–87.

9. CahillAG, MaconesGA (2006) Vital considerations for the use of vital statistics in obstetrical research. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194 : 909–910.