Progress in Using Systematic Reviews of Animal Studies to Improve Translational Research

1. SandercockP, RobertsI (2002) Systematic reviews of animal experiments. Lancet 360: 586.

2. HornJ, de HaanRJ, VermeulenM, LuitenPG, LimburgM (2001) Nimodipine in animal model experiments of focal cerebral ischemia: a systematic review. Stroke 32: 2433–2438.

3. PerelP, RobertsI, SenaE, WhebleP, BriscoeC, et al. (2007) Comparison of treatment effects between animal experiments and clinical trials: systematic review. BMJ 334: 197.

4. KenterMJ, CohenAF (2006) Establishing risk of human experimentation with drugs: lessons from TGN1412. Lancet 368: 1387–1391.

5. HooijmansCR, de VriesRB, RoversMM, GooszenHG, Ritskes-HoitingaM (2012) The effects of probiotic supplementation on experimental acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 7: e48811 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048811

6. FestingMF (2009) Fifty years after Russell and Burch, toxicologists continue to ignore genetic variation in their test animals. Altern Lab Anim 37: 1–5.

7. FestingMF (2004) The choice of animal model and reduction. Altern Lab Anim 32 Suppl 2: 59–64.

8. van DrongelenJ, HooijmansCR, LotgeringFK, SmitsP, SpaandermanME (2012) Adaptive changes of mesenteric arteries in pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 303: H639–657.

9. BebartaV, LuytenD, HeardK (2003) Emergency medicine animal research: does use of randomization and blinding affect the results? Acad Emerg Med 10: 684–687.

10. MigniniLE, KhanKS (2006) Methodological quality of systematic reviews of animal studies: a survey of reviews of basic research. BMC Med Res Methodol 6: 10.

11. KilkennyC, ParsonsN, KadyszewskiE, FestingMF, CuthillIC, et al. (2009) Survey of the quality of experimental design, statistical analysis and reporting of research using animals. PLoS One 4: e7824 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007824

12. LandisSC, AmaraSG, AsadullahK, AustinCP, BlumensteinR, et al. (2012) A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research. Nature 490: 187–191.

13. MacleodMR, van der WorpHB, SenaES, HowellsDW, DirnaglU, et al. (2008) Evidence for the efficacy of NXY-059 in experimental focal cerebral ischaemia is confounded by study quality. Stroke 39: 2824–2829.

14. IoannidisJP (2012) Extrapolating from animals to humans. Sci Transl Med 4: 151ps115.

15. KorevaarDA, HooftL, ter RietG (2011) Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of preclinical studies: publication bias in laboratory animal experiments. Lab Anim 45: 225–230.

16. SenaES, van der WorpHB, BathPM, HowellsDW, MacleodMR (2010) Publication bias in reports of animal stroke studies leads to major overstatement of efficacy. PLoS Biol 8: e1000344 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000344

17. BrackenMB (2009) Why animal studies are often poor predictors of human reactions to exposure. J R Soc Med 102: 120–122.

18. IoannidisJP (2006) Evolution and translation of research findings: from bench to where? PLoS Clin Trials 1: e36 doi:10.1371/journal.pctr.0010036

19. HackamDG (2007) Translating animal research into clinical benefit. Bmj 334: 163–164.

20. HackamDG, RedelmeierDA (2006) Translation of research evidence from animals to humans. JAMA 296: 1731–1732.

21. LevinLA, Danesh-MeyerHV (2010) Lost in translation: bumps in the road between bench and bedside. JAMA 303: 1533–1534.

22. HooijmansCR, RoversM, de VriesRB, LeenaarsM, Ritskes-HoitingaM (2012) An initiative to facilitate well-informed decision-making in laboratory animal research: report of the First International Symposium on Systematic Reviews in Laboratory Animal Science. Lab Anim 46: 356–357.

23. SenaES, BriscoeCL, HowellsDW, DonnanGA, SandercockPA, et al. (2010) Factors affecting the apparent efficacy and safety of tissue plasminogen activator in thrombotic occlusion models of stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 30: 1905–1913.

24. RobertsI, KwanI, EvansP, HaigS (2002) Does animal experimentation inform human healthcare? Observations from a systematic review of international animal experiments on fluid resuscitation. BMJ 324: 474–476.

25. de VriesRB, BumaP, LeenaarsM, Ritskes-HoitingaM, GordijnB (2012) Reducing the number of laboratory animals used in tissue engineering research by restricting the variety of animal models. Articular cartilage tissue engineering as a case study. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 18: 427–435.

26. HooijmansCR, Pasker-de JongPC, de VriesRB, Ritskes-HoitingaM (2012) The effects of long-term omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on cognition and Alzheimer's pathology in animal models of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Alzheimers Dis 28: 191–209.

27. GreekR, MenacheA (2013) Systematic reviews of animal models: methodology versus epistemology. Int J Med Sci 10: 206–221.

28. KilkennyC, BrowneW, CuthillIC, EmersonM, AltmanDG, et al. (2010) Animal research: reporting in vivo experiments: the ARRIVE guidelines. Br J Pharmacol 160: 1577–1579.

29. HooijmansCR, LeenaarsM, Ritskes-HoitingaM (2010) A gold standard publication checklist to improve the quality of animal studies, to fully integrate the Three Rs, and to make systematic reviews more feasible. Altern Lab Anim 38: 167–182.

30. PoundP, EbrahimS, SandercockP, BrackenMB, RobertsI (2004) Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans? BMJ 328: 514–517.

31. RawlinsMD (2004) Cutting the cost of drug development? Nat Rev Drug Discov 3: 360–364.

32. Nuffield, Council, on, Bioethics (2005) The ethics of research involving animals. London.

33. American, Council, on, Science, and, et al. (2005) America's war on “carcinogens”: reassessing the use of animal tests predict human cancer risk. Meister K, editor. New York: American Council on Science and Health.

34. HirstTC, VesterinenHM, SenaES, EganKJ, MacleodMR, et al. (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of temozolomide in animal models of glioma: was clinical efficacy predicted? Br J Cancer 108: 64–71.

35. van der WorpHB, MacleodMR, KollmarR (2010) European Stroke Research Network for H (2010) Therapeutic hypothermia for acute ischemic stroke: ready to start large randomized trials? J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 30: 1079–1093.

36. BegleyCG, EllisLM (2012) Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature 483: 531–533.