Global Research Priorities to Better Understand the Burden of Iatrogenic Harm in Primary Care: An International Delphi Exercise

article has not abstract

Vyšlo v časopise: Global Research Priorities to Better Understand the Burden of Iatrogenic Harm in Primary Care: An International Delphi Exercise. PLoS Med 10(11): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001554
Kategorie: Guidelines and Guidance
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001554

Souhrn

article has not abstract

Zdroje

1. The Health Founation (2011) Improving safety in primary care. Available: http://www.health.org.uk/publications/improving-safety-in-primary-care-research-scan/. Accessed 7 September 2013.

2. FissT, DreierA, MeinkeC, van den BergN, RitterCA, et al. (2011) Frequency of inappropriate drugs in primary care: analysis of a sample of immobile patients who received periodic home visits. Age Ageing 40: 66–73.

3. WoolfSH, KuzelAJ, DoveySM, PhillipsRLJr (2004) A string of mistakes: the importance of cascade analysis in describing, counting, and preventing medical errors. Ann Fam Med 2: 317–26.

4. Makeham M, Dovey S, Runciman W, Larizgiotia I (2008) Methods and measures used in primary care patient safety research. Available: http://www.who.int/patientsafety/research/methods_measures/makeham_dovey_full.pdf. Accessed 7 September 2013.

5. Donaldson SL (2005) World alliance for patient safety: forward programme. Geneva: WHO.

6. BatesDW, LarizgoitiaI, Prasopa-PlaizierN, JhaAK (2009) Global priorities for patient safety research. BMJ 338: b1775.

7. Starfield B (1998) Primary care: balancing health needs, services and technology. New York: Oxford University Press.

8. ReerinkIH, SauerbornR (1996) Quality of primary health care in developing countries: recent experiences and future directions. Int J Qual Health Care 8: 131–9.

9. WHO (1978) Declaration of Alma-Ata. In International Conference on Primary Health Care. Alma-Ata, USSR: WHO.

10. Institute of Medicine (1996) Primary care: America's health in a new era. Available: http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=5152&page=27. Accessed 7 September 2013.

11. MirG, SalwayS, KaiJ, KarlsenS, BhopalR, et al. (2013) Principles for research on ethnicity and health: the Leeds Consensus Statement. Eur J Public Health 23: 504–510.

12. AveryAJ, SavelyichBS, SheikhA, CantrillJ, MorrisCJ, et al. (2005) Identifying and establishing consensus on the most important safety features of GP computer systems: e-Delphi study. Inform Prim Care 13: 3–12.

13. JonesJ, HunterD (1995) Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ 311: 376–80.

14. Cuhls K (2012) Delphi method. Available: www.unido.org/fileadmin/import/16959_DelphiMethod.pdf. Accessed 7 September 2013.

15. BrookRH, ChassinMR, FinkA, SolomonDH, KosecoffJ, et al. (1986) A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2: 53–63.

16. ElwynG, O'ConnorA, StaceyD, VolkR, EdwardsA, et al. (2006) Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ 333: 417–23.

17. FerriCP, PrinceM, BrayneC, BrodatyH, FratiglioniL, et al. (2005) Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study. Lancet 366: 2112–7.

18. ShekelleP, WoolfSH, EcclesM, GrimshawJ (1999) Clinical guidelines: developing guidelines. BMJ 318: 593–6.

19. ShekelleP (2004) The appropriateness method. Med Decis Making 24: 228–31.

20. StewartJ, O'HalloranC, HarriganP, SpencerJA, BartonJR, et al. (1999) Identifying appropriate tasks for the preregistration year: modified Delphi technique. BMJ 319: 224–9.

21. MullenPM (2003) Delphi: myths and reality. J Health Organ Manag 17: 37–52.

22. De MeyrickJ (2012) The Delphi method and health research. Health Education 103: 7–16.

23. WHO (2012) Injection safety. Available: http://www.who.int/injection_safety/en/. Accessed 7 September 2013.

24. Institute of Medicine (1999) To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington (D.C.): National Academy Press.

25. ReasonJ (2000) Human error: models and management. BMJ 320: 768–70.

26. PrestonC, CheaterF, BakerR (1999) Left in limbo: patients' views on care processes across the primary/secondary interface. Quality in Health Care 8: 16–21.

27. Roland M (1995) R&D priorities in relation to the interface between primary and secondary care. Report to the Central Research and Development Committee. Leicester: Department of Health.

28. WHO (2009) More than words. Conceptual Framework for the International Classification for Patient Safety. Available: http://www.who.int/patientsafety/implementation/taxonomy/icps_technical_report_en.pdf. Accessed 7 September 2013.

29. World Bank (2012) How we classify countries. Available: http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-classifications. Accessed 7 September 2013.