-
Články
- Časopisy
- Kurzy
- Témy
- Kongresy
- Videa
- Podcasty
Are Drug Companies Living Up to Their Human Rights Responsibilities? The Perspective of the Former United Nations Special Rapporteur (2002-2008)
Background to the debate:
The human rights responsibilities of drug companies have been considered for years by nongovernmental organizations, but were most sharply defined in a report by the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to health, submitted to the United Nations General Assembly in August 2008. The “Human Rights Guidelines for Pharmaceutical Companies in relation to Access to Medicines” include responsibilities for transparency, management, monitoring and accountability, pricing, and ethical marketing, and against lobbying for more protection in intellectual property laws, applying for patents for trivial modifications of existing medicines, inappropriate drug promotion, and excessive pricing. Two years after the release of the Guidelines, the PLoS Medicine Debate asks whether drug companies are living up to their human rights responsibilities. Sofia Gruskin and Zyde Raad from the Harvard School of Public Health say more assessment is needed of such responsibilities; Geralyn Ritter, Vice President of Global Public Policy and Corporate Responsibility at Merck & Co. argues that multiple stakeholders could do more to help States deliver the right to health; and Paul Hunt and Rajat Khosla introduce Mr. Hunt′s work as the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to the highest attainable standard of health, regarding the human rights responsibilities of pharmaceutical companies and access to medicines.
Vyšlo v časopise: Are Drug Companies Living Up to Their Human Rights Responsibilities? The Perspective of the Former United Nations Special Rapporteur (2002-2008). PLoS Med 7(9): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000330
Kategorie: The PLoS Medicine Debate
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000330Souhrn
Background to the debate:
The human rights responsibilities of drug companies have been considered for years by nongovernmental organizations, but were most sharply defined in a report by the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to health, submitted to the United Nations General Assembly in August 2008. The “Human Rights Guidelines for Pharmaceutical Companies in relation to Access to Medicines” include responsibilities for transparency, management, monitoring and accountability, pricing, and ethical marketing, and against lobbying for more protection in intellectual property laws, applying for patents for trivial modifications of existing medicines, inappropriate drug promotion, and excessive pricing. Two years after the release of the Guidelines, the PLoS Medicine Debate asks whether drug companies are living up to their human rights responsibilities. Sofia Gruskin and Zyde Raad from the Harvard School of Public Health say more assessment is needed of such responsibilities; Geralyn Ritter, Vice President of Global Public Policy and Corporate Responsibility at Merck & Co. argues that multiple stakeholders could do more to help States deliver the right to health; and Paul Hunt and Rajat Khosla introduce Mr. Hunt′s work as the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to the highest attainable standard of health, regarding the human rights responsibilities of pharmaceutical companies and access to medicines.
Zdroje
1. UN General Assembly 11 August 2008 The Right of Everyone to the Enjoyment of the Highest Attainable Standard of Physical and Mental Health: Report of the Special Rapporteur, Paul Hunt. U.N. General Assembly, 63rd Session, Agenda Item 67(b). U.N. Doc. A/63/263. Available: http://www.essex.ac.uk/human_rights_centre/research/rth/index.aspx. Accessed: 23 August 2010
2. MarksS
2006 Health and Human Rights: Basic International Documents. FXB Center for Health and Human Rights
3. UN Human Rights Council 5 May 2009 The Right of Everyone to the Enjoyment of the Highest Attainable Standard of Physical and Mental Health: Report of the Special Rapporteur, Paul Hunt. U.N. Human Rights Council, 11th Session, Agenda Item 3. U.N. Doc. A/HRC/11/12/Add.2
4. HRC11: UK Statement for the interactive dialogue with the SR on Freedom of Opinion and Expression and the SR on the Right to Health. On file with authors
5. [No authors listed] 1998 Right-to-health responsibilities of pharmaceutical companies. Lancet 373 1998
6. ATM 2010 The Access to Medicine Index [2008 and 2010]. Available: http://www.accesstomedicineindex.org/. Accessed 23 August 2010
7. DFID 2005 Increasing people's access to essential medicines in developing countries: a framework for good practice in the pharmaceutical industry. Available: http://www.accesstomedicineindex.org/sites/www.accesstomedicineindex.org/files/publication/dfid_2005.pdf. Accessed 23 August 2010
8. Pharma Futures 2004 The Pharmaceutical Sector: A Long-Term Value Outlook. Available: http://www.pharmafutures.org/sp1.asp. Accessed 23 August 2010
9. The George Institute for International Health 2008 Neglected Disease Research & Development: How Much are We Really Spending? Available: http://www.georgeinstitute.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/G-FINDER_2008_Report.pdf. Accessed 23 August 2010
10. Oxfam 2007 Investing in Life. Available: http://www.oxfam.ca/news-and-publications/publications-and-reports/investing-for-life-meeting-poor-people2019s-needs-for-access-to-medicines-through. Accessed 23 Aug 2010
11. NorrisP
HerxheimerA
LexchinJ
MansfieldP
2005 Drug Promotion: What We Know, What We Have Yet to Learn. WHO and HAI, WHO/EDM/PAR/2004.3. Available: http://www.who.int/medicines/areas/rational_use/drugPromodhai.pdf. Accessed 23 August 2010
12. Access to Medicines Project 2010 About Us. Available: http://www.essentialaction.org/access/index.php?/categories/2-About-Us. Accessed 23 August 2010
Štítky
Interné lekárstvo
Článok vyšiel v časopisePLOS Medicine
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
2010 Číslo 9- Pleiotropní účinky statinů na kardiovaskulární systém
- Nech brouka žít… Ať žije astma!
- Hydroresponzivní krytí v epitelizační fázi hojení rány
- Projekt MedPed
- Jak rozpoznat pacienty s familiární hypercholesterolémií ve své praxi
-
Všetky články tohto čísla
- Examining the “Urban Advantage” in Maternal Health Care in Developing Countries
- Radiodiagnostic Imaging in Pregnancy and the Risk of Childhood Malignancy: Raising the Bar
- Does It Matter Who Writes Medical News Stories?
- Drug Companies Should Be Held More Accountable for Their Human Rights Responsibilities
- Are Drug Companies Living Up to Their Human Rights Responsibilities? The Merck Perspective
- Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?
- Persistence with Statins and Onset of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Population-Based Cohort Study
- Effectiveness of Chest Physiotherapy in Infants Hospitalized with Acute Bronchiolitis: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial
- Combined Impact of Lifestyle-Related Factors on Total and Cause-Specific Mortality among Chinese Women: Prospective Cohort Study
- Are Drug Companies Living Up to Their Human Rights Responsibilities? The Perspective of the Former United Nations Special Rapporteur (2002-2008)
- AIDS Vaccine for Asia Network (AVAN): Expanding the Regional Role in Developing HIV Vaccines
- Are Drug Companies Living Up to Their Human Rights Responsibilities? Moving Toward Assessment
- The Haunting of Medical Journals: How Ghostwriting Sold “HRT”
- Major Radiodiagnostic Imaging in Pregnancy and the Risk of Childhood Malignancy: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Ontario
- A Genetic Association Study of Serum Acute-Phase C-Reactive Protein Levels in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Implications for Clinical Interpretation
- Cost-Effectiveness of Pooled Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing for Acute HIV Infection after Third-Generation HIV Antibody Screening and Rapid Testing in the United States: A Comparison of Three Public Health Settings
- Community Case Management of Fever Due to Malaria and Pneumonia in Children Under Five in Zambia: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
- PLOS Medicine
- Archív čísel
- Aktuálne číslo
- Informácie o časopise
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle- Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?
- A Genetic Association Study of Serum Acute-Phase C-Reactive Protein Levels in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Implications for Clinical Interpretation
- Persistence with Statins and Onset of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Population-Based Cohort Study
- The Haunting of Medical Journals: How Ghostwriting Sold “HRT”
Prihlásenie#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#Zabudnuté hesloZadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.
- Časopisy