Preventing Bias in Cluster Randomised Trials
article has not abstract
Vyšlo v časopise:
Preventing Bias in Cluster Randomised Trials. PLoS Med 6(5): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000065
Kategorie:
Essay
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000065
Souhrn
article has not abstract
Zdroje
1. CampbellDT
1957 Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychol Bull 54 297 312
2. GreenS
HigginsJ
2005 Glossary. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2.5. Available: http://www.cochrane.org/resources/glossary.htm. Accessed 23 March 2009
3. FisherLD
DixonDO
HersonJ
FrankowskiRK
HearonMS
1990 Intention to treat in clinical trials.
PearceKE
Statistical issues in drug research and development New York Marcel Dekker 331 350
4. HollisS
CampbellF
1999 What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ 319 670 674
5. LachinJM
2000 Statistical considerations in the intent-to-treat principle. Control Clin Trials 21 167 189
6. DonnerA
KlarN
2000 Design and analysis of cluster randomization trials London Arnold 178
7. MurrayDM
1998 Design and analysis of group-randomized trials New York Oxford University Press 467
8. PufferS
TorgersonD
WatsonJ
2003 Evidence for risk of bias in cluster randomised trials: Review of recent trials published in three general medical journals. BMJ 327 785 789
9. UkoumunneOC
GullifordMC
ChinnS
SterneJA
BurneyPG
1999 Methods for evaluating area-wide and organisation-based interventions in health and health care: A systematic review. Health Technol Assess 3 iii-92
10. BlandJM
2004 Cluster randomised trials in the medical literature: Two bibliometric surveys. BMC Med Res Methodol 4 21
11. CampbellMK
ElbourneDR
AltmanDG
2004 CONSORT statement: Extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ 328 702 708
12. EdwardsSJ
BraunholtzDA
LilfordRJ
StevensAJ
1999 Ethical issues in the design and conduct of cluster randomised controlled trials. BMJ 318 1407 1409
13. ElbourneDR
CampbellMK
2001 Extending the CONSORT statement to cluster randomized trials: For discussion. Stat Med 20 489 496
14. CampbellMJ
2000 Cluster randomized trials in general (family) practice research. Stat Methods Med Res 9 81 94
15. FarrinA
RussellI
TorgersonD
UnderwoodM
2005 Differential recruitment in a cluster randomized trial in primary care: The experience of the UK back pain, exercise, active management and manipulation (UK BEAM) feasibility study. Clin Trials 2 119 124
16. EldridgeS
AshbyD
BennettC
WakelinM
FederG
2008 Internal and external validity of cluster randomised trials: Systematic review of recent trials. BMJ 336 876 880
17. TaljaardM
DonnerA
KlarN
2008 Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials. Biom J 50 329 345
18. HunsbergerS
MurrayD
DavisCE
FabsitzRR
2001 Imputation strategies for missing data in a school-based multi-centre study: The Pathways study. Stat Med 20 305 316
19. TorgersonDJ
TorgersonCJ
2008 Designing randomised trials in health, education and the social sciences. An introduction New York Palgrave Macmillan 256
20. HahnS
PufferS
TorgersonDJ
WatsonJ
2005 Methodological bias in cluster randomised trials. BMC Med Res Methodol 5 10
21. JordhoyMS
FayersPM
Ahlner-ElmqvistM
KaasaS
2002 Lack of concealment may lead to selection bias in cluster randomized trials of palliative care. Palliat Med 16 43 49
22. GrovesRM
DillmanDA
EltingeJL
LittleRJA
2002 Survey nonresponse New York John Wiley & Sons 520
23. KesslerRC
LittleRJ
GrovesRM
1995 Advances in strategies for minimizing and adjusting for survey nonresponse. Epidemiol Rev 17 192 204
24. RosenbaumP
RubinD
1983 The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70 41 55
25. RosenbaumPR
RubinDB
1984 Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. J Am Stat Assoc 79 516 524
26. RavaudP
FlipoRM
BoutronI
RoyC
GiraudeauB
2009 ARTIST (osteoarthritis intervention standardized) study of standardised consultation versus usual care for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee in primary care in France: Pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ 338 b421 doi:10.1136/bmj.b421
27. van MarwijkHW
AderH
de HaanM
BeekmanA
2008 Primary care management of major depression in patients aged > or = 55 years: Outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Br J Gen Pract 58 680 686I–II; discussion 687
28. NicholasJ
GullifordMC
2008 Commentary. What is a propensity score? Br J Gen Pract 58 687
29. CampbellR
StarkeyF
HollidayJ
AudreyS
BloorM
2008 An informal school-based peer-led intervention for smoking prevention in adolescence (ASSIST): A cluster randomised trial. Lancet 371 1595 1602
30. BellaryS
O'HareJP
RaymondNT
GumberA
MughalS
2008 Enhanced diabetes care to patients of south Asian ethnic origin (the United Kingdom Asian Diabetes Study): A cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet 371 1769 1776
Štítky
Interné lekárstvoČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Medicine
2009 Číslo 5
- Parazitičtí červi v terapii Crohnovy choroby a dalších zánětlivých autoimunitních onemocnění
- Statiny indukovaná myopatie: Jak na diferenciální diagnostiku?
- Význam hydratace při hojení ran
- Pleiotropní účinky statinů na kardiovaskulární systém
- DESATORO PRE PRAX: Aktuálne odporúčanie ESPEN pre nutričný manažment u pacientov s COVID-19
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Preventing Bias in Cluster Randomised Trials
- No More Free Drug Samples?
- A New Tumor Suppressor That Regulates Tissue Architecture
- Policy Coherence in US Tobacco Control: Beyond FDA Regulation