Late-Life Cardiac Interventions and the Treatment Imperative

1. ShimJKRussAJKaufmanSR

2006

Risk, life extension, and the pursuit of medical possibility.

Sociol Health Illn

28

479

502

2. AlexanderKPGalanosANJollisJGStaffordJAPetersonED

2001

Post-myocardial infarction risk stratification in elderly patients.

Am Heart J

142

37

42

3. AlexanderKPRoeMTChenAYLytleBLPollackJ

2005

Evolution in cardiovascular care for elderly patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: Results from the CRUSADE National Quality Improvement Initiative.

J Am Coll Cardiol

46

1479

1487

4. KatzNMGershBJCoxJL

1998

Changing practice of coronary bypass surgery and its impact on early risk and long-term survival.

Curr Opin Cardiol

13

465

475

5. MaiselWH

2006

Pacemaker and ICD generator reliability: Meta-analysis of device registries.

JAMA

295

1929

1934

6. PetersonEDAlexanderKPMalenkaDJHannanELO'ConnerGT

2004

Multicenter experience in revascularization of very elderly patients.

Am Heart J

148

486

492

7. AndersonHVBachRG

2005

The elderly are not so old anymore.

J Am Coll Cardiol

46

1488

1489

8. KaufmanSRShimJKRussAJ

2004

Revisiting the biomedicalization of aging: Clinical trends and ethical challenges.

Gerontologist

44

731

738

9. KolataG

2004 March 21

New studies question value of opening arteries. The New York Times.

Available: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/21/health/21HEAR.html. Accessed 30 January 2008

10. ChristakisNA

1999

Death foretold: Prophecy and prognosis in medical care

Chicago

University of Chicago Press

328

11. SchneidermanLJKaplanRMRosenbergETeetzelHPearlmanRA

1997

Do physicians' own preferences for life-sustaining treatment influence their perceptions of patients' preferences? A second look.

Camb Q Healthc Ethics

6

131

137

12. UhlmannRFPearlmanRA

1991

Perceived quality of life and preferences for life-sustaining treatment in older adults.

Arch Intern Med

151

495

497

13. WeeksJCookEO'DaySPetersonLWengerN

1998

Relationship between cancer patients' predictions of prognosis and their treatment preferences.

JAMA

279

1709

1714

14. CraneMKWittinkMDoukasDJ

2005

Respecting end-of-life treatment preferences.

Am Fam Physician

72

1263

1268

15. MeierDEMorrisonRS

2002

Autonomy reconsidered.

N Engl J Med

346

1087

1089

16. ThompsonBTCoxPNAntonelliMCarletJMCassellJ

2003

Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU: Statement of the 5th International Consensus Conference in Critical Care: Brussels, Belgium, April 2003: Executive summary.

Crit Care Med

32

1781

1784

17. DroughtTSKoenigBA

2002

“Choice” in end-of-life decision making: Researching fact or fiction.

Gerontologist

42

114

128

18. SchneiderCE

2002

The practice of autonomy and the practice of bioethics.

J Clin Ethics

13

72

77

19. LynnJArkesHRStevensMCohnFKoenigB

2000

Rethinking fundamental assumptions: SUPPORT's implications for future reform.

J Am Geriatr Soc

48

S214

S221