Point-of-Care Information in Open Access: A Time to Sow?
The PLOS Medicine Editors support expanding the global benefits of clinical point-of-care information through open access and note challenges that may arise along the way.
Vyšlo v časopise:
Point-of-Care Information in Open Access: A Time to Sow?. PLoS Med 12(8): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001870
Kategorie:
Editorial
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001870
Souhrn
The PLOS Medicine Editors support expanding the global benefits of clinical point-of-care information through open access and note challenges that may arise along the way.
Zdroje
1. Heilman J. Open access to a high-quality, impartial point-of-care medical summary would save lives: Why does it not exist? PLoS Med 2015; 12(8): e1001868.
2. WHO. Online encyclopedia provides free health info for all. Bull World Health Organ 2013;91:8–9.
3. PLOS Computational Biology. Topic Pages: Guidance for Authors. http://topicpages.ploscompbiol.org/wiki/Topic_Pages
Štítky
Interné lekárstvoČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Medicine
2015 Číslo 8
- Mobilní aplikace jako nová možnost v prevenci napadení klíštětem
- Hydroresponzivní krytí v epitelizační fázi hojení rány
- Vztah mezi statiny a rizikem vzniku nádorových onemocnění − metaanalýza
- Myasthenia gravis: kombinace chirurgie a farmakoterapie jako nejefektivnější modalita?
- Parazitičtí červi v terapii Crohnovy choroby a dalších zánětlivých autoimunitních onemocnění
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- The Polypill: From Promise to Pragmatism
- Open Access to a High-Quality, Impartial, Point-of-Care Medical Summary Would Save Lives: Why Does It Not Exist?
- The Impact of a One-Dose versus Two-Dose Oral Cholera Vaccine Regimen in Outbreak Settings: A Modeling Study
- Retained in HIV Care But Not on Antiretroviral Treatment: A Qualitative Patient-Provider Dyadic Study