#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Changing Patterns in Place of Cancer Death in England: A Population-Based Study


Background:
Most patients with cancer prefer to die at home or in a hospice, but hospitals remain the most common place of death (PoD).This study aims to explore the changing time trends of PoD and the associated factors, which are essential for end-of-life care improvement.

Methods and Findings:
The study analysed all cancer deaths in England collected by the Office for National Statistics during 1993–2010 (n = 2,281,223). Time trends of age- and gender-standardised proportion of deaths in individual PoDs were evaluated using weighted piecewise linear regression. Variables associated with PoD (home or hospice versus hospital) were determined using proportion ratio (PR) derived from the log-binomial regression, adjusting for clustering effects. Hospital remained the most common PoD throughout the study period (48.0%; 95% CI 47.9%–48.0%), followed by home (24.5%; 95% CI 24.4%–24.5%), and hospice (16.4%; 95% CI 16.3%–16.4%). Home and hospice deaths increased since 2005 (0.87%; 95% CI 0.74%–0.99%/year, 0.24%; 95% CI 0.17%–0.32%/year, respectively, p<0.001), while hospital deaths declined (−1.20%; 95% CI −1.41 to −0.99/year, p<0.001). Patients who died from haematological cancer (PRs 0.46–0.52), who were single, widowed, or divorced (PRs 0.75–0.88), and aged over 75 (PRs 0.81–0.84 for 75–84; 0.66–0.72 for 85+) were less likely to die in home or hospice (p<0.001; reference groups: colorectal cancer, married, age 25–54). There was little improvement in patients with lung cancer of dying in home or hospice (PRs 0.87–0.88). Marital status became the second most important factor associated with PoD, after cancer type. Patients from less deprived areas (higher quintile of the deprivation index) were more likely to die at home or in a hospice than those from more deprived areas (lower quintile of the deprivation index; PRs 1.02–1.12). The analysis is limited by a lack of data on individual patients' preferences for PoD or a clinical indication of the most appropriate PoD.

Conclusions:
More efforts are needed to reduce hospital deaths. Health care facilities should be improved and enhanced to support the increased home and hospice deaths. People who are single, widowed, or divorced should be a focus for end-of-life care improvement, along with known at risk groups such as haematological cancer, lung cancer, older age, and deprivation.



Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary


Vyšlo v časopise: Changing Patterns in Place of Cancer Death in England: A Population-Based Study. PLoS Med 10(3): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001410
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001410

Souhrn

Background:
Most patients with cancer prefer to die at home or in a hospice, but hospitals remain the most common place of death (PoD).This study aims to explore the changing time trends of PoD and the associated factors, which are essential for end-of-life care improvement.

Methods and Findings:
The study analysed all cancer deaths in England collected by the Office for National Statistics during 1993–2010 (n = 2,281,223). Time trends of age- and gender-standardised proportion of deaths in individual PoDs were evaluated using weighted piecewise linear regression. Variables associated with PoD (home or hospice versus hospital) were determined using proportion ratio (PR) derived from the log-binomial regression, adjusting for clustering effects. Hospital remained the most common PoD throughout the study period (48.0%; 95% CI 47.9%–48.0%), followed by home (24.5%; 95% CI 24.4%–24.5%), and hospice (16.4%; 95% CI 16.3%–16.4%). Home and hospice deaths increased since 2005 (0.87%; 95% CI 0.74%–0.99%/year, 0.24%; 95% CI 0.17%–0.32%/year, respectively, p<0.001), while hospital deaths declined (−1.20%; 95% CI −1.41 to −0.99/year, p<0.001). Patients who died from haematological cancer (PRs 0.46–0.52), who were single, widowed, or divorced (PRs 0.75–0.88), and aged over 75 (PRs 0.81–0.84 for 75–84; 0.66–0.72 for 85+) were less likely to die in home or hospice (p<0.001; reference groups: colorectal cancer, married, age 25–54). There was little improvement in patients with lung cancer of dying in home or hospice (PRs 0.87–0.88). Marital status became the second most important factor associated with PoD, after cancer type. Patients from less deprived areas (higher quintile of the deprivation index) were more likely to die at home or in a hospice than those from more deprived areas (lower quintile of the deprivation index; PRs 1.02–1.12). The analysis is limited by a lack of data on individual patients' preferences for PoD or a clinical indication of the most appropriate PoD.

Conclusions:
More efforts are needed to reduce hospital deaths. Health care facilities should be improved and enhanced to support the increased home and hospice deaths. People who are single, widowed, or divorced should be a focus for end-of-life care improvement, along with known at risk groups such as haematological cancer, lung cancer, older age, and deprivation.



Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary


Zdroje

1. WHO Media centre (2013) Cancer: Fact sheet No 297. Accessed 26 January 2013. Available: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en/index.html.

2. GomesB, HigginsonIJ, CalanzaniN, CohenJ, DeliensL, et al. (2012) Preferences for place of death if faced with advanced cancer: a population survey in England, Flanders, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain. Ann Oncol 23: 2006–2015.

3. WrightAA, KeatingNL, BalboniTA, MatulonisUA, BlockSD, et al. (2010) Place of death: correlations with quality of life of patients with cancer and predictors of bereaved caregivers' mental health. J Clin Oncol 28: 4457–4464.

4. MitchellAJ, ChanM, BhattiH, HaltonM, GrassiL, et al. (2011) Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and adjustment disorder in oncological, haematological, and palliative-care settings: a meta-analysis of 94 interview-based studies. Lancet Oncol 12: 160–174.

5. LindqvistO, TishelmanC, HagelinCL, ClarkJB, DaudML, et al. (2012) Complexity in non-pharmacological caregiving activities at the end of life: an international qualitative study. PLoS Med 9: e1001173 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001173.

6. JordhoyMS, FayersP, SaltnesT, Ahlner-ElmqvistM, JannertM, et al. (2000) A palliative-care intervention and death at home: a cluster randomised trial. Lancet 356: 888–893.

7. Marie Curie Cancer Care (2012) Understanding the cost of end of life care in different settings. 8 p. London: Marie Curie Cancer Care.

8. Department of Health (2008) End of life care strategy - promoting high quality care for all adults at the end of life. 173 p. London: Department of Health.

9. Castillo GuzmanS, Palacios-RiosD, Nava-ObregonTA, Torres-PerezJF, Gonzalez-SantiagoO (2012) Home versus hospital mortality from cancer in Mexico (1999–2009). Am J Hosp Palliat Care In press.

10. European Association for Palliative Care (2010) EAPC task force on the development of palliative care in Europe. Accessed 26 January 2013. Available: http://www.eapcnet.eu/Themes/Organisation/DevelopmentinEurope.aspx.

11. HuntRW, BondMJ, GrothRK, KingPM (1991) Place of death in South Australia. Patterns from 1910 to 1987. Med J Aust 155: 549–553.

12. National Center for Health Statistics (2011) Health, United States, 2010: with special feature on death and dying. Hyattsville (Maryland): National Center for Health Statistics. 563 p.

13. Sharma M, Atri A (2010) Essentials of International Health. Sudbury (Massachusetts): Jones and Bartlett Publishers. 500 p.

14. WarrenJL, BarberaL, BremnerKE, YabroffKR, HochJS, et al. (2011) End-of-life care for lung cancer patients in the United States and Ontario. J Natl Cancer Inst 103: 853–862.

15. National End of Life Care Programme (2013) National end of life care programme. Accessed 26 January 2013. Available: http://www.endoflifecareforadults.nhs.uk/.

16. HigginsonIJ (2005) End-of-life care: lessons from other nations. J Palliat Med 8 Suppl 1: S161–S173.

17. HigginsonIJ, AstinP, DolanS (1998) Where do cancer patients die? Ten-year trends in the place of death of cancer patients in England. Palliat Med 12: 353–363.

18. DaviesE, LinklaterKM, JackRH, ClarkL, MollerH (2006) How is place of death from cancer changing and what affects it? Analysis of cancer registration and service data. Br J Cancer 95: 593–600.

19. CohenJ, BilsenJ, MiccinesiG, LofmarkR, Addington-HallJ, et al. (2007) Using death certificate data to study place of death in 9 European countries: opportunities and weaknesses. BMC Public Health 7: 283.

20. LahtiRA, PenttilaA (2001) The validity of death certificates: routine validation of death certification and its effects on mortality statistics. Forensic Sci Int 115: 15–32.

21. TurnerEL, DobsonJE, PocockSJ (2010) Categorisation of continuous risk factors in epidemiological publications: a survey of current practice. Epidemiol Perspect Innov 7: 9.

22. GomesB, CalanzaniN, HigginsonIJ (2012) Reversal of the British trends in place of death: time series analysis 2004–2010. Palliat Med 26: 102–107.

23. Payne RA, Abel GA (2012) UK indices of multiple deprivation-a way to make comparisons across constituent countries. London: Health Statistics Quarterly Office for National Statistics.

24. Population Division-Population Estimates and Projections Section (2011) World population prospects, the 2010 revision. Accessed 26 January 2013. Available: http://esa.un.org/wpp/Excel-Data/mortality.htm.

25. ChuKC, BakerSG, TaroneRE (1999) A method for identifying abrupt changes in U.S. cancer mortality trends. Cancer 86: 157–169.

26. HigginsonIJ, Sen-GuptaGJ (2000) Place of care in advanced cancer: a qualitative systematic literature review of patient preferences. J Palliat Med 3: 287–300.

27. GreenlandS (1989) Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis. Am J Public Health 79: 340–349.

28. MurtaghFE, PrestonM, HigginsonI (2004) Patterns of dying: palliative care for non-malignant disease. Clin Med 4: 39–44.

29. BrueraE, RussellN, SweeneyC, FischM, PalmerJL (2002) Place of death and its predictors for local patients registered at a comprehensive cancer center. J Clin Oncol 20: 2127–2133.

30. HowellDA, RomanE, CoxH, SmithAG, PatmoreR, et al. (2010) Destined to die in hospital? Systematic review and meta-analysis of place of death in haematological malignancy. BMC Palliat Care 9: 9.

31. GomesB, HigginsonIJ (2006) Factors influencing death at home in terminally ill patients with cancer: systematic review. BMJ 332: 515–521.

32. MackJW, CroninA, TabackN, HuskampHA, KeatingNL, et al. (2012) End-of-life care discussions among patients with advanced cancer: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 156: 204–210.

33. CostantiniM, CamoiranoE, MadedduL, BruzziP, VerganelliE, et al. (1993) Palliative home care and place of death among cancer patients: a population-based study. Palliat Med 7: 323–331.

34. MoinpourCM, PolissarL (1989) Factors affecting place of death of hospice and non-hospice cancer patients. Am J Public Health 79: 1549–1551.

35. BrueraE, SweeneyC, RussellN, WilleyJS, PalmerJL (2003) Place of death of Houston area residents with cancer over a two-year period. J Pain Symptom Manage 26: 637–643.

36. BolmsjoIA (2008) End-of-life care for old people: a review of the literature. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 25: 328–338.

37. GrundyE, MayerD, YoungH, SloggettA (2004) Living arrangements and place of death of older people with cancer in England and Wales: a record linkage study. Br J Cancer 91: 907–912.

38. HigginsonIJ, GaoW (2012) Opioid prescribing for cancer pain during the last 3 months of life: associated factors and 9-year trends in a nationwide United kingdom cohort study. J Clin Oncol 30: 4373–4379.

39. GottM, SeymourJ, BellamyG, ClarkD, AhmedzaiS (2004) Older people's views about home as a place of care at the end of life. Palliat Med 18: 460–467.

40. NeergaardMA, JensenAB, SondergaardJ, SokolowskiI, OlesenF, et al. (2011) Preference for place-of-death among terminally ill cancer patients in Denmark. Scand J Caring Sci 25: 627–636.

Štítky
Interné lekárstvo

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Medicine


2013 Číslo 3
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Získaná hemofilie - Povědomí o nemoci a její diagnostika
nový kurz

Eozinofilní granulomatóza s polyangiitidou
Autori: doc. MUDr. Martina Doubková, Ph.D.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#