#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Quality of Private and Public Ambulatory Health Care in Low and Middle Income Countries: Systematic Review of Comparative Studies


Background:
In developing countries, the private sector provides a substantial proportion

of primary health care to low income groups for communicable and

non-communicable diseases. These providers are therefore central to

improving health outcomes. We need to know how their services compare to

those of the public sector to inform policy options.

Methods and Findings:
We summarised reliable research comparing the quality of formal private

versus public ambulatory health care in low and middle income countries. We

selected studies against inclusion criteria following a comprehensive

search, yielding 80 studies. We compared quality under standard categories,

converted values to a linear 100% scale, calculated differences

between providers within studies, and summarised median values of the

differences across studies. As the results for for-profit and not-for-profit

providers were similar, we combined them. Overall, median values indicated

that many services, irrespective of whether public or private, scored low on

infrastructure, clinical competence, and practice. Overall, the private

sector performed better in relation to drug supply, responsiveness, and

effort. No difference between provider groups was detected for patient

satisfaction or competence. Synthesis of qualitative components indicates

the private sector is more client centred.

Conclusions:

Although data are limited, quality in both provider groups seems poor, with

the private sector performing better in drug availability and aspects of

delivery of care, including responsiveness and effort, and possibly being

more client orientated. Strategies seeking to influence quality in both

groups are needed to improve care delivery and outcomes for the poor,

including managing the increasing burden of non-communicable diseases.

: Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary


Vyšlo v časopise: Quality of Private and Public Ambulatory Health Care in Low and Middle Income Countries: Systematic Review of Comparative Studies. PLoS Med 8(4): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000433
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000433

Souhrn

Background:
In developing countries, the private sector provides a substantial proportion

of primary health care to low income groups for communicable and

non-communicable diseases. These providers are therefore central to

improving health outcomes. We need to know how their services compare to

those of the public sector to inform policy options.

Methods and Findings:
We summarised reliable research comparing the quality of formal private

versus public ambulatory health care in low and middle income countries. We

selected studies against inclusion criteria following a comprehensive

search, yielding 80 studies. We compared quality under standard categories,

converted values to a linear 100% scale, calculated differences

between providers within studies, and summarised median values of the

differences across studies. As the results for for-profit and not-for-profit

providers were similar, we combined them. Overall, median values indicated

that many services, irrespective of whether public or private, scored low on

infrastructure, clinical competence, and practice. Overall, the private

sector performed better in relation to drug supply, responsiveness, and

effort. No difference between provider groups was detected for patient

satisfaction or competence. Synthesis of qualitative components indicates

the private sector is more client centred.

Conclusions:

Although data are limited, quality in both provider groups seems poor, with

the private sector performing better in drug availability and aspects of

delivery of care, including responsiveness and effort, and possibly being

more client orientated. Strategies seeking to influence quality in both

groups are needed to improve care delivery and outcomes for the poor,

including managing the increasing burden of non-communicable diseases.

: Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary


Zdroje

1. World Bank

2004

World development report: Making services work for poor people

Washington (District of Columbia)

World Bank and Oxford University Press

2. Marek

T

O'Farrell

C

Yamamoto

C

Zable

I

2005

Trends and opportunities in public-private partnerships to improve

health service delivery in Africa. Africa Region Human Development Working

Paper Series

Washington (District of Columbia)

World Bank

3. Murray

CJ

Lopez

AD

1997

Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause

1990–2020: Global Burden of Disease Study.

Lancet

349

1498

1504

4. Bloom

G

Standing

H

Lloyd

R

2008

Markets, information asymmetry and health care: towards new

social contracts.

Soc Sci Med

66

2076

2087

5. Gilson

L

Sen

PD

Mohammed

S

Mujinja

P

1994

The potential of health sector non-governmental organizations:

policy options.

Health Policy Plan

9

14

24

6. Kanji

N

Kilima

P

Lorenz

N

Garner

P

1995

Quality of primary outpatient services in Dar-es-Salaam: a

comparison of government and voluntary providers.

Health Policy Plan

10

186

190

7. Waters

H

Hatt

L

Peters

D

2003

Working with the private sector for child health.

Health Policy Plan

18

127

137

8. Hanson

K

Gilson

L

Goodman

C

Mills

A

Smith

R

2008

Is private health care the answer to the health problems of the

world's poor?

PLoS Med

5

e233

doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050233

9. Lagomarsino

G

de Ferranti

D

Pablos-Mendez

A

Nachuk

S

Nishtar

S

2009

Public stewardship of mixed health systems.

Lancet

374

1577

1578

10. Sauerborn

R

2001

Low quality of care in low income countries: is the private

sector the answer?

Int J Qual Health Care

13

281

282

11. Leonard

KL

2002

When both states and markets fail: asymmetric information and the

role of NGOs in African health care.

Int Rev Law Econom

22

61

80

12. Saltman

RB

Ferroussier-Davis

O

2000

The concept of stewardship in health policy.

Bull World Health Organ

78

732

739

13. Patouillard

E

Goodman

CA

Hanson

KG

Mills

AJ

2007

Can working with the private for-profit sector improve

utilization of quality health services by the poor? A systematic review of

the literature.

Int J Equity Health

6

17

14. Peters

DH

Mirchandani

GG

Hansen

PM

2004

Strategies for engaging the private sector in sexual and

reproductive health: how effective are they?

Health Policy Plan

19

Suppl 1

i5

i21

15. Leonard

DK

2003

Africa's changing markets for health and veterinary services: the

new institutional issues

Berkeley

University of California Press/University of California

International and Area Studies Digital Collection

16. Mills

A

Brugha

R

Hanson

K

McPake

B

2002

What can be done about the private health sector in low-income

countries?

World Hosp Health Serv

38

24

30, 41–24

17. Donabedian

A

1978

The quality of medical care.

Science

200

856

864

18. World Health Organization

2009

Medicines use in primary care in developing and transitional countries:

Fact Book summarizing results from studies reported between 1990 and

2006

Geneva

World Health Organization

19. Berman

P

2000

Organization of ambulatory care provision: a critical determinant

of health system performance in developing countries.

Bull World Health Organ

78

791

802

20. Bennett

S

1992

Promoting the private sector: a review of developing country

trends.

Health Policy Plan

7

97

110

21. World Health Organization

2010

Health statistics and health information systems: service availability

mapping (SAM)

Geneva

World Health Organization

22. Measure

DHS

ICF Macro

2010

Service provision assessment (SPA) surveys

Calverton (Maryland)

Measure DHS and ICF Macro

23. Madden

JM

Quick

JD

Ross-Degnan

D

Kafle

KK

1997

Undercover careseekers: simulated clients in the study of health

provider behavior in developing countries.

Soc Sci Med

45

1465

1482

24. World Health Organization

2004

The world medicines situation

Geneva

World Health Organization

25. Zurovac

D

Rowe

AK

2006

Quality of treatment for febrile illness among children at

outpatient facilities in sub-Saharan Africa.

Ann Trop Med Parasitol

100

283

296

26. World Health Organization

2000

The world health report 2000—health systems: improving

performance

Geneva

World Health Organization

27. Leonard

DK

2003

Lessons from the new institutional economics for the structural

reform of human health services in Africa.

Leonard

DK

Africa's changing markets for health and veterinary services: the

new institutional issues

Berkeley

University of California Press/University of California

International and Area Studies Digital Collection

28. Das

J

Gertler

PJ

2007

Variations in practice quality in five low-income countries: a

conceptual overview.

Health Aff (Millwood)

26

w296

w309

29. Moher

D

Liberati

A

Tetzlaff

J

Altman

DG

2009

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and

meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

PLoS Med

6

e1000097

doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

30. Barber

SL

2006

Public and private prenatal care providers in urban Mexico: how

does their quality compare?

Int J Qual Health Care

18

306

313

31. Barber

SL

Bertozzi

SM

Gertler

PJ

2007

Variations in prenatal care quality for the rural poor in

Mexico.

Health Aff (Millwood)

26

w310

w323

32. Barber

SL

Gertler

PJ

Harimurti

P

2007

Differences in access to high-quality outpatient care in

Indonesia.

Health Aff (Millwood)

26

w352

w366

33. Boller

C

Wyss

K

Mtasiwa

D

Tanner

M

2003

Quality and comparison of antenatal care in public and private

providers in the United Republic of Tanzania.

Bull World Health Organ

81

116

122

34. Das

J

Hammer

J

2007

Location, location, location: residence, wealth, and the quality

of medical care in Delhi, India.

Health Aff (Millwood)

26

w338

w351

35. Barber

SL

Gertler

PJ

Harimurti

P

2007

Differences in access to high-quality outpatient care in

Indonesia.

Health Aff (Millwood)

26

w352

w366

36. Nahum

A

Akogbeto

M

2000

[Malaria and pregnancy: attitude of health care personnel

during prenatal care in Cotonou, Benin].

Med Trop (Mars)

60

251

255

37. Massele

AY

Sayi

J

Nsimba

SE

Ofori-Adjei

D

Laing

RO

1993

Knowledge and management of malaria in Dar es Salaam,

Tanzania.

East Afr Med J

70

639

642

38. Tuan

T

Dung

VT

Neu

I

Dibley

MJ

2005

Comparative quality of private and public health services in

rural Vietnam.

Health Policy Plan

20

319

327

39. Gilson

L

Alilio

M

Heggenhougen

K

1994

Community satisfaction with primary health care services: an

evaluation undertaken in the Morogoro region of Tanzania.

Soc Sci Med

39

767

780

40. Lindelow

M

Serneels

P

2006

The performance of health workers in Ethiopia: results from

qualitative research.

Soc Sci Med

62

2225

2235

41. World Health Organization, Health Action International

2003

Medicine prices—a new approach to measurement

Geneva

World Health Organization

42. World Health Organization

2005

WHO operational package for monitoring and assessing country

pharmaceutical situations

Geneva

World Health Organization

43. Russell

S

2005

Treatment-seeking behaviour in urban Sri Lanka: trusting the

state, trusting private providers.

Soc Sci Med

61

1396

1407

44. Deressa

W

Ali

A

Hailemariam

D

2008

Malaria-related health-seeking behaviour and challenges for care

providers in rural Ethiopia: implications for control.

J Biosoc Sci

40

115

135

45. Lewis

M

Eskeland

G

Traa-Valerezo

X

2004

Primary health care in practice: is it effective?

Health Policy

70

303

325

46. Hoa

NQ

Ohman

A

Lundborg

CS

Chuc

NT

2007

Drug use and health-seeking behavior for childhood illness in

Vietnam—a qualitative study.

Health Policy

82

320

329

47. Turan

JM

Bulut

A

Nalbant

H

Ortayli

N

Akalin

AA

2006

The quality of hospital-based antenatal care in

Istanbul.

Stud Fam Plann

37

49

60

48. Lim

MK

Yang

H

Zhang

T

Feng

W

Zhou

Z

2004

Public perceptions of private health care in socialist

China.

Health Aff (Millwood)

23

222

234

49. Paphassarang

C

Philavong

K

Boupha

B

Blas

E

2002

Equity, privatization and cost recovery in urban health care: the

case of Lao PDR.

Health Policy Plan

17

Suppl

72

84

50. Pongsupap

Y

Van Lerberghe

W

2006

Choosing between public and private or between hospital and

primary care: responsiveness, patient-centredness and prescribing patterns

in outpatient consultations in Bangkok.

Trop Med Int Health

11

81

89

51. Siddiqi

S

Hamid

S

Rafique

G

Chaudhry

SA

Ali

N

2002

Prescription practices of public and private health care

providers in Attock District of Pakistan.

Int J Health Plann Manage

17

23

40

52. Mbanefoh

GF

Soyibo

A

Anyanwu

JC

2004

Markets for health care in Nigeria.

Nwabu

G

Wang'ombe

J

Okello

D

Munishi

G

Improving health policy in Africa

Nairobi

University of Nairobi Press

431

441

53. Mahaprata

P

2003

Quality health care in private and public health care

institutions.

Abdo

S

Yazbeck

AS

Peters

DH

Health policy research in South Asia: building capacity for

reform

Washington (District of Columbia)

World Bank

333

367

54. Schneider

H

Palmer

N

2002

Getting to the truth? Researching user views of primary health

care.

Health Policy Plan

17

32

41

55. Strong

K

Mathers

C

Leeder

S

Beaglehole

R

2005

Preventing chronic diseases: how many lives can we

save?

Lancet

366

1578

1582

56. Das

J

Hammer

J

Leonard

K

2008

The quality of medical advice in low-income

countries.

J Econ Perspect

22

93

114

57. Rowe

AK

de Savigny

D

Lanata

CF

Victora

CG

2005

How can we achieve and maintain high-quality performance of

health workers in low-resource settings?

Lancet

366

1026

1035

58. Bhat

R

1996

Regulating the private health care sector: the case of the Indian

Consumer Protection Act.

Health Policy Plan

11

265

279

59. Brugha

R

Zwi

A

1998

Improving the quality of private sector delivery of public health

services: challenges and strategies.

Health Policy Plan

13

107

120

60. Das

J

Hammer

J

2005

Which doctor? Combining vignettes and item response to measure

clinical competence.

J Dev Econom

78

348

383

Štítky
Interné lekárstvo

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Medicine


2011 Číslo 4
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Získaná hemofilie - Povědomí o nemoci a její diagnostika
nový kurz

Eozinofilní granulomatóza s polyangiitidou
Autori: doc. MUDr. Martina Doubková, Ph.D.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#