Regulation of the Boundaries of Accessible Chromatin

English version České info

Regulatory regions maintain nucleosome-depleted, open chromatin status but simultaneously require the presence of nucleosomes for specific histone modifications. It remains unclear how these can be achieved for proper regulatory function. Here we demonstrate that nucleosomes positioned within accessible chromatin regions near the boundaries provide platforms for histone modifications while preventing the occlusion of regulatory elements. These boundary nucleosomes were particularly enriched for active or poised regulatory marks in human, such as histone acetylations, H3K4 methylations, H3K9me3, H3K79me2, and H4K20me1. Additionally, we found that based on a genome-wide profiling of ∼100 recombinant yeast strains, the location of open chromatin borders tends to vary mostly within 150 bp upon genetic perturbation whereas this positional variation increases in proportion to the sequence preferences of the underlying DNA for nucleosome formation. More than 40% of the local boundary shifts were associated with genetic variation in cis -⁠ or trans-acting factors. A sizeable fraction of the identified genetic factors was also associated with nearby gene expression, which was correlated with the distance between the transcription start site (tss) and the boundary that faces the tss. Taken together, the variation in the width of accessible chromatin regions may arise in conjunction with the modulation of the boundary nucleosomes by post-translational modifications or by chromatin regulators and in association with the activity of nearby gene transcription.

Vyšlo v časopise: Regulation of the Boundaries of Accessible Chromatin. PLoS Genet 9(9): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003778
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003778

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. BoyleAP, DavisS, ShulhaHP, MeltzerP, MarguliesEH, et al. (2008) High-resolution mapping and characterization of open chromatin across the genome. Cell 132 : 311–322.

2. SongL, ZhangZ, GrasfederLL, BoyleAP, GiresiPG, et al. (2011) Open chromatin defined by DNaseI and FAIRE identifies regulatory elements that shape cell-type identity. Genome Res 21 : 1757–1767.

3. GaultonKJ, NammoT, PasqualiL, SimonJM, GiresiPG, et al. (2010) A map of open chromatin in human pancreatic islets. Nat Genet 42 : 255–259.

4. HesselberthJR, ChenX, ZhangZ, SaboPJ, SandstromR, et al. (2009) Global mapping of protein-DNA interactions in vivo by digital genomic footprinting. Nat Methods 6 : 283–289.

5. BerchowitzLE, HanlonSE, LiebJD, CopenhaverGP (2009) A positive but complex association between meiotic double-strand break hotspots and open chromatin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Res 19 : 2245–2257.

6. AuditB, ZaghloulL, VaillantC, ChevereauG, d'Aubenton-CarafaY, et al. (2009) Open chromatin encoded in DNA sequence is the signature of ‘master’ replication origins in human cells. Nucl Acids Res 37 : 6064–6075.

7. JenuweinT, AllisonCD (2001) Translating the histone code. Science 293 : 1074–1080.

8. KouzaridesT (2007) Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell 128 : 693–705.

9. BarskiA, CuddapahS, CuiK, RohT-Y, SchonesDE, et al. (2007) High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell 129 : 823–837.

10. WangZ, ZangC, RosenfeldJA, SchonesDE, BarskiA, et al. (2008) Combinatorial patterns of histone acetylations and methylations in the human genome. Nat Genet 40 : 897–903.

11. BernsteinBE, MikkelsenTS, XieX, KamalM, HuebertDJ, et al. (2006) A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 125 : 315–326.

12. HeintzmanND, HonGC, HawkinsRD, KheradpourP, StarkA, et al. (2009) Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression. Nature 459 : 108–112.

13. CreyghtonaMP, ChengAW, WelsteadGG, KooistraT, CareyBW, et al. (2010) Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107 : 21931–21936.

14. ZentnerGE, TesarPJ, Scacheri1PC (2011) Epigenetic signatures distinguish multiple classes of enhancers with distinct cellular functions. Genome Res 21 : 1273–1283.

15. ZhuY, EssenDv, SaccanS (2012) Cell-type-specific control of enhancer activity by H3K9 trimethylation. Mol Cell 46 : 408–423.

16. ErnstJ, KheradpourP, MikkelsenTS, ShoreshN, WardLD, et al. (2011) Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types. Nature 473 : 43–49.

17. CrawfordGE, HoltIE, WhittleJ, WebbBD, TaiD, et al. (2006) Genome-wide mapping of DNase hypersensitive sites using massively parallel signature sequencing (MPSS). Genome Res 16 : 123–131.

18. SaboPJ, KuehnMS, ThurmanR, JohnsonBE, JohnsonEM, et al. (2006) Genome-scale mapping of DNase I sensitivity in vivo using tiling DNA microarrays. Nat Methods 3 : 511–518.

19. GiresiPG, KimJ, McDaniellRM, IyerVR, LiebJD (2007) FAIRE (Formaldehyde-Assisted Isolation of Regulatory Elements) isolates active regulatory elements from human chromatin. Genome Res 17 : 877–885.

20. BremRB, YvertG, ClintonR, KruglyakL (2002) Genetic dissection of transcriptional regulation in budding yeast. Science 296 : 752–755.

21. BremRB, KruglyakL (2005) The landscape of genetic complexity across 5,700 gene expression traits in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102 : 1572–1577.

22. BremRB, StoreyJD, WhittleJ, KruglyakL (2005) Genetic interactions between polymorphisms that affect gene expression in yeast. Nature 436 : 701–703.

23. KaplanN, MooreIK, Fondufe-MittendorfY, GossettAJ, TilloD, et al. (2009) The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 458 : 362–366.

24. ValouevA, JohnsonSM, BoydSD, SmithCL, FireAZ, et al. (2011) Determinants of nucleosome organization in primary human cells. Nature 474 : 516–520.

25. LeeK, KimSC, JungI, KimK, SeoJ, et al. (2013) Genetic landscape of open chromatin in yeast. PLoS Genet 9: e1003229.

26. TilloD, KaplanN, MooreIK, Fondufe-MittendorfY, GossettAJ, et al. (2010) High nucleosome occupancy is encoded at human regulatory sequences. PLoS ONE 5: e9129.

27. SchonesDE, CuiK, CuddapahS, RohTY, BarskiA, et al. (2008) Dynamic regulation of nucleosome positioning in the human genome. Cell 132 : 887–898.

28. JinC, ZangC, WeiG, CuiK, PengW, et al. (2009) H3.3/H2A.Z double variant-containing nucleosomes mark ‘nucleosome-free regions’ of active promoters and other regulatory regions. Nat Genet 41 : 941–945.

29. LiZ, NieF, WangS, LiL (2010) Histone H4 Lys 20 monomethylation by histone methylase SET8 mediates Wnt target gene activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108 : 3116–3123.

30. HonG, WangW, RenB (2009) Discovery and annotation of functional chromatin signatures in the human genome. PLoS Comput Biol 5: e1000566.

31. SchübelerD, MacAlpineDM, ScalzoD, WirbelauerC, KooperbergC, et al. (2004) The histone modification pattern of active genes revealed through genome-wide chromatin analysis of a higher eukaryote. Genes Dev 18 : 1263–1271.

32. OkadaY, FengQ, LinY, JiangQ, LiY, et al. (2005) hDOT1L links histone methylation to leukemogenesis. Cell 121 : 167–178.

33. Kolasinska-ZwierzP, DownT, LatorreI, LiuT, LiuXS, et al. (2009) Differential chromatin marking of introns and expressed exons by H3K36me3. Nat Genet 41 : 376–381.

34. YoungMD, WillsonTA, WakefieldMJ, TrounsonE, HiltonDJ, et al. (2011) ChIP-seq analysis reveals distinct H3K27me3 profiles that correlate with transcriptional activity. Nucleic Acids Res 39 : 7415–7427.

35. ShenX, MizuguchiG, HamicheA, WuC (2000) A chromatin remodelling complex involved in transcription and DNA processing. Nature 406 : 541–544.

36. BoyleAP, GuinneyJ, CrawfordGE, FureyTS (2008) F-Seq: a feature density estimator for high-throughput sequence tags. Bioinformatics 24 : 2537–2538.

37. RashidNU, GiresiPG, IbrahimJG, SunW, LiebJD (2011) ZINBA integrates local covariates with DNA-seq data to identify broad and narrow regions of enrichment, even within amplified genomic regions. Genome Biol 12: R67.

38. ZhangY, ShinH, SongJS, LeiY, LiuXS (2008) Identifying positioned nucleosomes with epigenetic marks in human from ChIP-seq. BMC Genomics 9 : 537.

39. AlbertI, WachiS, JiangC, PughBF (2008) GeneTrack–a genomic data processing and visualization framework. Bioinformatics 24 : 1305–1306.

40. MavrichTN, IoshikhesIP, VentersBJ, JiangC, TomshoLP, et al. (2008) A barrier nucleosome model for statistical positioning of nucleosomes throughout the yeast genome. Genome Res 18 : 1073–1083.

41. HeinzS, BennerC, SpannN, BertolinoE, LinYC, et al. (2010) Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol Cell 38 : 576–589.

42. LeeS-I, Pe'erD, DudleyAM, ChurchGM, KollerD (2006) Identifying regulatory mechanisms using individual variation reveals key role for chromatin modification. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103 : 14062–14067.

43. BenjaminiY, HochbergY (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Statist Soc Ser B 57 : 289–300.

44. DaiZ, DaiX, XiangQ, FengJ, WangJ, et al. (2009) Two distinct modes of nucleosome modulation associated with different degrees of dependence of nucleosome positioning on the underlying DNA sequence. BMC Genomics 10 : 15.