The Molecular Mechanism of a -Regulatory Adaptation in Yeast

English version České info

Despite recent advances in our ability to detect adaptive evolution involving the cis-regulation of gene expression, our knowledge of the molecular mechanisms underlying these adaptations has lagged far behind. Across all model organisms, the causal mutations have been discovered for only a handful of gene expression adaptations, and even for these, mechanistic details (e.g. the trans-regulatory factors involved) have not been determined. We previously reported a polygenic gene expression adaptation involving down-regulation of the ergosterol biosynthesis pathway in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here we investigate the molecular mechanism of a cis-acting mutation affecting a member of this pathway, ERG28. We show that the causal mutation is a two-base deletion in the promoter of ERG28 that strongly reduces the binding of two transcription factors, Sok2 and Mot3, thus abolishing their regulation of ERG28. This down-regulation increases resistance to a widely used antifungal drug targeting ergosterol, similar to mutations disrupting this pathway in clinical yeast isolates. The identification of the causal genetic variant revealed that the selection likely occurred after the deletion was already present at high frequency in the population, rather than when it was a new mutation. These results provide a detailed view of the molecular mechanism of a cis-regulatory adaptation, and underscore the importance of this view to our understanding of evolution at the molecular level.

Vyšlo v časopise: The Molecular Mechanism of a -Regulatory Adaptation in Yeast. PLoS Genet 9(9): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003813
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003813

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. Darwin C (1876) On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection: or, the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life. New York, NY: D. Appleton and Co.

2. KingMC, WilsonAC (1975) Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees. Science 188 : 107.

3. Prud'hommeB, GompelN, CarrollSB (2007) Emerging principles of regulatory evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104 (Suppl 1) 8605–12.

4. HoekstraHE, CoyneJA (2007) The locus of evolution: Evo devo and the genetics of adaptation. Evolution 61 : 995–1016.

5. FraserHB (2013) Gene expression drives local adaptation in humans. Genome Research 23 : 1089.

6. FraserHB, LevyS, ChavanA, ShahHB, PerezJC, et al. (2012) Polygenic cis-regulatory adaptation in the evolution of yeast pathogenicity. Genome Research 22 : 1930.

7. FraserHB, BabakT, TsangJ, ZhouY, ZhangB, et al. (2011) Systematic detection of polygenic cis-regulatory evolution. PLoS Genetics 7: e1002023.

8. FraserHB, MosesA, SchadtEE (2010) Evidence for widespread adaptive evolution of gene expression in budding yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107 : 2997.

9. FraserHB (2011) Genome-wide approaches to the study of adaptive gene expression evolution. Bioessays 33 : 469.

10. MartinHC, RoopJI, SchraiberJG, HsuTY, BremRB (2012) Evolution of a membrane protein regulon in Saccharomyces. Mol Biol Evol 29 : 1747–56.

11. TiroshI, ReikhavS, LevyAA, BarkaiN (2009) A yeast hybrid provides insight into the evolution of gene expression regulation. Science 324 : 659–62.

12. CrockerJ, TamoriY, ErivesA (2008) Evolution acts on enhancer organization to fine-tune gradient threshold readouts. PLoS Biol 6: e263.

13. ChanYF, MarksME, JonesFC, VillarrealGJr, ShapiroMD, et al. (2010) Adaptive evolution of pelvic reduction in sticklebacks by recurrent deletion of a Pitx1 enhancer. Science 327 : 302.

14. RebeizM, PoolJE, KassnerVA, AquadroCF, CarrollSB (2009) Stepwise modification of a modular enhancer underlies adaptation in a Drosophila population. Science 326 : 1663.

15. FrankelN, ErezyilmazDF, McGregorAP, WangS, PayreF, et al. (2011) Morphological evolution caused by many subtle-effect substitutions in regulatory DNA. Nature 474 : 598–603.

16. JeongS, RebeizM, AndolfattoP, WernerT, TrueJ, et al. (2008) The evolution of gene regulation underlies a morphological difference between two Drosophila sister species. Cell 132 : 783–93.

17. GerkeJ, LorenzK, CohenB (2009) Genetic interactions between transcription factors cause natural variation in yeast. Science 323 : 498–501.

18. LinnenCR, PohYP, PetersonBK, BarrettRD, LarsonJG, et al. (2013) Adaptive evolution of multiple traits through multiple mutations at a single gene. Science 339 : 1312–6.

19. MorschhäuserJ (2010) Regulation of multidrug resistance in pathogenic fungi. Fungal Genet and Biol 47 : 94–106.

20. YoungLY, HullCM, HeitmanJ (2003) Disruption of ergosterol biosynthesis confers resistance to amphotericin B in Candida lusitaniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47 : 2717–24.

21. KellySL, LambDC, TaylorM, CorranAJ, BaldwinBC, et al. (1994) Resistance to amphotericin B associated with defective sterol Δ87 isomerase in a Cryptococcus neoformans strain from an AIDS patient. FEMS Microbiology Letters 122 : 39–42.

22. BremRB, KruglyakL (2005) The landscape of genetic complexity across 5,700 gene expression traits in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 : 1572–1577.

23. WittkoppPJ (2011) Using pyrosequencing to measure allele-specific mRNA abundance and infer the effects of cis -⁠ and trans-regulatory differences. Methods Mol Biol 772 : 297–317.

24. MoC, BardM (2005) Erg28p is a key protein in the yeast sterol biosynthetic enzyme complex. J Lipid Res 46 : 1991–8.

25. MoC, ValachovicM, BardM (2004) The ERG28-encoded protein, Erg28p, interacts with both the sterol C-4 demethylation enzyme complex as well as the late biosynthetic protein, the C-24 sterol methyltransferase (Erg6p). Biochim Biophys Acta 1686 : 30–6.

26. GachotteD, EcksteinJ, BarbuchR, HughesT, RobertsC, et al. (2001) A novel gene conserved from yeast to humans is involved in sterol biosynthesis. J Lipid Res 42 : 150–4.

27. VentersBJ, WachiS, MavrichTN, AndersenBE, JenaP, et al. (2011) A comprehensive genomic binding map of gene and chromatin regulatory proteins in Saccharomyces. Mol Cell 41 : 480–92.

28. StoriciF, ResnickMA (2006) The delitto perfetto approach to in vivo site-directed mutagenesis and chromosome rearrangements with synthetic oligonucleotides in yeast. Methods Enzymol 409 : 329–45.

29. Raveh-SadkaT, LevoM, ShabiU, ShanyB, KerenL, et al. (2012) Manipulating nucleosome disfavoring sequences allows fine-tune regulation of gene expression in yeast. Nat Genet 44 : 743–50.

30. NagarajanM, VeyrierasJB, de DieuleveultM, BottinH, FehrmannS, et al. (2010) Natural single-nucleosome epi-polymorphisms in yeast. PLoS Genet 6: e1000913.

31. MacIsaacKD, WangT, GordonDB, GiffordDK, StormoGD, et al. (2006) An improved map of conserved regulatory sites for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Bioinformatics 7 : 113.

32. MontañésFM, Pascual-AhuirA, ProftM (2011) Repression of ergosterol biosynthesis is essential for stress resistance and is mediated by the Hog1 MAP kinase and the Mot3 and Rox1 transcription factors. Mol Microbiol 79 : 1008–23.

33. DaviesBS, RineJ (2006) A role for sterol levels in oxygen sensing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 174 : 191–201.

34. BarrettRD, SchluterD (2008) Adaptation from standing genetic variation. Trends Ecol Evol 23 : 38–44.

35. OrrHA, BetancourtAJ (2001) Haldane's sieve and adaptation from the standing genetic variation. Genetics 157 : 875–84.

36. HermissonJ, PenningsPS (2005) Soft sweeps: molecular population genetics of adaptation from standing genetic variation. Genetics 169 : 2335–52.

37. LitiG, CarterDM, MosesAM, WarringerJ, PartsL, et al. (2009) Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 458 : 337–341.

38. MortimerRK, JohnstonJR (1986) Genealogy of principal strains of the yeast genetic stock center. Genetics 113 : 35–43.

39. DimitrovLN, BremRB, KruglyakL, GottschlingDE (2009) Polymorphisms in multiple genes contribute to the spontaneous mitochondrial genome instability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288c strains. Genetics 183 : 365–83.

40. ZhengW, ZhaoH, ManceraE, SteinmetzLM, SnyderM (2010) Genetic analysis of variation in transcription factor binding in yeast. Nature 464 : 1187–91.

41. SharonE, KalmaY, SharpA, Raveh-SadkaT, LevoM, et al. (2012) Inferring gene regulatory logic from high-throughput measurements of thousands of systematically designed promoters. Nat Biotechnol 30 : 521–30.

42. GemayelR, VincesMD, LegendreM, VerstrepenKJ (2010) Variable tandem repeats accelerate evolution of coding and regulatory sequences. Annu Rev Genet 44 : 445–77.

43. Amberg DC, Burke DJ, Strathern JN (2005) Methods in Yeast Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.

44. TesteMA, DuquenneM, FrançoisJM, ParrouJL (2009) Validation of reference genes for quantitative expression analysis by real-time RT-PCR in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Mol Biol 10 : 99.

45. HellemansJ, MortierG, De PaepeA, SpelemanF, VandesompeleJ (2007) qBase relative quantification framework and software for management and automated analysis of real-time quantitative PCR data. Genome Biol 8: R19.

46. MeluhPB, BroachJR (1999) Immunological analysis of yeast chromatin. Methods Enzymol 304 : 414–430.