Genotype-Environment Interactions Reveal Causal Pathways That Mediate Genetic Effects on Phenotype

English version České info

Unraveling the molecular processes that lead from genotype to phenotype is crucial for the understanding and effective treatment of genetic diseases. Knowledge of the causative genetic defect most often does not enable treatment; therefore, causal intermediates between genotype and phenotype constitute valuable candidates for molecular intervention points that can be therapeutically targeted. Mapping genetic determinants of gene expression levels (also known as expression quantitative trait loci or eQTL studies) is frequently used for this purpose, yet distinguishing causation from correlation remains a significant challenge. Here, we address this challenge using extensive, multi-environment gene expression and fitness profiling of hundreds of genetically diverse yeast strains, in order to identify truly causal intermediate genes that condition fitness in a given environment. Using functional genomics assays, we show that the predictive power of eQTL studies for inferring causal intermediate genes is poor unless performed across multiple environments. Surprisingly, although the effects of genotype on fitness depended strongly on environment, causal intermediates could be most reliably predicted from genetic effects on expression present in all environments. Our results indicate a mechanism explaining this apparent paradox, whereby immediate molecular consequences of genetic variation are shared across environments, and environment-dependent phenotypic effects result from downstream integration of environmental signals. We developed a statistical model to predict causal intermediates that leverages this insight, yielding over 400 transcripts, for the majority of which we experimentally validated their role in conditioning fitness. Our findings have implications for the design and analysis of clinical omics studies aimed at discovering personalized targets for molecular intervention, suggesting that inferring causation in a single cellular context can benefit from molecular profiling in multiple contexts.

Vyšlo v časopise: Genotype-Environment Interactions Reveal Causal Pathways That Mediate Genetic Effects on Phenotype. PLoS Genet 9(9): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003803
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003803

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. VisscherPM, BrownMA, McCarthyMI, YangJ (2012) Five years of GWAS discovery. Am J Hum Genet 90: 7–24.

2. WheelerHE, MetterEJ, TanakaT, AbsherD, HigginsJ, et al. (2009) Sequential use of transcriptional profiling, expression quantitative trait mapping, and gene association implicates MMP20 in human kidney aging. PLoS Genet 5: e1000685.

3. DuboisPC, TrynkaG, FrankeL, HuntKA, RomanosJ, et al. (2010) Multiple common variants for celiac disease influencing immune gene expression. Nat Genet 42: 295–302.

4. FehrmannRS, JansenRC, VeldinkJH, WestraHJ, ArendsD, et al. (2011) Trans-eQTLs reveal that independent genetic variants associated with a complex phenotype converge on intermediate genes, with a major role for the HLA. PLoS Genet 7: e1002197.

5. MontgomerySB, DermitzakisET (2011) From expression QTLs to personalized transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet 12: 277–282.

6. SmithEN, KruglyakL (2008) Gene-environment interaction in yeast gene expression. PLoS Biol 6: e83.

7. GerritsA, LiY, TessonBM, BystrykhLV, WeersingE, et al. (2009) Expression quantitative trait loci are highly sensitive to cellular differentiation state. PLoS Genet 5: e1000692.

8. GrundbergE, SmallKS, HedmanAK, NicaAC, BuilA, et al. (2012) Mapping cis- and trans-regulatory effects across multiple tissues in twins. Nat Genet 44: 1084–1089.

9. KorolAB, PreigelIA, BocharnikovaNI (1987) Linkage between quantitative and marker loci. V. Joint analysis of various marker and quantitative traits. Genetika 23: 1421–1131.

10. FlutreT, WenX, PritchardJ, StephensM (2013) A Statistical Framework for Joint eQTL Analysis in Multiple Tissues. PLoS Genet 9: e1003486.

11. GoringHH, CurranJE, JohnsonMP, DyerTD, CharlesworthJ, et al. (2007) Discovery of expression QTLs using large-scale transcriptional profiling in human lymphocytes. Nat Genet 39: 1208–1216.

12. ManceraE, BourgonR, BrozziA, HuberW, SteinmetzLM (2008) High-resolution mapping of meiotic crossovers and non-crossovers in yeast. Nature 454: 479–485.

13. CubillosFA, BilliE, ZorgoE, PartsL, FargierP, et al. (2011) Assessing the complex architecture of polygenic traits in diverged yeast populations. Mol Ecol 20: 1401–1413.

14. PierceSE, DavisRW, NislowC, GiaeverG (2007) Genome-wide analysis of barcoded Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene-deletion mutants in pooled cultures. Nat Protoc 2: 2958–2974.

15. HillenmeyerME, FungE, WildenhainJ, PierceSE, HoonS, et al. (2008) The chemical genomic portrait of yeast: uncovering a phenotype for all genes. Science 320: 362–365.

16. BloomJS, EhrenreichIM, LooWT, LiteTL, KruglyakL (2013) Finding the sources of missing heritability in a yeast cross. Nature 494: 234–237.

17. SchadtEE, LambJ, YangX, ZhuJ, EdwardsS, et al. (2005) An integrative genomics approach to infer causal associations between gene expression and disease. Nat Genet 37: 710–717.

18. ChenLS, Emmert-StreibF, StoreyJD (2007) Harnessing naturally randomized transcription to infer regulatory relationships among genes. Genome Biol 8: R219.

19. ChenBJ, CaustonHC, MancenidoD, GoddardNL, PerlsteinEO, et al. (2009) Harnessing gene expression to identify the genetic basis of drug resistance. Molecular systems biology 5: 310.

20. ZhuJ, SovaP, XuQ, DombekKM, XuEY, et al. (2012) Stitching together multiple data dimensions reveals interacting metabolomic and transcriptomic networks that modulate cell regulation. PLoS Biol 10: e1001301.

21. CharronMJ, DubinRA, MichelsCA (1986) Structural and functional analysis of the MAL1 locus of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecular and cellular biology 6: 3891–3899.

22. BrownCA, MurrayAW, VerstrepenKJ (2010) Rapid expansion and functional divergence of subtelomeric gene families in yeasts. Curr Biol 20: 895–903.

23. LeeSI, DudleyAM, DrubinD, SilverPA, KroganNJ, et al. (2009) Learning a prior on regulatory potential from eQTL data. PLoS Genet 5: e1000358.

24. XieMW, JinF, HwangH, HwangS, AnandV, et al. (2005) Insights into TOR function and rapamycin response: chemical genomic profiling by using a high-density cell array method. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 7215–7220.

25. XuZ, WeiW, GagneurJ, Clauder-MunsterS, SmolikM, et al. (2011) Antisense expression increases gene expression variability and locus interdependency. Molecular systems biology 7: 468.

26. StoreyJD, TibshiraniR (2003) Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100: 9440–9445.

27. KangHM, ZaitlenNA, WadeCM, KirbyA, HeckermanD, et al. (2008) Efficient control of population structure in model organism association mapping. Genetics 178: 1709–1723.