#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Divergent Transcriptional Regulatory Logic at the Intersection of Tissue Growth and Developmental Patterning


The Yorkie/Yap transcriptional coactivator is a well-known regulator of cellular proliferation in both invertebrates and mammals. As a coactivator, Yorkie (Yki) lacks a DNA binding domain and must partner with sequence-specific DNA binding proteins in the nucleus to regulate gene expression; in Drosophila, the developmental regulators Scalloped (Sd) and Homothorax (Hth) are two such partners. To determine the range of target genes regulated by these three transcription factors, we performed genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments for each factor in both the wing and eye-antenna imaginal discs. Strong, tissue-specific binding patterns are observed for Sd and Hth, while Yki binding is remarkably similar across both tissues. Binding events common to the eye and wing are also present for Sd and Hth; these are associated with genes regulating cell proliferation and “housekeeping” functions, and account for the majority of Yki binding. In contrast, tissue-specific binding events for Sd and Hth significantly overlap enhancers that are active in the given tissue, are enriched in Sd and Hth DNA binding sites, respectively, and are associated with genes that are consistent with each factor's previously established tissue-specific functions. Tissue-specific binding events are also significantly associated with Polycomb targeted chromatin domains. To provide mechanistic insights into tissue-specific regulation, we identify and characterize eye and wing enhancers of the Yki-targeted bantam microRNA gene and demonstrate that they are dependent on direct binding by Hth and Sd, respectively. Overall these results suggest that both Sd and Hth use distinct strategies – one shared between tissues and associated with Yki, the other tissue-specific, generally Yki-independent and associated with developmental patterning – to regulate distinct gene sets during development.


Vyšlo v časopise: Divergent Transcriptional Regulatory Logic at the Intersection of Tissue Growth and Developmental Patterning. PLoS Genet 9(9): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003753
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003753

Souhrn

The Yorkie/Yap transcriptional coactivator is a well-known regulator of cellular proliferation in both invertebrates and mammals. As a coactivator, Yorkie (Yki) lacks a DNA binding domain and must partner with sequence-specific DNA binding proteins in the nucleus to regulate gene expression; in Drosophila, the developmental regulators Scalloped (Sd) and Homothorax (Hth) are two such partners. To determine the range of target genes regulated by these three transcription factors, we performed genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments for each factor in both the wing and eye-antenna imaginal discs. Strong, tissue-specific binding patterns are observed for Sd and Hth, while Yki binding is remarkably similar across both tissues. Binding events common to the eye and wing are also present for Sd and Hth; these are associated with genes regulating cell proliferation and “housekeeping” functions, and account for the majority of Yki binding. In contrast, tissue-specific binding events for Sd and Hth significantly overlap enhancers that are active in the given tissue, are enriched in Sd and Hth DNA binding sites, respectively, and are associated with genes that are consistent with each factor's previously established tissue-specific functions. Tissue-specific binding events are also significantly associated with Polycomb targeted chromatin domains. To provide mechanistic insights into tissue-specific regulation, we identify and characterize eye and wing enhancers of the Yki-targeted bantam microRNA gene and demonstrate that they are dependent on direct binding by Hth and Sd, respectively. Overall these results suggest that both Sd and Hth use distinct strategies – one shared between tissues and associated with Yki, the other tissue-specific, generally Yki-independent and associated with developmental patterning – to regulate distinct gene sets during development.


Zdroje

1. LelliKM, SlatteryM, MannRS (2012) Disentangling the many layers of eukaryotic transcriptional regulation. Annu Rev Genet 46: 43–68.

2. SpitzF, FurlongEE (2012) Transcription factors: from enhancer binding to developmental control. Nat Rev Genet 13: 613–626.

3. OngCT, CorcesVG (2012) Enhancers: emerging roles in cell fate specification. EMBO Rep 13: 423–430.

4. IyerVR, HorakCE, ScafeCS, BotsteinD, SnyderM, et al. (2001) Genomic binding sites of the yeast cell-cycle transcription factors SBF and MBF. Nature 409: 533–538.

5. RenB, RobertF, WyrickJJ, AparicioO, JenningsEG, et al. (2000) Genome-wide location and function of DNA binding proteins. Science 290: 2306–2309.

6. JohnsonDS, MortazaviA, MyersRM, WoldB (2007) Genome-wide mapping of in vivo protein-DNA interactions. Science 316: 1497–1502.

7. LiXY, MacArthurS, BourgonR, NixD, PollardDA, et al. (2008) Transcription factors bind thousands of active and inactive regions in the Drosophila blastoderm. PLoS Biol 6: e27.

8. MacQuarrieKL, FongAP, MorseRH, TapscottSJ (2011) Genome-wide transcription factor binding: beyond direct target regulation. Trends Genet 27: 141–148.

9. CaoY, YaoZ, SarkarD, LawrenceM, SanchezGJ, et al. (2010) Genome-wide MyoD binding in skeletal muscle cells: a potential for broad cellular reprogramming. Dev Cell 18: 662–674.

10. FisherWW, LiJJ, HammondsAS, BrownJB, PfeifferBD, et al. (2012) DNA regions bound at low occupancy by transcription factors do not drive patterned reporter gene expression in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 21330–21335.

11. JakobsenJS, BraunM, AstorgaJ, GustafsonEH, SandmannT, et al. (2007) Temporal ChIP-on-chip reveals Biniou as a universal regulator of the visceral muscle transcriptional network. Genes Dev 21: 2448–2460.

12. WilczynskiB, FurlongEE (2010) Dynamic CRM occupancy reflects a temporal map of developmental progression. Mol Syst Biol 6: 383.

13. HeQ, BardetAF, PattonB, PurvisJ, JohnstonJ, et al. (2011) High conservation of transcription factor binding and evidence for combinatorial regulation across six Drosophila species. Nat Genet 43: 414–420.

14. AgelopoulosM, McKayDJ, MannRS (2012) Developmental regulation of chromatin conformation by Hox proteins in Drosophila. Cell Rep 1: 350–359.

15. AbruzziKC, RodriguezJ, MenetJS, DesrochersJ, ZadinaA, et al. (2011) Drosophila CLOCK target gene characterization: implications for circadian tissue-specific gene expression. Genes Dev 25: 2374–2386.

16. MenetJS, AbruzziKC, DesrochersJ, RodriguezJ, RosbashM (2010) Dynamic PER repression mechanisms in the Drosophila circadian clock: from on-DNA to off-DNA. Genes Dev 24: 358–367.

17. GuertinMJ, LisJT (2010) Chromatin landscape dictates HSF binding to target DNA elements. PLoS Genet 6: e1001114.

18. GaertnerB, JohnstonJ, ChenK, WallaschekN, PaulsonA, et al. (2012) Poised RNA polymerase II changes over developmental time and prepares genes for future expression. Cell Rep 2: 1670–1683.

19. ArveyA, AgiusP, NobleWS, LeslieC (2012) Sequence and chromatin determinants of cell-type-specific transcription factor binding. Genome Res 22: 1723–1734.

20. RamO, GorenA, AmitI, ShoreshN, YosefN, et al. (2011) Combinatorial patterning of chromatin regulators uncovered by genome-wide location analysis in human cells. Cell 147: 1628–1639.

21. ShenY, YueF, McClearyDF, YeZ, EdsallL, et al. (2012) A map of the cis-regulatory sequences in the mouse genome. Nature 488: 116–120.

22. HongJW, HendrixDA, LevineMS (2008) Shadow enhancers as a source of evolutionary novelty. Science 321: 1314.

23. LaghaM, BothmaJP, LevineM (2012) Mechanisms of transcriptional precision in animal development. Trends Genet 28: 409–416.

24. BaroloS (2012) Shadow enhancers: frequently asked questions about distributed cis-regulatory information and enhancer redundancy. Bioessays 34: 135–141.

25. WebberJL, ZhangJ, CoteL, VivekanandP, NiX, et al. (2013) The relationship between long-range chromatin occupancy and polymerization of the Drosophila ETS family transcriptional repressor Yan. Genetics 193: 633–649.

26. BaroloS, PosakonyJW (2002) Three habits of highly effective signaling pathways: principles of transcriptional control by developmental cell signaling. Genes Dev 16: 1167–1181.

27. GuertinMJ, LisJT (2012) Mechanisms by which transcription factors gain access to target sequence elements in chromatin. Curr Opin Genet Dev 23: 116–23.

28. ZhouX, O'SheaEK (2011) Integrated approaches reveal determinants of genome-wide binding and function of the transcription factor Pho4. Mol Cell 42: 826–836.

29. ChengC, AlexanderR, MinR, LengJ, YipKY, et al. (2012) Understanding transcriptional regulation by integrative analysis of transcription factor binding data. Genome Res 22: 1658–1667.

30. FrietzeS, WangR, YaoL, TakYG, YeZ, et al. (2012) Cell type-specific binding patterns reveal that TCF7L2 can be tethered to the genome by association with GATA3. Genome Biol 13: R52.

31. Yanez-CunaJO, DinhHQ, KvonEZ, ShlyuevaD, StarkA (2012) Uncovering cis-regulatory sequence requirements for context-specific transcription factor binding. Genome Res 22: 2018–2030.

32. PasiniD, MalatestaM, JungHR, WalfridssonJ, WillerA, et al. (2010) Characterization of an antagonistic switch between histone H3 lysine 27 methylation and acetylation in the transcriptional regulation of Polycomb group target genes. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 4958–4969.

33. SimonJA, KingstonRE (2009) Mechanisms of polycomb gene silencing: knowns and unknowns. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10: 697–708.

34. FilionGJ, van BemmelJG, BraunschweigU, TalhoutW, KindJ, et al. (2010) Systematic protein location mapping reveals five principal chromatin types in Drosophila cells. Cell 143: 212–224.

35. van SteenselB (2011) Chromatin: constructing the big picture. EMBO J 30: 1885–1895.

36. van SteenselB, HenikoffS (2000) Identification of in vivo DNA targets of chromatin proteins using tethered dam methyltransferase. Nat Biotechnol 18: 424–428.

37. modEC, RoyS, ErnstJ, KharchenkoPV, KheradpourP, et al. (2010) Identification of functional elements and regulatory circuits by Drosophila modENCODE. Science 330: 1787–1797.

38. BadouelC, McNeillH (2011) SnapShot: The hippo signaling pathway. Cell 145: 484–e481, 484-484, e481.

39. ZhaoB, TumanengK, GuanKL (2011) The Hippo pathway in organ size control, tissue regeneration and stem cell self-renewal. Nat Cell Biol 13: 877–883.

40. StaleyBK, IrvineKD (2012) Hippo signaling in Drosophila: recent advances and insights. Dev Dyn 241: 3–15.

41. HalderG, JohnsonRL (2011) Hippo signaling: growth control and beyond. Development 138: 9–22.

42. PanD (2010) The hippo signaling pathway in development and cancer. Dev Cell 19: 491–505.

43. HarveyKF, PflegerCM, HariharanIK (2003) The Drosophila Mst ortholog, hippo, restricts growth and cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis. Cell 114: 457–467.

44. WuS, HuangJ, DongJ, PanD (2003) hippo encodes a Ste-20 family protein kinase that restricts cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis in conjunction with salvador and warts. Cell 114: 445–456.

45. HuangJ, WuS, BarreraJ, MatthewsK, PanD (2005) The Hippo signaling pathway coordinately regulates cell proliferation and apoptosis by inactivating Yorkie, the Drosophila Homolog of YAP. Cell 122: 421–434.

46. VarelasX, Samavarchi-TehraniP, NarimatsuM, WeissA, CockburnK, et al. (2010) The Crumbs complex couples cell density sensing to Hippo-dependent control of the TGF-beta-SMAD pathway. Dev Cell 19: 831–844.

47. OhH, IrvineKD (2011) Cooperative regulation of growth by Yorkie and Mad through bantam. Dev Cell 20: 109–122.

48. PengHW, SlatteryM, MannRS (2009) Transcription factor choice in the Hippo signaling pathway: homothorax and yorkie regulation of the microRNA bantam in the progenitor domain of the Drosophila eye imaginal disc. Genes Dev 23: 2307–2319.

49. ZhangL, RenF, ZhangQ, ChenY, WangB, et al. (2008) The TEAD/TEF family of transcription factor Scalloped mediates Hippo signaling in organ size control. Dev Cell 14: 377–387.

50. WuS, LiuY, ZhengY, DongJ, PanD (2008) The TEAD/TEF family protein Scalloped mediates transcriptional output of the Hippo growth-regulatory pathway. Dev Cell 14: 388–398.

51. GoulevY, FaunyJD, Gonzalez-MartiB, FlagielloD, SilberJ, et al. (2008) SCALLOPED interacts with YORKIE, the nuclear effector of the hippo tumor-suppressor pathway in Drosophila. Curr Biol 18: 435–441.

52. HalderG, PolaczykP, KrausME, HudsonA, KimJ, et al. (1998) The Vestigial and Scalloped proteins act together to directly regulate wing-specific gene expression in Drosophila. Genes Dev 12: 3900–3909.

53. HalderG, CarrollSB (2001) Binding of the Vestigial co-factor switches the DNA-target selectivity of the Scalloped selector protein. Development 128: 3295–3305.

54. SrivastavaA, BellJB (2003) Further developmental roles of the Vestigial/Scalloped transcription complex during wing development in Drosophila melanogaster. Mech Dev 120: 587–596.

55. BessaJ, GebeleinB, PichaudF, CasaresF, MannRS (2002) Combinatorial control of Drosophila eye development by eyeless, homothorax, and teashirt. Genes Dev 16: 2415–2427.

56. AzpiazuN, MorataG (2000) Function and regulation of homothorax in the wing imaginal disc of Drosophila. Development 127: 2685–2693.

57. AldazS, MorataG, AzpiazuN (2005) Patterning function of homothorax/extradenticle in the thorax of Drosophila. Development 132: 439–446.

58. CasaresF, MannRS (1998) Control of antennal versus leg development in Drosophila. Nature 392: 723–726.

59. CasaresF, MannRS (2000) A dual role for homothorax in inhibiting wing blade development and specifying proximal wing identities in Drosophila. Development 127: 1499–1508.

60. ZhangT, ZhouQ, PignoniF (2011) Yki/YAP, Sd/TEAD and Hth/MEIS control tissue specification in the Drosophila eye disc epithelium. PLoS One 6: e22278.

61. BuszczakM, PaternoS, LighthouseD, BachmanJ, PlanckJ, et al. (2007) The carnegie protein trap library: a versatile tool for Drosophila developmental studies. Genetics 175: 1505–1531.

62. DongJ, FeldmannG, HuangJ, WuS, ZhangN, et al. (2007) Elucidation of a universal size-control mechanism in Drosophila and mammals. Cell 130: 1120–1133.

63. SlatteryM, MaL, NegreN, WhiteKP, MannRS (2011) Genome-wide tissue-specific occupancy of the Hox protein Ultrabithorax and Hox cofactor Homothorax in Drosophila. PLoS One 6: e14686.

64. JohnsonWE, LiW, MeyerCA, GottardoR, CarrollJS, et al. (2006) Model-based analysis of tiling-arrays for ChIP-chip. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 12457–12462.

65. MoormanC, SunLV, WangJ, de WitE, TalhoutW, et al. (2006) Hotspots of transcription factor colocalization in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 12027–12032.

66. NegreN, BrownCD, MaL, BristowCA, MillerSW, et al. (2011) A cis-regulatory map of the Drosophila genome. Nature 471: 527–531.

67. AnbanandamA, AlbaradoDC, NguyenCT, HalderG, GaoX, et al. (2006) Insights into transcription enhancer factor 1 (TEF-1) activity from the solution structure of the TEA domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 17225–17230.

68. MadhaniHD, FinkGR (1997) Combinatorial control required for the specificity of yeast MAPK signaling. Science 275: 1314–1317.

69. NoyesMB, ChristensenRG, WakabayashiA, StormoGD, BrodskyMH, et al. (2008) Analysis of homeodomain specificities allows the family-wide prediction of preferred recognition sites. Cell 133: 1277–1289.

70. RyooHD, MartyT, CasaresF, AffolterM, MannRS (1999) Regulation of Hox target genes by a DNA bound Homothorax/Hox/Extradenticle complex. Development 126: 5137–5148.

71. ChangCP, JacobsY, NakamuraT, JenkinsNA, CopelandNG, et al. (1997) Meis proteins are major in vivo DNA binding partners for wild-type but not chimeric Pbx proteins. Mol Cell Biol 17: 5679–5687.

72. JoryA, EstellaC, GiorgianniMW, SlatteryM, LavertyTR, et al. (2012) A survey of 6,300 genomic fragments for cis-regulatory activity in the imaginal discs of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell Rep 2: 1014–1024.

73. VoasMG, RebayI (2004) Signal integration during development: insights from the Drosophila eye. Dev Dyn 229: 162–175.

74. FrankfortBJ, MardonG (2002) R8 development in the Drosophila eye: a paradigm for neural selection and differentiation. Development 129: 1295–1306.

75. PichaudF, CasaresF (2000) homothorax and iroquois-C genes are required for the establishment of territories within the developing eye disc. Mech Dev 96: 15–25.

76. GrahamTG, TabeiSM, DinnerAR, RebayI (2010) Modeling bistable cell-fate choices in the Drosophila eye: qualitative and quantitative perspectives. Development 137: 2265–2278.

77. SenA, StultzBG, LeeH, HurshDA (2010) Odd paired transcriptional activation of decapentaplegic in the Drosophila eye/antennal disc is cell autonomous but indirect. Dev Biol 343: 167–177.

78. HipfnerDR, WeigmannK, CohenSM (2002) The bantam gene regulates Drosophila growth. Genetics 161: 1527–1537.

79. ThompsonBJ, CohenSM (2006) The Hippo pathway regulates the bantam microRNA to control cell proliferation and apoptosis in Drosophila. Cell 126: 767–774.

80. NoloR, MorrisonCM, TaoC, ZhangX, HalderG (2006) The bantam microRNA is a target of the hippo tumor-suppressor pathway. Curr Biol 16: 1895–1904.

81. NegreN, BrownCD, ShahPK, KheradpourP, MorrisonCA, et al. (2010) A comprehensive map of insulator elements for the Drosophila genome. PLoS Genet 6: e1000814.

82. GraveleyBR, BrooksAN, CarlsonJW, DuffMO, LandolinJM, et al. (2011) The developmental transcriptome of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 471: 473–479.

83. Abu-ShaarM, RyooHD, MannRS (1999) Control of the nuclear localization of Extradenticle by competing nuclear import and export signals. Genes Dev 13: 935–945.

84. RieckhofGE, CasaresF, RyooHD, Abu-ShaarM, MannRS (1997) Nuclear translocation of extradenticle requires homothorax, which encodes an extradenticle-related homeodomain protein. Cell 91: 171–183.

85. RyooHD, MannRS (1999) The control of trunk Hox specificity and activity by Extradenticle. Genes Dev 13: 1704–1716.

86. RandoOJ, ChangHY (2009) Genome-wide views of chromatin structure. Annu Rev Biochem 78: 245–271.

87. GiresiPG, KimJ, McDaniellRM, IyerVR, LiebJD (2007) FAIRE (Formaldehyde-Assisted Isolation of Regulatory Elements) isolates active regulatory elements from human chromatin. Genome Res 17: 877–885.

88. OhH, SlatteryM, MaL, CroftsA, WhiteKP, et al. (2013) Genome-wide Association of Yorkie with Chromatin and Chromatin-Remodeling Complexes. Cell Rep 3: 309–318.

89. NagarajR, Gururaja-RaoS, JonesKT, SlatteryM, NegreN, et al. (2012) Control of mitochondrial structure and function by the Yorkie/YAP oncogenic pathway. Genes Dev 26: 2027–2037.

90. WangK, DegernyC, XuM, YangXJ (2009) YAP, TAZ, and Yorkie: a conserved family of signal-responsive transcriptional coregulators in animal development and human disease. Biochem Cell Biol 87: 77–91.

91. BertiniE, OkaT, SudolM, StranoS, BlandinoG (2009) YAP: at the crossroad between transformation and tumor suppression. Cell Cycle 8: 49–57.

92. KoontzLM, Liu-ChittendenY, YinF, ZhengY, YuJ, et al. (2013) The hippo effector yorkie controls normal tissue growth by antagonizing scalloped-mediated default repression. Dev Cell 25: 388–401.

93. MacArthurS, LiXY, LiJ, BrownJB, ChuHC, et al. (2009) Developmental roles of 21 Drosophila transcription factors are determined by quantitative differences in binding to an overlapping set of thousands of genomic regions. Genome Biol 10: R80.

94. LickwarCR, MuellerF, HanlonSE, McNallyJG, LiebJD (2012) Genome-wide protein-DNA binding dynamics suggest a molecular clutch for transcription factor function. Nature 484: 251–255.

95. EstellaC, McKayDJ, MannRS (2008) Molecular integration of wingless, decapentaplegic, and autoregulatory inputs into Distalless during Drosophila leg development. Dev Cell 14: 86–96.

96. JenettA, RubinGM, NgoTT, ShepherdD, MurphyC, et al. (2012) A GAL4-driver line resource for Drosophila neurobiology. Cell Rep 2: 991–1001.

97. HeinzS, BennerC, SpannN, BertolinoE, LinYC, et al. (2010) Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol Cell 38: 576–589.

98. LiuT, OrtizJA, TaingL, MeyerCA, LeeB, et al. (2011) Cistrome: an integrative platform for transcriptional regulation studies. Genome Biol 12: R83.

99. BaileyTL, MachanickP (2012) Inferring direct DNA binding from ChIP-seq. Nucleic Acids Res 40: e128.

100. SandelinA, AlkemaW, EngstromP, WassermanWW, LenhardB (2004) JASPAR: an open-access database for eukaryotic transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res 32: D91–94.

101. NoroB, CuliJ, McKayDJ, ZhangW, MannRS (2006) Distinct functions of homeodomain-containing and homeodomain-less isoforms encoded by homothorax. Genes Dev 20: 1636–1650.

102. WhiteK, GretherME, AbramsJM, YoungL, FarrellK, et al. (1994) Genetic control of programmed cell death in Drosophila. Science 264: 677–683.

103. StevensKE, MannRS (2007) A balance between two nuclear localization sequences and a nuclear export sequence governs extradenticle subcellular localization. Genetics 175: 1625–1636.

104. GrothAC, FishM, NusseR, CalosMP (2004) Construction of transgenic Drosophila by using the site-specific integrase from phage phiC31. Genetics 166: 1775–1782.

105. PfeifferBD, JenettA, HammondsAS, NgoTT, MisraS, et al. (2008) Tools for neuroanatomy and neurogenetics in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 9715–9720.

106. RiddihoughG, Ish-HorowiczD (1991) Individual stripe regulatory elements in the Drosophila hairy promoter respond to maternal, gap, and pair-rule genes. Genes Dev 5: 840–854.

107. FitzgeraldM, ShenkT (1981) The sequence 5′-AAUAAA-3′forms parts of the recognition site for polyadenylation of late SV40 mRNAs. Cell 24: 251–260.

108. BischofJ, MaedaRK, HedigerM, KarchF, BaslerK (2007) An optimized transgenesis system for Drosophila using germ-line-specific phiC31 integrases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 3312–3317.

109. GlazovEA, PheasantM, McGrawEA, BejeranoG, MattickJS (2005) Ultraconserved elements in insect genomes: a highly conserved intronic sequence implicated in the control of homothorax mRNA splicing. Genome Res 15: 800–808.

110. BrenneckeJ, HipfnerDR, StarkA, RussellRB, CohenSM (2003) bantam encodes a developmentally regulated microRNA that controls cell proliferation and regulates the proapoptotic gene hid in Drosophila. Cell 113: 25–36.

Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicína

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Genetics


2013 Číslo 9
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Získaná hemofilie - Povědomí o nemoci a její diagnostika
nový kurz

Eozinofilní granulomatóza s polyangiitidou
Autori: doc. MUDr. Martina Doubková, Ph.D.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#