Public Access to Genome-Wide Data: Five Views on Balancing Research with Privacy and Protection

1. HomerN

SzelingerS

RedmanM

DugganD

TembeW

2008 Resolving individuals contributing trace amounts of DNA to highly complex mixtures using high-density SNP genotyping microarrays. PLoS Genet 4(8) e1000167 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000167

2. BraunR

RoweW

SchaeferC

ZhangJ

BuetowK

2009 Needles in the haystack: identifying individuals present in pooled genomic data. PLoS Genet 5(9) e1000668 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000668

3. VisscherPM

HillWG

2009 The limits of individual identification from sample allele frequencies: theory and statistical analysis. PLoS Genet 5(9) e1000628 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000628

4. Human Genome Project Information 2003 Policies on the release of human genomic sequence data: bermuda-quality sequence. Available: www.ornl.gov/hgmis/research/bermuda.html. Accessed 1 September 2009

5. House of Representatives 26 December 2007 H.R. 2764, SEC. 218.

6. LunshofJE

ChadwickR

VorhausDB

ChurchGM

2008 From genetic privacy to open consent. Nat Rev Genet 9(5) 406 411

7. Wellcome Trust Sanger Center Press Releases 14 April 2003 The finished human genome – Wellcome to the genomic age. Available: http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Info/Press/2003/030414.shtml. Accessed 1 September 2009

8. Wellcome Trust 2003 Sharing data from large-scale biological research projects: a system of tripartite responsibility. In: a meeting organized by the Wellcome Trust; 14–15 January 2003; Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States. Available: http://www.genome.gov/Pages/Research/WellcomeReport0303.pdf. Accessed 7 October 2008

9. KayeJ

HeeneyC

HawkinsN

de VriesJ

BoddingtonP

2009 Data sharing in genomics – re-shaping scientific practice. Nat Rev Genet 10(5) 331 335

10. KayeJ

2003 The regulation of direct-to-consumer genetic tests. Hum Mol Genet 17 R180 183

11. CouzinJ

2008 Genetic privacy: whole-genome data not anonymous, challenging assumptions. Science 321 1278

12. HuangL

LiY

SingletonAB

HardyJA

AbecasisG

2009 Genotype imputation accuracy across worldwide human populations. Am J Hum Genet 84 235 250

13. GitschierJ

2009 Inferential genotyping of Y chromosomes in latter-day saints founders and comparison to Utah samples in the HapMap project. Am J Hum Genet 84 251 258

14. NyholtDR

YuCE

VisscherPM

2008 On Jim Watson's APOE status: genetic information is hard to hide. Eur J Hum Genet 17 147 149

15. 6P

JuppB

2001 Divided by information? The “digital divide” that really matters and the implications of the new meritocracy London Demos

16. TorraV

Domingo-FerrerJ

TorresA

2003 Data mining for linking data coming from several sources. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Joint UN/ECE-Eurostat Work Session on Statistical Data Confidentiality, March 2003; Thessaloniki, Greece. Available: http://www.iiia.csic.es/~vtorra/publications/unrestricted/confUNECE.2003.143.150.pdf. Accessed 1 September 2009

17. GreenbaumD

DuJ

GersteinM

2008 Genomic anonymity: have we already lost it? Am J Bioeth 8 71 74

18. LowranceWW

CollinsFS

2007 Identifiability in genomic research. Science 317 600 602

19. TaylorP

2008 When consent gets in the way. Nature 456 32 33

20. SweeneyL

2001 Information explosion.

DoyleP

LaneJI

TheeuwesJM

ZayatzrLM

Confidentiality, Disclosure and Data Access: Theory and Practical Application for Statistical Agencies New York Elsevier Science 43 74

21. GillP

BrennerCH

BuckletonJS

CarracedoA

KrawczakM

2006 DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics (ISFG): recommendations on the interpretation of mixtures. Int J Legal Med 160 90 101

22. WeirBS

1995 DNA statistics in the Simpson matter. Nat Genet 11 365 368

23. GillP

Puch-SolisR

CurranJ

2009 The low-template-DNA (stochastic) threshold – its determination relative to risk analysis for national DNA databases. Forensic Sci Int Genet 3 104 111