#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Prescribing patterns of polypharmacy in Korean pediatric patients


Authors: Soo-Min Jeon aff001;  Susan Park aff001;  Sandy Jeong Rhie aff002;  Jin-Won Kwon aff001
Authors place of work: College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea aff001;  College of Pharmacy and Division of Life and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea aff002
Published in the journal: PLoS ONE 14(10)
Category: Research Article
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222781

Summary

Background

Several studies have examined the risk and health outcomes related to polypharmacy among the elderly. However, information regarding polypharmacy among pediatric patients is lacking.

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of polypharmacy and its related factors among the pediatric population of South Korea.

Methods

We used national claim data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service—Pediatric Patients Sample (HIRA-PPS) in Korea originating from 2012 through 2016. Polypharmacy was defined as a daily average of two or more drugs used yearly. Complex chronic conditions (CCCs) were examined to evaluate concomitant chronic diseases in pediatric patients. Age-specific contraindications and potential drug-drug interactions were assessed according to criteria established by the Korea Institute of Drug Safety & Risk Management (KIDS). Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were conducted to analyze the status of polypharmacy and its associated risk factors in pediatric patients.

Results

The 5-year prevalence of pediatric polypharmacy in pediatric patients was 3.7%. The prevalence of polypharmacy was much higher in younger pediatric patients: 9.5% for patients between the ages of 1–7 years, 0.9% for ages 6–11 years, and 1.1% for ages 12–19 years. Pediatric patients with CCCs, Medical Aid benefits, or a hospital admission history had a significantly higher prevalence of polypharmacy when compared to their counterparts without those conditions. The most commonly prescribed drugs were respiratory agents (29%) followed by anti-allergic drugs (18.7%), central nervous system agents (15.9%), antibiotics (10.1%), and gastrointestinal drugs (7.7%). There was a positive correlation between the daily average number of inappropriate prescriptions and the degree of polypharmacy, especially in pediatric patients between the ages of 1–7 years. Contraindications and potential drug-drug interactions occurred in 11.0% and 10.1% of patients exposed to polypharmacy, respectively.

Conclusions

One in ten pediatric patients under the age of 7 years was prescribed two or more concurrent drugs on average per day. Furthermore, pediatric patients exposed to polypharmacy showed an increased risk of inappropriate drug use. The implementation of a medication review system that considers pediatric patient polypharmacy exposure would reduce inappropriate drug use and prevent unwanted adverse outcomes.

Keywords:

Pediatrics – Hospitals – Drug therapy – Drug metabolism – antibiotics – Health insurance – Korea – Drug-drug interactions

Introduction

Polypharmacy is a common global phenomenon caused by increasing comorbidities [1, 2], and it increases the risk of inappropriate medicine use, drug-drug interactions, and adverse health outcomes [35]. Several polypharmacy studies have been conducted in many countries and most examine elderly populations [2]. Their results indicate that there is an association between polypharmacy and adverse health outcomes such as falls, hospitalization, and mortality [4, 5]. Concerns about polypharmacy in pediatric patients are on the rise [6] because of the increasing number of prescriptions used to treat chronic conditions in pediatric patients [79].

Very few studies are available regarding polypharmacy among pediatric patients, and they are limited to a single region (i.e. western countries) or a single drug class (i.e. antipsychotics) [10, 11]. Several studies have investigated polypharmacy exposure for a wide variety of medicines and their related outcomes based on population-level data [12, 13]. One study examining pediatric patients from 463 hospitals in the United States (U.S.) found that 10% of children less than one year of age received 11 medications on the first day of admission into a healthcare facility and were cumulatively exposed to 29 medications during 7 days of admission [12]. Another U.S. study by Feinstein et al. examining polypharmacy among outpatients reported that 35% of pediatric patients (N = 232,240) were exposed to more than two concurrent drugs for at least one day during the one-year observation period [13]. It also showed that the potential for drug-drug interactions increased as the number of drugs being prescribed increased [13]. However, there is a lack of information on pediatric polypharmacy for many drug classes in East Asia countries.

Polypharmacy is generally characterized as the use of multiple medications. However, accurately defining pediatric polypharmacy and quantify related exposures is challenging [14]. Some studies have defined polypharmacy based on the actual number of prescribed drugs [12, 13] while other studies have assessed polypharmacy using the average number of drugs prescribed [15, 16]. The method that uses the maximum number of concurrent drugs is sensitive when multiple drugs are used to treat acute illnesses; however, the method that uses an average number of drugs is useful for assessing long-term exposure to medicines used daily for the treatment of chronic conditions. As chronic diseases in pediatric patients increases, along with a tendency toward polypharmacy, the duration of drug exposure and the number of active ingredients in the drugs being prescribed should be carefully considered [17].

The objectives of this study were to investigate the prevalence of polypharmacy based on the daily average number of medications taken and to assess the risk factors associated with polypharmacy in pediatric patients in South Korea.

Materials and methods

Data source

We used the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service–Pediatric Patients Sample (HIRA-PPS) claim database using data originating from 2012 through 2016. South Korea has a universal health coverage system consisting of the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) and the Medical Aid Program, which covers approximately 97% and 3% of the Korean population, respectively. The HIRA manages and assesses claim data from NHIS and Medical Aid for 46 million patients (about 90% of the total population that visits medical institutions annually) that need to be reimbursed from approximately 80,000 health care centers per year. Data from 10% of all patients under the age of 20 were selected from the HIRA-PPS database using a random sampling of sex and age strata [18]. The HIRA-PPS also contains patient socio-demographic characteristics, medical treatment, prescription drug information, and disease diagnoses based on the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10). We included patients only between the ages of 1–19 years (n = 977,817 from 2012, n = 906,556 from 2013, n = 967,193 from 2014, n = 945,550 from 2015, and n = 928,025 from 2016).

This study was approved by the institutional review board of Kyungpook University in September of 2018 (IRB Number KNU2018-0141).

Drug identification and classification

Medications were matched to their active ingredients using their nine-digit Korea Drug Code listed by the HIRA, and drug classifications were matched according to the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) (MFDS Internal Rule No. 68; 15 May 2015) [19].

Polypharmacy

Polypharmacy was defined as an average of two or more active ingredients per patient per day during the one-year observation period. To evaluate long-term exposure to polypharmacy, the average number of active ingredients was calculated on a yearly basis from January 1 through December 31. In this calculation, each active ingredient in a single combination drug was counted.

Complex chronic conditions

Complex chronic conditions (CCCs) were used to evaluate concomitant chronic diseases in pediatric patients. CCCs were categorized into nine groups: cardiovascular, respiratory, neuromuscular, renal, gastrointestinal, hematologic or immunologic, metabolic, other congenital or genetic, and malignancy [20]. Additionally, we treated three prevalent chronic diseases that require long-term medication (asthma, psychiatric disease, and diabetes) in the same manner as CCCs.

Potential drug-drug interactions and age-related contraindicated drugs

Potential drug-drug interactions (PDDIs) and age-related contraindications were defined according to guidelines established by the Korea Institute of Drug Safety & Risk Management (KIDS) [2123]. PDDIs and age-related contraindications defined by KIDS featured 954 drug pairs and 160 active ingredients, respectively. For analysis of PDDIs, we evaluated the list of drugs prescribed on the same date and did not consider the prescription period. In the case of age-related contraindications, acetaminophen (sustained-release formulations), cetirizine, and levocetirizine, which were contraindicated due to their formulations rather than their ingredients, were excluded from the analysis.

Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to demonstrate the overall prevalence of polypharmacy according to individual characteristics originating between 2012 and 2016. The associations between the presence of polypharmacy and the variables considered in this study (age, sex, insurance type, hospital admission, CCC categories, and the three other chronic diseases previously mentioned) were statistically tested via logistic regression. In these analyses, the presence of polypharmacy was the dependent variable, and the previously mentioned considered variables were the independent variables. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals are presented using multivariable logistic regression models. To assess the association between polypharmacy and inappropriate drug use, we analyzed the prevalence of age-related contraindications and PDDIs in the presence of polypharmacy. We performed chi-square tests to determine whether there was a significant difference in the proportion of inappropriate prescriptions between the polypharmacy and non-polypharmacy groups. We also investigated commonly prescribed drug classes in the pediatric polypharmacy group. For this analysis, the numerator of the proportion represented the sum of prescription days for each active ingredient according to the drug classification system of the MFDS. The denominator represented the sum of prescription days for all active ingredients used. Then, the proportions between the polypharmacy and non-polypharmacy groups were compared.

Stratified analysis was performed using age groups (patients aged 1–7 years, 8–13 years, and 14–19 years) due to the heterogeneity of comorbidities and prescription patterns. All analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 statistical software (SAS Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Table 1 shows the prevalence of polypharmacy by year, demographics, and chronic conditions. In pediatric patients, the 5-year prevalence (2012–2016) of polypharmacy was 3.7%. The overall prevalence of polypharmacy decreased with age: it was 9.5% for patients between the ages of 1–7 years, 0.9% for patients between the ages of 8–13 years, and 1.1% for patients between the ages of 14–19 years. A higher prevalence of polypharmacy was observed in pediatric patients with CCCs compared to those without CCCs. Patients with CCCs involving neurologic and neuromuscular diseases showed the highest prevalence of polypharmacy. Pediatric patients with other chronic conditions or any hospital admission history also had a higher prevalence of polypharmacy when compared with those without such conditions or history of hospital admission.

Tab. 1. Prevalence of polypharmacy according to demographics and chronic conditions.
Prevalence of polypharmacy according to demographics and chronic conditions.

Multivariable logistic models showed that patients between the ages of 1–7 years have a seven times greater risk of polypharmacy than patients between the ages of 14–19 years after adjusting for chronic conditions and history of admission (OR = 7.14, 95% CI = 7.02–7.26). Also, pediatric patients with CCCs had a significantly increased risk of polypharmacy. The likelihood of polypharmacy due to chronic diseases was greater in patients between the ages of 8–19 years than in patients between the ages of 1–7 years. These patterns were prominent in patients with neurologic and neuromuscular CCCs and in patients with psychiatric disease. Pediatric patients with Medical Aid benefits (OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.40–1.49) or any admission history (OR = 2.68, 95% CI = 2.64–2.71) had a significantly higher risk of polypharmacy (Table 2).

Tab. 2. Odds ratios for polypharmacy according to demographics and chronic conditions: PPS 2012–2016.
Odds ratios for polypharmacy according to demographics and chronic conditions: PPS 2012–2016.

Fig 1 shows the association between PDDIs and age-related contradictions in the presence of polypharmacy. The prevalence of inappropriate prescriptions was significantly higher for all age groups within the polypharmacy group. Among the three age groups, patients between the ages of 1–7 years showed the highest prevalence of PDDIs and age-related contradictions. Among patients between the ages of 1–7 years with polypharmacy exposure, approximately 10.1% and 11.0% had PDDIs and age-related contradictions in their medication use, respectively. The three most frequent PDDIs involved domperidone and clarithromycin, domperidone and mequitazine, and domperidone and metoclopramide. The three most frequently prescribed drugs involved in age-related contradictions were mequitazine for patients younger than 24 months, loratadine for patients younger than 6 years, and thiocolchicoside/aescin for patients younger than 16 years.

The proportions of drug-age contraindications and drug-drug interactions by polypharmacy group: (a) age-related contradictions (b) potential drug-drug interactions; * indicates a p-value <0.001 for the chi-square test.
Fig. 1. The proportions of drug-age contraindications and drug-drug interactions by polypharmacy group: (a) age-related contradictions (b) potential drug-drug interactions; * indicates a p-value <0.001 for the chi-square test.

Table 3 shows the prescription dosage for each drug class in the polypharmacy group. Regardless of age, respiratory agents were the most frequently administered drugs (29%), followed by anti-allergic drugs (18.7%), central nervous system drugs (15.9%), antibiotics (10.1%), and gastrointestinal drugs (7.7%). However, the prescription pattern varied by age group. Among patients between the ages of 1–7 years with polypharmacy exposure, respiratory agents were most commonly prescribed (34.4%), followed by anti-allergic drugs (21.3%), and antibiotics (10.1%). Among patients between the ages of 8–19 years with polypharmacy exposure, the most frequently prescribed drug was a central nervous system drug that accounted for approximately half of all prescriptions (47.3% for ages 8–13 years and 49.0% for ages 14–19 years). Among central nervous system drug subclasses, antipsychotic drugs were prescribed most often (17.9% for ages 8–13 years and 22.5% for ages 14–19 years).

Tab. 3. Proportions of prescribed drugs by MDFA drug class among pediatric patients with polypharmacy.
Proportions of prescribed drugs by MDFA drug class among pediatric patients with polypharmacy.

We also analyzed the prevalence of polypharmacy based on different calculation methods. We calculated the proportion of patients with a maximum number of prescribed drugs (0, 1–4, 5–9, and ≥ 10) for at least one day during the one-year observation period in 2016. The proportion of each exposure level was 2.9%, 16.5%, 71.9%, and 8.7%, respectively. This indicates that 80.6% of pediatric patients were prescribed more than five drugs concurrently on at least one day during the 1 year follow-up period (92.5% for ages 1–7 years, 76.3% for ages 8–13 years, and 72.9% for ages 14–19 years) (S1 Table).

Discussion

There have been inconsistencies in the definition of polypharmacy. Some studies qualified polypharmacy using terms such as duplication, drug-drug interaction, and non-match between medication and diagnosis, which confer a clinical meaning regarding inappropriate medication. However, most studies examining polypharmacy use the text definition that is based on the number of medications prescribed [2, 24]. The most commonly referenced number was more than 5 drugs for adults [2, 24] and more than 2 drugs for children [14]. In addition, the method for measuring polypharmacy exposure that considers the number of concurrent drugs prescribed is not standardized. The measurement that uses the maximum number of concurrently prescribed drugs per day, which is the most frequently used method, can provide intuitive information on the number of drugs used concurrently, but it is difficult to quantify the duration of medication. For example, children who were prescribed two drugs for only one day for one year would be considered exposed to polypharmacy [13]. Meanwhile, the calculation that relies on the daily average number of drugs prescribed has the advantage of providing both the number of medications prescribed and their duration. In this study, polypharmacy was defined and quantified as two or more active ingredients prescribed per day based on the daily average number of medications prescribed each year. Also, this study focused on describing the long-term exposure of pediatric polypharmacy. Therefore, the daily average number of drugs prescribed was used to determine polypharmacy. This method is similar to the one described in the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on drug use indicators, stating that an average number of medications per prescription or patient greater than two is considered polypharmacy [25].

Our results show a higher prevalence of pediatric polypharmacy and age-related differences when compared to results from previous U.S. studies. Feinstein et al. graded pediatric polypharmacy exposure based on the maximum number of concurrent drugs prescribed (no medication, 0, 2–4, 5–9, and ≥10 drugs), and the proportion of each exposure level was 45.3%, 19.5%, 27.6%, 6.6%, and 1.0% of total samples, respectively [13]. However, our results were based on a daily average of ≥2 medications during the one-year observation period, making direct comparisons with previous results difficult. Thus, to compare the results, we estimated the proportions of patients with a maximum number of prescription drugs for at least one day during the one-year observation period (0, 1–4, 5–9, and ≥ 10) using the same method as Feinstein et al. In summary, the proportions of patients with a maximum number of concurrent drugs ≥5 were 80.6% in our results and 7.6% in the U.S. study's results. This indicates that pediatric polypharmacy exposure was more prevalent in South Korea than in the U.S. Despite the relatively high prevalence of polypharmacy, the prevalence of CCCs (5.1%) in South Korea was similar to that in the U.S. (5.9%) [12]. The rate of polypharmacy was higher in patients with CCCs or a hospital admission history than those without them, which was also in line with results from the previous U.S. study. However, age-related patterns of polypharmacy were different when compared to the previous U.S. study [12, 13]. Our results showed that polypharmacy prevalence was lower in patients between the ages of 14–19 years, whereas in the U.S. study, the prevalence was higher for the same age group [13].

Comparisons between nations regarding the prevalence of polypharmacy are difficult because health problems can vary between populations and comparable data is scarce. However, since the prevalence of chronic complex diseases was similar between Korea and the U.S., it is unlikely that differences in disease severity were associated with differences in the prevalence of polypharmacy. The greater utilization of healthcare in Korea might explain the relatively high polypharmacy prevalence and its different age-related patterns among pediatric patients. Korea reported the highest number of doctor visits per person (16.0 in 2015) among the 32 OECD countries (the average for OECD countries was 6.9 in 2015) [26]. In this context, the number of office visits per person was more than two times higher in patients between the ages of 1–4 years (27.4 per year) than in patients between the ages of 5–19 years (6.6–14.5 per year) in Korea [27]. However, among U.S. patients between the ages of 1–4 years (2.8 per year) and 5–14 years (2.0 per year), the values were nearly equivalent [28]. Thus, greater utilization of healthcare may have influenced the relatively high rates of polypharmacy, especially for younger children in Korea.

We found that the inappropriate prescription of drugs, including PDDIs and age-related contradictions, increased in pediatric patients with polypharmacy, which was consistent with previous studies [13, 29]. Moreover, the proportion of inappropriate drug prescriptions was notably highest in patients between the ages of 1–7 years among the three age groups. When considering the pharmacokinetic factors of pediatric patients, adverse drug reactions are greater in younger children. During the first decade of life, age-dependent changes in body composition and organ function are dynamic, and this leads to unpredictable pharmacokinetics [30]. For example, children have more body water than body fat when compared to adults, which affects the distribution of drugs. Drug metabolic enzymes such as cytochrome P-450(CYP) isoforms and a glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) isoform are diminished in children. Thus, drugs are eliminated more slowly from the body, and drug concentrations may be increased. In addition, the structure and function of the gastrointestinal tract and kidney display age-dependent changes, and they are immature in early life [31].

In our study, the combination of antiemetic agents and antibiotics was the most frequently listed PDDI among pediatric patients. The medication selection and direction of treatment are determined by the clinical condition of the patient. However, evaluations of antiemetic agents and antibiotics may be helpful in reducing the potential harm of polypharmacy. In fact, the misuse of antiemetic agents and antibiotics has been specifically mentioned with the development of adverse drug events in pediatric patients [3235]. In addition, we found that antipsychotic drugs were the major medication class prescribed to patients between the ages of 8–19 years with polypharmacy exposure. Previous studies have shown that the prevalence of psychotropic polypharmacy is substantial in pediatric patients [36, 37]. A study using the U.S. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (2004–2007) reported that 32.2% of patients visiting medical facilities for mental disorder treatment were prescribed more than 2 classes of psychotropic medications [37]. The risk of ADEs and PPDIs increased with the number of antipsychotic medications prescribed [11, 29, 38].

Our study has several limitations. First, our overall study group did not include approximately 10% of the entire South Korean population that did not visit a clinic or hospital. Therefore, our prevalence of polypharmacy is limited to prescriptions provided to pediatric patients who visit a medical institution at least once during the one-year observation period. Second, we relied exclusively on the claim database, including prescriptions issued by the medical institute. Under this condition, we could not assess the patients' compliance in taking the prescribed medication or the use of over the counter (OTC) medications. Thus, our polypharmacy prevalence results could be overestimated if patients did not take the medication even though they received the prescription. Also, our polypharmacy prevalence results could be underestimated if patients used additional OTC drugs. Third, we did not identify the appropriate indication for each medication. However, simply taking multiple medications at the same time could increase undesirable outcomes, including potential drug-drug interactions and prescription of contraindicated drugs [39, 40]. Lastly, a patient's disease state was defined using ICD-10 codes provided by the database, and there is a possibility of uncertainties in the diagnosis.

Conclusions

Our study showed that several pediatric patients were exposed to polypharmacy that could result in inappropriate drug use. Health professionals, including pharmacists, need to be aware of this phenomenon and take action to reduce the number of medications that patients take. To aid in this, further evidence should be gathered so that pediatric medication guidelines can be established for the treatment of acute and chronic diseases. Furthermore, a system should be established to provide professional services that reduce polypharmacy exposure and prevent further unwanted outcomes in pediatric patients.

Supporting information

S1 Table [pdf]
Prevalence of polypharmacy based on the maximum number of prescribed drugs for at least one day during the one-year observation period: PPS 2016.


Zdroje

1. Burt J, Elmore N, Campbell SM, Rodgers S, Avery AJ, Payne RA. Developing a measure of polypharmacy appropriateness in primary care: systematic review and expert consensus study. BMC Med. 2018;16(1):91-. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1078-7 29895310.

2. Masnoon N, Shakib S, Kalisch-Ellett L, Caughey GE. What is polypharmacy? A systematic review of definitions. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1):230-. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0621-2 29017448.

3. Maher RL, Hanlon J, Hajjar ER. Clinical consequences of polypharmacy in elderly. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014;13(1):57–65. Epub 2013/09/27. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2013.827660 24073682.

4. Frazier SC. Health outcomes and polypharmacy in elderly individuals: an integrated literature review. Journal of gerontological nursing. 2005;31(9):4–11. Epub 2005/09/30. doi: 10.3928/0098-9134-20050901-04 16190007.

5. Fried TR, O'Leary J, Towle V, Goldstein MK, Trentalange M, Martin DK. Health outcomes associated with polypharmacy in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(12):2261–72. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13153 25516023.

6. Morden NE, Goodman D. Pediatric polypharmacy: time to lock the medicine cabinet? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(1):91–2. Epub 2011/09/05. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.162 21893639.

7. Burns KH, Casey PH, Lyle RE, Bird TM, Fussell JJ, Robbins JM. Increasing prevalence of medically complex children in US hospitals. Pediatrics. 2010;126(4):638–46. Epub 2010/09/22. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1658 20855383.

8. Cox ER, Halloran DR, Homan SM, Welliver S, Mager DE. Trends in the prevalence of chronic medication use in children: 2002–2005. Pediatrics. 2008;122(5):e1053–61. Epub 2008/11/04. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-0214 18977954.

9. Gu Q, Dillon CF, Burt VL. Prescription drug use continues to increase: U.S. prescription drug data for 2007–2008. NCHS data brief. 2010;(42):1–8. Epub 2010/09/22. 20854747.

10. Díaz-Caneja CM, Espliego A, Parellada M, Arango C, Moreno C. Polypharmacy with antidepressants in children and adolescents. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014;17(7):1063–82. doi: 10.1017/S1461145712001265 23190624

11. Toteja N, Gallego JA, Saito E, Gerhard T, Winterstein A, Olfson M, et al. Prevalence and correlates of antipsychotic polypharmacy in children and adolescents receiving antipsychotic treatment. The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology. 2014;17(7):1095–105. Epub 2013/05/16. doi: 10.1017/S1461145712001320 23673334.

12. Feudtner C, Dai D, Hexem KR, Luan X, Metjian TA. Prevalence of polypharmacy exposure among hospitalized children in the United States. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(1):9–16. Epub 2011/09/07. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.161 21893637.

13. Feinstein JA, Feudtner C, Valuck RJ, Kempe A. The depth, duration, and degree of outpatient pediatric polypharmacy in Colorado fee-for-service Medicaid patients. Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety. 2015;24(10):1049–57. doi: 10.1002/pds.3843 26248529

14. Bakaki PM, Horace A, Dawson N, Winterstein A, Waldron J, Staley J, et al. Defining pediatric polypharmacy: A scoping review. PLOS ONE. 2018;13(11):e0208047. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208047 30496322

15. Lai SW, Lin CH, Liao KF, Su LT, Sung FC, Lin CC. Association between polypharmacy and dementia in older people: a population-based case-control study in Taiwan. Geriatrics & gerontology international. 2012;12(3):491–8. Epub 2012/01/12. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2011.00800.x 22233227.

16. Park HY, Park JW, Sohn HS, Kwon JW. Association of Parkinsonism or Parkinson Disease with Polypharmacy in the Year Preceding Diagnosis: A Nested Case-Control Study in South Korea. Drug safety. 2017;40(11):1109–18. Epub 2017/06/22. doi: 10.1007/s40264-017-0559-5 28634824.

17. Park HY, Ryu HN, Shim MK, Sohn HS, Kwon JW. Prescribed drugs and polypharmacy in healthcare service users in South Korea: an analysis based on National Health Insurance Claims data. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016;54(5):369–77. Epub 2016/03/24. doi: 10.5414/CP202484 27007996.

18. Kim L, Kim J-A, Kim S. A guide for the utilization of Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service National Patient Samples. Epidemiology and health. 2014;36:e2014008–e. doi: 10.4178/epih/e2014008 25078381.

19. MFDS. Regulation on Codes for Classification of Drugs and Other Products (MFDS Internal Rule No. 68) 2015. https://www.mfds.go.kr/eng/brd/m_18/view.do?seq=70098&srchFr=&srchTo=&srchWord=&srchTp=&itm_seq_1=0&itm_seq_2=0&multi_itm_seq=0&company_cd=&company_nm=&page=3.

20. Feudtner C, Feinstein JA, Zhong W, Hall M, Dai D. Pediatric complex chronic conditions classification system version 2: updated for ICD-10 and complex medical technology dependence and transplantation. BMC pediatrics. 2014;14:199-. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-199 25102958.

21. KIDS. The list of age-related contradictions 2016. https://www.drugsafe.or.kr/iwt/ds/ko/useinfo/EgovDurInfoSerAge.do.

22. KIDS. The list of contraindication of comedication 2016. https://www.drugsafe.or.kr/iwt/ds/ko/useinfo/EgovDurInfoSerJoin.do.

23. KIDS. Introduction of DUR 2016. https://www.drugsafe.or.kr/iwt/ds/en/useinfo/EgovIntroductionDur.do.

24. Bushardt RL, Massey EB, Simpson TW, Ariail JC, Simpson KN. Polypharmacy: Misleading, but manageable. Clinical Interventions in Aging. 2008;3(2):383–9. 18686760

25. Sharma S, Bowman C, Alladin-Karan B, Singh N. Antibiotic prescribing patterns in the pediatric emergency department at Georgetown Public Hospital Corporation: a retrospective chart review. BMC infectious diseases. 2016;16(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1512-4 27094391

26. OECD. Health at a Glance 2017: OECD indicators. OECD, 2017.

27. Tchoe B, Nam S-H. Aging risk and health care expenditure in Korea. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010;7(8):3235–54. Epub 2010/08/20. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7083235 20948958.

28. Rui P, Okeyode T. National ambulatory medical care survey: 2016 National Summary Tables. 2016.

29. Hilt RJ, Chaudhari M, Bell JF, Wolf C, Koprowicz K, King BH. Side effects from use of one or more psychiatric medications in a population-based sample of children and adolescents. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2014;24(2):83–9. Epub 2014/02/11. doi: 10.1089/cap.2013.0036 24506790.

30. Kearns Gregory L. A-R SM, Alander Sarah W. B DL, Leeder J. Steven K RE. Developmental Pharmacology-Drug Diposition, Action, and Therapy in Infants and Children. The new england journal of medicine. 2003;349:1157–67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra035092 13679531

31. Bourgeois FT, Shannon MW, Valim C, Mandl KD. Adverse drug events in the outpatient setting: an 11-year national analysis. Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety. 2010;19(9):901–10. Epub 2010/07/14. doi: 10.1002/pds.1984 20623513.

32. Guarino A A F, Ashkenazi S, Gendrel D, Hoekstra JH, Shamir R, Szajewska H ESPGHAN/ESPID Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Management of Acute Gastroenteritis in Children in Europe Expert Working Group. European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition/European Society for Paediatric Infectious Diseases evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute gastroenteritis in children in Europe: executive summary. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. 2008;46(5):619–21. 18493225

33. Nazarian L.F., Berman J.H., Brown G., Margolis P. Practice parameter: The management of acute gastroenteritis in young children American Academy of Pediatrics. 1996;97:424–35. 8604285

34. Principi N, Esposito S. Antimicrobial stewardship in paediatrics. BMC infectious diseases. 2016;16(1):424. Epub 2016/08/20. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1772-z 27538503.

35. Tamma PD, Avdic E, Li DX, Dzintars K, Cosgrove SE. Association of Adverse Events With Antibiotic Use in Hospitalized PatientsAdverse Events and Antibiotic Use in Hospitalized PatientsAdverse Events and Antibiotic Use in Hospitalized Patients. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2017;177(9):1308–15. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1938 28604925

36. Comer Jonathan S., Olfson Mark, Mojtabai R. National Trends in Child and Adolescent Psychotropic Polypharmacy in Office-Based Practice, 1996–2007. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolscent Psychiatry 2010;49. Epub 2010. Sep. 1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.07.007 20855045

37. Comer Jonathan S. O M, Mojtabai Ramin. National Trends in Child and Adolescent Psychotropic Polypharmacy in Office-Based Practice, 1996–2007. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2010;49(10):1001–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.07.007 20855045

38. Diaz-Caneja CM, Espliego A, Parellada M, Arango C, Moreno C. Polypharmacy with antidepressants in children and adolescents. The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology. 2014;17(7):1063–82. Epub 2012/11/30. doi: 10.1017/S1461145712001265 23190624.

39. Juurlink David N., Mamdani Muhammad, Kopp Alexander, Laupacis Andreas, Redelmeier Donald A. Drug-Drug Interactions Among Elderly Patients Hospitalized for Drug Toxicity. Jama. 2003;289:1652–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.13.1652 12672733

40. Doan J, Zakrzewski-Jakubiak H, Roy J, Turgeon J, Tannenbaum C. Prevalence and risk of potential cytochrome P450-mediated drug-drug interactions in older hospitalized patients with polypharmacy. Ann Pharmacother. 2013;47(3):324–32. Epub 2013/03/14. doi: 10.1345/aph.1R621 23482734.


Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 10
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Získaná hemofilie - Povědomí o nemoci a její diagnostika
nový kurz

Eozinofilní granulomatóza s polyangiitidou
Autori: doc. MUDr. Martina Doubková, Ph.D.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#