Electrical impedance myography for the detection of muscle inflammation induced by λ-carrageenan

Autoři: Marie Mortreux aff001;  Carson Semple aff001;  Daniela Riveros aff001;  Janice A. Nagy aff001;  Seward B. Rutkove aff001
Působiště autorů: Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America aff001
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(10)
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223265


Electrical impedance myography (EIM) is a technique for the assessment of muscle health and composition and has been shown to be sensitive to a variety of muscle pathologies including neurogenic atrophy and connective tissue deposition. However, it has been minimally studied in pure inflammation. In this study, we sought to assess EIM sensitivity to experimental inflammation induced by the localized intramuscular injection of λ-carrageenan. A total of 91 mice underwent 1–1000 kHz EIM measurements of gastrocnemius using a needle array, followed by injection of either 0.3% λ-carrageenan in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or PBS alone. Animals were then remeasured with EIM at 4, 24, 48, or 72 hours and euthanized and quantitative assessment of muscle histology was performed. Parallel alterations in both 5 and 50 kHz EIM values were identified at 4 and 24 hours, including reductions in phase, reactance, and resistance. In PBS-treated animals these values normalized by 48 hours, whereas substantial reductions in phase and reactance in 5 kHz EIM values persisted at 48 and 72 hours (i.e., values of phase 72 hours post-injection were 6.51 ± 0.40 degrees for λ-carrageenan versus 8.44 ± 0.35 degrees for PBS p<0.001, n = 11 per group). The degree of basophilic area observed in muscle sections by histology correlated to the degree of phase change at these two time points (Rspearman = -0.51, p = 0.0029). Changes in low frequency EIM parameters are sensitive to the presence of inflammatory infiltrates, and have the potential of serving as a simple means of quantifying the presence and extent of muscle inflammation without the need for biopsy.

Klíčová slova:

Cell staining – Euthanasia – Histology – Inflammation – Inflammatory diseases – Electrical impedance – Intramuscular injections


1. Kuo GP, Carrino J a. Skeletal muscle imaging and inflammatory myopathies. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2007;19: 530–5. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e3282efdc66 17917531

2. Gdynia HJ, Muller HP, Ludolph AC, Koninger H, Huber R. Quantitative muscle ultrasound in neuromuscular disorders using the parameters “intensity”, “entropy”, and “fractal dimension.” Eur J Neurol. 2009/06/03. 2009;16: 1151–1158. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02663.x 19486136

3. Tanaka ahigeru, Ikeda K, Uchiyama K, Iwamoto T, Sanayama Y, Okubo A, et al. [18F]Fdg uptake in proximal muscles assessed by pet/ct reflects both global and local muscular inflammation and provides useful information in the management of patients with polymyositis/ dermatomyositis. Rheumatol (United Kingdom). 2013;52: 1271–1278. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket112 23479721

4. Auerbach A, Julie CFS, Wang G, Rushing EJ. Focal myositis a clinicopathologic study of 115 cases of an intramuscular mass-like reactive process. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33: 1016–1024. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31819e63fe 19363438

5. Grimnes S, Martinsen OG. Bioimpedance and Bioelectricity Basics. 3rd ed. Academic Press; 2014.

6. Sanchez B, Rutkove SB. Present Uses, Future Applications, and Technical Underpinnings of Electrical Impedance Myography. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2017;17. doi: 10.1007/s11910-017-0793-3 28933017

7. Rutkove SB, Kapur K, Zaidman CM, Wu JS, Pasternak A, Madabusi L, et al. Electrical impedance myography for assessment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Ann Neurol. 2017;81: 622–632. doi: 10.1002/ana.24874 28076894

8. Shefner JM, Rutkove SB, Caress JB, Benatar M, David WS, Cartwright MC, et al. Assessing ALS progression with a dedicated electrical impedance myography system. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2018;(in press).

9. Tarulli A, Esper GJ, Lee KS, Aaron R, Shiffman CA, Rutkove SB. Electrical impedance myography in the bedside assessment of inflammatory myopathy. Neurology. 2005;65. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000172338.95064.cb 16087913

10. Pinniger GJ, Lavin T, Bakker AJ. Skeletal muscle weakness caused by carrageenan-induced inflammation. Muscle and Nerve. 2012;46: 413–420. doi: 10.1002/mus.23318 22907233

11. Diehl B, Hoheisel U, Mense S. Histological and neurophysiological changes induced by carrageenan in skeletal muscle of cat and rat. Agents Actions. 1988;25: 210–213. doi: 10.1007/bf01965013 3218593

12. Radhakrishnan R, Bement MKH, Skyba D, Sluka KA, Kehl LJ. Models of Muscle Pain: Carrageenan Model and Acidic Saline Model. Current Protocols in Pharmacology. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2004. doi: 10.1002/0471141755.ph0535s25 22294122

13. Gautam M, Benson CJ, Sluka KA. Increased response of muscle sensory neurons to decreases in pH after muscle inflammation. Neuroscience. 2010;170: 893–900. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.08.003 20691768

14. Walder RY, Rasmussen LA, Rainier JD, Light AR, Wemmie JA, Sluka KA. ASIC1 and ASIC3 play different roles in the development of Hyperalgesia after inflammatory muscle injury. J Pain. 2010;11: 210–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.07.004 20015700

15. Wang LL, Spieker AJ, Li J, Rutkove SB. Electrical impedance myography for monitoring motor neuron loss in the SOD1 G93A amyotrophic lateral sclerosis rat. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011;122: 2505–2511. S1388-2457(11)00279-3 [pii] doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.04.021 21612980

16. Li J, Staats WL, Spieker A, Sung M, Rutkove SB. A Technique for Performing Electrical Impedance Myography in the Mouse Hind Limb: Data in Normal and ALS SOD1 G93A Animals. PLoS One. 2012;7: 1–7. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045004 23028733

Článok vyšiel v časopise


2019 Číslo 10