-
Články
- Časopisy
- Kurzy
- Témy
- Kongresy
- Videa
- Podcasty
Accurate and Robust Genomic Prediction of Celiac Disease Using Statistical Learning
Practical application of genomic-based risk stratification to clinical diagnosis is appealing yet performance varies widely depending on the disease and genomic risk score (GRS) method. Celiac disease (CD), a common immune-mediated illness, is strongly genetically determined and requires specific HLA haplotypes. HLA testing can exclude diagnosis but has low specificity, providing little information suitable for clinical risk stratification. Using six European cohorts, we provide a proof-of-concept that statistical learning approaches which simultaneously model all SNPs can generate robust and highly accurate predictive models of CD based on genome-wide SNP profiles. The high predictive capacity replicated both in cross-validation within each cohort (AUC of 0.87–0.89) and in independent replication across cohorts (AUC of 0.86–0.9), despite differences in ethnicity. The models explained 30–35% of disease variance and up to ∼43% of heritability. The GRS's utility was assessed in different clinically relevant settings. Comparable to HLA typing, the GRS can be used to identify individuals without CD with ≥99.6% negative predictive value however, unlike HLA typing, fine-scale stratification of individuals into categories of higher-risk for CD can identify those that would benefit from more invasive and costly definitive testing. The GRS is flexible and its performance can be adapted to the clinical situation by adjusting the threshold cut-off. Despite explaining a minority of disease heritability, our findings indicate a genomic risk score provides clinically relevant information to improve upon current diagnostic pathways for CD and support further studies evaluating the clinical utility of this approach in CD and other complex diseases.
Vyšlo v časopise: Accurate and Robust Genomic Prediction of Celiac Disease Using Statistical Learning. PLoS Genet 10(2): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004137
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004137Souhrn
Practical application of genomic-based risk stratification to clinical diagnosis is appealing yet performance varies widely depending on the disease and genomic risk score (GRS) method. Celiac disease (CD), a common immune-mediated illness, is strongly genetically determined and requires specific HLA haplotypes. HLA testing can exclude diagnosis but has low specificity, providing little information suitable for clinical risk stratification. Using six European cohorts, we provide a proof-of-concept that statistical learning approaches which simultaneously model all SNPs can generate robust and highly accurate predictive models of CD based on genome-wide SNP profiles. The high predictive capacity replicated both in cross-validation within each cohort (AUC of 0.87–0.89) and in independent replication across cohorts (AUC of 0.86–0.9), despite differences in ethnicity. The models explained 30–35% of disease variance and up to ∼43% of heritability. The GRS's utility was assessed in different clinically relevant settings. Comparable to HLA typing, the GRS can be used to identify individuals without CD with ≥99.6% negative predictive value however, unlike HLA typing, fine-scale stratification of individuals into categories of higher-risk for CD can identify those that would benefit from more invasive and costly definitive testing. The GRS is flexible and its performance can be adapted to the clinical situation by adjusting the threshold cut-off. Despite explaining a minority of disease heritability, our findings indicate a genomic risk score provides clinically relevant information to improve upon current diagnostic pathways for CD and support further studies evaluating the clinical utility of this approach in CD and other complex diseases.
Zdroje
1. AndersonRP (2011) Coeliac disease is on the rise. Med J Aust 194 : 278–279.
2. GreenPH, CellierC (2007) Celiac disease. N Engl J Med 357 : 1731–1743.
3. CatassiC, KryszakD, Louis-JacquesO, DuerksenDR, HillI, et al. (2007) Detection of Celiac disease in primary care: a multicenter case-finding study in North America. Am J Gastroenterol 102 : 1454–1460.
4. DubeC, RostomA, SyR, CranneyA, SaloojeeN, et al. (2005) The prevalence of celiac disease in average-risk and at-risk Western European populations: a systematic review. Gastroenterology 128: S57–67.
5. AndersonRP, HenryMJ, TaylorR, DuncanEL, DanoyP, et al. (2013) A novel serogenetic approach determines the community prevalence of celiac disease and informs improved diagnostic pathways. BMC Med 11 : 188.
6. ThompsonT (2005) National Institutes of Health consensus statement on celiac disease. J Am Diet Assoc 105 : 194–195.
7. HusbyS, KoletzkoS, Korponay-SzaboIR, MearinML, PhillipsA, et al. (2012) European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition guidelines for the diagnosis of coeliac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 54 : 136–160.
8. Walker-SmithJ, GuandaliniS, SchmitzJ, ShmerlingD, VisakorpiJ (1990) Revised criteria for diagnosis of coeliac disease. Report of Working Group of European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. Archives of Disease in Childhood 65 : 909–911.
9. HillID (2005) What are the sensitivity and specificity of serologic tests for celiac disease? Do sensitivity and specificity vary in different populations? Gastroenterology 128: S25–32.
10. HillPG, ForsythJM, SemeraroD, HolmesGK (2004) IgA antibodies to human tissue transglutaminase: audit of routine practice confirms high diagnostic accuracy. Scand J Gastroenterol 39 : 1078–1082.
11. ChinMW, MallonDF, CullenDJ, OlynykJK, MollisonLC, et al. (2009) Screening for coeliac disease using anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody assays, and prevalence of the disease in an Australian community. Med J Aust 190 : 429–432.
12. LefflerDA, SchuppanD (2010) Update on serologic testing in celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol 105 : 2520–2524.
13. KarellK, LoukaAS, MoodieSJ, AscherH, ClotF, et al. (2003) HLA types in celiac disease patients not carrying the DQA1*05-DQB1*02 (DQ2) heterodimer: results from the european genetics cluster on celiac disease. Human Immunology 64 : 469–477.
14. HendersonKN, Tye-DinJA, ReidHH, ChenZ, BorgNA, et al. (2007) A structural and immunological basis for the role of human leukocyte antigen DQ8 in celiac disease. Immunity 27 : 23–34.
15. KarellK, LoukaAS, MoodieSJ, AscherH, ClotF, et al. (2003) HLA types in celiac disease patients not carrying the DQA1*05-DQB1*02 (DQ2) heterodimer: results from the European Genetics Cluster on Celiac Disease. Human Immunology 64 : 469–477.
16. LundinKE, ScottH, FausaO, ThorsbyE, SollidLM (1994) T cells from the small intestinal mucosa of a DR4, DQ7/DR4, DQ8 celiac disease patient preferentially recognize gliadin when presented by DQ8. Human Immunology 41 : 285–291.
17. LundinKE, ScottH, HansenT, PaulsenG, HalstensenTS, et al. (1993) Gliadin-specific, HLA-DQ(alpha 1*0501,beta 1*0201) restricted T cells isolated from the small intestinal mucosa of celiac disease patients. Journal of Experimental Medicine 178 : 187–196.
18. Tye-DinJA, StewartJA, DromeyJA, BeissbarthT, van HeelDA, et al. (2010) Comprehensive, quantitative mapping of T cell epitopes in gluten in celiac disease. Sci Transl Med 2 : 41ra51.
19. MegiorniF, MoraB, BonamicoM, BarbatoM, NennaR, et al. (2009) HLA-DQ and risk gradient for celiac disease. Human immunology 70 : 55–59.
20. SollidLM, LieBA (2005) Celiac disease genetics: current concepts and practical applications. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3 : 843–851.
21. RomanosJ, RosenA, KumarV, TrynkaG, FrankeL, et al. (2013) Improving coeliac disease risk prediction by testing non-HLA variants additional to HLA variants. Gut [Epub ahead of print].
22. RomanosJ, van DiemenCC, NolteIM, TrynkaG, ZhernakovaA, et al. (2009) Analysis of HLA and non-HLA alleles can identify individuals at high risk for celiac disease. Gastroenterology 137 : 834–840, 840.e831–833.
23. van HeelDA, FrankeL, HuntKA, GwilliamR, ZhernakovaA, et al. (2007) A genome-wide association study for celiac disease identifies risk variants in the region harboring IL2 and IL21. Nature Genetics 39 : 827–829.
24. DuboisPCA, TrynkaG, FrankeL, HuntKa, RomanosJ, et al. (2010) Multiple common variants for celiac disease influencing immune gene expression. Nature Genetics 42 : 295–302.
25. IzzoV, PinelliM, TintoN, EspositoMV, ColaA, et al. (2011) Improving the estimation of celiac disease sibling risk by non-HLA genes. PloS ONE 6: e26920.
26. AbrahamG, KowalczykA, ZobelJ, InouyeM (2012) SparSNP: Fast and memory-efficient analysis of all SNPs for phenotype prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 13 : 88.
27. EvansD, VisscherP, WrayN (2009) Harnessing the information contained within genome-wide association studies to improve individual prediction of complex disease risk. Human Molecular Genetics 18 : 3525–3531.
28. YangJ, LeeSH, GoddardME, VisscherPM (2011) GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. American Journal of Human Genetics 88 : 76–82.
29. LeeSH, WrayNR, GoddardME, VisscherPM (2011) Estimating missing heritability for disease from genome-wide association studies. American Journal of Human Genetics 88 : 294–305.
30. AbrahamG, KowalczykA, ZobelJ, InouyeM (2013) Performance and robustness of penalized and unpenalized methods for genetic prediction of complex human disease. Genetic Epidemiology 37 : 184–195.
31. WeiZ, WangW, BradfieldJ, LiJ, CardinaleC, et al. (2013) Large Sample Size, Wide Variant Spectrum, and Advanced Machine-Learning Technique Boost Risk Prediction for Inflammatory Bowel Disease. The American Journal of Human Genetics 92 : 1008–1012.
32. WrayNR, YangJ, GoddardME, VisscherPM (2010) The genetic interpretation of area under the ROC curve in genomic profiling. PLoS Genetics 6: e1000864.
33. VarmaS, SimonR (2006) Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection. BMC Bioinformatics 7 : 91.
34. WoodIa, VisscherPM, MengersenKL (2007) Classification based upon gene expression data: bias and precision of error rates. Bioinformatics 23 : 1363–1370.
35. ZhengX, ShenJ, CoxC, WakefieldJC, EhmMG, et al. (2013) HIBAG – HLA Genotype Imputation with Attribute Bagging. Pharmacogenomics Journal [Epub ahead of print].
36. MonsuurAJ, de BakkerPI, ZhernakovaA, PintoD, VerduijnW, et al. (2008) Effective detection of human leukocyte antigen risk alleles in celiac disease using tag single nucleotide polymorphisms. PLoS ONE 3: e2270.
37. The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (2007) Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature 447 : 661–678.
38. CotsapasC, VoightBF, RossinE, LageK, NealeBM, et al. (2011) Pervasive sharing of genetic effects in autoimmune disease. PLoS Genetics 7: e1002254.
39. SmythDJ, PlagnolV, WalkerNM, CooperJD, DownesK, et al. (2008) Shared and distinct genetic variants in type 1 diabetes and celiac disease. The New England Journal of Medicine 359 : 2767–2777.
40. AltmanDG, BlandJM (1994) Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values. BMJ 309 : 102.
41. Rubio-TapiaA, Van DykeCT, LahrBD, ZinsmeisterAR, El-YoussefM, et al. (2008) Predictors of family risk for celiac disease: a population-based study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6 : 983–987.
42. BourgeyM, CalcagnoG, TintoN, GennarelliD, Margaritte-JeanninP, et al. (2007) HLA related genetic risk for coeliac disease. Gut 56 : 1054–1059.
43. VoltaU, TovoliF, CaioG (2011) Clinical and immunological features of celiac disease in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 5 : 479–487.
44. HinH, BirdG, FisherP, MahyN, JewellD (1999) Coeliac disease in primary care: case finding study. BMJ 318 : 164–167.
45. HarrellFEJ (2001) Regression Modeling Strategies: Springer.
46. NaiyerAJ, HernandezL, CiaccioEJ, PapadakisK, ManavalanJS, et al. (2009) Comparison of commercially available serologic kits for the detection of celiac disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 43 : 225–232.
47. ReevesGE, SquanceML, DugganAE, MurugasuRR, WilsonRJ, et al. (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of coeliac serological tests: a prospective study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 18 : 493–501.
48. LewisNR, ScottBB (2006) Systematic review: the use of serology to exclude or diagnose coeliac disease (a comparison of the endomysial and tissue transglutaminase antibody tests). Aliment Pharmacol Ther 24 : 47–54.
49. WongRC, SteeleRH, ReevesGE, WilsonRJ, PinkA, et al. (2003) Antibody and genetic testing in coeliac disease.[see comment]. Pathology 35 : 285–304.
50. SimellS, HoppuS, HekkalaA, SimellT, StahlbergMR, et al. (2007) Fate of five celiac disease-associated antibodies during normal diet in genetically at-risk children observed from birth in a natural history study. Am J Gastroenterol 102 : 2026–2035.
51. SimellS, KupilaA, HoppuS, HekkalaA, SimellT, et al. (2005) Natural history of transglutaminase autoantibodies and mucosal changes in children carrying HLA-conferred celiac disease susceptibility. Scand J Gastroenterol 40 : 1182–1191.
52. WalkerMM, MurrayJA, RonkainenJ, AroP, StorskrubbT, et al. (2010) Detection of celiac disease and lymphocytic enteropathy by parallel serology and histopathology in a population-based study. Gastroenterology 139 : 112–119.
53. BiagiF, KlersyC, BalduzziD, CorazzaGR (2010) Are we not over-estimating the prevalence of coeliac disease in the general population? Ann Med 42 : 557–561.
54. MakiM, MustalahtiK, KokkonenJ, KulmalaP, HaapalahtiM, et al. (2003) Prevalence of Celiac disease among children in Finland. New England Journal of Medicine 348 : 2517–2524.
55. KurppaK, AshornM, IltanenS, KoskinenLL, SaavalainenP, et al. (2010) Celiac disease without villous atrophy in children: a prospective study. J Pediatr 157 : 373–380, 380 e371.
56. KurppaK, CollinP, ViljamaaM, HaimilaK, SaavalainenP, et al. (2009) Diagnosing mild enteropathy celiac disease: a randomized, controlled clinical study. Gastroenterology 136 : 816–823.
57. HopperAD, HadjivassiliouM, HurlstoneDP, LoboAJ, McAlindonME, et al. (2008) What is the role of serologic testing in celiac disease? A prospective, biopsy-confirmed study with economic analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6 : 314–320.
58. HopperAD, CrossSS, HurlstoneDP, McAlindonME, LoboAJ, et al. (2007) Pre-endoscopy serological testing for coeliac disease: evaluation of a clinical decision tool. BMJ 334 : 729.
59. NPD Group (January 2013) Dieting monitor: Eating Patterns in America. NPD Group.
60. JonesHJ, WarnerJT (2010) NICE clinical guideline 86. Coeliac disease: recognition and assessment of coeliac disease. Arch Dis Child 95 : 312–313.
61. Rubio-TapiaA, HillID, KellyCP, CalderwoodAH, MurrayJA (2013) ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol 108 : 656–676; quiz 677.
62. RostomA, MurrayJA, KagnoffMF (2006) American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute technical review on the diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Gastroenterology 131 : 1981–2002.
63. DoolanA, DonaghueK, FairchildJ, WongM, WilliamsAJ (2005) Use of HLA typing in diagnosing celiac disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 28 : 806–809.
64. Matysiak-BudnikT, MalamutG, de SerreNP, GrosdidierE, SeguierS, et al. (2007) Long-term follow-up of 61 coeliac patients diagnosed in childhood: evolution toward latency is possible on a normal diet. Gut 56 : 1379–1386.
65. HadithiM, von BlombergBM, CrusiusJB, BloemenaE, KostensePJ, et al. (2007) Accuracy of serologic tests and HLA-DQ typing for diagnosing celiac disease. Ann Intern Med 147 : 294–302.
66. TrynkaG, HuntKa, BockettNa, RomanosJ, MistryV, et al. (2011) Dense genotyping identifies and localizes multiple common and rare variant association signals in celiac disease. Nature Genetics 43 : 1193–1201.
67. PattersonN, PriceAL, ReichD (2006) Population structure and eigenanalysis. PLoS Genet 2: e190.
68. ZhouX, CarbonettoP, StephensM (2013) Polygenic Modeling with Bayesian Sparse Linear Mixed Models. PLoS Genetics 9: e1003264.
69. R Core Team (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
70. Wickham H (2009) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer.
71. HanleyAJ, McNeilBJ (1982) The Meaning and Use of the Area under A Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve. Radiology 143 : 29–36.
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicína
Článek Natural Polymorphisms in Influence Negative Selection and CD4∶CD8 Lineage Commitment in the RatČlánek MicroRNAs Located in the Hox Gene Clusters Are Implicated in Huntington's Disease PathogenesisČlánek Comparative RNAi Screens in and Reveal the Impact of Developmental System Drift on Gene FunctionČlánek Mutation of SLC35D3 Causes Metabolic Syndrome by Impairing Dopamine Signaling in Striatal D1 Neurons
Článok vyšiel v časopisePLOS Genetics
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
2014 Číslo 2- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
-
Všetky články tohto čísla
- Fifteen Years Later: Hard and Soft Selection Sweeps Confirm a Large Population Number for HIV In Vivo
- The Same but Different: Worms Reveal the Pervasiveness of Developmental System Drift
- Serine Carboxypeptidase SCPEP1 and Cathepsin A Play Complementary Roles in Regulation of Vasoconstriction via Inactivation of Endothelin-1
- Coherent Functional Modules Improve Transcription Factor Target Identification, Cooperativity Prediction, and Disease Association
- A Long-Chain Flavodoxin Protects from Oxidative Stress and Host Bacterial Clearance
- Mammalian E-type Cyclins Control Chromosome Pairing, Telomere Stability and CDK2 Localization in Male Meiosis
- Influenza Virus Drug Resistance: A Time-Sampled Population Genetics Perspective
- Transcriptome-Wide Analyses of 5′-Ends in RNase J Mutants of a Gram-Positive Pathogen Reveal a Role in RNA Maturation, Regulation and Degradation
- Selective Disruption of Aurora C Kinase Reveals Distinct Functions from Aurora B Kinase during Meiosis in Mouse Oocytes
- X Chromosome Control of Meiotic Chromosome Synapsis in Mouse Inter-Subspecific Hybrids
- A Cohesin-Independent Role for NIPBL at Promoters Provides Insights in CdLS
- Extreme Population Differences in the Human Zinc Transporter ZIP4 (SLC39A4) Are Explained by Positive Selection in Sub-Saharan Africa
- Classic Selective Sweeps Revealed by Massive Sequencing in Cattle
- Genomic Networks of Hybrid Sterility
- Natural Polymorphisms in Influence Negative Selection and CD4∶CD8 Lineage Commitment in the Rat
- Oxidative Stress Is Not a Major Contributor to Somatic Mitochondrial DNA Mutations
- Molecular Identification of Collagen 17a1 as a Major Genetic Modifier of Laminin Gamma 2 Mutation-Induced Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa in Mice
- Uncoupling of Molecular Maturation from Peripheral Target Innervation in Nociceptors Expressing a Chimeric TrkA/TrkC Receptor
- MicroRNAs Located in the Hox Gene Clusters Are Implicated in Huntington's Disease Pathogenesis
- Loss of Trabid, a New Negative Regulator of the Immune-Deficiency Pathway at the Level of TAK1, Reduces Life Span
- Targeted Ablation of Nesprin 1 and Nesprin 2 from Murine Myocardium Results in Cardiomyopathy, Altered Nuclear Morphology and Inhibition of the Biomechanical Gene Response
- Identification of Novel Genetic Loci Associated with Thyroid Peroxidase Antibodies and Clinical Thyroid Disease
- CEP-1, the p53 Homolog, Mediates Opposing Longevity Outcomes in Mitochondrial Electron Transport Chain Mutants
- Transcriptomics and Functional Genomics of ROS-Induced Cell Death Regulation by
- Quantitative Genome-Wide Genetic Interaction Screens Reveal Global Epistatic Relationships of Protein Complexes in
- Cascades of Genetic Instability Resulting from Compromised Break-Induced Replication
- Serine- and Threonine/Valine-Dependent Activation of PDK and Tor Orthologs Converge on Sch9 to Promote Aging
- Zfp322a Regulates Mouse ES Cell Pluripotency and Enhances Reprogramming Efficiency
- Insertional Mutagenesis and Deep Profiling Reveals Gene Hierarchies and a -Dependent Bottleneck in Lymphomagenesis
- DAAM Is Required for Thin Filament Formation and Sarcomerogenesis during Muscle Development in Drosophila
- Plasma Cholesterol–Induced Lesion Networks Activated before Regression of Early, Mature, and Advanced Atherosclerosis
- High-Resolution Profiling of Stationary-Phase Survival Reveals Yeast Longevity Factors and Their Genetic Interactions
- Comparative RNAi Screens in and Reveal the Impact of Developmental System Drift on Gene Function
- Accurate and Robust Genomic Prediction of Celiac Disease Using Statistical Learning
- Sex-Specific Embryonic Gene Expression in Species with Newly Evolved Sex Chromosomes
- Chromosome X-Wide Association Study Identifies Loci for Fasting Insulin and Height and Evidence for Incomplete Dosage Compensation
- Negative Feedback and Transcriptional Overshooting in a Regulatory Network for Horizontal Gene Transfer
- DNA Sequence Explains Seemingly Disordered Methylation Levels in Partially Methylated Domains of Mammalian Genomes
- Insights into the Genomic Landscape: Comparative Genomics Reveals Variations in Ploidy and Nutrient Utilisation Potential amongst Wine Isolates
- Molecular Evidence for the Inverse Comorbidity between Central Nervous System Disorders and Cancers Detected by Transcriptomic Meta-analyses
- The Centriolar Satellite Protein AZI1 Interacts with BBS4 and Regulates Ciliary Trafficking of the BBSome
- Fine-Mapping the Region Detects Common Variants Tagging a Rare Coding Allele: Evidence for Synthetic Association in Prostate Cancer
- Transmission Distortion Affecting Human Noncrossover but Not Crossover Recombination: A Hidden Source of Meiotic Drive
- A Variant in the Neuropeptide Receptor is a Major Determinant of Growth and Physiology
- Mutation of SLC35D3 Causes Metabolic Syndrome by Impairing Dopamine Signaling in Striatal D1 Neurons
- NSUN4 Is a Dual Function Mitochondrial Protein Required for Both Methylation of 12S rRNA and Coordination of Mitoribosomal Assembly
- MicroRNA-133 Inhibits Behavioral Aggregation by Controlling Dopamine Synthesis in Locusts
- Convergence of Light and ABA Signaling on the Promoter
- Arf4 Is Required for Mammalian Development but Dispensable for Ciliary Assembly
- Distinct Requirements for Cranial Ectoderm and Mesenchyme-Derived Wnts in Specification and Differentiation of Osteoblast and Dermal Progenitors
- Chk2 and P53 Regulate the Transmission of Healed Chromosomes in the Male Germline
- Ddc2 Mediates Mec1 Activation through a Ddc1- or Dpb11-Independent Mechanism
- Mapping the Fitness Landscape of Gene Expression Uncovers the Cause of Antagonism and Sign Epistasis between Adaptive Mutations
- Euchromatic Transposon Insertions Trigger Production of Novel Pi- and Endo-siRNAs at the Target Sites in the Germline
- miR-100 Induces Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition but Suppresses Tumorigenesis, Migration and Invasion
- Canine Hereditary Ataxia in Old English Sheepdogs and Gordon Setters Is Associated with a Defect in the Autophagy Gene Encoding
- Within-Host Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Plant Virus Infection at the Cellular Level
- Analysis of Meiosis in SUN1 Deficient Mice Reveals a Distinct Role of SUN2 in Mammalian Meiotic LINC Complex Formation and Function
- Genome-Wide Association Study of Metabolic Traits Reveals Novel Gene-Metabolite-Disease Links
- Mechanistically Distinct Mouse Models for -Associated Retinopathy
- DAF-16/FoxO Directly Regulates an Atypical AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Gamma Isoform to Mediate the Effects of Insulin/IGF-1 Signaling on Aging in
- Chromosome I Controls Chromosome II Replication in
- Integrated Genomic Characterization Reveals Novel, Therapeutically Relevant Drug Targets in FGFR and EGFR Pathways in Sporadic Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
- The Iodotyrosine Deiodinase Ortholog SUP-18 Functions through a Conserved Channel SC-Box to Regulate the Muscle Two-Pore Domain Potassium Channel SUP-9
- The Genome of Highlights a Fish Pathogen Adapted to Fluctuating Environments
- Distinct DNA Binding Sites Contribute to the TCF Transcriptional Switch in and
- The Streamlined Genome of spp. Relative to Human Pathogenic Kinetoplastids Reveals a Parasite Tailored for Plants
- PLOS Genetics
- Archív čísel
- Aktuálne číslo
- Informácie o časopise
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle- Genome-Wide Association Study of Metabolic Traits Reveals Novel Gene-Metabolite-Disease Links
- A Cohesin-Independent Role for NIPBL at Promoters Provides Insights in CdLS
- Classic Selective Sweeps Revealed by Massive Sequencing in Cattle
- Arf4 Is Required for Mammalian Development but Dispensable for Ciliary Assembly
Prihlásenie#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#Zabudnuté hesloZadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.
- Časopisy